FERAL HOUSE POSTS THE COMING RELEASE GENES, GIANTS, MONSTERS, AND MEN

Well, to all of you patiently waiting for Genes, Giants, Monsters, and Men it's now official. Feral House has posted the coming release of the book here:

Genes, Giants, Monsters, and Men

This means the book is at the printer and for those of you who have pre-ordered it, it may be another 4-6 weeks or so. As I've indicated to some of you in the members' only area here, this book is a follow-up in the series I've planned as post-Cosmic War books, which included Babylon's Banksters and the book I am writing now plus a couple more I have planned. GGMM paints in very broad strokes, and I will continue to do that in this book. But anyway, I thought everyone deserved to know....and thank you all for supporting my work, and being so very patient in waiting for this.

Joseph P. Farrell

Joseph P. Farrell has a doctorate in patristics from the University of Oxford, and pursues research in physics, alternative history and science, and "strange stuff". His book The Giza DeathStar, for which the Giza Community is named, was published in the spring of 2002, and was his first venture into "alternative history and science".

88 Comments

  1. Lawrence on June 2, 2011 at 6:56 am

    Just a heads up; I just received in the mail “The Grid Of The Gods” from Adventures Unlimited, today, June 2.



  2. paul de gagne on May 31, 2011 at 9:19 am

    I stand corrected! We have a matter or difference of opinion of what constitutes a “bad” word but this is your site. I should show more respect and I can and will. Except what I just posted before reading yours – grant me some latitude. Yeah, I even admit it is in a way, raising the bar. I’m just from a lower-class background but I don’t have to act lower-class. (I know that doesn’t sound quite right?)

    It’s OK with me!



  3. paul degagne on May 31, 2011 at 8:15 am

    I finally completed my first reading of GGMM. In a way I am glad to be done with it for it distracted me from my own studies. Presently, I was and now again trying to read a book that just came out this month in English by Paul Feyerabend called “The Tyranny of Science.”

    I have a feeling viewers and members here are on a mission to tract down something or to get with it. Good. Go for it! As for myself I like exploratory contemplations or to reflect over and over, again and again, certain materials until I get a “feeling” but my wife calls it obsessive (heck, what does she know with her IQ of 156, ha, ha!) A feeling of comprehensibility or depth. I believe it’s called “Tacit Understanding,’ she calls it slow ,versus Logical or Rational Thinking/Calculating”. I don’t want to be a nusance but I probably am.

    I’m just a plodder. I plough. I wish I were a soaring Eagle like some of you in here. This isn’t false modesty —I know I am only a turtle. ( it’s not all that bad being a turtle.) It like always going to a wedding and never catching the bouquay of flowers or always a bridesmaid but never the Lucky Bride. Then again, a 50% Divorce Rate maybe I’m griping about missing out on something not so pleasant? People would say, Marriage ? – Why Bother?

    Well I want a Marriage of the Minds and it seems nowhere to be found.

    Enough of this personal stuff for I have to tell my self this isn’t a chat room!

    On to business — Sykes says in a Footnote in the last chapter of GGMM “sykes notes that in rare occurrances, one in twenty-thousand women are born with the “Y” chromosone, which makes then ….

    Is One in Twenty Thousand so Rare? It depends?

    Lets do a little simple arithematic. 20,000 into the population of this Good Earth I estimate 6,500,000,000 (last I heard) —- Take 20,000 and divide it into 6,500,000,000. I believe it come out to 650,000 million women stuck with this “Y” chromosone business.

    Does 650,000 people sound rare to You?

    I don’t know about Statiticians especially statisticians that come from Crete – Their the worst Kind for force one to make all kinds of extra effort.

    Farrel early on in GGMM suggests in my words, “Lets get out of the quagmire of Skeptics?believers. I agree but if he’s saying to me don’t examine the literal meaning of words then toots to that. There are or is a Third Alternative and I agree completely but their also is a Fourth, Fifth, etc, etc, ad nausium.

    As for myself — What Pet Theories do I Hold? Firstly, if you don’t even know your self enough to have one or dozens like I have then go back to school. We all have special preferences that really appeal or turn us on and brings “meaning’ to our lives. Like William James the Philosopher stated, ” I only want some “LIVE OPTIONS” instead of petrified or fossilized Objective, stuffed-starched white shirt Bullshit!

    In the end I believe it’s all about Value-Systems. (another pet theory of mine)
    Where you stand at this historical moment and the language we use does determine out lives but not all of it. Besides I do not possess a pet-theory? It more like a pet-theory possesses me and I try and shake it off but I cant fool my true desire or self who would want to listen to such aclever, cunning fool who even fools him/her self.

    Do you want to hear my real PET_THEORY? A couple of years ago someone gave me a Goldern Retriever. I never had a dog in my Life. (I’m 62) Now, I’m a converted Dog Lover!!!!

    My pet theory is matches up with Paul Shepards Beliefs in his book called “The Other: how animals made us human.” The Anunnuki designed us (maybe?) or our “physical” bodies but —- “But, Animals Made Us Humane!”

    One other Pet_THEORY of mine is that animals possess SUPER-SENSES that one might as well call out of practically ESP. An elephant stomps his feet and miles away some other elephant perceives it. A Whale off the coast of South America sends sounds other Whales hear across the planet. The billions spent by the pentagon on dolphen research and all the findings we the public get are nice PR> Farrall — Human’s and Anunnaki may need “Temples” to communicate over vast distances but animals don’t! Wouldn’t you like to have the sensorial awareness they have. Like the Parrot that answered his investigators “I’m tired. I want to go for a bite to eat and take a naap —-IN PLAIN ENGLISH!!! Ha, ha!! Now if Animals have it then why cant Humans have it Hidden or suppressed in their DNA! —- Paranormal Powers do exist but I believe not only in the form we expect but in a form like the animals have that we do not suspect.

    Phew!!! I’m glad I got that off my chest! I will quit making a nusance of my self now and use this site as I first intended as a source or grapevine of the present field of Alternate- Alternates”

    Shit I got a slight headache now. These dam Cretians take up all my time!

    Have a nice day and beware of Statiticians.



  4. Harvey Price on May 30, 2011 at 7:51 pm

    Hi Dr Farrell et al.

    A few thoughts wrenched out from the crevices of my mind … not really on the topic of Genes, Giants, Monsters and Men … although considering Dr Farrell’s work is kind of intertwined with a lot of other themes and ideas, it may be on topic …

    (1) I read with some interest at an earlier post talking about all sorts of things but talked about 360 … as in minutes, degrees etc.. I’ve been thinking for some time that when people look at the Great Pyramid and talk about certain lengths, breadths etc encoding certain numbers, my thought is (and it may be a stupid one, I’m entirely sure) that has anyone played around with different bases and these values?? ie instead of using base 10 with a length, has anyone tried converting this into another base eg base 60 (which I believe the Sumerians used) and see what comes up?? Is there any point in doing this in the first place? Would there be any new information that arises from doing such a thing? Just a thought that has been sitting at the back of my mind for a while.

    (2) Talking about encoding of information. A couple of days ago, I was browsing through a book by the mathematician Ian Stewart, and he had a picture of the Eye of Horus in it which he said had “encoded” in it different Egyptian Fractions (different parts of the “shape” being different fractions). Could this mean that other information could be encoded in hieroglyphs and other Egyptian pictures from the time, hiding in plain site?? Are we missing out on a lot of information right in front of our face??

    (3) and finally … this is a (fun??) conspiracy theory I came up with when listening to a podcast interview with Frank Joseph about his book (yawn?), Atlantis and 2012. He talks about how the Maya (I think) talk about how a major catastrophe in 2012 could be averted by Man getting back to nature, as it were … though they never actually give any useful details regarding what that might entail(!).

    Anyway, that got me thinking. Knowing that the elites basically want to depopulate the Earth, and are complete psychopaths … what if they knew about the way consciousness can affect the reality around us (assuming thats possible, of course!), and were purposefully causing all the rubbish (the wars, and generally horrible events) to create a problem which may only be corrected by a major event, say a large plasma gas discharge from the Sun.

    I’ve heard about how some people have claimed that “the powers that be” have been building underground bases in the event that something nasty happens, and they can continue whilst the surface heals itself. Would they be mad enough to actually cause some sort of instabilty in the fabric of our reality (or the sun) through a sort of psychic disturbance using war etc?? and then when the Sun corrects things (it being affected by such a disturbance) sit it out underground whilst the rest of us fry??

    Just a total and far out speculation, and some thoughts that may or may not be of any importance whatsoever!! lol.

    Best wishes

    Harvey Price, Chch, NZ



  5. paul de gagne on May 27, 2011 at 12:39 pm

    I really need to go back and correct myself.

    The DNA Process can be “personified” or spoken of metaphorically as a Two-Million-Old Being!

