Readers here know I have been concerned with monitoring Germany's well-camouflaged role in nuclear proliferation.  Most readers here know of Germany's quiet role - along with Russia's - in supplying the former Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein with the technical expertise for nuclear research and weaponry. Additionally, I have referred numerous times throughout various blogs to the New York Times book The Nuclear Axis, detailing the secret collaboration between West Germany, South Africa, and Israel in helping South Africa develop a nuclear weapons capability. Last month I noted that France's new submarine-launched ICBM  - as are its thermonuclear warheads - are built in part with German corporate assistance, thus making Germany a de facto thermonuclear power with a strategic delivery capability.

Let's pause a do a little history lesson here: Why is Germany using other nations as shills or fronts to develop its own military capabilities? Well, a look at the map will reveal at least the geopolitical reasons: Germany is surrounded by powerful enemies, necessitating a military that can maneuver, strike hard and fast at one enemy, and then confront another. That much Frederick the Great realized, and it has been a component of German politics and military thinking ever since. It is part of geopolitical reality and no self-respecting German government would ever deny it.

Now comes the history part: in the wake of Versailles, the Allied powers essentially tried to force a geopolitical situation that was totally devoid of reality by forcing Germany essentially to disarm, leaving it squeezed between two powerful camps: France to the West and Russia to the East, with powerful buffer states hemming it in further: Poland and Czechoslovakia. It is worth noting what the German response was: General Hans von Seekt, the chief of the German General Staff, immediately began to plan for the eventual return to reality, and therefore to eventual German rearmament. To that end, he realized that the small 100,000 man army permitted to the Germans was, in reality, an opportunity to make that army a thoroughly professional army, and to make it the nucleus officer corps for a much-expanded army to come later.

It was Von Seekt who, a mere four years after the  end of World War One, and a mere three years after the Treaty of Versailles was signed, who insisted on secret protocols to be negotiated in the Treaty of Rapallo with Russia in 1922: these protocols allowed German officers and soldiers to train secretly on Soviet soil with tanks, heavy artillery, and aircraft, weapons specifically denied to them by the Versailles treaty. Russia became, in effect, the front, or shill, for the development of the military technologies prohibited by treaty to Germany.

Now we have this interesting bit of news to add to all this long historical context:

Raw Reports, Nuclear Threat from Germany (updated)

Unlike Veterans Today I don't view a thermonuclear Germany as a threat, but rather, as an inevitablity: for the major power in Europe after Russia, not to have a nuclear capability while surrounded by three other nuclear powers (Russia, the UK, and France) would simply, as stated before, be unthinkable to any self-respecting German government, treaty obligations or not. What we have with this article, in other words, is yet more confirmation that von Seekt's Rapallo strategy, so successfully pursued after World War One, was also successfully pursued after World War Two.

Of course, we have the usual ET interdimensional hyperdimensional nonsense being hawked in this article...but that, as I hope my previous blogs on the subject of a (thermo)nuclear Germany make clear, shouldn't detract from the subject nor the military and geopolitical reality behind it. As Zbigniew Brzezinski himself put it in his The Grand Chessboard, the hidden purpose behind NATO was really not how to deal with Russian power, but with the reality of German power. A nuclear Germany would inevitably be part of that reality.  So don't allow the article to deflect into silliness....

What must be questioned is not why Germany would seek to develop such military capabilities, but why it should be so apparently involved in the proliferation of them into the most dubious hands... Here too, we seem to be looking at a kind of historical deja vu, for it isn't the development of modern military capabilities or technologies that have historically been the problem... it has never been the German military but rather the policies of its corporate and civil leaders that has been the problem...

Posted in

Joseph P. Farrell

Joseph P. Farrell has a doctorate in patristics from the University of Oxford, and pursues research in physics, alternative history and science, and "strange stuff". His book The Giza DeathStar, for which the Giza Community is named, was published in the spring of 2002, and was his first venture into "alternative history and science".


  1. James on May 16, 2012 at 11:25 am

    If you can handle it I suggest checking out John Kettlers web site or John This is some strange stuff but interesting he has some or several you-tube video interviews kind of slow speaker but still interesting!

    I say the same thing about David Ike at first his subjects are a bit strange and people used to laugh about his reptilian idea’s but these days most people aren’t laughing anymore! As he is more rellivent then many in the mass media of today that is for sure.

    Look what they do to Ron Paul and he is the only presidential candidate making any sense what so ever he is both consistant and persistant.

    For those who don’t believe in UFO or ET’s or ED’s we holy spirit folk lead the way as some have said on the history channel in the Ancient Aliens show! It is quite possible they may have witnessed flying craft and or UFO’s several times in what we call Angels! Simply because they had no way to describe something even such as an airplane in our time. So a winged creature either man or woman was perhaps very much so like an emissary of God to them.

    Personally myself in my walk I have had dreams and or visions and i have never seen and winged creature but I have seen numerous videos of various UFO type craft! And we have heard that there are different types of Aliens both Good and Bad! So that would better fit my understanding of the angels in the bible then some winged human form! And really it is not that big of a stretch ot wrap my mind around ! But if you can’t grasp it I won’t hold it against you either as it is a stretch for me at times as well.

    I mean if you have anti-gravity stealth high speed ships do you not as well have control of time or dimensional space travel as well. And in fact supposedly there was one of these Vimanas type crafts uncovered by some of our troops in large cave in Afganistan.

    But apparently some higher dimensional beings are helping us down here with some of these NWO types trying to start WWIII. And they say they are not going to allow them to do so! Along with destroying certain underground bases and weaponry and chemtrails

  2. Johnycomelately on May 15, 2012 at 12:19 am

    Don’t forget that in the Balkans the Germans showed their true colours when they backed their old axis allies, infact a Serbian soldier captured in Kosovo was held as a prisoner of war in Germany.

