As you can gather, we're not done with the Japanese bearer bond scandal, as there are some remaining miscellaneous things that we must consider.

As has been noted in previous posts, at least ten of the bearer bonds recovered by the Guardia di Finanza were so-called "Kennedy bearer bonds" denominated in the unheard of amount of $1,000,000,000. In searching for pictures of the header and obverse of these $1 billion bearer bonds, I found this:

Now, on the surface of it, this looks entirely faked. Before we consider this image, let's compare it to an image of a legitimate $500,000,000 US Treasury bearer bond:

Now let's compare. (1) Note first that the legitimate bond on the bottom has the clear read seal of the United States Treasury clearly stamped on the obverse of the header, with the coupons clearly visible beneath the note; (2) this seal is clearly missing from the "bond" on top, lending credence to the publicly stated evaluations of these bonds as plain counterfeits.

But let us consider once again the implication of the view that the "bond" on top is a counterfeit. First, why would anyone issue such a counterfeit bond, with no evident connection to or seal of the US Treasury on the bond itself thus only drawing attention to its potential counterfeit nature? Second, why would anyone issue a counterfeit bond for such an extremely high amount of money, an amount virtually guaranteeing that any potential purchaser would immediately seek to verify the bond?

I submit that there is a message being sent by this bond, and it is a message that works regardless if one views this strange securities instrument as legitimate or faked, for note the reverse of the bond: we have a clear image of the Moon, a clear image of the space shuttle lifting off, and on the obverse, the image of President John F. Kennedy, and a read seal of some sort. Consider then the imagery and the message being sent here. A read seal of the US treasury only appears on American currency notes - United States Notes - issued directly and debt-free by the US Government. Kennedy was the last president to order the issuance of such money. He was also, of course, the president that set the goal of American space exploration in the 1960s with his designation of the Moon as the target for manned landings before the 1960s had closed.

So to my mind, there is another message being sent in the bearer bonds episode, and that is, it has something to do with space. The important question here is: why would a bond-smuggling operation, whether or not the bonds were real or counterfeit, be smuggling such instruments, and my conclusion is, that we may be looking at a part of the funding mechanism for a vast covert space program, with the "collateral" clearly imaged on the reverse of the bond header itself: space, and whatever might be found out there. Hence, the use of a red seal - connoting a debt-free money - might be significant. We might, in short, be looking at a funding mechanism for covert space activities and programs, and hence, be looking at a very real bond, with, quite literally, the Moon as collateral. We might, so to speak, even be looking at a hidden funding mechanism for Mr. Richard Dolan's idea of a "breakaway civilization." If so, that would account for the virtually total absence of news coverage of the story in American media and its virtual disappearance as a story in the rest of the world's media. If this admittedly wild and radical, not to mention completely speculative scenario is at all true, it may be the hidden reason why the USA has not publicly gone back to the Moon, and why other nations are so intent on getting there.

All this now places the Japanese political context once again in a peculiar perspective, for recently the Japanese Space Agency, JAXA, began releasing images of the Moon, including these stunning images in 2007:

Japanese HDTV Moon Images

Consider only this strange photo taken by India's Chandrayaan lunar probe:

We can easily imagine that the High definition tv images that Japan's mission gathered were equally impressive.

Which brings us to a second strange miscellaneous anomaly. (To be continued)

Joseph P. Farrell

Joseph P. Farrell has a doctorate in patristics from the University of Oxford, and pursues research in physics, alternative history and science, and "strange stuff". His book The Giza DeathStar, for which the Giza Community is named, was published in the spring of 2002, and was his first venture into "alternative history and science".


  1. ken on April 29, 2011 at 3:51 pm

    Weidner’s premise of the Martian Arians being the real “bad guys” above/behind the most nefarious PTB/illuminati of this planet assumes that they escaped Maris in their last catastrophe to hid out here on Earth for past few millennia basically re-engineering/rebuilding everything technologically, economically and socially in preparation for now, when they are “getting of out Dodge” back to Mars, escaping, just in time, the next catastrophe on Earth (a la 2012) etc.

