Daily News

OH GEEZ, HE’S AT IT AGAIN FOLKS(ZBIGNIEW BRZEZINSKI, THAT IS)

Well folks, it seems that Zbugnkw Brgzntzski (oh puh-leeze could we have some more vowels!?!?!?) or whatever-his-name-is, is at it again. Now, this article was sent to me by a friend, and normally, I would have glanced right over it, except it piqued my interest when I saw the name Brgszgwotz Zbgwkwhatsis, so I read his article (and as another aside, we here at Gizadeathstar.com would heartily encourage Mr. Brzstistozznskts Zqwtznnchtsi to legally change his name, preferably to something in Arabic or Swahili, with their abundant VOWELS> It may resolve that vowel-deficient-trauma-induced syndrome you're suffering, which gives rise to your hallucinations(see below)). Check this out:

[Zbigniew Brzezinski] Toward universal political culture

Well, at first glance, for those of us who've been quietly following this Rockefeller protege's "ouvre," especially his "Grand Chessboard" hallucinations, this article would seem to be a retreat from the unipolar one superpower world projected in his book by the same name. Take, for example, this passage, which at first reading, sounds like a retreat from the positions advocated in his last diminutive magnum opus:

"The 20th century was dominated by fanatical ideological efforts to recreate societies by brutal totalitarian methods on the basis of utopian blueprints. Twentieth century Europe knows best the human costs of such simplistic and arrogant ideological fanaticism. Fortunately, today, with the exception of some highly isolated cases, such as North Korea, it is unlikely that a new attempt at large-scale utopian social engineering could arise.

"That is largely so because in the 21st century, for the first time in human history, the entire world is now politically awakened. The peoples of the world are restless, they are interconnected, they are resentful of their relative social deprivations, and they increasingly reject authoritarian political mobilization. It follows that democratic participation is in the longer run the best guarantee both of social progress and political stability.

"In the global arena, however, the combination of rising populist aspirations and the inherent difficulties of shaping common global responses to political and economic crises poses the danger of international disorder to which neither Germany alone, nor Russia alone, nor Turkey alone, nor China alone, nor America alone can provide an effective response. Indeed, potential global turmoil ― coincidental with the appearance of novel threats to universal well-being and even to human survival ― can be effectively addressed only within a larger cooperative framework based on more widely shared democratic values."

The manner of Mr. Zgbzrzskoz's carefully worded response gives me pause, and it should you as well, for in his Grand Chessboard vision of the world on which would-be-Metternichs (which he assuredly views himself as being one) get to play Georealpolitik, the unipolar world of an American-dominated Central Asia ultimately morphs - by some obscure magical process -  into the grand and very utopian vision of a genuine global state, in which, be it noted, the Great Powers all get to play an updated version of the game "Congress of Vienna.' That means, as he himself has just implied, that stripping away all the verbiage of "democracy" and "brutal totalitarian methods" and "utopian blueprints", the Russians, Chinese, Germans, Americans, (insert Great Power Name here), are going to be calling the shots. In short, imagine a world of Dummycrooks and Republithugs extended globally, and you get the picture of Mr. Gbzqszazz's "democracy." But wait, there's more!

Having donned his preaching tabs, we then hear him intone this marvelous Introit:

"The time is thus ripe for translating the values and interests that bind us together into more comprehensive ties. That requires the deliberate promotion of genuine reconciliation between historically conflicting peoples.

"The EU would not exist today if it were not for the deliberate effort made by France and Germany ― not only on the official level but especially between their peoples ― to foster a genuine and deeply rooted national reconciliation. The EU could not have embraced central Europe if more recently a similar ongoing effort had not been pursued between the Germans and the Poles."

Uhm...excuse me here Mr. Zbbgibbz, but have you bothered asking any Greek, Italian, or Spanish people lately how they like the idea of living in a Europe dominated by Paris and Berlin? Why did you not mention Germany's post-reunification policies of allowing the Volksdeutsche in Poland to have dual citizenship, while denying Poles living in Germany the same opportunity, which happened in the immediate aftermath of the Wiedervereinigung? Have we forgotten Germany's virtually unilateral role in the crack-up of Yugoslavia, that artificial creation of global elites at Versailles, the same elites which you compliantly serve? or of the break-up of Czechoslovakia?

