Scientists in Japan are perparing to try the impossible, to bring back to life a species long extinct, the woolly mammouth: 

Woolly Mammoth to Have New Lease on Life

Sure, it sounds kind of fun: fur-covered pachyderms roaming the vast frozen wastes of Siberia and Artic Canada.

In and of itself, I suppose it is rather harmless, but none of us, I suppose, will forget the movies in the Jurassic Park series, where dinosaurs resurrected through the miracles of modern genetic engineering run amok and threaten to hunt down their human "captors" and...well, eat them alive. Not such a good idea.

Genetic engineering is already intruding itself in a variety of ways that do not seem terribly beneficial. Everyone is probably familiar with Monsanto's "seedless plants." How smart is it for farmers to raise crops that cannot reproduce? Smart for Monsanto's "bottom line" I suppose, but not so smart if, for some reason, a mutation occurs and all such crop plants become seedless. We're tinkering with life itself here, and engineering DNA is mightily different than engineering an electrical circuit. DNA, like all living things, can mutate.

Then there's the "spare body parts" aspect...growing body parts - everyone remember the human ear grown on the back of a rat in China? - for harvesting, perhaps even for a food source in some sort of updated version of Soylent Green.

But the most chilling aspect of it all are the temptations, with which genetic engineers are already flirting, to engineer the beasts of ancient lore, the "fish-men" and "scorpion-men" and "serpent-men" and centaurs of Mesopotamian, Greek, and even Meso-American myth. Scientists talk openly of creating "manimals," of modifying common animals in some way with some aspect of human DNA. Others talk less openly and under their breath about engineering these gods of old, of brining them into existence.

To my mind, the scientific rationalizations for such projects just do not wash, and I suspect that something else is afoot, an esoteric agenda not only to recreate the creatures and technologies of ancient lore and its encoded "paleosciences," but also the culture that created them. The recreation of that civilization, after all, if one has been following my books, was one of the goals of the elites that survived that ancient cosmic war.

If that genuinely be the case, then another disturbing possibility arises, namely, that as geneticists such as Brian Sykes at Oxford trace the mitochondrial DNA and the y-chromosomal groups back to their clan mothers and fathers, the same technology that allows such chimerical engineering could also be used to "reverse engineer" what the ancient texts say about the creation of man himself. Such techniques could conceivably be employed to find "the genes of the gods" that - if the Mesopotamian texts have any basis in reality - must exist within mankind. If so, they're not going to talk about it, nor talk openly about which "genetic clans" have more or less of it, if any at all.

Why look for such a gene or genes? Well, for one thing, the elites are no less busy "decoding" ancient texts than you or I are. And if that is true, then they will surely have encountered the fact that all those fabulously destructive technologies of hegemony spoken of in them were only yielded by certain people, suggesting some sort of activation by consciousness, and/or genetics. And for another thing, many of those elites are steeped in "theosophical" types of thought about the origins of the races -notwithstanding clear genetic science that states that we are indeed all related, and quite literally descended from a common mother, "mitochondrial Eve."  If - perish the thought - those elites ever learn of concentrations of the "genes of the gods" in this or that group, one can only imagine what their twisted minds might think to do with that information.

See y0u on the flip side...

Posted in

Joseph P. Farrell

Joseph P. Farrell has a doctorate in patristics from the University of Oxford, and pursues research in physics, alternative history and science, and "strange stuff". His book The Giza DeathStar, for which the Giza Community is named, was published in the spring of 2002, and was his first venture into "alternative history and science".


  1. Justina on January 20, 2011 at 8:03 pm

    and there are natives who repeatedly have pointed to
    drawings of dinosaurs as being what is in their
    African and South American rivers. The word
    dinosaur didn’t exist when the KJV translation was
    made, and elephants and hippos can’t be leviathan,
    because their tails are not like cedars. So when it
    says, dragons, it means, dinosaurs.

    Fire breathing? how about methane belching and
    spark striking odd chemistry to snapping teeth?

    It is only a matter of time, before someone clones
    a dragon from some old bone in a Chinese collection
    of stuff, or from the T-Rex red blood cells in marrow
    or was it soft tissue, I forget, currently in a German
    laboratory if I remember the magazine article and
    photographs correctly. The red blood cells are
    definitely remembered correctly.