    Weidner has stated that these Martian overlords somehow “cheated” their karmic destiny of getting wiped out with everyone else the last time around and are manipulating all the rest of us for their own advantage. this is working from some basic assumption that civilizations are destined to be destroyed in periodic cosmic cycles of planetary reboot (be it Mars, Terra, whatever) and if they somehow survived intact and took refuge that somehow it is cheating “God’s” plan, inherently “bad joss” or “sticky wicket” in the cosmic game plan…

    regardless if they helped the Nazi’s, Freemasons, Illuminati, whom are generally associated with being on the dark side, i think any society or civilization is OK with basic existential karma/dharma in trying to survive a planet shaking catastrophe…

    so even if our Martian cousins have fixed the game over the last few thousands of years, getting the dynamically self-motivated, greedy hybrid homo sapiens’ elite to do their bidding and now allegedly split, leaving the rest of us behind to face this or that doom, so to speak, that is their nature and prerogative.

    at any rate, what kind of life has it been for them all this time, going from post-catastrophe Mars living underground, to thousands of years here underground (literally, vampires, avoiding light of day), to escaping now back to Mars to again live underground?…. some life!

    if our unit consciousness, atma, soul, whatever does survive past one incarnation, there is no limitation, to which sort of body/time/civilization/galaxy we are destined to return. all societies then, native or alien, are made of up a rich variety of evolving souls, each with their own individual destiny, so there are good guys and bad guys intermixed no matter, where or who we are currently appearing to be.

    yeah, the Nazi’s pulled off some real bad stuff, but, as JPF has duly chronicled, they also thought outside of the box and have shown those of us with eyes and ears to understand, that, with disciplined focus, a group, nation, or society can go overcome their past, break the imposed shackles of the status quo PTB of the time, and shake things up…. the challenge for us is to learn and apply the positive beneficial features they managed to pull off along the way without succumbing to dogma, treachery and exploitation…

    i am drawn to the last sentence in Joseph’s recent tome: Babylon’s Banksters, in reference to the eons suffered under the banksters and their minions’ closed system(s):

    “It is high time to have done with them.”

    for that we will need a conscious, refined technology, morality and unity of purpose employed on a global (to start with) scale with local utility and relevance. let us learn by historical examples of what works and what doesn’t and not repeat the grievous errors of our for-bearers — even if we have to form a fifth column amidst the black ops and getting-away Martians. this is our challenge to achieve real “humanity” by establishing and sustaining a universal progressive and morally open system on all levels.


    • Duncan Phelps on April 29, 2011 at 6:53 pm

      You have some good ideas here. However, what if, as is usual, that everything being dualistic by nature there is a good side and bad side of every faction? In my 2009 book, ‘ENSLAVEMENT 2011?’ I write about a “breakaway civilization” termed ‘The Black Ops World.’ Now, here again, don’t get snared by labeling Them as “bad guys” for everything has some bad aspects contained within. In order to advance, said “Black World” had to separate themselves from a debt-based economy/System. Jump forward a few decades and you have a secret space program based on what the Germans began with help from former beings which lived on Earth in an ancient age. And here is a scary thought: these ancient ones look just like us (the Nordics)!
      So before, you grab a gun and start shooting, as the banksters want—as money and control can be had by some in war, think: you may be shooting at your great-great-etc-grand daddy!

      Great direction Joseph. This is going to get REALLY good! It may even start a chain-reaction that brings about The necessary ‘Change,’ so many of us can survive 2012 as ‘Graduates!’

      Duncan Phelps, gov’nor 51st e-state (state-of-being/mind/reality: each [of us has] an estate [thanks to Trust Law] to claim, with which we may govern of our own self [“outside” The System], if we are responsible and keen!)

  2. MK on April 29, 2011 at 1:33 pm

    Dear Mr. Farrell,

    You might want to take a look at the transcripts from the radio shows of Dr. Peter Beter. He was an international business attorney and member of the Kennedy cabinet. I am quite sure that you will find what he has to say intriguing to say the least.


    • Joseph P. Farrell on April 29, 2011 at 1:37 pm

      Got a couple of links?

      • Ramura on April 29, 2011 at 6:31 pm

        Here’s a link to the index of Dr. Beter’s audio letters, with enough description to determine what is in each audio:


        But I would love it if MK (comment above) would provide links to the SPECIFIC transcripts or audios he has in mind. Otherwise, one could spend YEARS researching Beter’s information….

        Hope this helps!

