Like It?

DIAMONDS, QUANTUM COMPUTERS, AND TABLETS OF DESTINIES

In my book The Cosmic War I speculated a great deal on the Epic of Ninurta and the destruction of the ancient Tablets of Destinies, and what they might have been, based on suggestions in the texts, and a bit of modern science. One of the things that I speculated was that they may have represented either the “software” hol0grams to some sort of weapon based on an ultra-sophisticated phase-conjugate mirror, or perhaps even some sort of crystal memory system to a vast computer….

Well, Science Daily is reporting the use of a diamond in a quantum computer, making the Hermetic possibility quantum computing a step closer to reality(and you’ll have to think a bit, based on what I say below, about why I call quantum computing a “Hermetic possibility):

Quantum Computer Built Inside a Diamond

Let’s pause a minute to try to understand why quantum computing, if it could be made practical, would be such a breakthrough. It was Aristotle who said that two contradictory attributes cannot cohabit the same object in the same place at the same time. We hear a distant echo of this in Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle, according to which one cannot measure the momentum and position of an electron at the same time. And this essentially Aristotelian principle is reflected in the modern computer itself. As most know, the modern computer is a binary system: its logic gates can be either in an “on” or “off” – a “zero” or a “one” – position, thus each logic gate is an object preventing the simultaneous manifestation of both contradictory attributes.

But imagine, for a moment, that one could construct a “logic” gate not with just two possible states, but with seven, one of which is the ability, as the article states, to model what in a binary either-or dialectical system is impossible: the simultaneous superposition of a zero and a on, an “on” and an “off”, or to put it in classical mediaeval hermetic terms, the coincidenta oppositorum; we would, in effect, be constructing not a “logic” gate, but a “dialectic” gate:

“As opposed to traditional computer bits, which can encode distinctly either a one or a zero, qubits can encode a one and a zero at the same time. This property, called superposition, along with the ability of quantum states to “tunnel” through energy barriers, will some day allow quantum computers to perform optimization calculations much faster than traditional computers.”

Now let’s speculate even more wildly: one of the implications of the Uncertainty principle was one that, to this day, causes some people, including scientists themselves, some philosophical headaches, for the implication of the Uncertainty principle is that one determines the outcome of an experiment depending on what one chooses to look for: position, or momentum, and to that extent, one determines reality. It was this conundrum that led even the great Einstein to remark that God does not play dice with the universe, and that has led more modern physicists – Wheeler for example – to answer the conundrum by pointing out that God isn’t playing dice, but rather, that man,m to some extent, is God, or at least, participates with God in creating the reality we call the universe.

Now if that determination of reality is modeled by our traditional binary logic gate, then quantum computer’s ability to superpose both states in one position would, in effect, be a mechanical representation of the state of affairs prior to a scientist’s performance of an experiment… thus allowing a quantum computer to “model” the entire process of “reality creation” from the quantum mechanical point of view (with apologies to physicists and engineers for putting it so nakedly). And that would, indeed, constitute a kind of Tablets of Destiny inscribed on a diamond… another indicator, perhaps, of how sophisticated the society spoken of in the ancient Mesopotamian myths perhaps really was….

 DIAMONDS, QUANTUM COMPUTERS, AND TABLETS OF DESTINIES Joseph P. Farrell (2251 Posts)

Joseph P. Farrell has a doctorate in patristics from the University of Oxford, and pursues research in physics, alternative history and science, and "strange stuff". His book The Giza DeathStar, for which the Giza Community is named, was published in the spring of 2002, and was his first venture into "alternative history and science".

Website DIAMONDS, QUANTUM COMPUTERS, AND TABLETS OF DESTINIESFacebook DIAMONDS, QUANTUM COMPUTERS, AND TABLETS OF DESTINIESTwitter DIAMONDS, QUANTUM COMPUTERS, AND TABLETS OF DESTINIESLinkedin DIAMONDS, QUANTUM COMPUTERS, AND TABLETS OF DESTINIESeMail DIAMONDS, QUANTUM COMPUTERS, AND TABLETS OF DESTINIESYouTube DIAMONDS, QUANTUM COMPUTERS, AND TABLETS OF DESTINIES

16 Responses to DIAMONDS, QUANTUM COMPUTERS, AND TABLETS OF DESTINIES

  1. “Coincidenta Oppositorum”

    What a mysteriously sounding word!

    I like it. ——–It reminds me of the time I use to spend sitting in a Church pew listening to Latin Phrases that went along with certain Rituals in the Catholic Church. When the language of the Mass was changed to the Venacular (English) it lost even more of the Mystery it once had for me as a growing child.

    It all sounded like Hocus-Pocus or Open-SAYS-A-ME! (EXCITING!)

    But now no more = Disenchantment!

    You said, ” superimpose both states in one position…” which gets me going til you come out with a truth > mechanical representation — which I said to my self at least he’s honest with his talk.

    Model Madness — or the MAP IS NOT THE TERRITORY!

    Nice Try Farrell?

    But I do love the idea of Tablets of Destiny or Stones of Destiny. (that’s a fantasy hit)

    It certainly got who was behind the Movie “Lord of the Rings” fifthy rich even though a Ring is not a Stone they are both you could say RADIOACTIVE in a ‘psychological sort of way?”