  2. Justina on January 20, 2011 at 7:59 pm

    It might be we could have more to worry about than some
    mammoth rampaging around eventually. A T-Rex thigh
    bone with soft tissue and red blood cells intact or maybe
    it was from the bone marrow not soft tissue I forget, is
    last heard from in some laboratory in Germany.

    As “Dr. Dino” points out, the word dinosaur was invented
    in 18-something, so wasn’t around to translate certain
    words in The Bible in King James’ time. Marco Polo
    apparently reported that the then khan had dragons
    trained to draw his carriage in public processions, and
    in the lifetime of some Welshman’s great grandfather,
    there were smallinsh gliding beautifully colored small
    dragons that lived in a forest but were exterminated for
    taking sheep and chickens. Then there is Nessie.

    This link to a page only skims the surface
    and repeatedly natives have pointed to drawings of
    brontosaurus and others when asked what certain
    reputed monsters in African and South American
    rivers look like.

    So it shouldn’t be long before we got real problems.

  3. Andy on January 19, 2011 at 6:27 am

    i have a certain feeling of deja vouz about this….but…like it´s been sayed…« there´s nothing new above the earth »

  4. MattB on January 19, 2011 at 1:58 am

    Can I mention the nasties running around in the book of Revelations?

  5. MattB on January 19, 2011 at 1:56 am

    Can I mention some of the nasties running around in the Book of Revelations?

  6. Justina on January 18, 2011 at 10:01 pm

    Has anybody been watching the new V series lately?

  7. Bill on January 18, 2011 at 5:11 pm

    Perhaps there is something to be said of certain clandestine powerful agencies that may wish to utilize genetic engineering in order to develope an effective infantry soldier; the ULTIMATE INFANTRY COMBAT SOLDIER that will be unwaveringly loyal and physically superior to your enemy ground forces! Such soldiers could be engineerable in great numbers and could be considered by some high command as expendable: no need to bother mothers with the loss of their sons in a combat theatre of operations!

    • Joseph P. Farrell on January 18, 2011 at 5:51 pm

      One can see the development of an attitude that such clones would not have souls, be somehow less than human, and therefore, expendable. And one can envision these clone armies eventually rebelling because of it.

      • Chris on January 18, 2011 at 6:15 pm

        Can anyone say “I Robot” repeated???

      • spiritsplice on January 18, 2011 at 6:45 pm

        Star Wars had this as a plot element. The empire originally used clones until they realized they.couldnt grow them fast.enough (growing them faster than about 200% caused insanity). At which point they resorted to intensive brainwashing of recruits.

  8. Justina on January 18, 2011 at 3:35 pm

    The super race may not exist…..yet. But it certainly isn’t the whites.
    we have to many mental and physical inheritable issues.
    Most likely, all races have the genes buried in them.

    another motive, might be (useable by the hidden agenda crowd,
    but that only requires one or two such in existence to steer the
    rest) would be the thrill.

    yes, this is highly compatible with racism of a sort, a caste
    sort rather than a color sort.

    There is a lot of popular culture that supports a kind of separatism
    as well as miscegenation. the present view of blacks that Obama
    is not black but mixed race is like the old French standard of
    gradation, totally unlike the white anglo german view of one
    drop non white and you are non white.

    Oops, the blacks in the family tree woodpile came out in the
    research that got a book banned in South Africa, showing some
    black women in the foundation part of the pedigrees of some of
    the white members of parliament or whatever they call it there.

    Incidentally, the Genome Project has an organizational pedigree
    (as in group A is renamed or subsidiary of group B which ditto
    goes back to group C) that goes back to Nazi Germany.

  9. spiritsplice on January 18, 2011 at 1:48 pm

    What I find so interesting is that while they are searching evidence.if.the super.race, they also forcefully.promote miscegenation in popular culture, especially in the European.countries. and.its derivatives.

    Might this be another example such as we have seen in the case of physics..i.e. do as I say, not as I do?

Help the Community Grow

Please understand a donation is a gift and does not confer membership or license to audiobooks. To become a paid member, visit member registration.

Upcoming Events