Alternative Archaeology


I ran across this anecdote in a book of essays recently edited and published by the editor and publisher of Atlantis Rising magazine, J. Douglas Kenyon. Mr. Kenyon's recent book, Forbidden History: Prehistoric Technologies, Extraterrestrial Intervention, and the Suppressed Origins of Civilization, contains this interesting tidbit of information prefaced to an article by Christopher Dunn, noted author of The Giza Powerplant:"In the summer of 1997, Atlantis Rising was contacted by a scientist involved in government research into nonlethal acoustical weapons. He said his team had analyzed the Great Pyramid using the most advanced tools available and concluded that its builders used sophisticated geometries that we have only recently begun to understand - "way beyond Euclidean" or any of the other familiar, ancient systems. Moreover, we were told, the analysis indicated that the only way to understand the configuration of the chambers in the Great Pyramid was in acoustical terms: in other words, by the sophisticated manipulation of sound. For the weapons designer, that meant the Great Pyramid was, in all probability, a weapon - an extremely powerful one at that. Unfortunately, for reasons that remain unclear, we soon found ourselves unable to contact the scientist again, and we were left with a tantalizing bit of information that we could not corroborate." (p. 221)While this is in some respects typical of the type of anecdotal evidence that so often makes its rounds in alternative literature, there are features of this story that suggest its authenticity, not the least of which is the association of US government laboratories such as Sandia and Los Alamos with precisely this type of "non-lethal" and "acoustical" weapons research. More important, however, is the fact that, other than myself, I know of no one in publicly available literature who has suggested the association of the Great Pyramid with weaponry of an "acoustical" (and highly non-linear) nature. While Kenyon indicates that his initial contact was in 1997, his book, from which this anecdote was taken, only appeared in 2005, a few years after the appearance of my Giza Death Star and Giza Death Star Deployed. Readers familiar with both books will recall that I argued for the "gravito-acoustic" or "electro-acoustic" nature of its highly powerful energy manipulations, and moreover urged that these were based upon a highly "unified" physics, a kind of "well tempering" of all types of frequency and wave-form phenomena, which could only be brought about by a sophisticated and highly developed topological and geometric analysis.Hence, it is Kenyon's reference to geometries "way beyond Euclidean" that I find the most compelling thing here, for the phrase conjures the type of "hyper-dimensional" quasi-Euclidean type of geometry one finds in such works as Coxeter's Regular Polytopes (an excellent introduction to the theory and technique of hyper-dimensional geometry and its depiction and mathematical descriptions of the regular solids in >3 dimensions). That such geometries would be involved in the analysis of the Great Pyramid I find to be no surprise then.Nor do I find it at all surprising that the scientist disappeared into the aether almost as soon as he had made his revelations, revelations that are but another indicator that someone, somewhere deep and high within government black projects takes very seriously the idea of a sophisticated and very ancient "paleophysics", and that it might find visible and tangible expression in the Great Pyramid.In short, I for one am inclined to take Mr. Kenyon's anecdote seriously, and at his word.


  1. Oh, and what I forgot to mention is this wikiarticle about torsion field that comes to be unfavorable to the very idea of torsion field’s existing

    You know, it would be interesting to hera some kind of discuusion on the topic, to hear contraguments against relativists (i.e. traditionalists) from someone , who are in the subject like you. What sources could I go through to find that contrargumentation and is it possible to display the latter here, on ?

  2. Dr. Farrell, maybe that would be off-top, but since you mention in one of your books of the Giza Death Star Trilogy (i don’t remember which one of the set) experiments by russian phycisian Akimov (talking about scalar physics and torsion fields) I would like greatly to know your opinion of the attacks on him held by some official science adapts: there have been The Comission of the Russian Academy of Science against fictive science recently formed which claimed one of his aims to distract all kinds of fictive science: occultism and…. torsion fields. Some proponents of the official science have made certain attempts to compromise “torsionists”, statting that all the thing is a crap, pure mystification, that practical usage of this theory failed completely, in the first place menitioning Akimov and blaiming Russian state of wasting its finances to nowhere (dotating his experiments), claiming that Akimov is aferist, willing to grab more money for himself in the name of failed theory of tosion field which is kind of charlatanism (certain Piotr Obrazcov, wrote his book against E. Muldashev theories, with the latter mentioning these torsion fields, and thus attacking all proponent of that theory, Akimov among them). Please, could you express your thoughts on aforementioned facts?

    1. Actually, I am acutely aware of the recent attacks on Akimov however material on these people is very limited in the USA, most material is internet sources and most of those are nothing but attacks, there is little presentation of the other point of view.

      However, in my work I mostly address the work of Dr. Nikolai Kozirev. My SUSPICION is that these attacks in some respects resemble the Pravda attacks in the 1950s on Kozyrev, while he and his work became deeply classified in the Soviet Union.

Comments are closed.