In case you missed it on American media - and you probably did because it's not really a story they've paid much attention to - the air space over the nuclear plant north of Omaha is still closed:

Air Space over Nebraska Nuclear Plant Still Closed

Of course the no-fly-zone has fueled all sorts of speculations, but what stood out in the article for me was this little statement towards the end: "OPPD spokesman Jeff Hanson told Business Insider that the nuclear plant is in a "stable situation." He said the Missouri River is currently at 1005.6" above sea level, and that no radioactive fuel had yet been released or was expected to be released in the future.

"Asked about the FAA flight ban, Hanson it was due to high power lines and 'security reasons that we can't reveal.' He said the flight ban remains in effect."

What intrigues me here is that we have had no "threat level" warnings recently from the Reichsicherheithauptamnt.... er...pardon me, the Department of Heimatsicherung.... er, Department of Homeland Security (it's so hard to keep all those things straight any more), but clearly, the government is worried about something, or at least, wanting us to think it's worried about something.

Ok...I'll bite: to issue no-fly zones over a water-and-flood surrounded nuclear plant suggests that it suspects that someone - God forbid - might  try to do something against the plant. But who, and why? Well, there are the usual suspects: "terrorists" (against whom we've been at war, remember, for 10 years), but that story might not wash too well because the Muslim world is pretty preoccupied right now with its own internal affairs. So who else might the government be worried about, assuming, of course, that the "security reasons" that "can't be revealed" are legitimate and that the government is telling the truth (cough hack wheeze).

We can, I think, reasonably rule out that those reasons might be because the government would expect a "panic" in case of a Fukushima type event. Panic wouldn't happen; anger, possibly, but panic, no. This leaves one more possibility, assuming, again, that the threat is genuine, and that is that the government, or rather, its corrupt controlling elites, might be worried about a response to actions it (or rather, they) had undertaken previously. It is a small, minor, but nonetheless, tacit corroboration of the idea that we might be looking at a covert war, being waged behind the screen of perfect plausible deniability: mother nature herself.

Posted in

Joseph P. Farrell

Joseph P. Farrell has a doctorate in patristics from the University of Oxford, and pursues research in physics, alternative history and science, and "strange stuff". His book The Giza DeathStar, for which the Giza Community is named, was published in the spring of 2002, and was his first venture into "alternative history and science".


  1. MattB on June 21, 2011 at 1:14 am

    Or rivers of xerum 525 might be splashing around everywhere………

  2. Jens on June 20, 2011 at 6:42 pm

    Well, if the US Heimatsicherung is anything like their japanese counterpart I would say the sentence “that no radioactive fuel had yet been released or was expected to be released in the future.” should be read like “that a lot of radioactive fuel has already been released and they expect to do it again in the near future.”

    Just last week they admitted that Fukushima is not only a meltdown like 3 Mile Island but actually like Chernobyl and that the meltdown material is now happily doing what ever it wants inside the basement and ground under the plant. I don`t remember which building they where talking about right now. But in the end they will admit it is be the same for all of them.

    And some more, maybe, disturbing news about Fukushime. Are you aware that (refering to a scientific info show here in japan) in the fourth building of Fukushima there actually was no reactor inside?! Only thousands of nuclear fuel rods.
    But would that be enough to cause an explosion that destroys the complete building? Because the disctruction you can see on building four is not caused by the explosions of building one or three and therefore still a mystery to me.

  3. Charles Frith on June 20, 2011 at 9:49 am

    Foreign Policy write a pro conspiracy article *gasp*

  4. Patrick on June 20, 2011 at 8:09 am

    What if there are UFO’s above the plant mitigating any release as has been claimed in Japan? I know you saw the mirage city in China right? Or was that from another website? oh yes…here we are…

  5. Ramura on June 19, 2011 at 8:03 pm

    Turns out this “no fly” shutdown is #36 issued in the last 13 days! The attached link also reports unusual military transfers and a strange call to George Noory at C2C about how his neighbor in North Carolina (military), suddenly got married and packed his RV that night and left the area, with the ominous message, “My best advice to you is to go west of the Mississippi!”

    I agree with other comments regarding there seems to be many levels of a “war going on” already, above the radar/heads of most people, who are oblivious to it.

    Check out this link:

  6. Antoine on June 19, 2011 at 7:56 pm

    My two cents…

    No fly zone is because if the top blows off it can irradiate and possibly crash the previously healthy occupants of the airplane whose timing is unfortunate.

    Most likely they have intel of a serious threat and they won’t leave any jokers in the deck for the opposition to gamble with: a sensible precaution.

    Nothing spooky here. If Zhironovski, or anyone wants to freak the US top echelons with scalar weaponry he can do a much better show, public or private.

    This is the herr kommandants of xyz doing their pony show based on cia/fbi threats they picked up.

  7. Thomas Marz on June 19, 2011 at 7:48 pm

    How long do you think weather warfare has been used against the U.S.A. and how long has weather warfare been used against other countries by the U.S.A?

    • Jon on June 19, 2011 at 9:55 pm

      Bearden believes that it has been at least since the late 60s early 70s.

    • Iris on June 21, 2011 at 7:36 pm

      Project Stormfury started in 1962. Hostile weather warfare has been banned by the United Nations 1972.

  8. Jennifer on June 19, 2011 at 7:42 pm

    My first thought is that they don’t want people getting pictures so we can see what is actually going on there….plumes of smoke (filled with radiaion maybe) rising into the air.

  9. Citizen Quasar on June 19, 2011 at 3:26 pm

    The gobmit’s NO FLY zone is to accustom Amerikans to have their freedom of movement restricted. This is akin to children being “locked down” at schools when there is a tornado over a hundred miles away or when “someone” leaves a box of cookies on the sidewalk then cops cordon off a four block area and call in the bomb squad.

    It’s all part of an effort to gradually increase the area that people are being restricted from entering (or reducing the are that people are being prohibited from leaving) AND to increase the frequency of such restrictions.

    Whatever else is going on there, this is SURELY one of the objectives.

  10. LSM on June 19, 2011 at 3:20 pm

    shutting down the airspace over the Nebraska nuke plant for conventional aircraft would be a lame attempt to defend it against the advanced technologies of a breakaway society- or societies-

    Larry in Germany

  11. Robert Barricklow on June 19, 2011 at 8:22 am

    Leuren Moret: Mega-Tsunami, Total Melt-Through, Radiation Levels and Illnesses
    This video goes into modus operandi, objectives, and the players in Nebraska & Fukushima Events

  12. Nordman on June 19, 2011 at 6:47 am

    The fuelrods does not have any roof above, so radiation is
    Easily picked up by a airplane/helicopter with geigercounter.

    Secured by sandbaging a nucklear plant, not news ?
    Is this ordinary security standard is USA ?

  13. Robert Totten on June 19, 2011 at 6:47 am

    Just remember that old saying: It’s not nice to fool Mother Nature! Or fool with her as the case may be.

  14. JWA05 on June 19, 2011 at 5:47 am

    What a game our leaders play with us as the collateral .

  15. Charles Frith on June 19, 2011 at 5:22 am

    A while back in Hong Kong I was talking about the third world war as information warfare and an intelligent girl pointed out that it had already started. I say the weather/nature disguised wars have and none of us know when it quite started.

Help the Community Grow

Please understand a donation is a gift and does not confer membership or license to audiobooks. To become a paid member, visit member registration.

Upcoming Events