September 17th, 2014
Page     Profile     Twitter     Youtube     LinkedIn     News Feed     Comments

Tag Archives: IMF

ARGENTINA AT THE CROSSROADS: CORPORATE SOVEREIGNTY OR NATIONAL SOVEREIGNTY?

Last week I blogged about Agentina’s struggles with vulture hedge funds and about its lawsuit against a Dutch bank for its part in the LIBOR (London Inter-Bank Offered Rate) scandal. You’ll recall that some of Argentina’s sovereign securities were tied to the LIBOR rate, and hence, rate-fixing and collusion amounted to, in that nation’s case, a manipulation of its sovereign securities, which raised the thorny question: how many issues of that nation’s bonds were so tied? and the larger issue: how many other nations’ securities are so affected?

In that context, there’s a thought-provoking article by Ellen Brown over at Global Research that is worth considering, even though one might have issues with some of her own positions:

Colonization by Bankruptcy: The High-stakes Chess Match for Argentina

There’s several things to notice in her analysis, but I want to draw your attention to these paragraphs:

“Global financiers and interlocking megacorporations are increasingly supplanting governments on the international stage. An international bankruptcy court would be one more institution making that takeover legally binding and enforceable. Governments can say no to the strong-arm tactics of the global bankers’ collection agency, the IMF. An international bankruptcy court would allow creditors to force a nation into bankruptcy, where territories could be involuntarily sold off in the same way that assets of bankrupt corporations are.

“For Argentina, says Salbuchi, the likely prize is its very rich Patagonia region, long a favorite settlement target for ex-pats. When Argentina suffered a massive default in 2001, the global press, including Time and The New York Times, went so far as to propose that Patagonia be ceded from the country as a defaulted debt payment mechanism.

“The New York Times article followed one published in the Buenos Aires financial newspaper El Cronista Comercial called “Debt for Territory,” which described a proposal by a US consultant to then-president Eduardo Duhalde for swapping public debt for government land. It said:

[T]he idea would be to transform our public debt default into direct equity investment in which creditors can become land owners where they can develop  industrial, agricultural and real estate projects. . . . There could be surprising candidates for this idea: during the Alfonsin Administration, the Japanese studied an investment master plan in Argentine land in order to promote emigration.  The proposal was also considered in Israel.

Salbuchi notes that ceding Patagonia from Argentina was first suggested in 1896 by Theodor Herzl, founder of the Zionist movement, as a second settlement for that movement.”(Italicized emphasis added)

For those of you who have been following Catherine Austin Fitt’s analysis, this squares perfectly with it: liabilities are being moved into the “legacy systems”, i.e., national sovereignties, and equity is being moved into private and corporate hands, all via the mechanism of expanding credit to governments, hooking them on the debt heroin, and when they cannot repay, forcing that government into a kind of national bankruptcy in which hard assets of that government are sold off and “privatized.” One can imagine a Patagonia under the rule of, say, Goldman Swag or JP Bilk. For sure, there would be massive development of infrastructure, manufacturing, and plenty of jobs. What there would not be is any recognition of hard won individual rights.

You’ll note something else too: Argentina was targeted because of the policies of – here it comes – Juan Domingo Peron:

“Salbuchi traces Argentina’s debt crisis back to 1955, when President Juan Domingo Perón was ousted in a very bloody US/UK/mega-bank-sponsored military coup:

“Perón was hated for his insistence on not indebting Argentina with the mega-bankers: in 1946 he rejected joining the International Monetary Fund (IMF); in 1953 he fully paid off all of Argentina’s sovereign debt. So, once the mega-bankers got rid of him in 1956, they shoved Argentina into the IMF and created the “Paris Club” to engineer decades-worth of sovereign debt for vanquished Argentina, something they’ve been doing until today.”

Thus, in this long historical context, President Fernandez’s recent actions are entirely understandable, as is Argentina’s move to make its own central bank and not a bank in New York responsible for service on its outstanding sovereign debt according to the 2005 agreement:

“Argentina is playing hardball with the vulture funds, which have been trying to force it into an involuntary bankruptcy. The vultures are demanding what amounts to a 600% return on bonds bought for pennies on the dollar, defeating a 2005 settlement in which 92% of creditors agreed to accept a 70% haircut on their bonds. A US court has backed the vulture funds; but last week, Argentina sidestepped its jurisdiction by transferring the trustee for payment from Bank of New York Mellon to its own central bank. That play, if approved by the Argentine Congress, will allow the country to continue making payments under its 2005 settlement, avoiding default on the majority of its bonds.”