    It’s an “AS IF” proposition and quite frankly an intellegent method to follow when dealing with certain kinds of reality or the Great Unknown. All this talk about how “primitive” our primeaval our ancestors were compared to the Anunnaki is disturbing and gives the wrong impression. From what I’ve read in my Anthropological Studies they were exceptually cunning. They were just no match for beings from somewhere else. (Maybe they were destroyed by an alledged flood because they grew smarter than the Anunnaki.. . or an experiment with unintended consequences?)



  6. paul de gagne on May 27, 2011 at 12:02 pm

    I am on my second hr of free time at the public library. I just looked over what I just posted. Please bear with me til I get my own computor. Having to watch the clock really cramps and fucks up my style for it’s like some Boss breathing down my neck telling me to go faster!

    When I get my new computer in a couple of weeks I will mind my p’s and q’s and grammar and grammatical sentence structure. The thoughts and ideas are what’s important but still, why be that sloppy. I’m a bit ashamed but what can I say.

    If you go to page 163 and take a closer look at the footnotes 5 and 6 you will see even proof-readers mess up now and then? The Name is either mispelled in 5 or 6. Which one is it? Dr Martin Schonberger or Schonberg. I wouldn’t want to be him for I can imagine what he might say, ” What, he uses me for a reference and then gets my name wrong. Then again, he’s probably grateful for the reference. We all need what help we can get in this ignored field!

    So we have the mystery of the funny footnotes? (maybe they are two different people?) Probably a transcription error. If Farrell goes back and asks either the proofreader ( they can be expensive if one is on a tight budget) or secretary i bet the crime (ha, ha) was done early monday morning or late friday afternoon. Remember. those of you old enough to, back in the seventies, when the advice was don’t buy a FORD or a fix or repair daily car that was made on monday or a friday. ( my wife informs me FORD is doing much better nowdays and beating some of the others who need bailouts)

    i just don’t feel so bad now apologizing for my atrochous writing because you see if Farrell can do it so can it. (Actually, a book should be almost perfect in these areas that can be perfected and, and — Farrell cant accuse me of not paying attention and getting his ideas all wrong. Maybe he cant, I like to think so?)

    I was thinking about the person who doesn’t like the title GGMM. Should I go there? Farrell does sort of telegraph intentions ahead of time. What I think what the commentator might not like or appreciate is that the results of this telegraphing are not always what one usually expects to read – The Unexpected is emotional Dynamite! That’s what I bought this book for.

    Anyway, have a pleasant weekend!



    • Joseph P. Farrell on May 27, 2011 at 4:14 pm

      PLease watch your language Paul… this is the last warning… keep it clean please….I appreciate your comments, but stay away from the bad words.



  7. paul de gagne on May 27, 2011 at 11:12 am

    i like the title of GGMM. It could be a little misleading depending on what one is looking for. I could gripe that there is not enough information in it but that would be a lie. It certainly would be disingenuous of me. What I would really be complaining about is the fact I have to go out and do the further legwork, research and give these ideas or matters the serious thought they disserve and even demand. Yes, we should use our heads for more than just hat-racks( I am not suggesting you the commentor) I always need to exercise my mind or intellect with mental gymnastics and keep myself fit for there is some serious brainwashing tactics (propaganda/advertising) going on out there(?) and I need all the help I can get.

    I got to the sixth chapter in section (a) called the “Code within the Code.” I sliced and diced it. I deconstructed it or give it a few once overs. I really like the last paragraph in that section. The segment of a full sentence that goes, I quote: “On this view, the I Ching becomes a “probability calculus,” a kind of “psychic computer…more words then the footnote 10 .”

    pause: different for a different matter.

    I have serious differences of the wording in the first number – 1.) of the DNA?I Ching comparison but that’s my own problem and quite frankly I like the summaries, chart, grafts, etc very much because it makes very complex ideas more comprehensiveability or are better able to be understood. Maybe I should say it makes things agreeable.

    Also,

    The wordsquote — “They represent not objective entities, but functions -footnote 25.”, skip,skip then —- the possible actions of a given person, given a certain set of programmed instructions inherent in two systems.”

    It seems to me I heard this in less formalistic terms? Carl Jung was telling (writing) someone the archetypes are not exactly in the genes (not going to find them with a microscope) but he was using the older but just as effective word or term –“Predisposition or Propensity to act or behave in a certain direction or way.

    Return to “Probability Calculus.”

    I may be off the mark but the first two quotations I mentioned from the GGMM book sound a lot like what Jung was saying but not in such scientific terminology. It makes more sense for some of the main switches of DNA to point or impell one in a certain direction than in some specific single action. More open spaces for Nature to Experiment or for adaptation rather then strick rules (genetic) that may leave no elbow room for flexibility. There are lessor functions or circuits that do “do” commands one must obey for elementary survival but I don’t think they are of a global nature. Kinda like the simplist rules about structure in “Generative Grammar” in Linguistic Theory.

    It reminds of a King desiring or coverting his neighbor territory and going to the Delphi Oracle for advice. The Oricle says something like this, ” A great kingdom will be forfieted or lost. The King was too lusty for the land and not wise enough to learn later that it was his kingdom that lost.

    It’s like the Two-Million-Old-Being inside of us that Carl Jung spoke of when trying to make simple the process of interpreting dreams to a young student also I am speaking partly metaphorically here about what I believe. It vert wekk be our genetic inheritence. Hindu’s believe it’s Vishnu dreaming up the Universe. What difference does it matter?

    In a way it all makes sense because if you really had one of those beauts of a dream where you thought your self, “I could never have thought up that one in two million yrs just maybe, maybe someone or something did? Creative Artists use this process ( source = dreaming) all the time and they find it a good reference library. But I say what a Hell of a Library!!!!!



  8. Pedro Marcos on May 26, 2011 at 3:44 pm

    I finished GGMM yesterday.
    I would like to say that each of Mr. Farrell works establishes a border between the before and after its publication. It cannot be ignored.

    Mr. Farrell must be the first to provide the reader with clear picture of a broad cenario with the help of the work of a lot unknown (for me) researchers and having the obvious good sense of avoiding the new-age mumbo-jumbo.

    Sir, your work sends to the recicle bin a huge amount of old paper.
    And make what I suspect to be a decent amount of scepctics to consider other scenarios.

    But please, try to choose the titles of your works a bit less suspicious! Give the curious begginers a chance….

    A question, if I may: is the Phoenix is the symbol of the goal of the ancient elite?



  9. pau de gagne on May 26, 2011 at 8:59 am

    I am continuing reading GGMM and it is getting more fascinating by the page. I intended to say or write more but the other post got my time so I will just add these few observations and call it a day. It’s got something to do with chapter 3 in GGMM and that behaviorist in the bullring. (I heard the story long ago but it is still interesting and for those who haven’t it still carries weight or worth mentioning. )

    I can remember being startled or even a bit shocked when I saw that Image, snapshot or photograph of a Ant? In between the antenni (spelt wrong) was an almost invisible micro-device. For what reason it was planted there I don’t remember but it does jolt one’s imagination. Hey, that scientist brought the mighty Taurus the Bull to his knees. What might it do to us lowly humans if… or if you still don’t believe in conspiracies then I suggest you quit wasting my time and “seek your bliss: elsewhere. ( Somebody reading this by the off chance who might have just stumbled in this site by accident but i have a feeling most of you know what I am talking about when you are trying to explain some nuance of a Conspiratorial nature to others especially your loved ones and getting flack from all sides. (this last sentence is really bad sentence structure but the clock is ticking) It’s not really our problem but it is a “problem” because this flack can certainly wear a person out.

    I teased Farrell the other day about Bumfuck, South Dakota but I hope he took it in good stride or spirit because It is very important not to overwork too much and get that god-dam burnout! You know – quit two feet in front of the finish line. I can imagine some pretty nice places in Bumfuck that are still natural and indeed the spot to “regenerate.” I find if I don’t regenerate then I head toward some degenerate intellectual-positons and actually I don’t feel comfortable thinking I am part of the problem instead of the solution. One has to travel FAR and wide to get to the WELL to refresh our poor spirits.

    Pardon the PUN for I couldn’t resist the little bit of unasked-for wit or humorless (?) from a sometimes wiiseass like me who takes a person’s name and reputation as still meaning something. I discovered on this uneven path or journey in cyberspace that “Satire done right is a better tool or hammer than the hammer Nietszche’used although I admit in a somewhat different fashion.

    One more light-hearted joke but this really happened to me,I shit you not!
    I was at the kitchen sink last Sunday watching my wife washing the dishes while looking out the window and I thought i’d humor her with a bit of a put-on. She just killed an innocent, harmless(?), solitary ant creeping along on the metal kitchen sink. ( I tease her about her Buddhist Beliefs!) I said to her, “You just indiscrimately or reflexively murdered that poor ant! Hey, that ant could have been someone’s mother! She instantly retorted without a second or moment’s thought this, ” NO, that’s someone’s Ant and we both burst out laughing!!”( She’s got a 156 IQ so it’s hard getting one over on her!)

    Keep on keeping on and have a nice day even if you are someone’s ant!