Don't get me wrong, I'm as much for global peace as is Mr. Mnxbzuzg, but I cannot envision the solution as being ever larger regional and eventually global governmental structures as being the solution. We need only to look at our own out of control, unresponsive, and runaway federal government, and then project that image, increased several orders of magnitude, to realize that this scheme, for all the flowery verbiage, is just another "top-down" solution. If Mr. Rbczkzlnski is trying to convince us that he's had a change of heart, I, for one, remain unconvinced. The only thing that has changed, in his formulae, is the begrudging extension of invitations to Asia to join the "Old West" at the conference tables of Vienna in 1814, or of Munich in 1938, where the "great powers" may, and do, and did, dictate the fates of the less powerful. If there is restlessness in the world right now, Mr. Gfdzxkibob, it is because an increasing number of people are waking up to this outdated playbook, and are increasingly, and rightly, cynical about anything emanating from people connected with old banking dynasties, whose behavior against many of those peoples is a matter of historical and indisputable record. IN short, you're full of globaloney.

26 thoughts on “OH GEEZ, HE’S AT IT AGAIN FOLKS(ZBIGNIEW BRZEZINSKI, THAT IS)”

  1. Well, on the upside, my Russians friends assures me that he is nationally known as a nut, to put it simply. Everything he says has the benefit of being highly suspicious and provokes the Russian listeners to triple distill it every time…thereby reducing his nuttiness to nothing.

  2. ‘IG Nobel’ Peace Prize to ‘Big Zbig… For Geo-Economics, to WE(e) Lilliputians?

    Who won the 2011 Ig Nobel Economics Prize, I don’t know. See “Beetle Sex, Wasabi Alarm Win Ig Nobel Prizes [Full List of Winners]” at http://www.ibtimes.com/articles/223074/20110930/beetle-sex-wasabi-alarm-win-ig-nobel-prizes.htm.

    However, in 2010, see “Wall Street Cleans Up at Ig Nobel Awards” at http://www.efinancialnews.com/story/2010-10-11/wall-street-cleans-up-ig-nobel-prize-economics AND http://www.savvysugar.com/Ig-Nobel-Economics-Prize-11351814.

    On Big Zbig’s ‘Grand Chessboard’ (by Doctor[ed] Zbigniew Brzezinski], WE(e) Lilliputian pawns may have already checkmated Big Zbig’s big kings. Thus, my perception that ‘WE(e) Lilliputians’ may-have/should-have won the 2011 Ig Nobel Geo-Politico-Economics Prize may be quite correct.

    Why? As ‘Big Swig’ recently said (in a slightly different context), “That is largely so because[,] in the 21st century, for the first time in human history, the entire world is now politically awakened… restless… interconnected… resentful… [and] reject[ing of] authoritarian political mobilization. It follows that democratic participation is[,] in the longer run[,] the best guarantee both of social progress and political stability.”

    In other words, ‘Big Swig’ may be more drunk on himself &/or on OUR ‘Kool-Aid’ than he & we knew. Ig-Nobel kudus to the ‘Big Swig,’ to OUR ‘Kool-Aid’ and/or to WE(e) Lilliputians.

    P.S. For this year’s list of ‘Ig Nobel’ awards, see “Beetle Sex, Wasabi {Fire} Alarm Win Ig Nobel Prizes [Full List of Winners]” at http://www.ibtimes.com/articles/223074/20110930/beetle-sex-wasabi-alarm-win-ig-nobel-prizes.htm. The “Wasabi Fire Alarm” may or may not awaken the ‘WE(e) Lilliputians’ who are still asleep; and beetle sex with Australian “stubbies” may or may not account for reasons that it may not. If you disagree, then see the MSM.

  3. Question is what you mean by a nation most of what we call nations are realily empires of different sizes a world government is possible but only if they keep religion especially monotheism out of it you would have to go to a Chinese system of a universal written script which woulld allow the free exchange of ideas. Also you must allow for the freedom of life styles this planet cannot support unless certain changes in technology the lifestyle we the Euro-Western Asians are trying to in\mpose on the world. The universal script would be a cross between the Chinese with the simplicity of Korean so it would be easy to use and learn.

  4. “Brizzy” is a product of “Jimmy who?” Carter’s New Age gobbledy-gook administration…no wonder you are having trouble with the message, Dr Farrell. Your mind has not been washed by the blood of “Maitreya, the Christ”. Brizzy who openly says “It is easier to kill one million people, than it is to control them “, just wants to make a depopulated world a better place for the elitists to live in.