But this does not solve Argentina’s long term monetary problem. The real question now for that country is how to maintain its national sovereignty against some very powerful corporate and banking players. After all, the West/USA can always send in the “payment enforcers” in the guise of some trumped up event. But there’s the rub… the playbook is old, it’s well-known, and it hasn’t been working too well lately, and if current trends continue, if Iceland wasn’t invaded, it’s not likely most of South America will be either. But in the meantime, Argentina still faces some powerful opposition.

And for that, Argentina will need new friends and allies… And they can be found.

… Watch for Mr. Putin and Mr. Xi to be hosting President Fernandez in Beijing and Moscow, and for the Russian and Chinese leaders to be enjoying the the delights of Buenos Aires and a nice formal dinner at the Casa Rosada in the near future.

See you on the flip side.

DOMINIQUE STRAUSS-KAHNING CHRISTINE LAGARDE

Remember the former IMF head Dominique Strauss-Kahn, and how they accused him of raping a hotel maid? You’ll recall the basics: Strauss-Kahn was jailed on allegations of rape, and then subsequently released when the allegations proved to be …well, let’s just say, nothing that a prosecutor would want to bring to trial. But the damage[More...]

A LOOK BACK: ANNE WILLIAMSON AND THE RAPE OF RUSSIA

This very significant article was brought to my attention – along with many others which, hopefully, I will share and blog about eventually, as soon as I have the time to digest them – by former Housing and Urban Development Assistant Secretary Catherine Austin Fitts. It tells a story that, given the current Western “policies”[More...]

UKRAINIAN GOVERNMENT RESIGNS: JULY 24 2014, AND A BIT OF WAFFLING FROM THE US DEPT OF STATE: PART ONE

You may have missed it, and in case you did, the entire puppet regime put into power in Kiev by the USA has resigned, but there’s a catch: no one really knows why, except that it seems clear that the IMF imposed “austerity” program was the ultimate catalyst. Here’s a couple of articles, the first[More...]

NEWS AND VIEWS FROM THE NEFARIUM JULY 24 2014

Joseph comments on the recent BRICSA summit in Brazil as context for an important developing story coming from British Columbia, Canada. Here’s the links to the articles: BRICS against Dollar Dominance or the US as Global Stronghold of Evil Premier eyes China currency centre in B.C

NEWS AND VIEWS FROM THE NEFARIUM MAY 8 2014

Joseph comments on three developing stories: (1) Putin signs into law the creation of a system of domestic clearing in Russia bypassing Visa and Mastercard, (2) The BRICSA development bank (and when the preliminary structure is supposed to be done…you won’t believe it when you hear it folks), and (3) the issuance of bonds in[More...]

IMF, GLOBAL TAXES, AND AN INTERESTING CONCLUSION FROM THE DAILY BELL

In case you didn’t know it folks, our friends from the Daily Bell are back, and treating us to their usually prescient and penetrating analysis of all things financial and oligarchical, but this one is…well, intriguing to say the least.  It seems that the International Monetary Fraud…er…Fund … is once again floating the idea of draconian global taxes: DAILY[More...]

MORE SIGNS OF FACTIONAL INFIGHTING? THE WALL STREET JOURNAL VS THE UNITED KINGDOM

Here’s a very unusual story from Zero Hedge that appeared the day I am scheduling and writing this past week’s blogs (i.e., Friday, Oct 18, 2013).  It seems that American’s premier financial news organ, The Wall Street Journal, has complied with an injunction in a British court not to publish an article naming the names of the banks,[More...]

NEWS AND VIEWS FROM THE NEFARIUM OCT 17 2013

Joseph Comments on the recent theater in the US government shutdown fiasco, calls both political parties to account, and points out three stories that were running under the radar while all the clowns were marching back and forth to the White House to see the clown-in-chief. UPDATED: Chase Bank Limits Cash Withdrawals, Bans International Wire[More...]