Daily News

A LOOK BACK: HANNAH AHRENDT, THE CREATION OF ISRAEL, AND THE ...

Enter Hannah Ahrendt once again:

"If a Jewish commonwealth is obtained in the near future--with or without partition--it will be due to the political influence of American Jews.... But if the Jewish commonwealth is proclaimed against the will of the Arabs and without the support of the Mediterranean peoples, not only financial help but political support will be necessary for a long time to come. And that may turn out to be very troublesome indeed for Jews in this country [the U.S.], who after all have no power to direct the political destinies of the Near East. It may eventually be far more of a responsibility than today they imagine or tomorrow can make good." (Arendt: Born in conflict, Israel will degenerate into Sparta, and American Jews will need to back away)

With that, Ahrendt fingered the hidden geopolitical agenda, an agenda emanating from pre-World War One London, and transferred, though not substantially altered, to post-Word War Two Washington, after the Second World War. This geopolitical agenda may be summarized by a statement given to British Prime Minister Campbell Bannerman by the 1907 Colonial Conference Commission:

"[to fight] against the Union of popular masses in the Arab region or the establishment of any intellectual, spiritual or historical link between them… [and thus recommended] all practical ways of dividing them as such as possible should be taught, and one way of doing so would be to construct a powerful, human ‘barrier’ foreign to the region – a bridge linking Asia and Africa – thus creating in this part of the world, and near the Suez Canal, a force friendly towards imperialism and hostile towards the inhabitants of the region." Cited in Anwarul Haque Haqqi, West Asia Since Camp David (Mittal P_ublications, 1988), pp. 105, cited at: The Origins of Imperial Israel- Part I Friday, 30. December 2011 Israel: A Buffer against Arab Nationalism: This, incidentally, is an excellent and informative article)

The British commission recommended:

"1) To promote disintegration, division and separation in the region.

"2) To establish artificial political entities that would be under the authority of the imperialist countries.

"3) To fight any kind of unity – whether intellectual, religious or historical – and taking practical measures to divide the region’s inhabitants.

"4) To achieve this, it was proposed that a “buffer state” be established in Palestine, populated by a strong, foreign presence which would be hostile to its neighbors and friendly to European countries and their interests. (Ibid., citing Robert I. Rotberg, Israel and Palestinian Narratives of Conflict: History's Double Helix (Indiana University Press, 2006), p. 220, emphasis added).
That state was, of course, Israel.

Initially, of course, the scheme met opposition from the other great corporate interest of the West, the Rockefeller interest, whose ties were principally with the Arabs of the Arabian peninsula. But in a pattern that would be repeated by the Nazis of the Third Reich, it was soon realized that to maintain efficient control of the region, both a buffer state and links to the Muslim world had to be sponsored. Divida et impera. And to do that, one had, of course, to manipulate the theological tenets of both religions, and to manipulate their apocalyptic expectations.

"In short, our global elites, in factoring the calculus of the influence of the Three Great Yahwisms on world culture and events must reckon with their individual prophetic expectations, and to the extent possible, manipulate and control them." (Scott D. deHart and Joseph P. Farrell, Yahweh the Two-Faced God: Theology, Terrorism and Topology, p. 96)  That, of course, is the story we tell in part in our ebook, and particularly so in the third and fourth chapters.

What remains, though, is that Hannah Ahrendt was a courageous and outspoken critic of Zionism and its consequences for the modern world. And in this year 2012 of the apocalypse theater, we salute her, for her words are indeed prophetic, truer now, than when she first penned them.

 

 

14 thoughts on “ A LOOK BACK: HANNAH AHRENDT, THE CREATION OF ISRAEL, AND THE ...”

  1. –From a yogic perspective, the state of Israel serves a spiritual purpose as well: if one can overcome their hatred of these despicable people, then one has overcome a tremendous hurdle and has made great gains spiritually.