    Brizzy openly supports his love child relationship with the CFR, Trilateral Commision and Bilderberg Group…

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VOk6ENxyAh0&feature=related

    What a sweetheart Brizzy is………….NOT

  5. How come nobody has mentioned Mr Whatchamacallitt’s bosum buddy Henry Kissinger, what a shame to leave him out of this most stimulating discussion.

    Theres never a firing squad around when you need one.

  6. Just so there is NO misunderstanding, I think that Mr. Brzhpxyqwczk should have been stood in front of a firing squad decades ago.

    His mention of “Democracy” as some form of valid government is incorrect. Democracy gives the power to the majority collective at the expense of the individual. And since ONLY individuals have rights, democracy is, by its very nature, a form of government that does NOT respect rights. It is only a republic that can honor and protect rights.

    As America was conceived and originally established, America was a republic; one with a rightfully armed public, NO ARMY, and only sheriffs who had the authority to deputize posses when needed but NO hordes of ticket writing local police (who now make it a disturbing habit to beat up anyone they want to whenever they want to for whatever reason they want to).

    America is NO LONGER a republic but is now a communist dictatorship (Which one of the ten planks of the Communist Manifesto are NOT in effect today? Executive orders? Communist Central Committee?…uh…I mean “Super Congress.”) posing as a (UGH!) democracy.

    The ONLY reason I am NOT a full blown anarchist is because the average human being is too stupid to understand what a right is and the reason for respecting them. On the flip side, it is government itself that is the bane of humanity and the destroyer of life on Earth.

    How did I get off on this tangent? Should I erase it and start all over? Nah. Up against the wall, Mr. Brazierskirt.

    1. I “liked” your passage that America is a communist dictatorship. Certainly it’s not a communist, but rather financial one, a fusion of cklans and groups from banks, industry etc. The authocracy of the capital. That’s how the stable ruling of the country has been achieved. 😀 Interesting what will happen if you destroy it?

        1. Ok, I’ll agree for a moment. But I have a question: how it happens that in a such “fascist” and “communist’ country various meetings, manifestations and protest actions are still held, without dispersal of it using the police, Army, without concentration camps and the political police in the KGB/Gestapo fashion? I suppose, you have never lived in a communist/fascist country and I have to admit I was born in a Soviet Union and now am living in a former country which used to be a part of that empire – in Lithuania. Though I was 10 years old when it all ceased to exist, I still have fractions of memory of some featuyres of the soviet life and my parents do even better though they were apolitical and did not opposed themselves to the regime (not because they loved it, but mostly because of the widespread belief of ordinary people of the time that it’s better and safer “not to interfere into policy”, because this was looked at as very dangerous; in other hand the major part along with mentioned passive inloyalty to the communist authority saw the country as the continuation of Russia and they loyalty to the regime were detrmined by their patriotic/national feelings and not by a desire to live under socialism/communism which many hated on active or laughed at on a passive basis of thinking) . So, I would advise to you to read as much available studies on the subject that disclose the nature of totalitarian dictatorships in order not to be scattered by the general both badly understood words and definitions

      1. Like I said: “Which one of the ten planks of the Communist Manifesto are NOT in effect today? “

    2. As Robert Anton Wilson said, “I am a libertarian because I don’t trust people as much as the anarchists do.”

    3. Citizen Quasar

      You’re being pretty damned insulting to all of those who lived and died in communist dictatorships.

      Go right ahead and believe everything Beck and the Birchers tell you to think. (Way to think for yourself, ironic no that you’re simply an advocate for a different form of thug dictatorship.)

  7. I think if there was any doubt that Zbgnjrshski is a clinical psychopath, he has admitted it in his own words.

    Somebody get out the gurny, we gotta live one here!!

  8. Dr Farrell, re: “If Mr. Rbczkzlnski is trying to convince us that he’s had a change of heart, I, for one, remain unconvinced” That makes at least 2 of us.
    As to Ilja’s, “the unification of all the nations” I am rather surprised that you would mention such a thing. Surely you are not suggesting that each nation give up their Sovereignty? The world can of course come to some sort agreement, but who is to say that even if your suggestion were to come to pass, would there not always be a boss!
    The state of America today is governed by the Defacto government. And is a corporation.You can view the listing on the Dunn & Bradstreet.
    As such, they are the prevailing power, ( the banksters) who send us all to war and the like. If America is to be the leader in peace, we MUST Restore and reinhabit the de jure institutions of lawful government.