    • Joseph P. Farrell on May 26, 2011 at 9:10 am

      THanks for the comment Paul…but please, keep the language clean here, ok? I’d appreciate it.



  10. paul de gagne on May 24, 2011 at 8:48 am

    I’m back on my second hour at the main chicago library.

    If I am “HOGGINg” or bogarting this web-site floor then tell me because who likes a bore. I just try to be a little entertaining in my quest to stimulate thought – yours, the members and mine (I like cream with my existential coffee) – tooo much light-brevity and not enough common sense is my wife’s criticisms. Hey, that’s her problem if she isn’t as intelligent as a the Great I Am, ha, ha!!! Yeah, We’re all just some closet escape artists who want to hitchike a free-ride when the little green men finally leave this planet or so the theory goes.

    Morality or should I say, Decency is OK> I love E. Wilson’s concept of “BIOPHILIA!” So we can have a biological-(reality)-morality without the strings that are usually attached with religion. Good!

    If I can correctly recall Wilson’s discription or definition Biophilia is (i should watch out using that word) or it goes like this:

    1.) The Love of Life.

    2.) The Love of Living Organisms.

    and

    3.) The Love of Living Systems.

    I kinda like the last option or number the best. It’s reminds me of William James idea of a “LIVE OPTION, Yes, who wants some dead or fossilized system that leads only to death, dead-ends or some other necrophobic purpose. Things are sick enough with all this CONTROL BUSINESS without my having to add to them.

    i think I better end here because my thoughts are wandering all over the place.

    Yes! Very good first words in the first paragraph of Chapter One in GGMM. —- HOW DO WE MAKE SENSE. I cant answer that fragment but I do know I am stopping now?”

    I guess I don’t know when to say No to myself because I just contradicted myself. One more justification or defense if someone here thinks I speakest-too-much! Is it not without purpose that Farrell uses the word “apologetics’ often?



  11. paul de gagne on May 24, 2011 at 8:08 am

    I am having difficulties with this book (GGMM). In mid-chapter three I came to a sudden halt! I could only finish 5 pages in this sitting for my mind kept going off in a thousand directs. That usually doesn’t happen to me often because I know how to speed read or scan a page. I am curious as to why?

    In the benefit of the doubt I give you Joseph my fair judgement or conscience (remember when most people had one or to get fancy – a super-ego but with all this electronic stimulation it seems it flew out the door. Mine’s didn’t because we were poor and I wasn’t introduced to tv in the living room. I escaped all that conditioning ( I was outside playing with all the other dozens of kids forming neural pathways that in the end serve the greater good) til I was about 7yrs old. I can remember the scenes showing blacks in the ghettos standing out in front of some all-purpose store watching the scenario after JFK was done in.

    Nnow where was I? Oh, yes. Charlton Heston, no that’s not it. Here it is. Anyone who puts that Charles Forte quotation in the near front end of a book is making a statement beyond words. OK! Now the other topic — Charlton Heston is food for the worms. Too bad because I did enjoy his epic acting. It’s just differences or matters of opinion or I thought to myself — I beg to differ using Moses as an example or symbol until I got disturbed and starting thinking about it.

    To me, this actor did wonders in the scene in “Planet of the APES” towards the end in that “CAVE” where the wise-old Orangatang admits or confesses to Heston. Yes, but if us apes or I mean if apes find out that man’s civilization came first it would upset the whole enchalota (cant spelt, ha, ha!) So he was an orthodox authoritarin or dogmatist and kind of like a dark/negative apologists.

    I wont fail to add that the original ape came from outer space in the latter series but leave that out because it just fouls up or like you say “confounds”the discussion like you did mention in GGMM – a third option that maybe we can get somewhere with in our research. Similar to looking at Joseph Campbell’s bookcover about Jung where in the far distance in a desert one can barely see a cloud-dust and then realize that’s moses’s wandering tribe. One should call them the “WHERE THE FUNG-OUR-WE-TRIBLE” BECAUSE AS THE SO-CALLED MYTH GOES IT TOOK 40 YRS!!!!!

    Back to the point. Heston up there on the mountain with the tablets left a much more indeliable mark on my psyche than some orangatang. So ok. Your writing for a general public as well as to a specific crowd. I am part of the specific crowd but I think is was also part of a pedagogic tool on your part or exercise in plain english out to educate a general public.

    This last paragraph is awful but I am racing against the clock to finish and post for if I don’t my library internet time goes f\puff and I just wasted my time.



  12. paul de gagne on May 23, 2011 at 9:15 am

    I’m on my second free hour on the library’s internet.

    I hope I am not a bore. i try to be gracious.

    This web site could be potentially be a very good source of information out in the margins where all the action is and if not it still could redirect me to where it’s at like that good old saying.

    Farrell talks about a “Text” right in the beginning of his book. I like that. I like the New Semiotics where one can read anything like its a language. So, I’ll get down to business and begin to read GGMM?

    The first “physical” page after one turns over the cover shows the title in white with a black background. I turnover the page and see mr. conehead, interesting. The second physical page is a reversal of the first for the title is now in black with a white backing. ER, interesting? I turn over and see a blanck white page. But now the third physical page I see a quote from “The Book of the Dammed.” How exciting. (Planting seeds in the reader mind just before they go on to read the rest of the text?

    A third option in this believers/skeptic debate or dialogue. I will try it with reservations but they could be a 4th or 5th etc. Why limit oneself and you don’t. It’s a heuristic “ruler of thumb” to keep some things simple and it’s also considerate and charitible at the same time, but…? (black and white sounds like only one and two..?)

    If there is one scientist or whatever who is in the margins or marginalize that’s Charles Forte. I just finished reading a biography of him and although I didn’t like it I found out or discovered some things through intuition that may assist me on my probes. At the very end of this quotation on the page, the last two words are “mysterious usefulness” which I think meaning us or humans.

    Yeah! We’re just living on a farm and we’re property. Gulch!

    The earth is just somebody’s backyard to stage a war in just like Vietnam was to russia and usa. Why shit the bed when we can do it on somewhere else.

    I am getting a little off topic here: What’s so useful or valuable about us mere humans that some so-called superior technological cultural inhabitants cant ignore in the first place? I can see they may need us to get back home but what really brought them here in the first place. Firstly, Any “sophisticated scientific culture that blew themselves up” I add to smithereens doesn’t sound so sophisticated or intelligent to me or at least the kind of intelligence I want. There’s got to be more to us humans than a scratch below the surface. I believe a “soul” may add something to this dialogue. (i know, that word, causes all kinds of trouble or conudrums (spelt wrong) because it also
    does to me.)

    One thing I realized immediately was the scientific talk in here. You, Farrell, are on a mission to find out all the pertinant information you can just like a scientist should and I commend you for that. And, so are some of your members or viewers of this web-site. Good way to go for ten heads are better than one dull-head or turtle-like plower like me, ha, ha! (boy, do I wish I was roger-rabbit like in that story of the Hare and the Turtle! but no, I am just plain old Charlie-Tuna (remember that TV commercial. where Charlie never get to “GO ABOVE” because upstairs wants good tasting fish rather than fish with good taste) At least I found some consolation in my grumpy sometimes ungrateful nature for I read somewhere in Chinese Mythology that the Turtle holds up the Earth just like Atlas does in Greek Myths.

    Enough of this humorous and humanistic side-tracting. What I notice in this scientific quest business is that I want a life. i don’t want to end up like some man in a white-coat wasting away in some cellar lab just like some monk in a monistary while he has a beautiful spouse and children pining for him up the stairs he seldom uses. All this for the Scientific Cause. I think (at least it’s my opinion) that Aesop’s Fables can be just as enlightening with a bit of a moral twist to it as the usually thought of mythology. Think! All the shape-shifting going on between animals in those fables. Kind of give one pause? What’s going on here? Maybe, maybe a Lab somewhere> Who knows?

    Imagination is a great thing. ( Opportunist scientists use it all the time. Where, where would you be without it. Oh yeah, some stiff over in Oxford all puffed-up with themselves being flattered by people who cant stand your guts. Instead, you wear a white-hat and have your own radio show with people who probably appreciate you over in west bumfuck South Dakato –ohs– please excuse and forgive me my parisan conceit, Spearfish, SD. l A better place to be than this death-trap I’m in they call “Chicago” —if there ever is an end to industrial civilization like the peak-oil enthusiasts prediced!

    I don’t have much time left on this library clock. I just wanted to add a few psychological ingredients to that cauldren of good ideas or imformation that is providing here on this site.

    Have a nice day.



  13. paul de gagne on May 23, 2011 at 8:13 am

    GGMM landed on my doorstep the other day. I’ve read up to the middle of the chapter 3 and took a peek at the last eight pages in chapter 8.

    Well, I got my money’s worth so far even though I think this is a very disturbing book that leads up to more questions and problems. The author did say he’s no know-it-all and how in the world could anyone know all this stuff unless, unless – he’s (?) yes, one of the partials or partially human. ( he did recently get accused of being a member of the Illuminati. Next thing you know he’ll probably get called a “Lizard, ha, ha!) Also, Do you mean partials are sociopaths whom, it seems, don’t have a conscience. I wonder? Little green men encoded in the DNA? It sounds just crazy enough for me to understand.

