THE GOLDMAN SACHS SAGA CONTINUES…
The folks at The Daily Bell have an interesting take on the recent and continued pillorying of Goldman Sachs:
Is Goldman Resignation Part of an Elite Plot?
The central argument is contained here:
"You ask why this is so. Why is it bad to have a Congressional Hearing to punish Wall Street and "throw the crooks in jail"? That's not the REAL reason for these upcoming hearings.
"The real reason is to kill the last vestiges of the capital-raising mechanism in the US. Kill it. Kill it dead. After these new hearings take place, the ability for average people to raise capital – already doubtful – will be improbable indeed.
"The other thing these hearings will attempt to do is to provide legitimacy for the current US political system and the penal-industrial complex. Over and over certain people complain that the "crooks" have not yet gone to jail.
"But to put the "crooks in jail" will utilize the entire illegitimate structure of US power including the entirely corrupt US Congress, increasingly authoritarian law enforcement and murderous penal facilities themselves. The powers-that-be intend to capitalize on the righteous anger of US citizens to prop up the horrid system of US jurisprudence and Congress itself that only has about a 10 percent approval rating currently with the larger public.
"This is only a secondary point, however. The primary goal is even more malicious. The power elite intends to make damn sure that if people make money in the future, it won't be via formal capital raising mechanisms.
"The US has always been a nightmare for the elites that intend to run the world (and apparently control the world's central banks). One of the worst parts of the US system from a its standpoint is that average people have the capacity to make money. This isn't really the case in Europe where capital is doled out like royal titles: One needs, mostly, to be "connected" to get it."
All this is, I suspect, true. But what the good folks at the Daily Bell seem to me to be missing is the possibility that there is indeed some real knock-down drag0out infighting going on in the high circles of the financial elite. While I tend to agree with the Daily Bell that much of what we read and see going on in the media is indeed what The Daily Bell calls directed history. But that directed history is like all propaganda... every now and then events transpire that were not planning, or are indeed setbacks, and have to be spun accordingly. I'm thinking Stalingrad here, and how German propaganda spun the disaster (made all the easier by Field Marshal Von Manstein's breathtaking counter-offensive in early 1943). Well, we've seen a financial Stalingrad in the past few years, one of the banksters' own making... and if the forged bearer bonds scandals are any indicator, things are coming to light that those elites, I suspect, were not - pardoning the pun - banking on happening. Somebody else is on the playing field...they doesn't necessarily mean they're nice guys either. After all, look who they're playing against.
See you on the flip side...
19 Comments
Help the Community Grow
Please understand a donation is a gift and does not confer membership or license to audiobooks. To become a paid member, visit member registration.
There is a book from the late 1958 I think titled the Tueton and the Slav about Berlin Slavic origins. That be said the USA has never really been a capitolist society that has been it cover. True capitolist have always gotten the shaft you could ask Tesla if he was alive among other victims. Well the real capitolists must now be diapose of now they are no longer needed long live the real protection racket the real face of the USA and it’s fellow garrison states around the world.
Goldman is a tool, just like the media, both purposely caught in a straight-jacket of their erroneous frame of market reference(one example: a privatized monoploy currency) and are thus generators of misleading perceptions.
Sort of like “a cuckoo-egg stragedy – when the chick hatches, it will display its true antagonistic nature & seek to decimate the nest.
The world’s ruler(s) understand implicitly that theirs is a system establishe to suit the needs of the few at the expense of the many, and that the many cannot therefore ever be permitted to question and alter their “corporate” rule. Afterall, the people who own the country(world) ought to govern it.
Power is achieved and maintained only through violence & force.
To the extent that our egos interfer with the correct perception of reality, we may be led waway from the truth and toward error.
In Alice In Wonderland, the deception of Royalty in who stole the tart; Alice evidence contains an enormous amount of paraded dignity * pseudo prestige necessary to bolster the absurd pretentions of incompetent leaders. The Queen of Hearts has the power. Her pointlessness is the point.
The King brings into play Rule 42. Alice said in effect, “Even if Rule 42 were coherent & consistant, which it isn’t, I don’t have to follow it unless I choose, which I don’t.”
Sometimes brave men & women have to make a stand and oppose the powers that be.
There is in the Declaration of Independence …that whenever ANY form of government becomes destructive of the ends, it is the RIGHT/DUTY of tjhe People to alter or abolish it, and institute a new government…
Goldman Sachs, the telecoms, the mortgage crimes, & ad infinitum…
No one is above the law.
If “No one is above the law” (of bio & social structures) – THERE WOULD BE NO EVOLUTION (UnFoldment). Such is the Nature Of The ILLUSION. … The Elite & Their Masters KNow This. It’s up to Their Chattel (el) to Learn Same. (Until such time, work the Salt Mines.) Helping Hand: The GOLDEN IMAGE RULES… all else Follows or RE-IMAGES (as previously given with penetrating clarity: “First Law of Alchemy.”)