  9. Okay, you’re criticizing this reunification under the “old banking dynasties”, let’s assume that they deserve this hatred. What the measures of the world’s stabilization would you suggest for “them” to take? Do you reject the idea of the Global Government, but if “yes” wouldn’t you suppose that the general tendency is one that goes towards the unification of all the nations and that the latter is rather positive than negative in that it has the potential of stopping this separation and narrow-minded remnants of feudal thinking and lead to both economic and cultural progress?

    1. The Viennese congress of 1814-15 established and had been providing a long-termed and stable peace in Europe, it’s worth mentioning… I think that a big (crucial) mistake of some intellectual is this that they often are linking to extrapolate human moral to the historic processes without even an attempt of try to realize that the relations bettween nations and countries of the world in a big retrospective are, always were and will be far from the Ideal. That’s the objective reality of the mankind.

      1. Huh?? I won’t even get into the late 1800’s, but where is the peace dividend with WW ONE and TWO, not to mention the millions of non combat deaths.

        1. That’s it, the world that had existed until the beggining of the 20 c, was terminated by the WW I which proved to a tragedy for the whole generation, not to speak of WW II. 20 c -a dark time of human history.

    2. The “old banking dynasties” DO “deserve this hatred” and tons more of it. I would suggest that they commit suicide sometime yesterday afternoon and that this would do legions to help “stabilize” things.

      Those who speak of “unification of nations” and “Global Government” RUN when I ask them, “By what right do you seek to enslave me?”

      1. No, surely, I’m not seeking to enslave you 😀 :D. However, I’m seeking to make clear that what I call Global Government and unification of nations is the clear tenedency and this is unavoidable, but more important it CAN be reached on the basis not that of democracy of american and european type, or on that of plutocracy, militarism, clericalism, dictatorship and banksters’ oligarchy. There ARE other ways.

        1. Global government outside of a dictatorship is an impossibility amd should not even be pursued.

          1 The diffusity of cultures and amount of people will ensure that people are never going to be on the same page, even if mostly peaceful. No government or political mass can seriously claim to represent planet Earth and its people.

          2 Even if this could happen, homogeneity on this large a scale is undesirable. This is a destruction of uniqueness and a disregard of reality. Nobody can effectively plan for a state, much less a country or a planet.

          1. Again, you’re ignoring some brilliant examples from the history that proves contrary and have nothing common with the “homogenity on the large scale” and the denial of “the diffusity of culture” nor there’s no need to achieve the global integration with the help of a dictatorship of any kind: Russia is the oldest state of the Europe continent THAT HAS MANAGED TO CONSOLIDATE THE MAXIMAL AMOUNT OF NATIONS AND ETHNIC GROUPS, standing on different levels of cultural, economic and political maturity, the country that has been existing as such a “commonwealth” of nations, for the longest period (for appr.1000 years) of time – even up to 1917 – , compared to other european states. Other empires began later and ended earlier for the most part because they missed something that was catched by the russians, which is a matter of national menthality, psichology that grants a person with feeling of compassion to other human being and, the most important, with ability to get on with people of any origin etc., and not matter of commerce, hostility, laws and so on. The guestion solely is not “what”, but “how”?

        2. Those who speak of “unification of nations” and “Global Government” RUN when I ask them, “By what right do you seek to enslave me?”

          Those who speak of “unification of nations” and “Global Government” RUN when I ask them, “By what right do you seek to enslave me?”

          Those who speak of “unification of nations” and “Global Government” RUN when I ask them, “By what right do you seek to enslave me?”

          Those who speak of “unification of nations” and “Global Government” RUN when I ask them, “By what right do you seek to enslave me?”

          Those who speak of “unification of nations” and “Global Government” RUN when I ask them, “By what right do you seek to enslave me?”

          Those who speak of “unification of nations” and “Global Government” RUN when I ask them, “By what right do you seek to enslave me?”

          Those who speak of “unification of nations” and “Global Government” RUN when I ask them, “By what right do you seek to enslave me?”

          Those who speak of “unification of nations” and “Global Government” RUN when I ask them, “By what right do you seek to enslave me?”

          Those who speak of “unification of nations” and “Global Government” RUN when I ask them, “By what right do you seek to enslave me?”

          Those who speak of “unification of nations” and “Global Government” RUN when I ask them, “By what right do you seek to enslave me?”

Comments are closed.