RIGHT-TURNING CELLS: A SPECULATION
UCLA is reporting that migrating cells prefer to turn right:
UCLA discovery that migrating cells 'turn right' has implications for engineering tissues, organs
What grabbed me was this paragraph:
"A UCLA research team discovered that migrating cells prefer to turn right when encountering changes in their environment. The researchers were then able to translate what was happening in the cells to recreate this left–right asymmetry on a tissue level. Such asymmetry is important in creating differences between the right and left sides of structures like the brain and the hand."
What excited me about this was that it's yet another loose sort of corroboration of a speculation that some scientists - albeit, not very well known ones in this country - were advancing some years ago, namely, that there is a direct connection, a kind of interface or if one wishes to put it even more technically, transducer effect between living cells and the physical medium.
The scientists in question were the Russian and German physicists Dr. Nikolai Kozyrev and Burkhardt Heim. Both men speculated - and Heim elaborated - on physical theories in which (1) space-time was not a continuum, but quantized, (2) space-time had a cellular and even crystalline structure as a result(a topic elaborated in the topological work of Michel Bounias and Dr. Volodymyr Krasnoholovets), and most importantly - and particularly so in Heim's case - (3) that these cells had a "rotation moment", i.e., a kind of "inclination" - to borrow a heavily loaded word - to turn or twist in a certain direction, namely, right-handed. Kozyrev went so far as to suggest that a change in this rotation moment from left to right would result in similar changes within large organisms, with organs now displaced in opposite places in the body - livers, for example, would be on the left and not the right, and so on. One may also think of physicist Hans Reichenbach's wonderful analysis The Directivity of Time or The Direction of Time, a book which spurred and inspired Kozyrev's own thoughts about time possibly not being a scalar.
Of course all of that was speculation, and so is this, but what I find intriguing in this study is the possibility it suggests, that namely, DNA, as an aperiodic crystal, would, like all crystals, grow and respond to minute conditions in the physical field itself, and as a result, twists in a certain direction as a result of the response to that field. It's a small discovery that UCLA has made, to be sure, and of course in Twain-like fashion, I am returning wholesale dividends of speculation for a minimum investment of fact, but nonetheless, the discovery does raise these interesting possibilities, and as Michio Kaku observed, sometimes it is necessary to allow oneself to think of the possibilities. If indeed these possibilities are ever borne out with further experimentation, then a whole new world would be opening up both for physics and the biological sciences.
Help the Community Grow
Please understand a donation is a gift and does not confer membership or license to audiobooks. To become a paid member, visit member registration.
All this means is that these cells aren’t as butt-dumb as redneck NASCAR drivers.
“Real racers turn right”.
I wonder if cells located south of the equator prefer to turn to the left?
Another blackeye for scientist who think they know everything
i heard this from my former physics instructor in a tech course I took long ago. He said, ” By the time you ask the “third – question” the response from the physicist is —Duh, We don’t know?” Well at least that is being honest! But unlike the Witness Stand it is not speaking the whole truth. Scientists amongst themselves tend to admit their ignorance or lack of knowledge of what could be known but when it comes time for “Funding” they have to initiate the BS, excuse me, their PR campaign preceding the hand-outs – it’s a completely opposite reaction or different story. Geniuses the – lot of them!
In interest of fairness or equal time – the instruments they have to use to research are so darn expensive they have to compromise. If not you don’t even get to play in the game. ( I say, “Do they, the Scientists/Technicians have to compromise that much?)
I had a dream after watching this science show, I think it was one of those NOVA series, about some new nuclear accelerator. The Round entrance or portal to it was so huge or gigantic! Millions upon millions of dollars were spent constructing this facility!
Now the dream I experienced at the time reminded me of the 3rd movie of the Dawn of the Dead series where all the Zombies were acting-up on the OTHER SIDE of the fence. Remember that scene? In this dream instead of Zombies I saw thousands of starving people or humanity on the OUTSIDE of this same Nuclear Accelerator compound fence pleading for food and screaming for their lives! ( it was only a dream for if you are starving the act of screaming takes up too much energy which you probably exhausted long before.)
So much for a BIO-POLITICS which makes decisions that determine who is to LIVE and who is TO DIE! ( Does this have the familiar ring or a ‘trace” of extermination camps of the past? One Difference in this example is the destruction is unintended or so they say? So much for BENEIGN NEGLECT?
Another perfect example of framing(in the since: ‘You’ve been framed’)
And in this case: It IS space-time that needs to be quantified.
This is another case of having drawn-out, by inspiration, the correct pieces of the puzzle, only then, to have them framed, by deception.
Just another reason why I enjoy Dr. Farrell’s work/He is very hard to deceive.