I found this very interesting article on the Japan quake, putting to rest a mistaken idea that I myself actually accepted when the first news broke, that the epicenter was not along any fault; it seems that it was along the junction of three such faults, and the article indicates that perhaps a fourth tectonic plate was involved. Notably, the article mentions that the scientific community is somewhat at a loss to explain this simultaneous slippage, and that means, of course, that the door is open a bit wider to the artificial induction hypothesis. Japan Quake Epicenter Was in Unexpected Location

Posted in

Joseph P. Farrell

Joseph P. Farrell has a doctorate in patristics from the University of Oxford, and pursues research in physics, alternative history and science, and "strange stuff". His book The Giza DeathStar, for which the Giza Community is named, was published in the spring of 2002, and was his first venture into "alternative history and science".


  1. Robert Totten on June 15, 2011 at 6:25 am

    Apparently no one in the official world wants any accurate information getting out to the public. We know darned good and well that they have instruments strung around on this earth and in space to monitor all sorts of issues such as radioactivity, EQ’s, ground and sea levels, ground and air temperatures–nearly anything that can be monitored is being. However if the public gets hold of enough accurate information they have gotten good at adding 2+2 and getting a reasonably accurate 4. Concerning Fukashima– they (some anyway) have admitted to inaccurate measuring and to modifying results to avoid panicking the populace–Japan”s and the World’s. As time goes by this simply becomes more evident from the evidence gathered worldwide. I can kinda understand Japan’s lying to their own citizens–but American authorities lying to US? Now if I hear a report of Clear and Sunny skys– I automatically reach for an umbrella and check the storm shelter!

  2. Karusselle on June 11, 2011 at 2:13 am

    Hello Joseph

    concerning Fukushima being an A-bomb sabotage act.
    I stumbled across this interesting webpage from freelanc journalist Jim Stone:

    http://www.jimstonefreelance.com/fukushima.html (with pictures)

    I don not have the knowledge to check its accuracy. Is it substantiated?

    Greetings from Switzerland

  3. Wil on May 18, 2011 at 1:52 pm

    Dear Joseph,

    Have you already seen this? :O

    Local Atmosphere Heated Rapidly Before Japan Quake




    Heating of the atmosphere/ionosphere.. I have been a bit ambivalent to the factor of technology in [the creation of] events like this, but this sounds rather familiar..

    As one of the comments in the first link mentions:

    “Others are engaging even in an eco-type of terrorism whereby they can alter the climate, set off earthquakes, volcanoes remotely through the use of electromagnetic waves. So there are plenty of ingenious minds out there that are at work finding ways in which they can wreak terror upon other nations. It’s real, and that’s the reason why we have to intensify our efforts, and that’s why this is so important. ” – Former Secretary of Defense William Cohen – April 28th, 1997


  4. Christine on April 17, 2011 at 6:34 pm


    unexpurgated version of Joe Brandt’s vision in 1937, which he told
    in mid 1960s, and incl. that Japan goes into the sea (and volcano
    goes off in Venezuela and/or Columbia) about three months before
    California coast is destroyed on a sunny day in what felt to him like
    early spring, when someone with bigger ears than Roosevelt had
    is president, begins 3:50 pm and disaster is finished by 4.29 pm.
    a geologist considered it a credible scenario.

  5. Nancy on April 17, 2011 at 4:14 pm

    Someone just sent me a U-Tube that shows various government sites showing that the north part of Japan is sinking — is that true or are the monitors on the video set up to look like that by government officials – also showed there have been over 900 earthquakes spreading out from that area. And, what about the call for evacuation of the island…someone my family knows is in touch with an old friend from there and the whole island is to tape their windows closed, not breathe the air or drink the water and get to another country if possible. Interesting – what is real?

    • LloydDobbler2 on April 21, 2011 at 8:43 am

      Here is the info from the European Space Agency showing the slippage into the sea. This is as real as youre going to get, as we all know that anyone can lie….but you have to start somewhere.


  6. kevin on April 17, 2011 at 7:35 am

    hi all. my instinct tells me that this was a man made tsunami. i believe a nuke (at least one) was set off near the northeast coast of japan. this was done for more than one reason, which i do not have the time to go into. i know a person that lives in tokyo and has a geiger counter and the backround radiation levels are quite normal, which means that the nuclear power plants were sabataged and are not spewing near the radiation that we are being told. always keep in mind that these sick puppies rely on fear to feed their appetite. please do not be fearfull of radiation coming from japan. if we see climbing radiation levels here in the usa, it will be coming from these sick bastards chemtrail planes. these psycopaths know that they are losing as people begin to awaken and they are pulling out all the stops. do not be afraid…be happy and proud as we know that they are on their way out. peace and love to you all.

  7. Jon on April 16, 2011 at 9:52 pm

    That map is not accurate. I checked this site:


    and the Japan Trench is about twice as far out to sea as shown in the Wired article. Also, the following site:


    shows a very different arrangement of the plates the article describes, with the junction of the 4 plates being below Tokyo, not anywhere near the northern part of the island.

    Wired is not always an accurate source of information, although Wikipedia has its problems as well.

    Are we seeing more spin?

  8. Christine on April 16, 2011 at 8:25 pm

    “Notably, the article mentions that the scientific community is somewhat at a loss to explain this simultaneous slippage, ”

    hellooooo, crustal displacement beginning?

    • Bill on April 17, 2011 at 11:28 am

      Shades of Charles H. Hapgood’s “Earth’s Shifting Crust?!”

Help the Community Grow

Please understand a donation is a gift and does not confer membership or license to audiobooks. To become a paid member, visit member registration.

Upcoming Events