As most of you know I like to check things out at every now and then to stay abreast of things, and I found a very intriguing article there on a sociological study of the role and importance of private foundations such as the Rockefeller, Ford, and Carnegie Foundations on the rise of the American Empire in the last century:

Foundations were major force behind US rise as a superpower:

The article, a review of Inderjeet Parmar's book Foundations of the American Century, quotes Professor Parmar as stating:

"Although today they do contribute to society in positive ways, the Rockefeller, Ford and Carnegie Foundations’ own records show that beneath a glossy, liberal, philanthropic exterior, they sometimes had sinister side.

“This should not really be so surprising when we consider their founders and origins - steeped in the rise of US corporate capitalism, violent anti-unionism, and political corruption, particularly in the late 1890s and early 1900s.

“Their original founders were industrialists and manufacturers, linked to big banks and finance houses like JP Morgan and Standard Oil.

“Their boards of trustees were, and are, normally drawn from a relatively narrow section of society – lawyers, elite university administrators and presidents, corporate executives, press magnates, former public officials.”

This, really, is only the tip of a vast iceberg, though it does imply that one of the methods employed by these foundations was literally the infiltration of the media, academia, and the creation of a variety of policy study groups and think tanks such as the Council on Foreign Relations, the Trilaterial Commission, the Rand Corporation, Stanford Research Institute, Brookings, and so on.

But this too is only the tip of the iceberg. As I noted in Saucers, Swastikas, and Psyops, these very groups, clustered around the Rockefeller Foundation, commenced a study in the pre-war days before World War Two, to study the geopolitical likelihoods of the coming war, and its probable result. The conclusion they reached was that Germany would lose the war, that Russia would be severely crippled, and that the British Empire would decline, leaving America in the position to begin a coordinated push to transform the world culture in America's image, and create effectively an American Empire. Their model here was the British Empire...

...with one significant exception. The study implied that a more effective means of maintenance of a global empire would not be the acquisition of colonies and the huge expense of maintaining them, but rather be based upon the expansion of overseas military bases for the rapid projection and deployment of American military power. This concept was wedded to George Kennan's policy of "containment" as embodied in National Security Memorandum 48, and carried with it the implicit long-term doctrine of roll-back, subsequently operationally perfected and implemented during the Reagan era.

Yet another activity of this group has been in the formation - commented upon often here and in The Daily Bell - of "directed historical narratives," an opinion-molding operation aimed at the formation of paradigms of thought under elitist influence. One particular area in which this has been particularly effective - though not often discussed nor deeply researched - is in the area of the formation and/or reinforcement of scientific orthodoxies. The premier case in point here was the reporting on cold fusion when it was first announced by Pons and Fleishman during the Administration of George H.W. Bush. The carefully inculcated scientific paradigm functioned in that case to exclude real examination of the claims, and, as the late Dr. Eugene Mallove documented in his now famous study Fire From Ice, data was deliberately suppressed or falsified by institutions having deep connections with those very foundations. Money, in other words, buys conformity, and distorts the scientific enterprise.

This reveals a very important weakness, one which I have commented upon on various occasions, namely, by constructing such directed narratives,  surrounding themselves with people of a like mind, and then infiltrating such personnel into academia, media, government and, yes, religion, these elites in effect have placed themselves in their own box, and thus rarely does one encounter personnel in those Foundations that think outside the directed narratives or are even able to perform analysis outside their paradigms. In the end, it is a recipe for stagnation both technologically and economically, as America is now bearing witness to in declining science and mathematics performance in students.

See you on the flip side...


Joseph P. Farrell

Joseph P. Farrell has a doctorate in patristics from the University of Oxford, and pursues research in physics, alternative history and science, and "strange stuff". His book The Giza DeathStar, for which the Giza Community is named, was published in the spring of 2002, and was his first venture into "alternative history and science".


  1. Jon Norris on April 20, 2012 at 1:20 am

    This is why I get cranky when people talk about the founders of such foundations being “philanthropists.” The purpose of such foundations was to create tax-sheltered power centers which could greatly extend the influence of the Robber Barons’ money.