NAGA,
This hasn’t to do with your specific post. This is more of a “fig leaf” that may do us both justice but still not E – leave-v-ate Hal’s legitimate feminine claims? ( it’s not really about femininism per say but links to it… we males do sometime have the good fortune to occasional see the ANIMA in our night-time wanderings? Sometimes it’s BEAUTIFIC or however you spell that connotative word?)
I recently passed through 3 lousy comic books called “Introducing Heidegger.” I come across this comic book version ( like E. Eco suggests – pictures really help our generation cognate?)
It’s by a Jeff Collins and Howard Selina. (coincidently Farrell’s Thought keeps popping us like a Freddie Gruger or some Jack-in-the-Box or should I say Joe-in-the-Box for Heidegger once wanted to be like Farrell — A Theologican WAS(?). I think Joe quit that JOB. No offense Joe! But the PUN is intended!)
Page 116 is the focus I am aiming at’. It’sPage Title is ‘Disclosures: from Husserl to Heidegger.”
(there is also a funny picture on the page but I wont describe it?)
Here is the rest of the Page.
Here goes:
Heidegger had already prepared his ground.
He took over archaeological metaphors from Husserl, who wrote of objects as ‘revealed’ or ‘disclosed’ in consciousness. And Husserl offered another powerful hint. Some objects were CLEARLY in consciousness but some were in a ‘fringe’ region, UNCLEAR or obscure –e.g. the ‘vagueness of a memory’, the ‘unclear floating image of a fantasy’.
[below is the picture I mention with some guy standing and a caption which is as follows —
Consciousness is a realm of
both light and dark,
yielding its flickering contents into clarity,
or concealing them in shadow.
Now some more writings below this at the bottom of the page;
In Being and Time, entities are ‘disclosed’ by Dasein. To disclose entities is to reveal them in particular ways, to encounter them, experience them or get to know them, as entities of this or that kind — e.g. as tools or natural things, as people or events, old or new, etc.
————————
What attracted me was the Caption part for what better way to describe the Images that float in Dreams. (of course what is brought up here is not separated or bracketed into such a thing ( I am getting off the mark, just like your famous for – NAGA, so forget I wrote this last sentence)
The Caption is in Terrific LANGUAGE!
———
Also I think it gives you – NAGAS OF THE WORLD a slight break on the eccentric way yourwrite (as if I should talk, ha, ha!)
ALSO — please don’t read (if you do come across this book in what I imagine is a huge pile of dusty books in front of You like some Steppenwolf figure) page 110 in this comic book?
It is aweful!
It mentions a “Conservative Revolution” in which my head (not exactly a Quiet-ist place) screams at me (in my imagination as a figure of expression despite what you think, ha, ha -This has, I THINK, Joe Farrell written all over it.HOW CAN THAT BE? He wasn’t even born then?
NAGA, (as a fig leaf for too HAL— we must not forget the YIN sic -Side as she often reminds you or we pay the consequences.)
Have a phenomenological great day — this day = TODAY
Eat or be eaten?
Or is it more like Chief Seattle’s, “Humankind has not woven the web of life. We are but one thread within it. Whatever we do to the web, we do to ourselves. All things are bound to each other. All things connect.
Quite frankly, I don’t like the embedded criminality associated within the structutre of the so-called law, as the actual results speaks to an uneven application of the laws, or more protection for those who can afford to assert them. Thus, once again, the laws become a tool to allign the interests of the few instead of the of the laws supposed purpose: A “just” society.
A financial Stalingrad indeed Dr Farrell and we are the 6th Army.
This is one article I agree with the explanation and forcast.
Also with Farrell’s not quite optimistic appraisal of the Bell article’s kind of suggestive reasoning. “What could go wrong!” When something does then that’s when “others” can step in and maybe correct something that’s been going on for too long? Maybe the best plans of mice and men really do go Kaput! ( it’s also troublesome because what may come after could just as well be worst and we end up praying for the ‘bad old days!”)
“Chance” is risky but it’s always better than this SSDD. Even though we bullshit and deceive ourselves we still know at a deeper level it’s the same shit, different day day in and day out.
Besides chance wakes us up from all the hypnotic spells cast on us called modern day advertising. If you think it has no influence on you then you better think again until you finally come to your senses. Our biological gifts are a whole lot better than technology tools meant to serve Frosty Cornflakes flakes to Man but Man ends up serving the juice to Technology!