  3. Old Cap'n Kent on April 28, 2011 at 11:13 pm

    Buy a piece of history: Get your authorized Kennedy Commemorative One Billion Dollar Bond beautifully crafted on fine 100% recycled paper from Money World for the astonishingly low introductory price of only $19.95. But wait! Order within the next 20 minutes and receive absolutely free a second Kennedy Bond to share with a loved one. Call 1-800-555-5555. Offer not available where prohibited.

    Now that I’ve had my fun let me say this. After studying the photos under 4X
    magnification for at least an hour, I see just too many flaws to believe the bond is real. Of course I am viewing what probably is a copy of a copy downloaded from the internet and then viewed on my computer monitor which would make any photo less than desirable.

    Just a few notes: The picture of Kennedy is sloppy, note the three vertical lines running down his lower lip into his chin where the three are joined by a fourth. The red “seal” on the front is encircled by what could be two words, Money World. Kennedy’s name is not under his picture which (or that for the doc) is customary on U.S. currency. And one more before I turn out the lights and go to bed, on the back I read God Bless A-something. Wouldn’t we have written In God We Trust?

    Oh, and what’s that thing on the lower right corner of the back side?

  4. Jon on April 28, 2011 at 9:08 pm

    Even if one accepts that NASA debunked Hoagland’s Mars Face idea (which they didn’t), there are still the dozens of other artifacts on Mars which clearly defy the “standard view,” not to mention the intricate mathematical information discovered in the orientation and relationships of the various artifacts.

    The Kennedy bonds certainly look fake, but I think you have hit on something with your interpretation. The elites are very fond of secret (and not so secret) messages hidden in plain sight. Whether these are real or fake, you are correct in how very strange this is.

    As an odd, though possibly timely bit of memory, I recently saw a program about the Madoff scandal, and it struck me that he broke the story himself, announcing to people on December 11 (!) of the year he was busted that his investment group was a ponzi scheme.

    This also made me wonder – after having skimmed 50 billion dollars over 40 years, why did he suddenly announce it was a scam? He could have easily fled the country, faked his death, or done a number of other things to escape justice. Why turn himself in? Also, who is he protecting? There had to be others, particularly in the SEC, helping him shield his scam.

    Lots of funny business with money. I smell Bankster……..

    • Mike M on April 28, 2011 at 10:24 pm

      I asume he was the low man on the totem pole, Maddoff that is, and if that’s true there are some whales out there, ones that would make moby dick look pueney

  5. Kathie on April 28, 2011 at 6:10 pm

    My take after studying the images a bit is that it purports to say this is financing mankind’s journey off planet to the moon, and the earth is going to be destroyed (the image on the far right appears to depict destruction of several things, possibly a bridge and tower (!); the sphere appears to represent in my view the new planet or death star or rebirth of earth. Life after earth, the new physics being financed. I wish I could see the image better I can’t make out the dates or the signatures, sigh 🙂

  6. jameske on April 28, 2011 at 2:54 pm

    The problem with photos like that one is that they can very easily be tricks of light and shadow. The enigmatic photos of Cydonia, and Hoagland’s original analysis of them turned out on closer inspection, after new data, to be nothing like the original hypothesized forms. The Face was not a face, even though earlier images certainly evoked the likeness of a face. The Fort was not a fort, and the D&M pyramid though still interesting in form, was clearly different from the hypothesized shape put forward in his book.

    Regarding Hoagland’s Lunar data, again they were enigmatic photos and worth pursuing, as with the Cydonia images. However, I went through the Apollo catalogue of images and found an example of what looked to be the rebar he theorized, except it was between the camera and an Apollo astronaut, so it could be an issue of camera artifactuals rather than anything of intelligent design and construction. And so, the example of the rainbow colour also could be the result of a camera scratch rather than something above the moon at great distance.

    The Shard, however, looks to be real, as do the Zond images. Though one wonders if the Shard is a captured photo of a lunar out-gassing. One of the Zond images compares favourably with images of out-gassings on Io. And the fact that these phenomena disappear may be more to do with them being out-gassings and thus temporary, rather than to being the loss of illumination of lunar ruins due to changed aspect of the camera.

    Of course, one should never rule these things out a priori, but after closer inspection, much more convincing evidence would have to be required to come to the conclusion of lunar ruins.

