GMOs | GMO Scrapbook

SUPREME COURT THROWS OUT PATENTS ON SOME HUMAN GENES

Well, every now and then something happens that makes you suspect that sanity might be threatening to break out all over the world if it were not for the indefatigable efforts of oligarchs and elitists in large banks preventing it from happening. After all, if it did, people would wise up to their scam and they'd be out of business, and most likely in a lot more trouble than that.  But we can all breathe easier when the places where sanity breaks out are such unlikely swamps of stupidity as the US Supreme Court, the same group of intellectual and moral giants as gave us (that is, the U.S.A.) the Dred Scott decision declaring Black people to be only 3/5 of a person, unborn infants no persons at all, and corporations fully endowed moral and rational persons (go figure).

Well, now there's this:

High court throws out human gene patents

I had to literally read this twice: the Supreme (Nuthouse) Court did what?!? Say that again!?!? Where were Bonzanto's Lawyers!?!?

"In 2010, a federal judge ruled that genes cannot be patented. U.S. District Judge Robert Sweet said he invalidated the patents because DNA's existence in an isolated form does not alter the fundamental quality of DNA as it exists in the body nor the information it encodes.

"But last year, a divided panel of the federal appeals court in Washington that handles patent cases reversed Sweet's ruling. The appeals court said genes can be patented because the isolated DNA has a "markedly different chemical structure" from DNA within the body.

"The Supreme Court threw out that decision, and sent the case back to the lower courts for rehearing. The high court said it sent the case back for rehearing because of its decision in another case last week saying that the laws of nature are unpatentable."

Ahhh....so that's the scam! Laws of nature are unpatentable, so, go tinker with the DNA some more, make it completely unrecognizable and unreproducible in nature, and then maybe you've got a case. In the meantime, we, in our stalwart uprightness and clarity of the moral vision we first enshrined in Dred Scott, are not going to come to any real decision at all and send the case back to you to get it right this time.

....Then we'll give your patent, and the more monstrous your creation, the better.

The sad thing is, they might try to create...oh, who knows, another Nancy Pelosi (I've never thought that smile could be anything less than the most egregious example of genetic engineering gone wrong).

15 thoughts on “SUPREME COURT THROWS OUT PATENTS ON SOME HUMAN GENES”

    1. Hardly. You play “intellect” to penetrate the OverUnity Ping-Pong Game, when this Game has Dual Seals (E-M): Impermeable, Impenetrable. Reading books & “pondering” is “Looking Outside.” Try Within. “As WithOut, So WithIn; As Above, So Below.” Bolster is just yawning ignorance. What has the hueman race achieved with it’s “Command performance” of “the Servant?” Synthesizing the two achieves eternal negation, not Penetration of The Central (Great) Mystery. To Blend Into wHoleness, you Must “Go There.” Third Presence, like the yogis (Yokers) knew to do, & the white intellects poo-poo.

      1. Robert Barricklow

        Your Poopoo pidoo debut Third Presence frangrance in not in my wong & weaching repertoire.

        The future ain’t what it used to be.
        -Yogi Berra

  1. Robert Barricklow

    Just a brief note.

    Dr. Farrell has mention Richard Dolan many times.
    I listen to Jim Fetzer’s podcast at times, depending upon the guest and/or subject matter.
    Just posted today(Fetzer is interminttently sporadic in his postings):

    Monday, April 30th, 2012
    Richard Dolan
    UFOs and the National Security State

    http://radiofetzer.blogspot.com/

    1. Robert Barricklow

      At 1hr:21min it gets worth listening to
      At 1hr:38min he goes to the UFO question.
      Disagree with his “alien body” as “real”.
      It is the alien technology from the ancient ones that real,
      but the “current” (1940s 0nward) sightings and abductions are terrestial.
      Thus, his “informants”, on the alein bodies, are the fruits of a disinformation process.
      Very savy, overall, in his analysis.

  2. This is actually quite disturbing to my mind.
    What is ‘Natural’?
    How do you define it?
    Is Human DNA really ‘natural’ at all?
    With all the chemically induced mutations through vaccines, our food and water and the ‘man made’ environment that we live in, does that mean that our DNA can be patented? Does that mean that eventually we won’t even own ourselves?
    Very disturbing.

      1. Robert Barricklow

        With the appropiate bar codes, embedded of course, with the new & improved RFID chip.

        1. Since when did you po’ folk presume you weren’t Entirely Owned Property? … “They are like little children who have installed themselves in a field which is not theirs. When the owners of the field come, they will say, “Release to us our field.” They take off their clothes before them to release it (the field) to them and to give back their field to them.” … You are a soul-aspect, which has a bodily extension: “Woe to the flesh which depends upon the soul; woe to the soul which depends upon the flesh.” (“Gospel of Thomas,” A.Guillaumont trans.)

          1. Robert Barricklow

            To be
            Or not to be?
            That IS the question.

            Or, is it an alternate choice?
            Or, is it in a quantum state? Both existing at once?

            “Ask the cat”, sez Schroeder.

          2. You are Thus the Problem, “The UnSolvable Solution.” … Delve Deeper to see the CruX. … Implicate-EXplicate//~SuperImplicate. The ParadoX Generates via Attachment of either of the dual Aspects. One Is… The Other, as “In A Mirror.” Seemingly ‘Infinite’ in Depth, it is merely Eternity, eternally. (Infolding-Unfolding, Inf… *Yawn*) … The cat (beneficent) or the dog (maleficent) have No clue.

          3. Do you know what a “Yo-Yo” Is? You play it in a duality, which you believe is “a/the reality.” Got it… kNow?

Comments are closed.