8 thoughts on “Jan 14 2011 Fireside Chat: Ben Rich and Hidden Physics”

  1. I think what Dr. Farrell said was not that the place of
    quaternions is properly or was different from their
    place in modern mathematics, but that Maxwell’s
    notations were originally in quaternion, which gives
    a very different result from doing them as they
    are done now, not in quaternion.

  2. Joseph,
    Great work!
    Can you give a reference on quaternions? Not the basic mathematical mechanics but more the idea that some aspect or interpretation of their original formulation/understanding is different from their current place in math/physics?

    1. I”m not sure what you mean…. I’ve tried, in my books, to give the place they used to occupy compared to now.As for a referemce on their mathematics, Rotations, QUaternions, and Double Groups.

  3. Joseph,
    You work in the areas I have been reading (your books, of course) is fantastic. Before I read, I would’ve had no idea. Now that I have read, it seems so obvious.
    Keep up the great work!

    Dan

  4. Dr. Farrell,

    Congratulations on the new website design. I am totally fascinated with your work and the insight into history and technology it reveals. I am providing you with a link that you may already be familiar with, or at least the subject matter it contains. I gave this link to Richard Hoagland via his Facebook page, but I have no idea whether he followed up on it. I have not heard either you or RCH offer any commentary on this particular twist to the whole story of Tesla and the insights into the suppression of aspects of his research, and the attendant players. The circular nature of of the events described made my hair stand on end, and were a virtual verification of the dark “conspiratorial” nature of how the 20th Century was hijacked. I would very much enjoy a critique and commentary from you on what is presented on this website and how it relates to your personal research.

    Thank you, and best regards,

    Gary Hunter
    San Jose CA

    http://www.proliberty.com/observer/20070405.htm

    1. Thank you Gary… as many others have shared this link and as I have commented elsewhere on it, I basically put no stock in the whole Sherf story. The rest of its allegations regarding the elite and activities can be gleaned or surmised from other sources, so there isn’t that much new in it. PERHAPS we might be looking at an attempt to discredit the wider picture by entangling it with the whole Sherf story….just a thought…

Comments are closed.