    • Jay on April 28, 2011 at 8:44 pm

      Doesn’t sound like you’ve read much Hoagland nor those who back him up particularly on the Mars Face.

      No, later data did not prove the Face is a trick of light and shadow.

      In trying to debunk those like Hoagland, the European Space Agency even went so far as to do a wonderful 3D full color image of the Face, the Europeans then claimed that it didn’t look like a face, except it looked exactly like an upside down face with a crown on the forehead–really they lied for all to see.

      • jameske on April 29, 2011 at 1:05 am

        I have both his books and his Mars and Moon video presentations and actually went to one of his presentations about 15 years ago where he did a talk about the Lunar data and also provided images and film not published in his works. Also have read the McDaniel analyses etc… and have kept fairly up to date on that stuff. There was nothing intrinsically wrong with the Martian hypothesis, based on what images were available all those years ago when it started. The logic was sound, and certainly the rationale was reasonable, if perhaps outlandish due to inherent biases that existed.

        If you see the Face on Mars as an eroded Face then that is your opinion I guess, but for me it was Jerry built if it is, whether they are breakaway Nazis or not (see what I did there?). The original image was much more strongly face-like than the subsequent images of later missions. The Fort, if you have his original book Monuments of Mars, is nothing like what he hypothesized at all, and the D&M pyramid has a very different symmetry to the original one he proposed. This is proof positive that the original images that inspired the investigation in the first place were, at least in the case of the aforementioned objects, wholly or in part, tricks of light and shadow, because they did trick Richard into putting forward designs that turned out to be wrong. Though the D&M certainly still has interesting structure but is quite different from the five-sided object Richard put forward in his original book. The Fort is nothing at all, no central courtyard or anything of that ilk. The Face, really, does not look like a face anymore either.

        Anyway, the point is, lunar photos too can be, wholly or in part, tricks of light and shadow also, if the ones on Mars can be. Much more evidence is required. One never rules out completely a hypothesis, however, the Martian ruins are definitely a fading hypothesis, and it is quite possible the Lunar hypothesis will go the same way. I am not going to rule out absolutely the possibility of ruins there, but there needs to be much better photos of the stuff that he says is there, especially since there are other more natural explanations. One of the Zond images that he says is a ruined lunar dome looks in structure very like the out-gassings that occur on the Jupiter satellite, Io. The Shard is the best image he has, it certainly looks real, but is it also an out-gassing? His theory arose out of the back-drop of the notion of a smooth and undulating moon surface, eroded over millions of years by a meteoric rain that would prevent slim towers of material miles high from existing. So, the Shard image is certainly interesting. as was the Castle and the others. But, in the Apollo images there is an example of that rebar captured between Astronaut and camera which indicates it can certainly be artifactual, and there are other images in which the supposed material is not there – which either indicates that the Castle was added to a version of the photo and is a fake, or it was hidden in other versions of the photo by conspiratorial forces, or it was simply a bad photo that was processed again, and so could be crud after all.

        So, does it sound like I have read much Hoagland now?

        • Jay on April 29, 2011 at 6:30 am

          I specifically did not comment on Hoagland’s lunar claims.

          And no, it doesn’t sound like you’ve read much Hoagland. The Face is very clearly still a face and built by somebodies. Remember Hoagland maintains a website with papers too.

  7. MQ on April 28, 2011 at 2:39 pm

    Note that the top bond is labeled “Commemorative One Billion”–weird verbiage. Weird in general! Ah, this whole fish is starting to stink more and more.

  8. carlee on April 28, 2011 at 2:25 pm

    The photo is of the space shuttle. The shuttle program started in 1981 am I missing something here? If the bonds were issued in the 60’s and the shuttle program started in the 80’s???????

  9. Kathie on April 28, 2011 at 12:48 pm

    Well I am delighted to see this. Joseph this was what I thought bought two mites ago but did not know if airplane meant space shuttle. Bravo just Bravo. I was listening last night to all three Sessions with GeorgeAnn on Roswell and third Reich and I was also looking into off book financing and thinking how absolutely valuable your books and research are toward the quest for truth. Thank you.

  10. Father Krespi on April 28, 2011 at 11:02 am

    Interesting. Truth is definitely stranger than fiction. Just think, there is a guy named Danny Clinton walking this planet who’s father was a US President and his mother was an African-American Arkansas crack whore.

    Anything is possible.