    Some of the material in this book certainly will or can demolish someone’s religious foundations! The Authoritian Dogmatics deserve it and make sure not to “Spare the Rod!.” The rest or the innocents, I don’t know? You, Farrell, do seem to have some consideration for the apologetics. Good! Sometimes one’s religious beliefs or faith can be a defense ( a form of mental health) against all this deliberate destruction going on in our culture wars. There are millions dying because of this elite. That’s a hard fact to digest. I say, “If you can keep your mental health by believing in some “Life-Affirming conepts of a religious nature than all power to you. Go for it if it is helping you to lead a decent life. Who am I to sic, “educate you.”

    This terrible business of getting at the facts in Alternate History could lead some weaker minds to have a dam neeervous breakdown from the stress of realizing they have been duped most of their lives. Kind of reminds me of the look on the actor – Van Dam’s Face in the movie “Universal Soldier” where he wakes up in that trailor chair and comes to the realization all his memories are false or belong to someone else and he’s just some “Clone.”

    Yes, like Foucault suggests, some of the deepest parts of “OUR” inner Subjectivity’ are only products reproduced by this Mad-Cow Culture Factory or assembly line! Just Junk! Like those weird fishes on a wall that turn your way and sing you a tune or some flaming flamingo on one’s front lawn! Such high culture! The Snob in me says, “Where is this former HIGH CIVILIZATION that’s supposingly crashing down that everyone especially the peak-oil enthusiaist are so scared of? I like to know? If that’s high culture then I want to be some Amazonian who tribe has still yet to be found who is enjoying his/her life? Shades of Rouseau.

    Alien abduction? i cant recall this ever happening to me. I once had an out-of the-body experience that was pretty exciting. You know where my consciousness was floating about in the room. But then I woke up and found myself stiff for a minute or so. i realize or knew what was happening at the time because I was experimenting with “Lucid Dreaming” and I knew I was dreaming or in a dream which is very different than some abductives experiences,but… though… I can see how at least some of these poor people can get it confused or get it wrong for waking up in a dream seems very, very real. At least the phenomenological experience is.

    I have to cut this short for I am using the Library’s free internet service and my first hr’s time is almost up. (my computer finally died or went caput and I don’t have the means to replace it til some weeks from now.)

    I do like this web site so far. The Internet is the new guttenburg’s printing press and like Marshal McCluhan’s ideas, it opens up a chance for new dialogues. I hope so. (Chat Rooms aren’t that inviting to me anymore although I did meet my Wife a good woman in one and moved a thousand miles away to a better life.)



  14. Bruno Buike on May 22, 2011 at 3:38 am

    From Farrells latest book on “Genes, Giants …” I produced the following short abstract “on the Sumerian division of the circle into 360 degrees” – just to have some exercise for the brain:

    In his brandnew book

    Farrell, Joseph P.: Genes, Giants, Monsters and Men. The surviving elites of the Cosmic War and their hidden agendas, Port Townsend, WA, USA: Feral House 2011

    the author is dealing – among others – with problems of ANCIENT MEASUREMENT METHODS, saying something like, that ” there from facts in astronomy the circle should be divided into 366 degrees – at least on Earth -, which however was replaced by the Sumerian system of 360 degress within a circle”.

    Well, we might say, that this is just common tale among historians, causing a LOT OF TROUBLE among authors, because they NEVER – even with mathematical STRICTNESS – will be able, to “HARMONIZE”, the NUMBERS in circles derived from orbits of VENUS, MOON and JUPPITER, the orbits of which we have in Babylonian astronomical tables, right down to ancient Greek times of the Library of Alexandria.

    Now, we may question, whether HARMONIZATION was the GOAL of the Sumerian system at all, which does not fit into astronomical observations, but – odd enough – by authors normally is seen as SO MUCH PRACTICAL in everyday computation, which we are going to question likewise, at least inasmuch if seen as GOAL of the system.

    Well, our NEW IDEA is LAUGHABLE EASY, and everybody can grasp the genial simplicity behind the Sumerians as follows.

    If we have mathematical problems of a very wide range from number theory to geometry, we all know, that things improve DRASTICALLY, if using a CARTESIAN SYSTEM with x,y,z coordinates. The FUNCTIONING of this MERE AUXILIARY CONSTRUCTION is, that it allows DEFINED RELATIONS among OTHERWISE disturbing peculiarities, and from DEFINEABLE ORDER in an AUXILIARY SYSTEM we in today school mathematics or basic mathematics have all this stuff about “ABBILDUNGEN,groups, manifolds,relations,orders” etc. pp.

    So our idea FROM THIS ARGUMENTATIVE BASIS now is:

    THE SUMERIANS MADE AN ARTIFICIAL CONSTRUCTION in DIVIDING THE CIRCLE INTO 360 DEGREES – and they did so, NOT, because problems and figures and numbers were intended to harmonzise – which they mathematically NEVER will – but to PLACE BY DEFINED PROJECTION ANY OTHER THINKABLE DIVISION OF THE CIRCLE INTO THIS NEW EQUIDISTANT DIVIDED CIRCLE of their 360 degrees. And they could do so with success, because the DIVISION OF THE CIRCLE WHATEVER is BOUND TO THE INVARIANT ELEMENTS OF SUCH UNIVERSAL SYSTEM, which is just the HALF-DIAMETER and A DEFINED OPERATION, which is just going around ONE FIXED POINT of the half-diameter ONCE, so to constitute the CIRCLE ITSELF, which by the way our teacher in mathematics did on the school-table very similar to the megalitic people or to any unskilled worker in houseconstructing today – a byside effect of this DEFINITION OF THE INVARANT ELEMENTS OF A CIRCLE being, that the “circle-constant” PI is NOT NEEDED, and may be introduced later under other mathematical demands.

    There was one little word, which cannot go unnoticed, the word “EQUIDISTANT” – which we see in operation, if TRYING TO DIVIDE THE MUSICAL OCTAVE into EQUAL PIECES as well – which in nature DO NOT EXIST. Farrell, Joseph P. in his GIZA DEATH STAR very decisive is hinting to two things,

    a) that the ancient Greeks KNEW this socalled “gleichstufig-gleichschwebende Temperatur” ( “equally tempered division of the octave” using 12th root of 2 as ONE DIVISION UNIT and producing equidistant steps of progression )

    b) that you normally do not need such an equally tempered musical tone system for MUSIC, but rather for to CONSTRUCT UNIFIED SYSTEMS.

    And indeed we have in music the “Circle of Fifths” – as we have in astrological use of astronomy a CIRCLE of the “birth chart” and other astrological charts, which latter is just an ARTIFICIAL METHOD for MEASURMENT – or more tangible: “rough maps” – of the sky.

    In other words: With exactly this we imply, that INDEED there might have been in Antique and Sumerian times a DEGREE OF UNIFICATION, produced by very abstract mathematical ideas, that were reinvented only in the last 100 years or so – and RATHER FRUITBEARING – for which we now have 2 KNOWN EXEMPLES from quite DIFFERENT fields of knowledge, that is music and “simple” star-maps.

    In modern mathematics we now would proceed from equidistant rows to Dedekind scission and related construction of socalled epsilon-proximities (or: epsilon-neighbourhoods, something from the manifold-theory) ) – and we apologize, if the professional mathematician would apply even more advanced theories, we as a hobbyist of course didn`t become aware of so far. This is a somewhat complicated approach to question again, why a subdivision of 360 had been choosen, that is: why it might have been choosen beyond its PRACTICALITY in BASIC COMPUTATION OF NUMBERS.

    Well, we might say: a subdivision into 360 equal parts is very. very remarkable IN ITSELF in times of old history, we normally see as some sort of “primitive stoneage”. Secondly we may say, that the Sumerian division method was RELATED to grade of COMPLEXITY in APPLIED MATHEMATICS of that rather old history. Because, everything we know from SCHOLARLY ANALYSIS of MATHEMATICS by professional mathematicians – Otto Neugebauer for instance or B. van der Waerden or others – in times of Egyptian “Papyrus Rhind” – if we are not mistaken here – or in Sumerian cuneiform tablets dealing with DOING maths or in ANTIQUE Greek astronomy, is hinting to an ITERATIVE mathematics based on BASIC computing operations as we have today in our common school-books on maths, plus, we may assume, certain RELATIVELY EASY methods of INTERPOLATION, as were for instance in use in trigonometrical tables from 19th to mid of 20th century, wandering from NAUTICAL navigation to schoolbooks of secondary education. Thirdly we may hint to the fact, that a subdivision into 360 parts will not only improve calculation with numbers, but will lead to surprising good approximations regardless of the “primitivity of elementary school-mathematics” we normally see as the only possible methods at hand in antique times.