    The Rockyfailure fortune was moved into such foundations after the attempt to contain the incredible power of their family cartels, anti-trust laws, to stop funneling the energy of the Banksters, and corrupting America.

    We just watched Bill Gates do exactly the same thing, and convince others in his billionaire world to join him. People keep spreading the meme (lie) that Gates is the greatest philanthropist ever, and I like to bring them back to reality by pointing out that he has not “given away” 35 billion dollars, he has just tax sheltered it in a highly controlled foundation which still exerts his will and extends his “vision,” only with greater power due to the blindness of people as to how “big money” uses philanthropy as just another tool of control (witness Public Broadcasting’s downhill spiral).

    He simply learned from Rockyfailure how to improve his control and influence, while also lowering the visibility of his real motives. He has given away any of the original money moved into the foundation, and they have been called on the carpet for not giving away enough of the interest on that money to retain their tax exempt status.

    These foundations also help create the smokescreen of “independent research organizations,” “think tanks,” and other such shills to manipulate “research” and create the pseudo-science needed to manipulate the public (like Gullible Warming).

    They are “Properganda” machines which would make Bernays weep with joy.

  2. carlo on April 20, 2012 at 12:03 am

    the new world order is the result of a lot of assassination, from General Sikorsky to air crash on Smolensk
    Putin or american presidents are simply criminal under the orders of jews lobbies
    Hitler was the only possibility to free the world from the strong powers.
    and the history, the true history soon or later . . . . .

    ONU is an instruments of new world order…
    we need oil? we go in Libya and in Iraq
    we need oil? we arm Israele and go in Iran (soon)

    after WW2 usa and urss take every type of new technologies, but not all theese we can see. only minimum to mantain new world order

    my english is little but I hope you understand

    but the american III reich rise and fall soon.

    now the problem is this:

    please read

  3. Bas on April 19, 2012 at 6:09 pm

    A very interesting video interview w/ transcript conducted by G. Edward Griffin with Mr. Norman Dodd who, in 1954, was the staff director of the Congressional Special Committee to investigate tax-exempt foundations.

    Here’s Mr. Griffin’s intro w/ appropiate links:
    “I am Ed Griffin. The story we are about to hear represents a missing piece in the puzzle of modern history. We are about to hear a man tell us that the major tax-exempt foundations of America, since at least 1945, have been operating to promote a hidden agenda. That agenda has nothing to do with the surface appearance of charity, good works or philanthropy. This man will tell you that the real objective has been to influence American educational institutions and to control foreign policy agencies of the Federal government…”

    Video Title: Norman Dodd On Tax Exempt Foundations
    Video Interview:

  4. marcos anthony toledo on April 19, 2012 at 5:10 pm

    The duskys of the world are going to kill the Europeans is a very old carnard stop beating this dead horse. You brought this problem on ourselves by leaving our enemies intack and alienating or destroying every potenial ally around the world over white supremessacy idocy greed has always been the driving force of our lusts and lead to our well deserve distruction some day.

    • sk on April 19, 2012 at 6:10 pm

      So, you try to justify and approve of Genocide then.

      • Tor on April 19, 2012 at 6:46 pm

        And one always wonders why they always seem to approve of the Genocide of every other White person, and never themselves. If they really hate White people so much, and they are White, why do they not simply kill themselves instead of calling for the Genocide of all White people?

  5. Jay on April 19, 2012 at 1:00 pm

    Of course the Stanford Research Institute did verify the positive cold fusion findings, so sometimes foundations don’t exactly maintain the status quo.

  6. bdw on April 19, 2012 at 10:08 am

    A similar manipulation can be seen in these venn diagrams:

    This goes hand in hand with the “foundation” idea.