    • Jay on April 28, 2011 at 12:11 pm

      Don’t think that story is strange, may not be true either.

      Now, Father Crespi did have some strange artifacts.

  11. m on April 28, 2011 at 10:12 am

    So as for the triangle in the left of the Japanese pictures, it could resemble an illuminati symbol maybe the all seeing eye in a pyramid. ??
    Just a thought………

  12. chuck on April 28, 2011 at 8:22 am

    Is “MONEM” Arabic for…service of the Most Benefactor or Grantor? I like the red serial numbers that start AP11….Apollo Eleven, I also notice what looks to be THE STAR OF DAVID behind the 1’s in the corners!

    • chuck on April 28, 2011 at 8:26 am

      Would that be something if we faked the landings just to turn around and sell the moon!!!

  13. Mike M on April 28, 2011 at 8:14 am

    I am a little confused by the last set of images in the article, are we to be looking at the triangular shape in the lower left hand corner? If so what is the significance of it?

    • MQ on April 28, 2011 at 2:37 pm

      Sort of like the eye in the pyramid on the back of the $ bill.

  14. James on April 28, 2011 at 7:53 am

    If I see the printing correctly, there is Monem World…..
    Perhaps the “Source” of Debt free money…….. ah, there be a clue.
    This is interesting.

  15. Jay on April 28, 2011 at 6:45 am

    Good idea about the message, but what is the message?

    Why would a break away civilization need to issue debt to raise standard currencies? That civilization ought to have many other ways of raising money to spend for earthly things.

    • Mike M on April 28, 2011 at 7:32 am

      All types of organizations need start up capital, so at some point you need to fish for investors.

      • Jay on April 28, 2011 at 8:22 am

        “Start up”, when? 1960? 1945? 1920? 1890?

        All perfectly valid dates for a so called break away civilzation.

        No, the message seems to be that standard debt is unnecessary–but that comes from more than a simple tweak to a bond form.

  16. Patrick on April 28, 2011 at 5:24 am

    Oh this isn’t a strange idea, in fact lets back it up with some more info…


    I can’t read all of this again (its long) but Weidner does an excellent job of pointing out inconsistencies in the moon images. We went sure, just not the way we think.

    Weidner also has a deconstruction of the Movie the Shining where he thinks Kubrick was trying to tell us about the faked landing through clever occult references (the son wearing an Apollo rocket sweater and standing up aka blasting off)…

    Add to this, Bob Dean did a presentation about those missing NASA photos…you know, the ones where they claimed to ERASE all of the Apollo pictures…well Dean claims a Japanese company actually bought the negatives to all of them and NASA basically forgot about it and Dean showed three slides that purport massive object in space moving as our lunar rockets moved through space.

    Search those out and it will add to this. It seems there is a elite fight going on for the last 1.5 years (well more publically) and its starting to reach an apex. Paul what’s your take on the Pentagon/CIA shakeup?

    • bdw on April 28, 2011 at 3:28 pm

      I was convinced by Weidner’s take on the moon landings: IF he is corrrect (I repeat, “if”), then much of what Hoagland writes will turn out to be meaningless.

      My only complaint with Weidner is that, after demonstrating all the hollywood tricks to be found in NASA moon footage, he says that “we went to the moon,” just using UFO technology, but does not explain HOW he knows that, and why so much faking was done if they really did go to the moon, by whatever means. Still, Weidner is required reading, just like Farrell.

      • Patrick on April 29, 2011 at 5:32 am

        I thin Weidner makes the leap untuitively…I must say there is a boundary where logic stops making sense. I’m sure you’ve found your own version of it…digging into this stuff for so long you start to see the two sides of the coin but it still takes leaps at times to connect them.

        Bringing in Montauk and Project Looking Glass and a few others seems to fill in how we’ve gone there. Its is beyond curious to me that we’ve never gone back. More so since only a few dozen people have ever seen it with their own two eyes (officially) and they dont like to talk. I was floored reading about the astronauts who did walk on the moon and how they saw orderly lines yet didnt take pictures and didnt really want to talk about it. I’m sure you’ve seen all the buzz, BUZZ has been generating lately with his own disclosures.

Help the Community Grow

Please understand a donation is a gift and does not confer membership or license to audiobooks. To become a paid member, visit member registration.

Upcoming Events