October 2nd, 2014
Page     Profile     Twitter     Youtube     LinkedIn     News Feed     Comments

NO SOONER SAID THAN DONE: PART THREE: LAVIOLETTE’S BLACK HOLE AT NASA

Dr. Paul A. LaViolette, as we have discovered in our blogs of the past two days, made submissions to NASA when it sent out requests for “the best and most innovative” ideas in the country to make possible the space vision outlined by then President G.H.W. Bush, who wanted to be on Mars(this year, incidentally) and to have a permanent human  base on the Moon. Like many others, LaViolette submitted suggestions to declassify work done since the 1950s on Thomas Townsend Brown’s electrogravitics. What he found, instead, was a black hole into which his, and others’ submissions had disappeared, with all mention of exotic technologies being purged from the final RAND Corporation report.

But as we indicated yesterday, there was more. LaViolette noted that while some exotic technologies were excluded from the final public report, others – the most impractical – were included, such as antimatter propulsion:

The report’s discussion of antimatter annihilation propulsion is another case in point. It would take a million years using the current multi-billion-dollar CERN and Fermilab facilities just to accumulate 1 miiligram of antiprotons, enough to propel a 1-ton payload to escape velocity from Earth. Accumulating and storing such large quantities of antimatter is an even more formidable problem, from both the technical and the cost standpoints. If cost was really of any concern, the report should not have even bothered discussing the antimatter subject.(LaViolette, Secrets of Antigravity Propulsion, p. 387)

LaViolette’s conclusions were, first, that “it is obvious the screening process was set up so that any ideas that were truly new and revolutionary were omitted,”(Ibid., p. 386) and that it was equally obvious that “It seemed that I had exposed a very large black hole, one that happened to be centered right smack in the middle of NASA and was swallowing up a lot of money and with it a lot of good ideas.”(Ibid., p. 387)  In other words, LaViolette came very close to the conclusion that NASA was intended to be a theater, while the real developments were going on elsewhere, a view shared by many others.

Additionally, as soon as the SEOP project’s report was issued, the program was terminated, “with no plans in place for carrying out follow-up activities.”(Ibid., p. 388) So what was the SEOP program all about anyway? For LaViolette, it was entirely clear “that SEOP had been planned to be a one-way information-gathering intelligence operation.”(Ibid., p. 388)

Yet, this too was not the end of the story for LaViolette, for having found the black hole, he was determined to find the boundaries of this particular singularity. Noting that in the final report mention was made of a database of computer disks for a Macintosh computer, LaViolette filed a FOIA(Freedom of Information Request) that NASA release the database to him. Not surprisingly, the archives had lost both the disks and the original submissions.(Ibid., p. 388)

Whatever else emerges from LaViolette’s book(and that’s quite a lot folks. It is definitely a book well-worth buying and reading!), one thing seems very clear and unavoidable: NASA, or someone, is hiding something.

And that something goes directly to all of the strange technologies first mentioned in NASA’s own Brookings Report, that strange category called “magneto-hydro-dynamic drives,” or, to give it its more popular term, electrogravitics.

See you on the flip side.

 

13 Responses to NO SOONER SAID THAN DONE: PART THREE: LAVIOLETTE’S BLACK HOLE AT NASA

  1. My take-away from La Violette’s book was exactly the same, NASA is just puppet theatre and that semi-autonomous MIC gangs/cliques/mafia are the ones really in control of the tech that counts.

  2. Good Evening Joseph,

    I enjoyed this series of blogs about T. Townsend Brown and “Electrogravitics”, lots of good stuff here! As a way of suggestion do you think that an interview for your site with Linda Brown (daughter of Townsend Brown) might bring out a LOT of additional information about this subject?

    I just finished reading her own biography of her father (“The Goodbye Man”) it was very interesting and informative as well!
    Linda’s website is: http://www.thomastownsendbrown.com/ LOTS of interesting discussion of the history and technology behind Electrogravitics and historical research about what Townsend Brown was *actually* involved with.

    Also her friend Rose has a website as well (co-author of the “Goodbye Man) that has many interesting posts as well: http://jansrose.blogspot.nl

    Max

    • Hi MadMax, as a matter of fact I referenced that book, and Paul Schatzkin’s even more informative, and in my opinion, ABSOLUTELY ESSENTIAL, research on T.T. Brown in my book Covert Wars and the Clash of Civilizations

  3. Anti gravity is linked to zero point energy, so it doesn’t matter what they release as a new energy, it will have both properties of good and bad. 9/11 was the bad side and as Dr. Judy Wood said in her book “Where Did The Towers GO”, the same energy can be used for the good side. I did like the comment in this thread of a “third party” that “may” release some form of this “new energy”, and that is the tooth paste out of the tube. The suppression of alternative energy has been going on for a long time, however pressure is now coming from the people who want to go out there and “mine”. The day may be coming that will negate the use of fossil fuels, but there will be a heavy price to pay, and that price may be coming from “off world”.

  4. Before “new electrics” (Clif High term), are released, the distribution and marketing will be owned by the same crew that runs Big Oil. I predict that they’ll be extremely expensive. Example, if the unit runs for 40 years, it will cost you 40 year’s worth of electricity / gasoline.. Anti-grav is alleged to have the properties of defying space and time. Time travel will never be released to the general populace. The System will never allow anything thing to threaten the System, i.e. voting, etc.. Now, there does exist the possibility of third party intervention that might throw a wrench in the works. To be filed under we’ll see. Real change, if and when it happens will be very sudden..

    • Yes, but at the moment Big Oil (BO?) controls the fuel not the machine and anti-grav may not need fuel per se so all it would take would be for the machine to be reverse engineered and the game would be up.

      So you might be right about requiring third party intervention.

  5. Just read an article from Motherboard dated 6/03/14 titled:
    Alexander Graham Bell Made A Wireless Phone That Ran On Sunshine.

  6. This all beginning to look like a episode of Metal Hulyant where this dictator of this planet keeps the people in a Medieval level of technology while using the good stuff to prolong his life and rule over the population full spectrum control and exploitation. The ultimate power junkie ignorance is power people are scum.

  7. While they live, work & play in the “real” world.
    They “regulate” us to Fantasy Land; where occasionally someone sees part of the real world and exclaims, ” DA PLANE!”.

  8. “others – the most impractical – were included, such as antimatter propulsion:”

    I read the book some years ago, and my thinking at the time would have been akin to LaViolette’s.

    However since then, I’ve reread a 2002 article from Infinite Energy–and likely a massive source of antimatter is hiding in plain sight. Safe extraction is a different matter and requires an understanding of matter that won’t likely yield its secrets to particle accelerators.

  9. The whole situation is beginning to look like old world religion, while the plebs were busy jumping bulls and sacrificing humans the nobles were charting the stars and practicing alchemy

    Modern science is daily beginning to looking like an exoteric and esoteric institution, when a handyman is defying the laws of energy conservation in his shed with a bicycle wheel and some levers something is definitely awry.

    James McCanney mentions two tiers of science, the public tier and the hidden tier. The fact that someone as insignificant as him is regularly attacked by NASA shows how important it is to maintain the ‘orthodoxy’ of the public doctrine.

    Seems like NASA was trawling for ‘heretics’ and RAND was playing the role of Inquisitor.