User Answers

RISING SEA LEVELS

This was a very interesting article, not the least for its cold-blooded tone and the accompanying maps, predicting a sort of "coastal apocalypse by gradualism."

Rising Sea Levels

This study, I imagine, was greeted with glee in the corridors of power of the Anglo-American elite, if, indeed, they didn't fund the study themselves. Let's assume the study is true and that its predictions may be relied upon with ironclad confidence, and that the Anglo-American elite will react with their usual claptrap of increased energy consumption regulation and taxes, more calls for stricter global measures and global government - you know, their same old Maurice Strong song-and-tap-dance routine.

This is where reason enters the picture (and they hate that). A rise of sea levels to the predicted coastlines in the study over the next 90 years need not be met with government programs or mass evacuations or global taxes. The natural human response, as sea levels rise, will be simply to gradually build in response to it, moving cities further and further away from their current sites, if the study is, in fact, true. We've responded this way before in history, and we will do so again. It isn't such studies that should disturb one, nor lead one into paroxyms of apocalyptic depair and hand-wringing, but rather, the responses of the elite that should do so, for their responses are, in my opinion, a vast irrelevance.

8 thoughts on “RISING SEA LEVELS”

    1. Depth CHANGES, that the depth has increased in some places
      or lessened or depending on the location, both.

      Ever hear of crustal displacement aka polar shift? Nowdays
      the focus is on MAGNETIC polar shift. But that wasn’t what
      Hapgood was talking about. The whole crust, tectonic plates
      and all, cutting loose and floating across the mantle. Slow
      at first, destabilized by the centrifugal force of the unequally
      balanced Antarctic continent and ice pack. Maybe global
      warming is slowing this down.

      But eventually it will be very fast, 2,000 or 3,000 miles
      moved in a few days, a couple of weeks, whatever.

      Remember those mammoths who froze to death, with warm
      climate plants in their stomachs?

      Hapgood in his second book, noted that a slight displacement
      had already started, a marker for one of the poles had to be
      relocated a few centimeters every year. Well, this had been
      creeping since 190-something, and around 1950-something
      I think these dates are correct, suddenly sped up something
      like 7 times as fast, and continued at that rate. Hapgood
      thought that May 5 2000 was going to be when it all broke
      loose (hence the title Ice 5-5-2000 or something like that),
      but he was wrong. It takes longer to build up enough momentum
      to melt enough rock to make a lubrication effect between the
      crust and the mantle.

      the direction of the creep was such that the southern tip of
      Greenland would end up being at the geographic north pole,
      all else rearranged accordingly. But if we are hit by a big
      asteroid at an angle that jolts the crust and changes the
      direction, let alone the speed, all bets are off.

      Go find John Moore’s Global Warming What the Government
      Isn’t Telling You on http://www.stagevu.com or on youtube
      in segments in the latter case, and about 1/2 way through
      he gets into the possibility, that something is headed our way,
      aiming for the southern hemisphere. A glancing blow on
      the Antarctic continent would be even more effective. And
      exactly what direction it pushes things in, whether North
      America will be closer to north east, and higher out of water,
      or in the other direction and more flooded by the waters
      held out by centrifugal force of the Earth’s rotation, will
      depend on what time of day it hits.

      Moore gives a hint, that it is expected to hit in AD 2014,
      because he says that they noticed that no one did anything
      much until 2 years were left before Y2K, and that is why
      such an effort is being made to push 2012, and its the
      wrong date. If the idea is to let the rest of us get prepared
      once the big deal people have gotten in place, and the
      economy not ruined by all the small business owners the
      country depends on closing shop and heading for high
      ground too early, then it figures that the hit will be in 2014.

      Meanwhile the demons love to kill people and make trouble,
      so they are pushing the consciousness nonsense, which
      is just a brain internal intoxication without application of an
      external source drug, just learn to do it to yourself, and
      adds to the same bullshit, worthlessness and failure as
      a regular drug run.

      Only the ones treating 2012 as a physical event, and
      preparing for that, will survive 2014 in anything like health,
      if at all.

  1. We see a serious increase in earthquakes, and volcanism. Are we not in the early stages of massive and cyclical “earth changes”? Periods of stasis, punctuated by drastic and quick change, seems to possibly be the rule – not the “gradualism” we have been spoon fed. I have heard reports, not formally verified insofar as I know, of sea bottom depth changes. …. the point is: man made “global warming” appears as a cover for changes the powers that be may know are coming, and certainly a justification for further taxes (funding our own prison), control, and deindustrialization/pauperization. of ‘first world’ workers.

  2. It’s like they haven’t heard of dikes. Coming from a country (the netherlands) where i lived over half my life below sea level I find this panic laughable.

    1. New Orleans had them, they’re called levees here. And they
      didn’t keep them in all that much good order. Oops. could
      happen again. imagine one such failure letting the sea in
      all over a coastal area through one break.

  3. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vpbiuKTtMZo This might be of some
    interest.

    but on global warming alone, some location in Greenland on the west
    coast, above the arctic circle, saw the sun rise TWO DAYS EARLIER
    than it ever had before, to begin the six months of day, because the
    ice cap has melted enough that the horizon is lower.

    two scenarios are presented by John Moore, one involving nibiru
    doing an electric disruption of the sun and earth, and relates to
    the electric universe theory (which is a revival of something forgotten
    from the 1800s), http://www.thunderbolts.info/home.htm
    and an asteroid hit, which would disrupt the probably already
    creeping crust and get the crustal displacement going big time.

    Seems the US has positioned an observatory in of all places
    ANTARCTICA, which would fit the rumor of something coming
    in from the south where most observers won’t catch it.

    Moore notes that observing the Y2K thing, most people did
    nothing until the last two years, so, he says, 2012 is being pushed
    but is a fake date. (It started without govt. or whatever help, but
    we all know they can add to the drum beat of anything.)

    That would sound like a hint, that the real date is 2014. The
    powers that be, incl. big corporations and the CIA which
    relocated its domestic operations center to Denver recently,
    almost finished, and left the foreign ops center in VA as if
    they were preparing for something in which foreign ops
    would be irrelevant. NSA I found independently has already
    dug in recently.

  4. Joseph, This is dead on and straight up!…as expected! I really like all of your articles but this one is absolutely dead on straight up correct. I don’t understand how an intelligent human can miss this. it is soooo obvious and has been for decades (if not longer!).
    Thank you very much for all of your articles but especially this one! Keep ’em comin’.

    Dan

Comments are closed.