Cosmic Warfare

DARPA, NASA, AND THE BREAKAWAY CIVILIZATION

One of the readers of this website sent me an interesting article that appeared in The Register in the United Kingdom, and I link it here because as readers of some of the papers in the members' only area will already know of my interest in ufo researcher and scholar Richard M. Dolan's idea of a "breakaway civilization," i.e., the idea that the pursuit of advanced and exotic propulsion and aerospace technologies has led, quite literally, to an underground hidden civilization utilizing these technologies to constitute a whole new society that has broken away from the rest of humanity.

DARPA, NASA to Spawn Starship Enterprise

What is most interesting about this article is not so much the idea that the USA wants to build a ship capable of reaching the stars and turning humanity into a genuinely space-faring race. After all, as I pointed out in one of the members' only white papers, there are abundant statements from those involved in American black projects that suggest not only that such technologies were under development, but also that the science behind them was an off-the-books physics that was different, in some respects, from the publicly known physics.

Rather, what is of interest here is the notion that the funding mechanism was to be utterly free of government oversight, a proposition I have explored much more fully in members' only papers, and that I have suggested in my speculations on the meaning behind the Japanese bearer bond scandal. And now, this article appears, somewhat "corroborating" that independent funding mechanisms are being deliberately sought by DARPA (The Defense Advance Projects Research Agency) and NASA, to do precisely that.

Again, I must be honest with my readers here, and state that when I read this article, the needle on my "suspicion meter" went into the red zone, for such revelations or messages only seem to come out after the practical steps have long been in place, suggesting that the actual organization and funding mechanism have been in place for quite some time, and is not, as the article suggests, a sudden and recent flash of inspiration in the minds of DARPA and NASA planners. Consider only the implications of the idea that this funding mechanism is to be a private entity, for in short we are being told - albeit subtly - that such technologies are best left in the hands of some private corporate elite.

But wait a minute.... isn't this exactly what has already been the case in American black projects, or, for that matter, in the Nazi International (if one accepts my hypothesis of the existence and research interests of such an organization)? What is truly frightening about this article is the obvious: even in American black projects as currently constituted, there is still some measure of connection to the American government and therefore to the American people, for ultimately, the source of funding for these projects come from them. Whereas, in the case of a hypothesized organization such as the Nazi International (or any similar such group), the funding mechanism ultimately has no connection to governments at all. Indeed, I believe one of the principal reasons that the Ronald Richter fusion project in Juan Peron's Argentina was shut down, was to remove all vestiges of outside influence over postwar Nazi research.

What I am suggesting, in other words, is that with this article, we are being told about conclusions and steps that were reached within the American black projects community years ago, namely, if it was to compete with such an opposing independent entity, it too had to become more or less independent from the very government that was sponsoring its projects. This has even been suggested in a number of UFO-Majic-12 documents whose authenticity is disputed, particularly in those documents associated with the so-called Cooper-Cantwheel set. But now we need not bother with issues of authencity: the idea is now being floated publicly.

This isn't therefore, a news item or an article in the proper sense. It's a message.

13 thoughts on “DARPA, NASA, AND THE BREAKAWAY CIVILIZATION”

  1. Tim Fonseca THE FONSECA

    Some fun questions for Joseph P. Farrell…

    Who ran the Village in the 1960s British TV series, “The Prisoner”?

    Irwin Allen’s 1960s American TV series, “The Time Tunnel”, is now over 40 years old.
    The Time Tunnel project, in the series, was ultra-top secret.
    The Time Tunnel center was hidden somewhere beneath the American Southwest deserts, with a live-n community of 20 thousand scientists and technicians.
    Just another campy Irwin Allen production or…….

  2. I see that the US gov has copyrighted the terms “100 Year Starship” and “100YSS” or own them anyway.

    Darpa have a page which I think the news item may have come from originally:

    http://www.darpa.mil/NewsEvents/Releases/2011/2011/05/05_DARPA_Releases_Request_for_Information_for_the_100_Year_Starship_Study.aspx

    And they even have an email address at which you can send them submissions:

    100YSS@darpa.mil

    I never thought that the entire future of the human race might actually hang on a email address like that lol.

    And the DARPA page leads you to this page where you can download a 3 page pdf about the study.

    And also a link to a website: http://www.100yearstarshipstudy.com

    Maybe some of this will help answering some questions people have about it.

    I’m certainly going to check the http://www.100yearstarshipstudy.com/ website and see where that leads me. You never know what you will find unless you dig lol.

