The Website of Dr. Joseph P. Farrell


Some weeks ago, two of my friends sent me the following link - George Ann Hughes of The Byte Show, and Mr. V.T. - and after some delays, I finally managed to find the time to watch the link and read the article. While the video is quite long, it is well worth watching due to the implications it has:

Proof of NASA\'s Off-The-Record Lunar Surface Operations

What is quite useful here is the author's conclusion, namely, that the official NASA record of Apollo 12, if scrutinized carefully, is both covering up a secret lunar activity, and yet, that activity can be reconstructed from careful consideration of the transcripts and mission timing.

What intrigues me here is that this activity is the camel's nose in the door, for it makes clear that there was a two-track program going on with Apollo, a public one, which we all saw on our tv screens, and a private one, hidden from the public. In short, it raises the philosophical question once again of a secret space program, one wrapped and packaged within the public one we all know about.

What also intrigues me here is the methodology of this researcher and what it could portend, for it is based on NASA's own official transcripts, upon careful cross-checking between the times recorded for various activities by the astronauts, and careful sifting of the evidence. What all this revealed was clearly a possibility - a strong possibility in my opinion - of a secret itinerary that lay carefully hidden within the official documents.

This raises the distinct possibility that similar things might be detectable on the other Apollo missions - 8, 10, 11, 13, 14-17. To my knowledge, no one has yet gone through the Apollo missions in this thorough fashion, comparing schedules, photos, transcripts, with a view to exposing areas and blocks of time where covert activities might have been conducted.IN short, this investigation was careful and scholarly, and points the methodological path for future researchers to follow, and it will be an important methodology to bear in mind when Europe, Russia, and China eventually return mankind to the Moon. In any case, following this careful methodology might reveal aspects of the hidden space program and provide further clues in answer to the question: What really went on with Apollo?

At the minimum, we are looking at "off-the-record Lunar surface operations," and that should give us all pause. Careful research of this nature can lead to accurate  FOIA requests of NASA, and when those requests come back that they are still classified, or that the files have been lost, or whatever, will in themselves be a significant indicator that there is still much about Apollo that remains secret.



Joseph P. Farrell has a doctorate in patristics from the University of Oxford, and pursues research in physics, alternative history and science, and "strange stuff". His book The Giza DeathStar, for which the Giza Community is named, was published in the spring of 2002, and was his first venture into "alternative history and science".


  1. Off topic, but I was saddened to hear of the passing of Neil Armstrong earlier today due to heart surgery complications..

    It is my hope that he wrote various “memoirs” of his time at NASA and of his time spent on the moon which were not to be published until after his death –

    How would NASA hose down something like that and could one imagine the fallout from anything, let’s say, “incriminating” lol 😉

  2. Have you been watching the Russians latest Mars probe failure. If I were them I would be looking for a mole in their space program sabotaging their Mars probes. Their man Soyoz seem safe so far but knows when they will have a “accident” with that too in the future. As they say just because your paraniod does mean you don’t have enemies out to get you.

    • Paranoia should be a ‘normal’ by now,
      “If you’re not paranoid, you’re not paying attention!”
      A network friend of mine.

  3. Dr. Farrell:

    I just thought that having a nice “fireside chat” with Dr. Kurt Debus might bring to light some of the strange things about the Apollo missions, thats if he was still alive that is.

    There is no doubt that we went, just what they achieved is another story, or in your own words….


    • *military – of coarse there are operations out there between the L points… the world pays for this budget and rapes the Earth of resources to finance it… it kinda reminds me of when I hide a few dollars from my wife so I don’t have to buy the milk for the kids … but in reality they / the breakaway folks have that extra cash to use on space adventuism.?

      • Might I point out a joke that my granfather once told me, ” You see the stone here? (picking up a piece of gravel whilst parlaying in outdoor chairs) this is a piece of the moon” So there it is; either we (modern humans) went to the moon or we didn’t … regardless, I feel that someone is on the moon (LUNA) and being in the service for awhile I actually ponder before falling asleep how many people are out there. At night I look in the sky and give a blessing to everyone working up there off world. Besides the point… Happy New Year!

  4. I have not seen the video.
    Stanley Kubrick’s alledged involvement is very plausible. Many of his works certainly touch on these & other themes both explicitly and implicitly.
    “Eye Wide Shut”. Indeed!

  5. Luna Cognitas’ channel is amazing. This is probably a crowning achievement for him but a few of his other videos are simply fantastic.

    If you want anomalies and examples of alternative technology , his videos clearly demonstrate it.

  6. hah!
    Very good, Charles, very GOOD.

    Joseph, I mentioned some time back, that according to
    Tom Bearden in one of his earliest books, he wrote
    that “we” had already explored the Solar System and I
    qualified that with, who is “we” ?

  7. I wrote a post about this video a while back, and I can also highly recommend it not only as a professional deconstruction of the twin track narrative of Apollo missions but also a brilliant feel for what a mission to space is actually like. It’s dry and detailed but I learned more about Apollo missions and what it feels like to be an astronaut than any other media piece to date. It’s terrific.

    Can I take this chance to wish everyone that frequents the comments here a rewarding 2012. I suspect it’s going to be a bit like childbirth. Painful but something special to show for it.

  8. Although Ron Paul is to be HIGHLY commended for taking many of the stances he does against the tide, I can’t begin to stand with him on social issues. One of my closest friends is a Libertarian, but draws the line at Ron Paul’s social policies.
    What most surprised me was Ron Paul’s NOT ‘walking the talk’. He ‘talks the walk well’; but, according to Tarpley’s discussions, this sadly comes undone in his “Austerity Plan”.

  9. You mean the Bankster’s money that you contracted for?
    How about money issued by other than the private international banking cartel?

    Yes, social would indeed imply more than one?

  10. This makes me wonder whether you listened(implied) to Tarpley’s ‘Guns and Butter’ “Critique of Ron Paul’s Austerity Plan”.
    ONE example: Cut JUST 15% of Military Budget.
    This radio show is REPLETE with trashing Ron Paul’s “image”.
    Lendman’s blog is more to the point, without the hardcore Tarpley gutting of Ron Paul.
    Your reference with the U.S. Constitution is misplaced. In ‘Cracks In The Constitution’ by Ferdinand Lundberg.
    “The constitution is peculiarly, and almost exclusively, the special instrument of the politicians and, of course, their close friends, a nuance understood by very few”. He continues later, “For all governments of men, who write and interpret the laws and more or less adhere to some, often violate others, trim and shave still others, as self-serving circumstances seem to dictate, and often boldly lie about more or less subtly misrepresent what they are doing.”
    So in the words of Grouch Marx,
    “Citizen, a child of five would understand this.
    Send someone to fetch a child of five Citizen.”

  11. “Give your evidence”, said the King: “and don’t be nervous, or I’ll have you executed on the spot.”

    “Well, I shouldn’t go, at any rate” said Alice, “Even if rule 42 were coherent & consistent, which it isn’t, she doesn’t have to follow it unless she chooses, which she doesn’t.”

    If we are free to choose or NOT choose, we are free.

  12. As we are free to vote or not to vote
    [for what is essentially one candidate
    {endorsing our enslavement to the rich and infamous}]?

    ‘I solenmly swear that I am free ONLY to consent
    to slavery or not to consent to slavery
    knowing that it makes difference whether I consent or not.’

    Is that about it, Robert?