A Facebook friend sent me the following very interesting link from YouTube, of satellite composite anomalies occurring in the Pacific and Atlantic oceans:

These were supposedly for August 11, 2011. I must admit when I first saw this after my friend sent me this link, my reaction was divided. My mind is telling me we're looking at (1) artifacts of processing, or (2) clever fakery of someone trying to make it look as if "someone" is doing "something" with some high technology. In that respect, one need point out that the source of this composite is Composite source


Nonetheless, my basic intuition, however, is telling me we're possibly looking at something very genuine, and very disturbing.

Now, assuming for the sake of argument that we're not looking at processing artifacts or fakery, what are we possibly looking at? Notably, there is little indication on the graph of exactly what it is all this swirling around is supposed to be. Temperatures? Pressure? Clouds?  It is this fact that gives me pause, and makes my mind incline to the view we're looking at fakery. One source, however, indicates that we're looking at wind patterns, and that I find to be the most plausible.

But again, assuming it isn't, what are we looking at? I think the putative and hypothetical answer is clear: we're looking at the application of ionospheric heater technology - i.e., HAARP-like technology - being applied by "someone" to manipulate the world's weather. The important questions, if that be the case, are who, and why?

One answer that immediately comes to mind, as far as the "who" is concerned, is that we are looking at very large scale applications of ionospheric heating technologies, i.e., we're looking at those "whos" in possession of fairly large arrays: the USA and its HAARP, Europe/Germany and its EISCAT, and Russia. Perhaps we are looking at all three, but my guess - and I stress, it is only a guess - is that it is the USA, possibly in conjunction with the other two, which brings us to a potential why.

The why I think perhaps lies in the fact that the Japanese nuclear meltdown has been spewing radiation since the tsunami disaster. My guess - and again, folks, it's only a guess, nothing more, since the data is so scanty - is that this technology is being applied to minimize the effects of radioactive fallout globally, and in particular, over North America, perhaps in one of two ways: (1) my re-directing the path of fallout, and (2) by adjusting the rate of radioactive decay rates, the latter being, of course, a radical idea, but one with some basis in fact, namely, that decay rates, contrary to popular beliefs, can vary.


  1. great insights, Dr. Farrell- this is why I continually visit your website, leave obnoxious comments (well, maybe for some) and am such a die-hard fan of your books, ByteShow interviews, etc.- I just think you’re truly great-

    you wrote: “the Japanese nuclear meltdown has been spewing radiation since the tsunami disaster. My guess – and again, folks, it’s only a guess, nothing more, since the data is so scanty – is that this technology is being applied to minimize the effects of radioactive fallout globally”-

    I’m still not convinced the Fukushima scenario is what we’ve been told it is- could it be the entire “publicized” Fukushima story is an invented cover-up to mask another more nefarious agenda, or if not exactly nefarious, just the state of the planet at the present moment?- there are many, many sources of radiation- you already know that-

    many warmest regards,

    Larry in Germany

  2. “Remember the tsunami that hit Indonesia a couple of years ago? That tsunami happened, but there was no earthquake and there was nothing that should have caused that, and yet witnesses on the ground said they saw northern lights before the tsunami came. Well, you can’t see the northern lights from Indonesia. But when HAARP is ramped up, it looks like the northern lights when they are using it.”

    Jesse Ventura in an interview for –
    I got it from here:

  3. Somewhat similar to radar artifacts noted by Hoagland and others regarding weather anomalies.

    Could actually be faked quite easily with computer animation these days – very little color depth, no 3D objects, etc. This would have been a few hours work for me on an Amiga in the 90s – much, much easier today, even with average desktop software. With more advanced stuff – a piece of cake. Given all the tomfoolery from the climate modeling crowd, could easily be faked by them as a joke.

    That said, if it is real, it would be interesting to map the possible sources of the interference bands. They appear to run nearly North-South, but pinpointing the source for EM scalar interferometers is not that straight forward. Is the new space plane flying right now?

  4. I doubt its a fake since in the video when the ‘zap’ stops you clearly see it affects the currents. A fake would simply overlay itself. This is one continuous and integrated motion flow. Very time consuming to fake properly.

  5. The video showed:
    SSMI/AMSRE Total Precipitable Water
    Precipitable water is the depth of the amount of water in a column of the atmosphere if all the water in that column were precipitated as rain.
    Notice that microwaves and water, same as in Judy Wood’s scenario.

    This is a connection to earthquake’s.

    Strange ideed…

  6. Not knowing anything, and being just a schlub myself, I get the impression of intervention on our behalf by white hats of some sort, to mitigate the radioactive fallout from Japan, also.On Earth or off-planet is moot to me, as It all seems to be layered dimensions like the skins of an onion- there is no ‘out there’.

  7. Another option that I know you have little time for is off earth technology neutralizing radioactivity. There are a number of channelled readings that have stated this since March. It’s an option.

Comments are closed.