User Answers


Nanotechnology has fascinated me ever since I first heard about the subject back in the good old days of Art Bell's presence at the helm of Coast to Coast AM, when he interviewed Eric Drexler about his now classic book on the subject of nanotechnology. Indeed, I stop in at often and read the nanotechnology articles, and it is well worth your time to do so as well, since it will soon become evident that this is a field growing so fast, and making so many extraordinary discoveries, that volumes of books could be written about this one subject alone.

But consider this one:

How to grow nanowires and tiny plates

I had to stop and re-read one particular section in this article a couple of times, at first not really believing what I had read, and then, after believing I had read it, not being able to believe that no one else - at least to my knowledge - in the alternative research community had caught it or mentioned it. It's a belief, or one might even go so far as to say, a doctrine, held in many areas of the alternative research community.

Did you catch it?

It was this telling paragraph: "Unlike larger structures, with nanomaterials — those with dimensions measured in nanometers, or billionths of a meter — differences in shape can lead to dramatic differences in behavior. “For nanostructures, there’s a coupling between the geometry and the electrical and optical properties,” explains Brian Chow, a postdoc at MIT and co-author of a paper describing the results that was published July 10 in the journal Nature Materials. “Being able to tune the geometry is very powerful,” he says. The system Chow and his colleagues developed can precisely control the aspect ratio (the ratio of length to width) of the nanowires to produce anything from flat plates to long thin wires."

The geometry or shape of a thing controls or changes its behavior, a principle one encounters in everything from Dr. Patrick Flanagan's pyramid power research(and the Soviets and Russians seem to have discovered this too, as I detail in The Giza Death Star Deployed), to the strange phenomenon of the Hieronymous Machine that I blogged about a few days ago. But now we're dealing with something new, something additional, and that is, at smaller scales such "shape power" changes effect things dramatically.

Then notice something else, something that, from my perspective at least, indicates yet another profound area opening into an Orwellian future, and that is the "cyborg" properties and implications for the creation of a kind of "machine-human" androgyny or chimera, a fusion of diametrically different properties: "The team also hopes to be able to use the method to make “spatially complex devices from the bottom up, out of biocompatible polymers. These could be used, for example, to make tiny devices that could be implanted in the brain to provide both sensing and stimulation."(emphasis added).

We are staring the future in the face: the re-engineering of man, not only by genetic modification, but by nano-tecthnological modification, all in the name of "enhancement," the ultimate fusion of man and machine, and a fusion so tiny, so small, that it would be undetectable to the naked eye. One can conceive of the ultimate nanotechnological fulfillment of Dr. Jose Delgado's "physical control of the mind," by the covert injection of nano-machines designed to "rewire" a given human mind.


  1. Timothy Robert

    …any speculation about ‘Morgellon’s disease’ being possibly related to nanotechnology experimentation on humans?

    Murder by Morgellons:

    There are two other significant organizations working on nantechnology that haven’t been discussed outside of MIT, SBGM (German) and the Institute for Nanotechnology University of Twente…


    Institute for Nanotechnology University of Twente (MESA+)

    One of the head professors at the Institute for Nanotechnology University of Twente is from Oxford, and it was Sir Martin Jacomb who started pushing agressively to ‘privitize’ Oxord; the point is this science is all in very private hands.

    Participating research groups at Twente:

    And now, something special, a video on the state of science today and who controls it:

    If you think all the experimentation on the human mind was destructive and destroyed a lot of lives, i.e., MKULTRA kinked to LSD, Dr. Ewen Cameron, mind control, Monarch, drugs, psychic driving, Timothy O’Leary and Tavistock, just wait until this nanotechnology gets deployed to the next phase.

  2. Great news if it removes starvation for millions people everyday with the aid of new technologies for organic farming, clean water, medical advancements for the human population developments instead of military. Although , as ever one should be wary of the side effects of any new technologies which come from the nano evolution.

  3. Marko Rodin said this about shape (geometry) and field effect in I think 2006. His videos are online but naturally govplex rejected his new energy claims.

  4. I’m no scientist, but isn’t it just a matter of time until they learn to hook it up to DNA (and learn how to turn on and off the [brackets] that now surround junk DNA (which just yesterday I read an article where a computer programmer had figured out the on/off “brackets” of DNA)….and build an entire android from scratch?

    Super-soldier robots, here we come!

  5. This is a very fascinating article, from many different angles, I did have a question or two about the functions being disscused.
    a.What effect would an acoustic field(or some type of field iterferomitry) have upon this process, would it either aid or hinder the construction of the structure?
    b. Would the chemical solution and the agents to be bonded have a greater degree of accuracy if various fields or forces were to be absent( i.e. gravity, sound, thermal conditions ect) ?

    From what the source article described, the whole process revolves around tuning these materials in a chemical solution with constant environmental conditions in a localized area. To my mind, the whole process could fluctuate depending upon where these experiments take place. Does anyone share that opinion?

  6. Bucky Fuller and others have shown that “space” isn’t empty but has dynamic properties that structure any energy events occurring in it into specific and definite shapes, dividing “inside” space from “outside” space; “size” is just a special case of this generalized principle of shape.
    These specific shapes (tetrahedron, Isotropic vector module, etc.) that result from the properties of space have various axis of rotation, polarizing potentials, topological affinities and antipathies, energy transfer functions, etc.
    Since Planck units are considered to be based only on properties of free space and not on properties of any particular object or particle, perhaps someone with the requisite math skills could work out the energy transfer functions of a tetrahedron and an IVM with edges equal to 1 Planck length, or with vertexes (energy events) equal to the Planck constant. Might be interesting.

    1. Hmmm…

      I saved this one. I made a folder entitled “Nefarium” and I saved the file as “Lawrence.”

  7. I must confess: if they told me swallow these little machines, and it’ll make you smarter like the movie ‘Limitless’, and they really were FDA approved, I’d be sorely, sorely tempted to say the hell with it and empty my glass!

Comments are closed.