  7. Tor on April 19, 2012 at 6:58 am

    It’s Interesting that the people who tried to do away with that paradigm, both in physics and economics, were Nazis. Not saying that Nazis were nice guys, but even accepting the figure of 6 million Jews killed, and ignoring the massive fraud of the Nuremberg Trials, this is not really a significant number, when compared to the death toll of Stalin or Mao. It’s also interesting to me, that today we have people freely running around American Universities, who seem to think that Communism is really cool. But anyway, IMO, the real criminals were never tried at the Nuremberg trials. The Rockefeller foundation went on to establish their eugenics programs in 33 U.S. States, and sterilized people, and the Rothschilds and other Zionists Banksters were never call to account for their role in rounding up Jews in Germany, or the multitudes of other crimes they committed. Their criminal operations went on uninterrupted, and now they stand on the floor of the U.S. Senate and boldly proclaim “You will have a New World Order, if you like it or not, and there is nothing you can do about it.” IMO, The Nuremberg trials played right into their hands, and really did nothing more than set the stage for their New World Order, which is really nothing more than global Communism. It was the plan of the criminals all along to use the Nuremberg trials to set the stage for their enforced multiculturalism, under the guise of so called “anti-racist” foundations. Anti-racism is nothing but a code word for anti-White, and Germany became the new symbol of racism, never able to redeem itself from the stigma that had been attached to it by criminal banksters and industrialists. The criminals began a new genocide campaign, targeting White Europeans, and flooding White countries and only White countries with immigrants, and assuring them that they would be all the better for it. These countries are not better for it, and have suffered greatly. Mass immigration into a country is always destructive, and makes for a great weapon against an enemy, and that was the intent of these criminals all along. Today, as they tighten their grip, the world becomes more and more of a hell hole. I personally don’t see any difference between the Nazis and anyone else, during WW2. If they had won, I wonder what a world would look like, without scarcity physics, and debt banking. Perhaps it would not be such a world of hopeless slavery where all one can do is work his fingers to the bone, and watch everything he worked for, fly out the window, as a bunch of criminal banksers who should have been tried and hung at the end of WW2, now sit and laugh at you as they finish taking what little you have.

    • spiritsplice on April 19, 2012 at 11:31 am


    • Jay on April 19, 2012 at 1:01 pm


      Name a communist at an US college or university?

    • Michael Wolff on April 20, 2012 at 10:50 am

      Very good statement Tor. I (born in 1975 and raised in GDR… I see it more or less the same meanwhile) + there is a possibility that the ‘hoax’ is MUCH BIGger. Beginning in renaissance chronological construction of Jod-He-Vau- HE-(history) — …..cabalistic construction after a cataclysm!)

  8. SSNaga on April 19, 2012 at 6:40 am

    Keep your EyE on the Hand… and you wiil Miss “The Trick.” … Myopia is well & live on this s-s-site. … You Cannot see the “Sleight of Life” – It’s ‘N’asterful.

    • Jedi on April 19, 2012 at 6:39 pm

      Tavistock, Aldous Huxley, Hippie culture, Laurel Canyon, MK Ultra. JFK ritual killing involving G Stalt psychology, Viet Nam, Moon Landings, 911…blah blah….

      all manufactured

  9. Dashiell Cabasa on April 19, 2012 at 5:28 am

    Yes, this is so true. It is no coincidence of course, that using these sorts of organizations, was how Borman and co funneled money and resources around and were able to put in place their Nazi international.
    I recall reading many years since of in that little book entitled ‘None Dare Call It Conspiracy’ how the Foundations were set up in the States and the struggle Teddy Roosevelt had supposedly trying to rein them on…too late though even at that point.
    As you astutely point out as per, these tactics eventually shoot the perpetrators in the jackboot of course.
    I worked for a retailer here whose owner was obviously trying to follow in the Rockafailures footsteps. He even opened a Bank of and of course had set up a Foundation (for tax evasion and all the other reasons of course) which he would talk about in his in house magazine : making out he was donating huge pars of his private income to charity to us mugs: carelessly failing to mention he owned the Foundation he would have his lackeys praising him for giving money to in the magazine. Comical.
    He even ‘served’ in the Labour government for a while until he quietly resigned as mention started to be made of his rather exorbitant and over the allowed limit donations to the party lol, craftily leaving before it all came to a head in the ensuing collapse of the parties fortunes.

Help the Community Grow

Please understand a donation is a gift and does not confer membership or license to audiobooks. To become a paid member, visit member registration.

Upcoming Events