    So we see not very clear here, we may put a NEW SUGGESTION, that a division into 360 parts was choosen because of the DEMANDS of mathematics of the time AS APPLIED TO OUR SOLAR-SYSTEM and a PROPPER handling of calculations and numbers, but NOT AIMED TO TODAY EXACT, not only because they could not manage to have such exact measurements, but BECAUSE THE INTENDED GRADE OF UNIFICATION for an INTENDED THEORY FOR EVERYTHING in THAT TIME OF HISTORY would NOT NECESSARELY NEED it! It would not need it, because the interest was restricted and NOT DIRECTED TO DEEP SPACE, at least not under our today horizons of questioning and search in astronomy.

    We see not very clear here and may add another possibility: The introduction of the Sumerian 360 degree circle was not only intended as HELP for to solve certain problems of application, but vice versa a RESTRICTION, a PROGRAMMING of the HUMAN MIND, a MIGTHY indirect method of MIND CONTROL, that indeed worked out to the perhaps PLANNED DEMANDS of the PROGRAMMERS THEMSELVES, because this method not only survived MILLENIA, but even is in use until today – in spite of the fact, that it might be for today scientific horizons a USELESS LIMITATION, mankind however could not get rid of so far! To give an exemple: NOBODY so far to our knowledge ever suggested a division of the circle into 100 or 1000 degrees. NOBODY so far came forward in GIVING UP the concepts based on circles and spheres – and taking a double Gize-Pyramid as CRYSTAL-TYPE MODELL of planet earth – or other heavenly bodies.

    This would mean, that the division-method of the circle of the Sumerians WOULD NOT BE SUFFICIENT, to build the PYRAMID OF GIZA, for which indeed Farrell, Jospeh P. in his 3 volumes of the Giza-Death-Star asked for QUANTUM-computers (!!!) … which TODAY we are searching for, but it WOULD FIT into an OVERALL LONGTERM STRATEGY, TO PRESERVE KNOWLEDGE AND SCIENCE after all the STRUGGLES, which followed the LAST INTERPLANETARIAN WAR and its near to extinction devastations including the blow-up of the lost planet, that formed eventually the today Asteroid Belt, covering say a span of time from 10 Million years down to 5000 years ago, if at least we take Sitchins reintepretation of the socalled “SECOND war at the pyramids” as referred to in Sumerian tablets into account.

    This argumentation would fit into Farrell`s latest book as cited at the beginning of this paper, dealing with those supposed longterm-strategies. Such we would argue, that we have with the Sumerian division of the circle jet another piece of RESTS FROM FORMER FAR ADVANCED UNIFIED THEORIES, with the special characteristis to BRIDGE DARK AGES – but NOT TO DISMANTLE those NECCESSARY TO BE POSTULATED advanced theories of very old.

    Not to dismantle is just the reverse of Plato and other authors from Antique Greece to KEEP SCILENCE – which is just the opposite the today NEW hyper-physics does, the appearence of which HOWEVER from view-point of longterm-strategies is INEVITABLE, IF A DEVELOPEMENT WAS FAR ADVANCED ENOUGH – so to say: for better or worse. In CONTRAST to those old times we however may say, that the REAPPEARENCE of Unified Theories in ELABORATED form THIS TIME is done by a MANKIND ASCENDING BY “HERSELF” – the process of ascendence very probably pre-programmed including possibly some security-locks in some way or another installed by WHOMEVER.

    If we today CONTINUE this line of developement, it is far from prophecy to see a NEXT Interplanetarian War coming …

    But we may close here with the following question, using a traditional language to put our idea, for which we may apologize to the “hardcore” natural scientist:

    AS GOD CREATED THE UNIVERSE, DID HE APPLY ANYTHING NEAR TO A UNIFIED THEORY, CREATING ARTIFICIALLY or SUPERIMPOSING UNITY of some questionable SORT, that is: by some sort of FORCE CONTRARY TO NATURE, or not??

    Or in other words: FOR ENGENEERS especially with the degree of today “enlightnment” it may seem attractive, to “solve” the DIVERSITY of nature by UNIFYING her NEGLECTING quite a lot of “details” to invariance: BUT WHY WAS THE CREATOR SO MUCH INTERESTED IN HAVING JUST THOSE DETAILS AND INCOMPABIBILITIES DISTURBING TODAY PHYSICISTS – representing PERHAPS quite ANOTHER SORT OF UNITY, quite MORE COMPLEX, than today TRIALS for unified theories???

    We – by the way – must not stop in stating, that the Sumerian circle and its division was just an ARTIFICIAL AUXILIARY – but may proceed to the assumption, that if so, the SPHERE OF THE HEAVEN was an ARTIFICIAL AUXILIARY as well – at least UNTIL those dark ages, that FORGOT, what is preserved in curriculum of geometry until 19th century, which are socalled PLATONICAL SOLIDS, which normally can be INSCRIBED INTO A SPHERE, from which there is a conceptual bridge to the TETRAHEDAL PHYSICS PREVALENT IN SPACE as brought forward by RICHARD HOAGLAND (and referred to frequently by Josph P. Farrell) …

    We may say further: The CIRCLE is NOT the target of this kind of CONCEPTUALIZATION and BUILDING RATIONALS, for what we see in LIVING SYSTEMS and in the UNIVERSE are SPIRALS, which in more recent trials for theories eventually led to theories of VORTICES, which they try to combine with today ETHER-Physics and VACUUM-Physics …

    So in the end we see the circle and its division into 360 degrees rather CRITICAL, in that it MAY have been some sort of GIFT ENABLING mankind to a CERTAIN RESTRICTED DEGREE – and DISABLING MANKIND AT THE SAME TIME from even search for OTHER concepts and divisions, say for circle divisions MORE ADAPTABLE TO OTHER PLANETARIAN SYSTEMS and even OTHER GALAXIES.

    This last remark clearly implies, that one of the longterm-strategies NOW IN PLACE ON EARTH, MAY INCLUDE SOMETHING NEAR TO QUARANTINE – set up PERHAPS AFTER the last great interplanetarian war – by WHOMEVER, but a “whomever”, that CERTAINLY must have had at his command HIGHER METHODS and TECHNOLOGIES, than those VERY ADVANCAED PARTICIPIENTS of the last interplanetarian war, say on the “administrative level” of our galaxy or “galactical sector” , not just on the level of the planetarian system!

    So EVERYTHING is OPEN – and REMAINS OPEN – for nobody can predict, what MANKIND will do next, what mankind will do THIS TIME and HOW OTHERS would react to that – which even would be of a very restricted importance, because planets and stars in THIS UNIVERSE are COMING and GOING every day, not hindering the universe to show something very disturbing, in that it SEEMS, that there is at work EVERY DAY some sort of “creatio ex nihilo” leading to EVER NEW CREATION as if the universe is REJUVENATING BY ITSELF instead of the dead ends and death-scenarios the OLD concepts in astronomy were suggesting, as was the Zim-Zum-concept in elder HEBREW writings, as for instance dealt with in books of Gershom Scholem, a RATHER “rational” author indeed.

    And of course: THANKS to all the VERY INTERESTING stuff in Farrell books!



  15. Greg Parent on May 19, 2011 at 4:26 am

    “Some brothers came to find Abba Anthony to tell him about the visions they were having, and to find out from him if they were true or if they came from demons. They had a donkey which died on the way. When they reached the place where the old man was, he said to them before they could ask him anything. ‘ How do you about that, Father?’ And he told them, ‘The demons shewed me what happened.’ So they said, ‘That was what we came to question you about, for fear we were being deceived, for we have visions which often turn out to be true.’ Thus the old man convinced them by the example of the donkey, that their visions came from the demons.”

    All revealed traditions teach and practice spiritual discernment and mastery usually requires many years of training. At the level of mastery the psychic is not confused with the spiritual. That is to say that the spiritual disciplines allow one to distinguish between authentic and non-authentic revelation. It is a fallacy to assume that because a technology can produce a phenomena that looks like something described in a spiritual text, that it has in fact produced the same thing. It does not follow that if you can make David Koresh think God is talking to him, that you can induce the same experience in a St. Anthony, or a Ramakrishna, or an Ibn Arabi.

    I remember when Richard Alpert told how he had given an a revered Indian master enough LSD to kill and elephant and it had discernible effect on him. It is also well known that some people are not susceptible to hypnosis and and I’m sure the Navy Seals are trained such that measures that they use on others would be ineffective against them. Likewise, Tibetan Monks are trained to be non-reactive to stimuli that would kill the average person.

    I haven’t finished Genes, Giants, and Monsters yet and perhaps I’m jumping the gun here–but I have not seen this distinction made. One of the characteristics of Theosophy is the failure to distinguish between the psychic and spiritual, as the materialist–and theosophists are at bottom, materialists– cannot distinguish between an authentic spiritual phenomenon, a psychic phenomenon, and something which looks like it. Because in the final analysis, phenomenon are only ancillary to authentic spiritual experiences. And the verbal descriptions of such phenomena
    don’t even begin to plumb their depths.