  2. I love it when Dr Farrell ‘speculates’, I know it means we’re in for a wild ride.

  3. Being in two places at once has nothing to do with on/off,
    speed, tunneling and all your other quaint descriptions and words,
    and everything to do with the actual construction of
    TIME and time quanta, which is equal to a Planck Time,
    which is also an infinity, which is also equal to a ‘frame’ of TIME.
    AND THERE
    are all your supposed impossibilities.

    • Oh, BTW,
      Hawking, who lives within his own mind where
      atheistic imagination rules,
      speculates on diamond cores at the center of
      dead suns and perhaps some planets.

      Now THAT’s a crystal !

  4. Dr. Farrell,

    I’ve been re-listening to your Cosmic War series with GeorgeAnn, and this morning was on part 7 before viewing this blog post. In it, you point out that the ancients placed primacy not on development of their scientifico-religious physical theories, but rather on the development of the engineering that could (and ultimately would! :-) make the theories possible! With the reality of crystal computers now in more mainstream physics, I was reminded of the all too ubiquitous line from Field of Dreams that it appears was a concept the ancients readily embraced: “If you build it, they will come”. The ‘they’ in this case could be taken to refer, as you also discussed in TBS – Cosmic War pt. 7, to the living power of the crystalline universe… perhaps :)

    Great, great thought provoking stuff as usual, Dr. Farrell. Thank you for your contributions :)

  5. OUTSTANDING!
    High WOW Factor!
    Theses gives me pause for qubits of thoughts.
    Puzzle-me this? …is one thing.
    But puzzle me out? is…

  6. “to answer the conundrum by pointing out that God isn’t playing dice, but rather, that man, to some extent, is God, or at least, participates with God in creating the reality we call the universe”

    I agree totally- but don’t ever tell that to a religious Fundi-

    no, God does not play dice- but an absolutly satanic evil faction of humans plays a mean (understatement) game of chess and we’re already at the “check” stage on this planet-

    it’s just a question of whether we will allow “checkmate” with the satanically created deities, a.k.a. ‘Bozos’ of the Abrahamic belief systems (among many others) or whether we will finally go within ourselves and re-connect with the true creator

  7. The ‘principle of de-superposition’ which explains the state vector collapse as well as the Schrodinger paradox is an example of vertical causality (non-Temporal, transcendent) according to Wolfgang Smith, a physicist and mathematician formerly of Bell Labs. Relating the material substrate to the Vedantic Prakriti and the scholastic prima materia , Smith says “…quantum physics has discovered an ontological level approaching the ‘primordial waters’, which remain in place even after’ the Spirit of God’ has breathed upon them to bring forth our world. I contend that quantum superposition–can indeed be viewed as reflective of the Primordial Chaos , or even more concretely as a remnant of this underlying ‘disorder’. “

    • The transcendent element is important–as it is both outside the system-and that which makes the system dynamic. Thus it is both transcendent and immanent. That which is transcendent is the Godhead–which because it transcends opposites, is that Principle of Unity. Both Purusha and Prakriti, Order and Chaos, are subordinate to this Principle, This Being is the principle of being- it is an analog of being. It’s Essence and Existence are one and the same. It is both Act and Potency. It is also a Person–it is the person we pray to. Who prays to an impersonal Essence? No one, because God is both Essence and Existence. “I am. “The great priestly prayer in John 13-17 aligns Jesus with this Ground in the “I am” statements.

  8. Joseph,

    Love this topic. “Anything that they imagined to do.” Wildly speculating, if one was to be able to engineer the womb of reality, then one would conceivably be able to not only superimpose new states of reality, but to also engineer entanglement itself In my view, it is entanglement that “writes” the medium, and consciousness is the stylus. Using your model of differentiation of the medium, it would be possible to overwrite the medium with new “themes” or gratings and to reshape the past as well as influence the course of events.

  9. “man, to some extent, is God, or at least, participates with God in creating the reality we call the universe.”

    Ding ding ding! We have a winner!

    • This would require man to be separate from god, which it is not,; and one has to assume that the uncertainty principle is, in fact, a principle, rather than an ad hoc band aid for a failed theory. This idea seems like the perfect sort of limiting paradigm to prevent progress, seized upon by the elites when problems arising from failed models led to absurd postulates in order to salvage a bad model.

      • Some men, perhaps not all or perhaps it is a choice, are of multiple natures. Part of or some of our origins are beyond the God potentials and some are of and by. When you plug into a grid you are part of it when you plug out you are not. The meta-physical can be a labrynth of many alternate dimensional potentials manifesting breifly a singular potential where it can exist but from multiple alternate dimensional originations. Some of us may be more limited to what we can plug into or perceive than others. As our awareness evolves so does our potential however. Perhaps some of us have already acquired unkowingly the abilty to program the future and have foolishly already done so without realising it. If so the sooner we change our own vibratory resonances the better, but I’m sticking this one out because it could lead somewhere very wonderous if it plays out correctly. Perhaps reality does dance to some of our tunes and those who we give power to only really have the power that they do because we consciously or unwittingly don’t know any better to revolk it. Have a model in your head about how everything will play out? If it’s not playing out how you would like take physical and MENTAL action to change it or sit back and enjoy the ride and quit complaining. Its that simple perhaps.