GERMAN BUNDESWEHR TO ADOPT ALL-ROUND CYBER WARFARE STRATEGY FOR ...

There's a very interesting article on Russia's Sputnik magazine website that was discovered and shared by Mr. V.T., and as might be expected, this is another one of those "little" stories that is huge with significance, and that didn't fall right off the radar screan of the western and American lamestream media, because it wasn't even on their radar screen. It's very short, but I think you'll see why it's huge with significance:

The Bundeswehr is planning to unfold its "offensive capabilities" in cyber warfare. A new strategy paper of the Ministry of Defense considers the Internet as a potential war zone.

These three paragraphs pretty much sum up what the German Federal Defense Forces are after:

Germany faces increasing cyberattacks on its infrastructure. Therefore, according to German officials, the Bundeswehr should be responsible for "the defense against cyberattacks, which represent an armed attack on Germany" in the future.

The use of the armed forces can be allowed in the event of attacks on critical infrastructure, such as communications or transport networks, as reported by Spiegel.However, the plans of the German Minister of Defense go even further.

The Bundeswehr is expected to be able to carry out "offensive cyberattacks inside the country and abroad". For instance, it is expected to be able to "reduce and, possibly, even eliminate" the access of the enemy to mobile networks and Internet. (Emphases added)

One should recall in this context the remarks of German Foreign Minister Frank-Walter Steinmeir last year in Berlin, calling for Germany to accept its world power role and assume a more militaristic posture in its foreign affairs, a speech hailing - perhaps - a break with the "soft power" methods of postwar German diplomacy in previous decades. Indeed, that break is already somewhat of a de facto reality, as it was under Chancellor Kohl that German military forces were committed to operations outside German borders for the first time since the end of the Second World War when Kohl, at the request of the Croatian government, recognized that government and rushed a squadron of the Luftwaffe and German armored battalions to that country on a peace-keeping mission, and as a not-too-subtle warning against Serbia, which harbored long memories of the suddenness of Von Mackensen's occupation of the country in World War One, and the even more swift blitzkrieg in May of 1941.

What is interesting in this Bundeswehr policy recommendation is, firstly, that a cyber attack on Germany would be considered an armed attack on the country, which opens the door to the total range of armed responses, from "soft" cyber-countermeasures to a "hard" armed response, and secondly, that as a component of developing this range of responses, the Bundeswehr "is expected to be able to carry out offensive cyberattacks inside the country and abroad."

Notably, what is absent - at least in Sputnik's reportage - is any mention of who it considers the principal threat or threats to be. And here, of course, the door is opened for our trademark high octane speculation. One can guess at the usual suspects: China, Russia, and even the group Anonymous(if they're not working for them already). But I suggest that it is in the context of recent events that this paper should be read and appreciated for what it really is, for recall that Germany, and indeed Chancellorin Merkel herself, were mightily displeased at the extent of American spying on that country, particularly in the form of electronic surveillance. Now, I don't for a moment think that this spying isn't a two-way street. Allies spy on each other all the time. America spies on Britain, France, Japan, Italy, &c., and they spy on us. What's really being implied here is that Germany, which bears with France the lion's share of the vast "Euro-projects" from CERN's collider to the European Space Agency, is recognizing the need to beef up its cyber capabiltiies, and in particular this will mean the ability to protect its military assets, communications, command, and control against any potential threat, and similarly, will develop offensive cyber capabilities against any threat. And that means in turn it will need to develop its own domestic computer industry, hardware and software, and design systems not dependent on any foreign source or power.

In other words, if you were waiting for Germany's response to the NSA spying on that country, you just received it.

See you on the flip side...

Posted in

Joseph P. Farrell

Joseph P. Farrell has a doctorate in patristics from the University of Oxford, and pursues research in physics, alternative history and science, and "strange stuff". His book The Giza DeathStar, for which the Giza Community is named, was published in the spring of 2002, and was his first venture into "alternative history and science".

7 Comments

  1. goshawks on July 30, 2015 at 1:35 pm

    I think Joseph has a point on the need for the Germans (indeed, any ‘sovereign’ nation) to develop ‘national’ cyber-structure all the way down to chip design and manufacture. Otherwise, there is always the danger of hardware ‘backdoors’ arriving with the equipment. The same with software, although this may be mitigated by building-on ‘open source’ operating systems and programs.

    In a way, this is good. The more truly-varied the basic hardware/software is, the less easy it is to ‘take out’ (overtly or covertly). It is like the documented vulnerability of ‘monoculture’ factory-farms versus ‘multi-crop’ farming-communities.

    I am again-reminded of the early scene in the reboot of “Battlestar Galactica” where the Cylon ‘seductress’ introduces malware into the central servers of the Colonial defense network…



  2. loisg on July 29, 2015 at 4:00 pm

    Maybe the US should try this approach, what with all the cyber attacks we’ve been having on our infrastructure lately.



  3. DownunderET on July 29, 2015 at 1:39 pm

    Don’t forget that after Frau Merkel found out that her phone had been hacked by the NSA, she flew to Washington and that’s when the “backslapping” started, in other words all is forgiven. Seems to me she knew all the time, or in other words, she only used her phone to “call HOME”. If Germany wants to have a safe and secure communication network, they have to do one thing, and that’s beat the other guys to the digital punch, and I’m sure they can do it.



  4. marcos toledo on July 29, 2015 at 8:55 am

    What are the Germans up to reviving the Reich again. Beating up old victims again like Greece, France, stamping down on Italy and the Balkans. Are they afraid of the Russians or have they had enough of being toadies of the pseudo British Empire plunder and destruction expeditions.



  5. emlong on July 29, 2015 at 8:13 am

    A rapidly developing spanner in the works of vertically and horizontally integrated globalization – nation autonomous computer networks. Could such networks precipitate a sort of “national currency” in the long run?



  6. DanaThomas on July 29, 2015 at 6:04 am

    And then of course there is the financial aspect: is the Bundeswehr (or related agencies) admitting that is has gone into the banking business? Which is of course based on communications, undoubtedly of a “critical” nature.
    For those who have time (I will count Joseph out!) here is a 20-minute video with extensive extracts of the ceremonial of the State visit to President Gauck in Berlin by Queen Elizabeth II in June. Including Bundeswehr band music and the customary joint review of the contingent of troops. These pictures are worth a thousand words…
    https://youtu.be/8YP2QLMqj3k



Help the Community Grow

Please understand a donation is a gift and does not confer membership or license to audiobooks. To become a paid member, visit member registration.

Upcoming Events