  16. Stig-ove on May 17, 2011 at 7:41 am

    Dr Farrell is now aligned with Cia and Aup is Cias front to give out material so that the common populace wont be taken on the bed with what is coming. According to this guy at amazon rewieving babylon banksters here it is enjoy:

    1 of 6 people found the following review helpful:
    5.0 out of 5 stars This guy is TOO good … TOO accurate …another CIA agent releasing info to ‘prepare us’ ….., April 7, 2011
    By Brad Allen “Revelations 20:12 – the dead were… (NYC Babylon) – See all my reviewsThis review is from: Babylon’s Banksters: The Alchemy of Deep Physics, High Finance and Ancient Religion (Paperback)
    Another CIA agent … like all the AUP books (the CIA press) – releasing the info so the public won’t be totally be surprised with what happens next.

    His books are right on. The NAzis did not lose WWII. They run the CIA and NASA … They killed JFK. They are in league with the Catholic church – the Bible has been completely changed – except for Revelations (written by Apollo – God the father) – which has also been changed.
    FYI Hitler is the resurrected ‘beast with the head wound’ and so is JFK … JFK is Sirius/Osiris not Nefillim however.
    What Farrell does NOT tell you is this: The Nazis have ‘tagged’ (and control/follow/watch) all the Jews from the twelve tribes (yes you may be “Jewish” and not even know it – nobody is ‘really’ Jewish by the way –
    religion is just a scam for the dumb ass Nefillim (Hitler etc) to run things until Judgement day.
    Earth is HELL run by the Nefillim.
    Electricity is one of the main sources of the problem – they and the other ‘bugs’ use it heavily. (cf. the fragment of the Gospel of Bartholomew for verification that
    Yeshua and the apostles (the real Yeshau and apostles) knew about the bugs (e.g. grays)
    Excrement is a by product of their shennannigans.
    Keep your bathroom VERY sanitary – put bleach in the toilet etc.
    Spray Raid and use plenty of candles … if you’re Jewish.



  17. chris on May 15, 2011 at 5:39 pm

    Just wanted to say I just finished the book this thread is named after and it was excellent! I was glad it was done both informationally entertainingly and also succinctly, because there was a lot of ground to cover so you did a great job picking out what was important and what was not so much in terms of details.
    very fascinating and many kudos for you mr Farrell 🙂 Your writing has improved by leaps and bounds the last 6 years, which I am sure you are happy to hear.
    lookin forward to Grid of the Gods!



  18. Bonnie on May 11, 2011 at 8:50 am

    Just got my order of the rest of your books, including Genes, Giants, Monsters and Men. I have previously read Giza Death Star, Bablyon’s Banksters, and am just finishing Reich of the Black Sun. I have alot of reading to do.



  19. f l on May 3, 2011 at 2:33 am

    I just read your newest book, ggm&m. It was the only one that I have read of yours. I really enjoyed it.

    My biggest question is, if some of the books assertions have validity, why were you allowed to publish it, and why haven’t these ‘elite’ not killed you yet? My purpose for this question is not to discredit your opinions. I would really like to know.

    Have you had some difficulties in this area?



    • Joseph P. Farrell on May 3, 2011 at 3:13 am

      Yes I have.



      • Dave Walton on May 3, 2011 at 11:36 am

        Are you willing to share any details Joseph?



        • MizGreen on May 26, 2011 at 2:19 pm

          Ah, someone asked the question that concerns many of your readers. Dr. Farrell, I hope you have a security system worthy of the Corleone family. Certainly there are elements that would like your books, your intellect, and your questions to go away. If sending prayers (to whatever Good, Loving force there may be) for your protection might help, I’m sure willing to give it a try, and I’m sure lots of others feel the same. Be safe!



  20. Stig-ove on May 1, 2011 at 12:33 am

    Hello dr Farrell

    Just wanted to ask if you read the book the pyramids by russian Valery Uvarov, His book does at least show some very different ways of thinking, if you compare western and eastern ways of thinking.

    His book is in some cases following your thesis on the purpose of the pyramids as some kind of harmonic resonator. But the main difference is he purports it to be an device to contact what he calls the Neferu or maybe nether(Neter) or gods in plain language.

    So in this case the Pyramid would be an device that lets humans contact the gods or receive information from them at certain times during the year when the astrological matters are in order.
    He also states that some crystals or other gadgets where removed to hide the purpose from the uninitiated.

    Just wanted to hear your thoughts on this and project Camelot has an interview with him for further info if someone is interested.



  21. chris on April 30, 2011 at 6:46 am

    I got my book yesterday and it shore is purty!
    Thanks again mr Farrell for all your hard work and especially your courage to study such important information and propagate it to help the world in some way.
    i cant wait to read this !



  22. Jon on April 27, 2011 at 11:44 pm

    Got my copy and motored through it in one (okay, two) sittings. Great stuff, and as usual, left me wanting more.

    One of the difficult mismatches in life is that something like a book, which takes so many long hours, days, and weeks of toil to create, can be consumed in mere hours and leave one wanting more. Fortunately, since your work is such a mishmash of crazy dismissals and plagiarism, I have to go back and read it again and again…. and then buy more. : )

    (forgive the sarcasm – long day….)



  23. frank on April 27, 2011 at 1:27 pm

    Dear Mr. Farrell,

    That is a totally crazy statement. Tsarion’s
    “agenda,” even if he has one, has nothing to do
    with bolstering the Bible or Christianity. He’s
    one of the most prominent and hard-hitting
    critics of them. You need to read his Atlantis
    Alien Visitation & Genetic Manipulation
    book right away, particularly since practically
    everything you are stating in your latest book
    is a direct second-hand, probably deliberate,
    restatement of his work, as well as that of
    Z. Sitchin and E. V. Daniken. Remove their
    influence and there is barely a unique idea to
    be found in this book of yours…Your crazy
    dismissal of Tsarion makes me think that you
    are familiar with his work alright, and have
    liberally borrowed from it, if not directly
    plagiarized it.



    • Joseph P. Farrell on April 27, 2011 at 2:11 pm

      No I have never used his work at all, and I have listened to him and he does seem to be in my opinion trying to follow some sort of biblical primacy in examination of texts.



  24. Gary on April 25, 2011 at 10:31 pm

    Read the book in 2 days and I find Dr. Farrell’s conclusions remarkably similar to Michael Tsarions writings. A different approach for sure but the thesis is the same.



    • Joseph P. Farrell on April 26, 2011 at 2:08 am

      I must beg to differ. Tsarion’s agenda is to bolster or buttress the Bible in many cases. Mine is not.



      • Gary on April 26, 2011 at 3:15 pm

        First let me say I found you’re book extremely informative and interesting, but I have to respectively disagree with the statement that Michael Tsarion buttress’s up to the bible. In volume two of “The Irish Origins of Civilization” published in 2007, he devotes chapter 2 “The Pagan Origins of the Bible” doing just the opposite. In Volume One I actually thought he did an over kill on exposing the bible and especially the Roman Catholic church.



      • Ramura on May 3, 2011 at 3:30 pm

        Dr. Farrell — I’m afraid that I, too, must respectively disagree with you regarding your characterization of Michael Tsarion’s work as buttressing the bible. Nothing could be further from the truth! In fact, the exact opposite.

        I don’t know what you heard, but it must have been somehow out of context.

        As you and he are two researchers I admire most, I do hope that at some point you will find time to actually read some of Tsarion’s work and realize you may have judged too soon in this regard.



  25. MattB on April 25, 2011 at 1:10 am

    Anti-Christ as a human-elite genetic hybrid/super chaimeara entity?

    Or throw some good old fashioned demon into the mix a.k.a Redfern?

    Possible ‘superman’ created or bred by the ‘unified’ elites or ‘winning’ elites?

    Thoughts any one?



  26. Maiden PEI on April 22, 2011 at 5:11 pm

    Hi Joseph,

    Re: ATOM BOMB WAS NEVER TESTED BEFORE BEING DROPPED
    (radio interview with George Noory Wednesday I think it was)

    Hiroshima & Nagasaki WERE the tests of the atom bomb!

    It is not widely known, but months before the bombs were dropped, the Japanese had offered conditional surrender…BUT…because the bomb wasn’t quite ready yet, the US refused…

    As they wanted to TEST the bomb on a LIVING POPULATION!!!!!!!

    Re: WHERE’S THE TECHNOLOGY of EXTINCT CIVILISATIONS?

    I don’t know who the author is, but on this website, http://www.crawford2000.co.uk/mag.htm, he has an article about the coming Pole Shift & how all synthetic, ie. non-biological, items will disappear as we move from 3D into 4/5D & he reckons this is why there is no evidence of advanced life from before.

    Here is an excerpt:

    About 5 – 6 hours before the actual shift happens, an extraordinary visual phenomenon should take place. The third and fourth dimensions actually begin to interface. Third dimensional consciousness gradually recedes away from us as we approach fourth dimensional consciousness.

    As the third dimensional grid begins to break down, synthetic objects disappear (say goodbye to your brand new Hi Fi & TV !!).