    What if modern day Israelis are not homo-nephilim at all but just dupes who have been lead to believe they have special DNA? Wow! The joke really would be on them. For what purpose I couldn’t even fathom..

    here’s a good quote:

    “Charles Bronfman, a main sponsor of the $210 million “Birthright Israel”
    project to “sell Jewishness” to American Jews, expresses a similar sentiment.
    He is co-chairman of the powerful Seagram company, and brother of Edgar
    Bronfman, Sr., president of the World Jewish Congress. “You can live a
    perfectly decent life not being Jewish,” says Charles Bronfman, “but I think
    you’re losing a lot — losing the kind of feeling you have when you know
    [that] throughout the world there are people who somehow or other have the
    same kind of DNA that you have.” (“Project Reminds Young Jews of Heritage,”
    The Washington Post, Jan. 17, 2000, p. A19)

      1. I pointed out that this institution for peace [the UN]
        has brought on nothing but war.

        And quoted myself that,
        “Nothing is as it seems and all of history is a lie,”
        and that this seems to be the theme throughout most,
        or all, of Dr Farrell’s books.

  2. WW2 had several purposes.

    To begin with, it was the [planned] second part
    of the original “Great War.”

    It was to bring everyone on board to a
    ‘League of Nations’ which became the
    United Nations.

    It was to pave the way, bringing along the rest
    of the world and its peoples, to the creation of Israel.

    You see…when FDR said that nothing happens unless it is planned,
    he was right !

  3. I want to thank Drs. Farrell and de Hart for continuing to educate me on all this back history, and also give thanks to your many informed members and readers who all contribute greatly to the knowledge and the conversation. I am really learning a lot about the forces that went making the world I live in, especially those of the just past century, during which SO much went down.

    I just got the notice that my amazonPrime copy of “Nazi International” arrives tomorrow. Five years ago, this would NOT have even been on my wish list. Now I can hardly wait!

    Thanks, Docs!

    1. You will enjoy it mate, it is a great read. Follow the sources in the footnotes as they are also of great interest.

  4. London; why of course: When Theodor Herzl went to the German Rothschild line to fund the State of Israel he was refused. When Herzl went to the British based N.M. Rothschild & Sons, Herzl was asked what he wanted for the State of Israel and he replied: “A charter.”

    The State of Israel is a corporation and you will probably find the bonds are held in the City of London. In the past decade over $40 trillion has been traded in financial assets. The City of London is the epicenter of hyper-competition and greed that has no limits.

    Israel: A Rothschild investment and buffer against the Arab world to protect resources using religion as the catalyst; quite ingenious actually. Ya’ll go kill yourselves but leave the damn resources alone. A central issue here are these collective Old Testament fantasies being exploited like a business investment – as the documentary makes clear. (Moses & Co. are a magnet for supremacist psychopaths: it’s all about tribal dominance. Jesus’ was not an ethnic covenant: it was an ethical covenant; same, I think, with Mohammed.) Also Israel’s territorial location at the confluence of trade routes. (Note: it’s the land gateway from Eurasia to Africa: extremely significant geopolitically.) It’s also a forward base for Western sabotage of Arab cohesion and Asian energy sovereignty.

    One of Israel’s largest exports are diamonds taken out of Africa (blood diamonds) through Rothschild’s holdings in DeBeers. Tamper with that hard and highly inflated magical resource and you will be seriously f#%&ed up. Israel is sitting on an estimated $3 trillion in minerals and resources which is why Africa re Libya was a serious threat to western banking/financial interests.

    The bottom line is religion is being exploited for profits.

  5. tremendous info- thanks so much for posting this- greatly appreciated

    Larry in Germany

    P:S: and thanks also to CQ and legio for their “ergänzendes” in-put in Part 1

  6. What do I know?
    I’m just a “goyum,”
    you know, subhuman.

    There are only two kinds of
    whatever, in the world.

    One are “God’s Chosen”
    and the other are NOT.

    This whole MidEast thing is starting to ‘peace’ me off.

Comments are closed.