TIDBIT: UPDATE ON THOSE EGYPTIAN PYRAMIDS

August 29, 2012 / Joseph P. Farrell /

A friend of mine (Ms P.H.) shared this article with me on those supposed new Egyptian pyramids. As it turns out (so we're told) they ruins are not pyramids at all, but are indeed ruins... So what do we make of it? Well, I still think it may dovetail to Bauval's theory, but time will tell, if indeed, the experts will talk...

'Google Earth pyramids' revisited

See you on the flip side...

Posted in Tidbits

Joseph P. Farrell

Joseph P. Farrell has a doctorate in patristics from the University of Oxford, and pursues research in physics, alternative history and science, and "strange stuff". His book The Giza DeathStar, for which the Giza Community is named, was published in the spring of 2002, and was his first venture into "alternative history and science".

8 Comments

foggybottom on August 31, 2012 at 8:52 am

does that stuff look like the shape/arrangement of the Big Dipper?
Jedi on August 30, 2012 at 7:37 am

as above so below, in so many ways….Mercury..err murky.

ps I liked your coaster…Platos climb and the Aristotle thrilling drop..
- Jedi on August 30, 2012 at 8:23 am
  
  if I was a computer programer err roller coaster designer I would design the ice pole express backwards.
  
  Starting with a giant slow climb, then into a loop, with a abrupt stop at the top, call it the caesar cracked egg beginning as any good salad begins with, then into reverse to drop any valuables before proceeding down into a toronado tightening spiral, call it dorthys drop, for the final plunge of the cars into glacial fed freezing waters where the passengers could float up for retrival. What a ride that would be.
Jon Norris on August 29, 2012 at 10:40 pm

Yeah, right.

“Nothing to see here folks, move along”

We haven’t dug them yet, but we know what they are.

The claim that they are already well known didn’t show up until after the announcement. While it is definitely possible that what they said was true, it is interesting that they were not recorded or mentioned where the person who found them on the satellite pics could locate that information easily.

So, are they really unimportant ruins or something more? Time will tell.
- Dan on September 4, 2012 at 4:18 am
  
  Davoli knows what they are without having excavated them because other archaeologists before her have excavated them and have published their findings. There are photos and a detailed description of the site near Dimai in this two-volume research report published in 1934: The Desert Fayum, by Caton-Thompson and Gardner. Here’s how easy it is to locate that information in a library near you:
  
  http://snipurl.com/easy_as_pie
HAL838 on August 29, 2012 at 1:12 pm

Uncovering Egypt seems to reveal…..
….more and more secrets.

I received Bauval’s latest book yesterday.
Now if I can only remember where I put it,
I could get started on it.
😉
- MattB on August 29, 2012 at 2:15 pm
  
  It’s a good read. The really interesting stuff comes from Thomas Brophy’s archaeoastrononomy. His book on Nabta Playa is quite something!
  - HAL838 on August 29, 2012 at 4:07 pm
    
    I’m sure it is.
    Thanks Matt