    Best wishes

    Harvey Price, Chch, NZ

    1. Dark conspiracy theory (read: too much x-files)
      DARPA put this site up to get information, so that they can find out who has the best ideas on non oil based technology in space, so they can keep it for themselves, make the inventors disappear, and then keep the inventions or technology secret.

      bad movie plot i know. its just what popped in my head reading their site. not saying i believe it- just speculating

  3. I do remember a episode of UFO Files that mention that the military airel-space techonogy was sixty years ahead and quess what they showed to prove this statement but a good old ufo speeding up into the sky with the Global Explorer they said that the submarine they were salvaging broke up I wonder about that they would to have tested it before the salvage attemp I don’t think they were that dumb not test the Global Explorer first before using it. By the way what was the date of that The Register that carried that story I get that every day I don’t know how I missed that story.

  4. Majestic Documents verification project. The Majestic Document item in the lft menu bar will open a menu that allows you to view the documents. The Cooper/Cantwheel (Cantwell) documents can be found under the “Documents Dated 1970-Present” option.

    http://www.majesticdocuments.com/

  5. This kind of funding has been in place since at least the 1930s in some areas, such as airplane development. Howard Hughes bankrolled projects like the Glomar Explorer, a ship supposedly (publicly) developed for deep sea research, while really being created to capture downed Russian subs. I think a lot of black project structure came from the Hughes arena, heavily influenced by the Nazis.

    In the old days, vendors like Lockheed would develop planes, then try and sell them to the government. Now it is vastly different, with vendors being deeply tied to government agencies like DARPA and the DOD. SAIC is a very interesting entity in this regard, as is Bechtel.

  6. I’d like to open up a discussion regarding the ethics of “black projects”. For instance, if I were an independent scientist doing experiments with time travel or other technologies in my basement or garage, funded by myself with my hard earned cash or from private donations and I successfully created a fully operational devise or system or technology that would allow me to time travel but I preferred to keep my inventions to myself or my small group of supporters would this be considered a “black project” and is it morally wrong? Where do the morals apply? Would it be different if I was designing a new hair dryer or a time machine. Is more value attached to the higher technology. Would this also apply to a private company who received no taxpayer funding. I can see people setting their hair on fire when we hear of large corporations getting huge taxpayer funded R&D grants and keeping all their findings under wraps or only to be used for military purposes. Why do we put so much weight on government disclosure of new technologies or ET’s? If we know it exists why do we desperately need mommy and daddy to tell us it is so? Is it a question of sharing the information? I can kind of understand the concept of “breakaways” whether it be a civilization, a cabal or an independent scientist whose only goal is to pursue an idea just to see if it can be done. Large governments are frustrating, cumbersome and chaotic and can be creatively stifling. It seems the control grid is getting tighter and tighter every day. Just asking. Any thoughts?

    1. just wanna say, very good questions. i would like some answers too . i think ethics only matter when you are using your invention to benefit only yourself or small group, however this is also human nature to a certain point…

  7. They’re (TPTB/W) getting out in front of the story that is becoming…not sure how much you follow any channeled information or if you even take stock in it. If not, I’d say find the LAW OF ONE series and branch out from there. Then tell me channeled information is bunk…its hardly different than a dream in that your consciousness is switched off temporarily and your body complex is available for a different flow of information. I’m being extremely broad, but I didnt really get into UFO’s until fall of last year and that was only because I avoided researching the issue. It didnt take long to see 1+1…

    Now depending on what resonates with you, and that is the only yard stick here (save some intellectual piques of interest), they are here. There are tons of videos on youtube that keep popping up with strange and increasingly numerous lights in the sky acting in accordance with certain hidden physics. Channeling is simply their only means of communication with us since we lack the ability to do so telepathically en mass.

    This is going to be so awesome…wait it already is!!!!!!

    1. Spirit Splice

      Ever notice how channeled information can never agree with itself? Super advanced spiritual beings that have nothing more to offer as help than crap like, “love one another”. Its never insight into how the universe, I.e. physics, really works, or a cure for some disease. Its always fortune cookie wisdom.

      Sorry, but the main proponent of Law of zone is David Wilcock who thinks the president is going to hold a press conference to introduce us to aliens and who thinks Obama is some messianic figure, and then there are the ET,s who are going to save us all before we all become ascended masters with magical powers overnight. Sorry, but its BS and has other explanations.

      1. i dont know, some channeled information has turned out to be practically useful. in some ufology books there was a guy who channeled schematics and circuit boards for some amazing things that actually turned out to work, and he had the educational equivalent of like high school, but he channeled it. i will have to look up the details hopefully its in my personal library not the public one.

Comments are closed.