  3. marcos anthony toledo on May 13, 2012 at 4:31 pm

    It has always been the political fruitcakes that have been the ones to look after since history began.

  4. HAL838 on May 13, 2012 at 12:07 pm

    It seems like it has always been a pissing contest
    testasterone and more testasterone as big pharma is now
    dictating with more ways to take your money
    and make you more fit and better for war.

    That part of the New World Order started with promoting
    more rape by way of Viagra, but NO birth contrrol for women.
    [hey what (?) ]

    No, I’m not against men and I am not a man hater.
    I am, however, against Rule by Testasterone.

  5. Юрий on May 13, 2012 at 10:10 am

    Герания уже много добилась. Она доминирует в Европе, а в России президент Путин ставленник Германии. Так-что геополитическое окружение Германии прорвано!

    • LSM on May 13, 2012 at 11:05 am

      Hi Yuri-

      (yes, I understand enough of the Russian alphabet and it’s pronounciation to decipher a name)-

      am just commenting as a normal blogger-

      many thanks for your tremendous insights- truly inspiring- it was definitely understood by all (no-one has ever provided a scrpit on this website that was, well, more discernable)-

      now could you please return to Novosibirsk (or is it Irkutsk?) and pre-prepare to freeze your shill ass off in the next winter?-

      many thanks in advance- I always have big heart for Cyrillic scheisters

      • romanmel on May 13, 2012 at 7:42 pm

        Aw, come on LSM, I kinda like Yuri’s…’er insight.
        At least I think I do….?

  6. Robert Barricklow on May 13, 2012 at 9:11 am

    Good point by LSM. Sometimes the answer to the question is: wrong question.
    A question, at times places one within a certain frame/work. The spirit of the question is what maters. As Lsm did, took the spirit of the question, and reframed it from w/in an/up the ladder perspective.
    And perhaps there are groups w/in groups, & players w/in groups, all playing w/in a z-brenski/spock dimensional chess-field.

  7. Lee on May 13, 2012 at 7:35 am

    try and get a hold of patrick moore’s recent interview in the british radio times.

    • LSM on May 13, 2012 at 9:51 am

      Hi Lee,

      could you post a link to this?- would interest me greatly- many thanks in advance-


      • HPrice on May 13, 2012 at 4:08 pm

        I think this will give you a bit of a taster for the Patrick Moore interview. For those who don’t know, Patrick Moore is an British astronomer, and a very well known household name in the UK, and has fronted one of the longest running tv shows on the planet, “The Sky at Night”. A very clever guy, he also plays a mean xylophone (i’m not joking lol), and was I believe somewhat of a musical prodigy. He is also a very old style reactionary.

        Quoting from the link below,

        “We must take care,” warned Moore. “There may be another war. The Germans will try again, given another chance. A Kraut is a Kraut is a Kraut. And the only good Kraut is a dead Kraut.”

        The interview sounds like a giggle. Here’s the link to a precis, I suppose, of the complete interview:–the-english-are-best

        (Best comment from the comments section, “Bless him” hehe …)

  8. LSM on May 13, 2012 at 5:54 am

    Hi Dr. Farrell and readers,

    at the very latest after reading Dr. Judy Wood’s gob-smacking “Where Did the Towers Go?” I came to the conclusion that “nukes” are a dinosaur technology in comparison to scalar weaponry- who needs the concept of “nukes” anymore?- only the controllers of the press who are fear-porning the masses into thinking that thermoneuclear devices are the alpha and omega of mass destruction when they are nothing more than fire crackers in comparison to all of the other technologies most probably available-

    many regards to all-


    • Don B on May 13, 2012 at 10:16 am

      I agree Larry. I’ve been saying this for quite a long time. The only thing we haven’t mastered is the problem with the fallout once we have vaporized the missiles. Also, there is still the problem with suitcase nukes.


      • LSM on May 13, 2012 at 11:45 am

        Hi Don B,

        many thanks for your response- but I’m not yet sure about whether you are refering to Fukushima or just insundery radiation (many sources- just starting with the sun!)-

        how can we vaporize missles?- please inform!-

        It’s just my own cheap opinion but I’m not yet convinced that suitcase nukes ever existed (more advanced technologies have always been there)-

        as for Fukushima: there are two camps of thinking out there but I tend to believe the camp that is the most conservative (definitely in the minority): all the “gloom and doom” scenarios are nothing but fear-porn-

        please be well-


        • HAL838 on May 13, 2012 at 12:23 pm

          By sending them into the ionosphere where the nuclear
          boom-booms can go boom far, far away and even
          unable to send down a pulse boom.

          Not the fairy tale of a missle hitting a missle,
          but the reality of an umbrella shield just like Reagan
          described, up and running since about the time
          he left office.
          Hawaii got left out.
          Too far in left (?) right field.

          • Don B on May 14, 2012 at 5:04 am

            Yes Larry, pretty much what Hal says above. The HAARP technology is developing quite fast……. Maybe not a suitcase nuke, but something that would fit into a car or truck.

            best regards …. db

    • HAL838 on May 13, 2012 at 12:14 pm

      Testasterone has always liked things that go BOOM.
      You know,
      ‘My boom is bigger than your boom.’

      It’s always a matter of having a bigger and biggest BOOM.

      “Scalar” can, but doesn’t a need a big boom………..
      No fun there

Help the Community Grow

Please understand a donation is a gift and does not confer membership or license to audiobooks. To become a paid member, visit member registration.

Upcoming Events