I really do hope “NOT” that Yahweh and his left-behind buddies don’t use this Sci-Fi “White -Light-Conversion-Experience device Farrell hints at. As experienced as I aint I don’t think I could over-ride that kind of brain-circuity changing instruments. I could end up LOVING BIG BROTHER and that is the instant someone PUTS a bullet in your head’ because one banker just proved he could turn you into a pupet and the other banker didn’t believe it. (sound like a familar movie?)
Ok on the lighter side —- Did you hear the latest Gossip?
Former President Bushy-boy wished his VP a swift recovery from his ‘heart-transplant surgery”
To think Dicky(head) -darth vadar – Chenny had a heart all along!
WOW!
Could have fooled me? I thought it was just some cold vacuum like the Anartica in there where a heart is supposed to be?
But alas,
I should have known? I heard the other day over in Transavania – Frankstein just DIED! So they got a jet plane and quickly flew Frankstein’s heart to the hospital sleezy, cheezy chenny is in.
The doctors declared the operation a success.
It’s no wonder and it does make some kind of sense for what other kind of ORGAN would want to live in such an awful place. ( the kind of organ that will not reject anything. Just like Franksteins> It’s ALIVE – just like in the movie!)
Ok so long fellow web-site visiters.
Have a good MOON day — this day = today!
what is your aversion to ET? is it one of theology? did you read that 1 star review of your new book on amazon co uk? i would be interested in your opinion of his opinions about you.
There are Three Phases of sSelf-UnFoldment (accomplished over many lifetimes)… Vegetative, Flowering, Fruiting. This is “The Cosmic Flower of Creation,” oft called “flower of life”). Duh doc is ib the First Phase, which is Marked by Extreme self-DeLimitation (of awareness) of LifeForce Energy… it is ‘”materialist” only, unAware of the Full-Field Surround. … Such people are “the masses.” They are expressing lower-level UbnFolding Process, which is Natural. As the Masses, they represent the “public opinion.” Everything in it’s ‘Time.’ (lifetimes)
I’d hardly say the Dr. is typical of the masses, but I’ll let him speak for himself if he so desires. Hence, you might try another new age strategy.
db
Hardly “new age,” which isn’t what I related. And yes., JF Is “typical” of ‘the masses,’ Many of Whom are EXTREMELY Intelligent (duh!) – they are just operating within the E-VEIL (Energy Veil), dealing with what they “think” is “physicality” & its “ascribed phenomena.” Like, perhaps, yourself.
The impression i get from reading Dr. Farrell’s books is that he is not opposed to the idea of extraterrestrials, he seems to be implying in ‘certain’ cases that there is no evidence to compel one to the conclusion of E.T.
Sort of like, “Pin the Donkey on the Tale,” eh?
What are you on about? Try and make some sense.
You’re suffering from the effects of “‘the rational mind.” Same that the chinese students recognize. Let’s try some “creative/intuitive” insight: the “Donkey” would be the “ETs” – “Pin it on the Tale” would be finding Them to “match the many stories.” You’ll need to lighten-up that rigid dependence on the rationcination process in order to nullify your Master’s programming: “Through the physical senses man can not obtain knowledge of anything that is above and beyond the gross material world; and his reasoning mind, no matter how highly developed, can not cognize spiritual realities… In the perfective work, therefore, the physical senses and reasoning mind are of no avail; instead, they present obstacles that must be overcome.” (James Pryse, 1925) Know what “Obstacles” are? Re-read 3x. … For simplicity, we’ll keep all future references “nice & CONCRETE” – as you like ’em. Better yet – Imagine if all the World “made sense.” You don’t even comprehend the absurdity of your request: “everybody, make sense ‘to me’.” Okayyy… Some things not everybody gets… Often, even the Obvious. Linearity… NonLinearity (the “NonL” is Always First).
NAGA—
I liked your sappy but very-timely comeback to Jeff’s remark although I have sympathies with Jeff over his “moments of Confusion>”
Those moments are sometimes when we are the “CLOSEST” to something that is very difficult to see or for all practical matters one can call it invisible. ( I am elastic on this concept of Visibility or that sensory mode of perceiving for if something is truly INVISIBLE how in the world can anyone ever “see” IT? (it is not LOGICAL as Spock would say?)
All we hear is the UNCONSCIOUS IS THIS AND THE UNCONSCIOUS IT THAT! (It gets really tiresome.)
Not Quite for if one sic – knows something it’s not UNconscious. Rather it’s something ‘ABOUT” what was once UNCONSCIOUS (a content) that can be imagined as ‘crossing a threshold” into Consciousness. ( it’s just a metaphor but an ‘apt’ one?)
Got that? And a bowl of cookies and milk would be nice, thank you very much.
I like how you get at the heart of this “Rationality Business.” Take rationality to it extreme logical conclusion and what do you find there?
