User Answers

UPDATE ON HAITI HAARP AND RELATED MATTERS

Some weeks ago I posted some small articles in consideration of the earthquakes in Haiti and Chile, and also joined in the ongoing discussions on Facebook concerning the sudden deaths of birds over Arkansas. The rumor mills were rife at the time with speculations that the strange animal deaths were somehow related to HAARP or HAARP-like technologies being tested or actually used.

While searching for follow-up stories, I ran across this interesting post:

Scalar Wars and HAARP

The poster, Rt Hon. Lord Stirling (of Evansville, Indiana!), notes in the article a surge of HAARP activity immediately prior to and after the Haiti quake. This, of course, is not corroboration that the two are connected. Indeed, to my knowledge there is nothing in the Eastland patents that form the basis of HAARP that suggests a usage such as earthquake generation.

What interests me about the article is that it does propose an interesting methodology: can the Haiti and Chile earthquakes, the various stories of dead animals, and so on, be correlated to HAARP's output, and, for that matter, the output of similar technologies elsewhere, e.g., the "European HAARP"? Can the appearance of strange cross-hatched cloud formations taken by satellites over Australia and elsewhere also be correlated to such output? In other words, can we find such correlations as to diminish the chances we are looking at mere coincidence?

The post also suggests a rudimentary methodology: (1) correlations of HAARP output to anomalous weather patterns/cloud formations, etc (2) correlations of HAARP output to earthquakes, and (3) correlations to animal deaths that otherwise cannot be rationalized. Of course the same would have to be undertaken for the output of Europe's version of HAARP.

Such a study - while being an enormous undertaking - would be intriguing from any number of points of view, not the least of which being that should such correlations be discovered, it would be a way of illustrating the capabilities and uses to which such technologies could be put, and from there, one might be able to "reverse engineer" the basis on which the various modes of deployment were achieved. It's definitely food for thought, and perhaps grist for someone's mill.

14 thoughts on “UPDATE ON HAITI HAARP AND RELATED MATTERS”

  1. Christine's other self

    And how are these HAARP facilities going to stay operational if (more like WHEN) the CMEs from the sun start knocking out the grid? And what if we get hit with another magnetar? Oh space weather is going to make all their tinker toys obsolete if you ask me. Who cares about safety anymore, really. Let’s hope it drives them all underground for years, I’d rather fry up here than have that fate! LOL

  2. all the more reason to be cautious about knocking out part of a bigger
    picture. The Norway and another site when online about the same
    time, and it may be that safe operation requires ALL of them be functional.

    you can always makes something worse.

  3. I’ve read reports of Aricebo being used for the same things, and there are certainly high-powered radars all around the U. S. and Canada which could also be used in a similar mode, perhaps as a large, widely space array.

    Recalling the Pueblo and her sister ship, the Liberty, which were equipped with special dishes supposedly for bouncing signals off the Moon to communicate covertly, I imagine the largest nuclear carriers could muster considerable energy for an antenna array, perhaps hidden in the flight deck.

    As with phased array radar, the antenna might not have to be huge. There have been some interesting advancements in antenna design lately.

  4. I don’t understand why the HAARP facility hasn’t been taken out by laser-guided missile, or from an orbiting space platform using plasma weapons like 9/11, or by ET for that matter, if there is such a thing. We should try and replicate a Crowley/Parsons intentional mind melding as a group, and just fry the damned thing, for the Greater Good of All.Screw-um!

    1. Well if you had a space based platform, like HAARP, it would negate someone engaging in acts of aggression. Don’t think that if there is something like that on the ground, that there is not one floating around in LEO.

    2. first off, anything of crowley/parsons is going to have a contamination
      that will probably do more harm than good. Just who do you think you
      can blame for the damn thing anyway? That very element whose
      current you want to use, is the darling of some of the worst of the
      American element back of 9-11. Didn’t you read about those weird
      mostly thelemic relevant numbers of flights, etc., that figured in all
      this?

      And the devil face in the smoke, recognized by TWO people who
      had experience with conjuring up demons as legitimate.

      Secondly, there are several HAARP like facilities, and taking out one
      just might cause an imbalance that would make a whole lot more
      of what you are trying to stop.

  5. Dr Farrell – you can monitor haarp’s activities right here:

    http://www.haarp.alaska.edu/haarp/data.html

    Would be interesting to correlate haarp activity with news articles relating to such. I wonder what this thing read a few months ago when all those animals were mysteriously dying…

    Also, its worth noting that there are at least 2 facilities like haarp in alaska, and probably others scattered around the country. We already know russia and other nations have ionospheric heaters like haarp.

  6. “to my knowledge there is nothing in the Eastland patents that form the basis of HAARP that suggests a usage such as earthquake generation.”
    What I heard on this (and it may be true or complete hokum) was that it was able to super-heat large amounts of subterranean water, which might induce an earthquake.
    Of course, what’s being used in Gakona (or elsewhere) might be more enhanced than the patent would describe. A study on this would be welcome, but it would almost certainly have to be self-financed since I seriously doubt the govt would pay to have their potential crimes aired out. The other minus point is the fact that the efficacy of the study might be directly correlated to loss of computer data/internet access, personal harassment or death. So, anonymity or balls of steel would be a pre-requisite.

  7. and maybe the environmentalist movement could be gotten
    into the act, to try to shut HAARP and co. down, or at
    least put severe limits on its activity.

    1. Torsion fields and these waves or scalar waves could be haarp as also with what Mr tesla had perfected back in the late 1800`s and early 1900`s and then taken out of sight and used in black project explains every problem the earth has or is having done to it.. go look out side when the plains fly over on a blue clear day and watch as the chemical trails fan out and you can see the wave lengths and patters in the man made clouds…using this you can calculate the frequency and the power or ie strength or wattage in the aptitude or depth of the wave sign …. using the sky as a cheap oscilloscope you can us a compass and a protractor and a calculator and a ruler for measuring to adjust to scale……great site MR Farrell….also didnt hurt that most of this technology was brought over from Germany as per paper clip as you speak of…….die Wahrheit wird immer in der einfachen Seite verborgen……

Comments are closed.