    This is one reason that even though there is a 500 million year history of advanced life on this planet, there is virtually no evidence of it.

    In order to survive a pole-shift, objects must be made purely out of natural materials like the pyramids and the Sphinx-natural materials that are in resonance with the Earth. Even then virtually everything on the planet will be blown away.

    As the synthetic objects begin to disappear, fourth dimensional objects may suddenly emerge. Colours and shapes unlike anything we have ever known will appear on the landscape. (end)

    I don’t know about this, as yes,3D would become invisible to the ‘graduates’ as they move into the higher dimension…but…as the Earth has NOT ascended into 4/5D before, like she IS doing NOW…wouldn’t all the objects just stay the same in 3D to be seen by the next 3D humans?

    Or does all but the pyramids/sphinx/temples etc. get destroyed in the shift?

    Just thought you might be interested in this little nugget.

    Enjoy!

    Maiden PEI
    PEI, Canada



    • Spirit Splice on May 3, 2011 at 8:33 am

      Oh brother



      • Old Cap'n Kent on May 3, 2011 at 9:48 pm

        Spirit Splice, is your above remark of “Oh brother,” something like, Oh brother, you’ve got to be kidding me or something else? With no punctuation marks I can’t feel out your meaning.

        An open invitation to any and all in Farrell Land who can help me navigate this web site, please write. Anyone? Please help. I can’t find my way around. Just chock it up to old age.

        Or if any of you Farrellites would wish to be 21st century pen pals to talk about our favorite author’s books, or just about anything else, please write.

        [email protected]



  27. Kent on April 22, 2011 at 3:43 pm

    Kent just received Genes, Giants, Monsters and Men and says
    he has just too many books piling up. He just started reading
    Richard Dolan’s new book A.D. After Disclosure and Babylon’s
    Banksters showed up in the mailbox four days ago. He set aside
    Giza Death Star Deployed to read The Cosmic War in preparation
    for the GGM&M. What’s a slow reader to do? He’s tried osmosis.



  28. Christine on April 22, 2011 at 1:37 pm

    I JUST GOT MY COPY of GGM&M! its great! thank you Dr. Farrell for writing
    this!

    I never took it in before now, that the Name Ya had turned up outside of
    Hebrew, except for Ebla. Delitzsch refers to its presence in a Babylonian
    cylinder seal.

    In fact, this CONFIRMS rather that refutes the Bible, because: (1) The Bible
    never said or implied, that the revelation to Abraham and Moses was a first
    time only revelation of monotheism. (that sort of thinking is a product of the
    kind of theology of the west, that starts with a concept and ends with a Person.)
    The Bible says, that YHWH was known from the start of creation in general,
    and by the first humans in particular, and gradually people fell away from the
    truth. In Abraham’s time, YHWH was being supplanted left and right by false
    gods and their worship promoters with agendas. YHWH wasn’t some local
    deity gone big time by a series of historical accidents, unknown before
    Abraham and Moses. That picture is refuted by evidence of His Name being
    known anywhere else and before them.

    (2) while the revelations to Abraham and Moses incl. manifestations that
    you could argue are a result of someone manipulating the physical medium
    itself, why should not the Creator of that physical medium itself be able to do
    so?

    the revelation to Abraham and Moses also consistently opposed pagan
    concepts and practices, and (however disobeyed and ignored) promoted
    attitudes and values that worked against elitism at every turn.

    the failure, as some might view it, of The Bible to go into intriguing detail
    about the genetic manipulations and the technology, makes sense as a
    middle ground, between leaving the memory of that part of history behind,
    and giving enough information for mad men to do it again.

    Peace in Christ/Messiah.



    • Spirit Splice on May 3, 2011 at 8:37 am

      Christine, are actually arguing in favor of a murderous and blood thirsty god? And then in the same sentence go on to mention Jesus who is supposed to be about love? I tell ya, the power of self delusion is incredible.



    • Old Cap'n Kent on May 3, 2011 at 9:06 pm

      Christine, GGM&M came as quite a shock for this old 67 year old, life long
      Baptist. I had to set it aside somewhere in Chapter 3 I believe and finish reading Richard Dolan’s AD, After Disclosure, but tonight I’ll pick up GGM&M again.

      I did hear Dr. Farrell on the George Ann Hughes radio program talking about his book and he did give a WARNING that some folks might be just a bit – shocked – is the only word I can quickly come up with. I didn’t find the warning before I began reading.

      Now I’ve got to somehow work out my belief system retaining as much of my life long held belief structure as I can.



  29. JAY on April 21, 2011 at 1:08 pm

    I just received my copy from Amazon about an hour ago. So pretty good delivery time since they shipped on April 16th and I’m over the border in Toronto. I’ve never had a problem with customs but I hear they can be a real hassle.

    This is also great timing since I just listened to Joseph on Coast to Coast last night which was another Classic Show and a teaser to GGMM and the next book The Grid of the Gods.



    • RENEE NELSON on April 21, 2011 at 1:52 pm

      I just got a copy of it in the mail today too, and I don’t even remember ordering it! !



    • Carrie on April 21, 2011 at 7:10 pm

      yeah, i was so busy reading on here last nite as a newbie to the site, that I missed him on Coast2Coast…lol; when i noticed the time it was already too late…ugh!



      • JAY on April 21, 2011 at 8:07 pm

        Hey Carrie(and anyone else) you can download the show if you purchase a membership and the best thing about that is that you can rewind or fast forward and all the commercials are omitted.

        Also, if you become a member on this site you get access to extra documents, videos and video chats. For me, all the extra material on the two websites compliment each other.

        Hope this is of benefit to you.



  30. Norm on April 21, 2011 at 1:01 pm

    UFO Contactee Billy Meier talks all about Genenetic manipulation in earths past of humans, giants & animals in his Contact 251. He said there are still a few giants alive on earth hiding from mankind in isolated places on earth..

    http://www.futureofmankind.co.uk/Billy_Meier/Contact_Report_251



  31. JoJo on April 21, 2011 at 2:01 am

    Received the book today from amazon – one happy camper here! Looks like I’ll be burning the midnight oil – again – with the three cats and gallons of decaf Earl Gray tea.

    Thanks for all your work, Dr. Farrell.



  32. Kathie on April 20, 2011 at 5:49 pm

    Oh, I got my book late yesterday afternoon, stayed up a bit late! JOSEPH IS CON COAST TO COAST TONIGHT 10:00 P.M. PST.

    JOSEPH, I got your Facebook post, but you should post it hear! I hope you can all be there it should be a great program tonight.



  33. lee on April 20, 2011 at 7:30 am

    why the wait fot this book in the UK but not US?



  34. Lawrence on April 15, 2011 at 12:38 pm

    Just received my copy of “Genes Giants, Monsters and Men” in the mail from Feral House!!! Gonna be a great weekend – hunkered down with good coffee, good cigars, and the mind of Dr. Farrell!!
    Thanks Doc!



  35. Christine on April 15, 2011 at 5:43 am

    This might be a bit off topic but I am not sure where else to put this, and I
    assume GGM&M will deal with the diffusion of culture issue.

    Well, I was looking at last Sunday’s paper, and there is the officially
    ugly dog “Icky” and he is either a Chinese Crested or a Peruvian hairless.
    There is also a Mexican breed of the same nature.

    Wouldn’t that point to Chinese or some Asian contact with the New World?

    Not to mention that the Rhodesian Ridgeback is identical to the allegedly
    now extinct Phu Quoc Island Dog, and Zimbabwe allegedly had Ming pottery
    fragments and the Hottentots have a somewhat different kind of African
    hair, tend to be bronze skinned with slanted eyes and the Mongolian spot
    at the bast of the spine….In Ming times, Mongolians would have been put
    in lower class occupations like workers and sailors because the Ming had
    just overthrown the Mongol Yuan Dynasty.



  36. JAY on April 14, 2011 at 3:27 pm

    Yet another update from Amazon. I don’t know what happened but they moved up my arrival date.

    ” Joseph P. Farrell “Genes, Giants, Monsters, and Men: The Surviving Elites of the Cosmic War and Their Hidden Agenda”
    Previous estimated arrival date: May 13 2011 – May 25 2011
    New estimated arrival date: April 25 2011 – April 26 2011″

    Even better.



    • Jon on April 14, 2011 at 10:24 pm

      I just checked my Amazon order and I am now seeing April 21-25 as a delivery date.

      Yay!



  37. JAY on April 13, 2011 at 3:44 pm

    Amazon emailed me this message:

    Hello,…

    …Joseph P. Farrell “Genes, Giants, Monsters, and Men: The Surviving Elites of the Cosmic War and Their Hidden Agenda”
    Estimated arrival date: May 13 2011 – May 25 2011

    Can’t wait for it to arrive!



  38. Kent Brashear on April 12, 2011 at 9:12 pm

    Barns and Noble are shipping Genes, Giants, Monsters and Men on
    April 22, 2011.

    So they have told me. I know it’s jumping ship and not ordering from here
    though.