You know?
Irrationality! = (minus any ethical concern for ENDS rather than MEANS! Bad Philosophy! Philosophy without ETHOS is DOOMED — at least that’s this poor lad’s opinion?)
For example — Take the Atom Boom-Boom Project over at Las Alamos (cant spell but I know it’s a short distance West from the New Wild West called El Paso and its Sister City just across the Rio Grande.)
Some of the most rational, scientific, and even logical at times type-people secretly worked on it’s success. (tilted Brains if you ask me!)
It may be LOGICAL or as you say RATIONAL to invent something THAT CAN DESTROY LIFE ON THIS PLANET. (see the paradox!)
I’ll let you (Naga – you already know this) I am now speaking to any of the 3% who read Naga think for themselves.
Kind of prods me into thinking —- Did the Characters (alien or otherwise) really know what they were doing when they BLEW UP that Planet? Or was it this kind of thing I was hinting at above?
If so we have some ‘Hope’ maybe even tiny little “SPECKS” of Hope or as you put it “DOTS!”
Outside of almost impossible to believe sophisticated Technology I BELIEVE ( notice I used this word instead of others) they (again – that lousy word?) weren’t as INTELLEGENT as we are led to think or even believe?
As for ME, ME, ME — I am dumb and numb having a lot of Fun playing doctor, ha, ha!
What you are acknowledging to be “brains,” is Ill-us-ion. Its a for of brain-washing, the kind Einstein hinted at (honoring the “servant” & ignoring “the Gift”). … UnKnown – Known – UnKnowAble (Trinity + One). Let’s ReDo that: InVisible – Visible ~ Immaterial … Duality/Polarity ~ Causality. … It’s PROCESS. The UnKnown Feeds & Consumes the Known – The Known Consumes the UnKnown & UnKnowAble (& “Dies” from The ForBidden, Process) – The UnKnowAble Kills Everything Yet ReGenerAtes All (True Source: HOME). … Duality/Polarity (InVisible UnKnown Womb/Visible Known TOMB) are “The Creation Process” – The Known Tries To Steal “The Crown.” I suggest you Look Much Deeper Into Why even Einstein called it “The Servant” (brains). Then you won’t be quite so worshipful, nor hardly apt to be so clever. It’s a Tough Request – especially in a World that “Polishes” the brain & Beams with Pride at the Blind(ing) Object. … Got it?
“The Intuitive mind is a Sacred Gift and the Rational mind is a Faithful Servant. We have created a society that honors the servant (reason/logic) and has Forgotten The Gift.” (Albert Einstein)
Hello Folks,
I came across this paragraph in my reading last night. It kind of reminds me of Venice’s Swamps where the Babylon Banksters supposedly ended up when they were run out of town ( was it Rome?) for being so nasty or maybe showing a little bit more darker competitive spirits as hinted at in Farrell’s, BB BOOK.
While the Corporation of Golden Sachs may not be those people who lived at that time I believe they look a lot like them. Is there a difference in people who “act’ almost in exactly the same way only centuries later? I don’t know? Tough question!
Well anyway, this paragraph is similar for it enlightened me a bit just as some ( now I said just “some” not all ) of Farrell’s work does.
You know an Alternate or way-out true Revisionist HIS – STORY?
Here’s the paragraph by a journalist writing a kind of travel-logue, historical type newspaper column with everything thrown in but the kitchen sink. Kind of like what Studds Kerkel back in America did only “IN EUROPE.”
————————————
“Berlin was the parvenu of Europe, but the city — with the frenetic
energy of all newcomers — did everything it could to make up for its
lagging behind London, Paris and Rome. Even today some of the neigh-
bourhoods resemble a febrile European dream: a Jugendstil villa here,
something a bit Venetian there, beside it a bit of Paris or Munich, with
styles and shapes filched from all over the continent. The myth of Berlin
was fabricated as well: supposedly, the city had started out as a Germanic
settlement, with the bear as its symbol and eponym. In actual fact,
however, for the first 600 years of its existence Berlin was a purely Slavic
village. Its name has nothing to do with bears, but with the Slavic word
brl, meaning ‘swamp’. The actual connotation is something along the lines
of ‘Swampy Place’, in Old Polish. Yet that, of course, is hardly the stuff
of which a Great German historical tradition can be made.
___________________________
I was not exactly the brightest kid on the block growing up but I also wasn’t the dumbest? Nobody told me this?
Ah, a recent MYTH instead of those OLD MYTHS?
The Nation=Building kind of Myth.
Look at Germany TODAY?
I can remember when I get really worked up talking about something and the response is —- “Nah —- It just a MYTH some some fairy-tale.”
IF only they knew a little bit more about —–“IT’S JUST A MYTH?