  39. Christine on April 12, 2011 at 2:14 pm

    I got my copy of LBJ today and IT IS GREAT! the Genes, Giants, Monsters
    and Men book is on order.

    Excellent job, Dr. Farrell!



    • chuck on April 12, 2011 at 6:09 pm

      Amazon just told me May 6-10th!



      • Joseph P. Farrell on April 12, 2011 at 10:08 pm

        That’s absurd….I received my complimentary copies last week



      • Gregory on April 13, 2011 at 3:16 am

        The Kindle edition will be available May 3 on Amazon.



  40. NoGreyAliens on April 9, 2011 at 7:17 pm

    I had the book pre-ordered at Amazon. They just recently sent me an email telling me that they were still trying to acquire it. Just letting you know. I assume it is just now coming out.



    • Kent Brashear on April 12, 2011 at 3:44 pm

      A funny thing happened on my way to Amazon to check out GGMM. In the
      wee hours of this morning I found Genes, Giants, Monsters and Men offered
      on Amazon by one of their booksellers called bordeebook.

      And they said: four new copies for about $13.20 each and one used with some writing along the margins for ONLY: $178,000.09 and no I didn’t stumble on the 0 key. I emailed the doc and fired off some stiff emails to Amazon and the lame bookseller. As if that weren’t enough, I found the same bookseller pricing another book at Amazon for the tidy sum of $221,000.54. The folks at Amazon were just as lamb. They support the booksellers pricing anything they choose. Can you believe it?

      I fought them all day and sometime during the day those astronomical prices vanished. I thought you folks might find some interest in this story. We truly do live in a Fortean world. Capt. Kent



      • Joseph P. Farrell on April 12, 2011 at 10:08 pm

        Yea it’s very weird, someone’s idea of a sick sick joke perhaps



        • Old Cap'n Kent on May 3, 2011 at 8:43 pm

          Sick is what I told Amazon,but it didn’t phase the two telephone customer service reps. I spoke with. I got the name of Amazon’s founder and linked it up with my story of the phony prices and put it on the Internet.

          Not too long after my posting I checked Amazon and the prankster’s prank had been removed. And for you folks who don’t know the story, Bordeebook , a bookseller, was advertising on Amazon.com one used copy of “Genes, Giants, Monsters, and Men” for $178,000.09 before the book was released, even before Dr. Farrell received his copy. And Amazon couldn’t see a problem with it. Good Night Nurse!



    • NoGreyAliens on April 14, 2011 at 8:05 pm

      Amazon update. Just got a new estimated delivery date of April 21.



  41. Thomask on April 9, 2011 at 5:04 am

    This morning amazon told me they hadn’t yet received it and would cancel my order unless I requested otherwise.



  42. MattB on April 1, 2011 at 8:36 pm

    Just ordered it along with Martin Bernal’s response to his critics. I will have to brush up on my cuneiform first haha.



    • Jonothon Boulter on April 2, 2011 at 10:19 am

      Its gone april 1st and the book is not out yet. Has it been delayed?



      • Joseph P. Farrell on April 2, 2011 at 12:31 pm

        I QUITE agree….it transduces something non-local, and in the aether.



        • Kent Brashear on April 12, 2011 at 4:03 pm

          Say again, Doc. Can’t wait for my copy of “Physics for Dummies.”



      • Joseph P. Farrell on April 2, 2011 at 12:31 pm

        THe book IS out but it amazon a while to report it as such… but it is JUST out. I haven’t even received my complimentaries yet so be patient



        • Jonothon Boulter on April 2, 2011 at 2:02 pm

          Cant wait. Can you give some clue to the other 4 books your writing, which will be out this year of the subjects they will be on?



  43. John C.King on April 1, 2011 at 12:21 pm

    I pre-ordered my copy today through the GDS store. I’m looking forward to this one big time!



  44. JAY on March 31, 2011 at 6:37 pm

    I just placed a pre-order with standard shipping from Amazon which is now just hours away from the advertised release date. It’ll have to go through customs since I’m in Toronto. So I’ll report back when it arrives in my mailbox.



  45. Christian de Coninck Lucas on March 24, 2011 at 6:01 am

    I friend of mine in Seattle has worked with a forensic sculptor to recreate the appearance of a South American elongated skull (peruvian if memory serves). It’s quite something…



    • Christine on March 24, 2011 at 11:59 am

      can you get a photo of this scanned and post it somewhere and give
      us a link? http://www.blogspot.com can set you up with a free
      page (you don’t control the ads on it) and you could put a bunch of
      photos and details on this, and send us a link.



      • Christian de Coninck Lucas on March 26, 2011 at 2:37 am

        Not at at this time, no. I’ll ask him when I get the chance.



  46. Dave Walton on March 14, 2011 at 8:41 pm

    Dr. Farrell I would like to recommend a remarkable book to you: The Murder of Reality, the Hidden Symbolism of the Dragon, by Piere Sabak. Sabak’s area of expertise is linguistics and symbolism. He shows that encoded in the very fabric of language itself is the existence of an “alien” race, what the ancients called the “Serpent Race.” He shows that the ancient languages such as Hebrew, Arabic, Sanskrit, Greek, Egyptian etc ALL reveal its existence in remarkable detail. His study helps explain the global “elite’s” fascination with the occult and satanic rituals and sacrifices, which they still do on a massive scale. The essential crux of this book is how these beings have controlled humanity via the manipulation of language, keeping us locked up in a ontological construct. I have read all your books, along with hundreds of others in connection with the New World Order Agenda, and I know for sure this is a book you will want to read. It took Sabak 7 years to research and connect the dots! Sabak is an academic and his book is an example of good scholarship that is sorly lacking with much of “alternative” research. He has even managed to correct some of the misstranslations by the British Museum of Egyptian hiroglyphs, implying that these translations were wrong intentionally.



  47. steven on March 13, 2011 at 5:07 pm

    Dr. Ferrell,

    I just read the first chapter of Genes, Giants, Monters, and men and noticed that the depictions on pages 18 & 19 (King Ashurbanipal Slaying a Lion and Ninurta/Marduk Slaying the Dragon with Thunderbolts) are mislabeled (ie: reversed). I realize the book is already at the printer but thought I would mention it. I loved the first chapter and am anxiously awaiting the book’s printing.



  48. Mike D. on March 9, 2011 at 11:55 am

    I can’t wait for GGMM. I am an avid reader and Joseph Farrell is by far my favorite researcher/author. I first heard of Mr. Farrell in the interveiw Mr. Hoagland did with Project Camelot and have since bought all his books. Keep up the great work Mr. Farell!



  49. Stig-ove on March 8, 2011 at 9:53 am

    Greetings from cold Finland Dr Farrell.

    I just wanted to ask if you and Mr Hoagland are going to publish some fruits of your common labour in the future?

    And since your first book about the Giza Death star you have had me hooked on your books.

    The information in them is just so fantastic that well lets just say the world is not the same after reading them.

    Also even if your books contain some very complex technical information you manage to describe them in an comphrehensible way even to a cook by education like me.

    And as we say in Finland Terve vaan ja anna tulla lisää.(Hello and keep it coming)



  50. Lawrence on March 8, 2011 at 4:54 am

    Joseph, why is the first of the three Giza books the only one not available on Kindle?



  51. mark on March 7, 2011 at 3:38 pm

    I currently have all the Farrell books published to date, and have started a semiduplicate set on my Kindle. Could you suggest the ‘basic’ volumes that started each ‘thread’ of books?

    They’re so intertwined that I kind of don’t know where to begin.



  52. chris on March 6, 2011 at 2:36 pm

    That cover on the feral house site for this book is way cooler than the one that is in the book-store on this site.Or at least was when I saw. I heard you talking about how awesome it was and when I saw that (it had 2 planets) i was like mmm not really. But the real one with the skull IS cool 😀
    Im sure the inside is equal in power. Maaaaybe 😉



  53. Mike M on March 5, 2011 at 11:48 am

    After reading the first chapter GGMM, I can not wait to read the rest. The table of contents leads me to believe the rest will be an awesome thrill ride! I can’t wait to get a copy:-)



    • Jay on March 6, 2011 at 10:51 am

      I agree. I’ve never had to stop reading any of Dr. Farrell’s books after just one chapter. It’s a bit like eating one potato chip, or worse!



  54. Oni Oshun on March 5, 2011 at 10:04 am

    What do you think about the idea of A=444 Hz tuning that Leonard Horowitz (frequent Coast AM guest ) proposes? He says that the Nazis forced the adoption of the musical scale that we currently use in the West (with the note of A as 440 hertz). You, who took a class on music and love classical music so much, must certainly have an opinion, my favorite genius.
    http://web.mac.com/len15/MUSICAL_CULT_CONTROL/Leonard_G._Horowitz.html



    • Christine on March 5, 2011 at 8:56 pm

      INTERESTING! I have bookmarked it.



Help the Community Grow

Please understand a donation is a gift and does not confer membership or license to audiobooks. To become a paid member, visit member registration.

Upcoming Events