NEWS AND VIEWS FROM THE NEFARIUM JUNE 7 2012
June 7, 2012 / /
Joseph comments on this article from the Daily Bell, and its implications for interpretive methodology:
Posted in News & Views
10 Comments
Help the Community Grow
Please understand a donation is a gift and does not confer membership or license to audiobooks. To become a paid member, visit member registration.
Very interesting commentary by Dr. Farrell on this Thursday. I believe that every human being is given by their creator as in God, with an inhearant sense of right and wrong. So we need not take the selfish and beastial rules and “laws” created to take advantage of good human beings, as in “just doing my job” seriously. We can fight back. I`m not a christian, but the “Golden Rule” is all we need to maintain a decent society, nothing more. On the other hand, we also have the right, in my opinion, to defend ourselves against those greedy psychopaths who try and take our inherant human rights away. We have the right to take them out just like they want to take us out. Otherwise we are nothing more than sheep to be lead to slaughter, and I will slaughter them who wish to slaughter me without a thought, except I wish they would want to treat me as kindly as I would treat them. But most people don`t have the backbone enough to realize they don`t have to lie down like a dog on it`s back and be humiliated. Society is sad and weak for the most part. we must learn the art of fighting without fighting.
Yes, I know.
Always
to the last man standing,
but that never seems to go ‘well.’
It just never works.
Hi Dr. Farrell,
you advise us to spread the net and read other sources- I always do that-
I also believe that the Global Elite are also not 100% in control but SOMEONE, somewhere has to be at least in temporary control of the steering wheel-
am not sure if Gordon Duff of veteranstoday.com is 100% percent credible, but I found his latest posting @veteranstoday.com/2012/06/04/germany-mounts-soviet-nuke-cruise-mi: to be worthy of slightly raising at least one eye brow- a short quote from his latest “offing”:
“British security experts are of a general belief that the Gehlen group, under Operation Paperclip, run by the Dulles brothers, Allen and John Foster, aided by a young Richard Nixon (highly classified) created the CIA, not out of the OSS but entirely out of German intelligence groups who had worked, hand in hand, with counterparts in America during the entire Second World War. Among their best known operations were the Kennedy assassinations, their manipulation of American media….,” etc.-
would love to hear your take on this commentary if you deem it worthy of your time, mind and patience with my postings- it at least slightly dove-tails with your own research-
many warmest regards,
Larry
My favorite line out of that srticle was
‘With press as it is, you could create “clear evidence” with a crayon.’
And his previous article on this:
Breaking Exclusive – Japan Attack, German Terror-Intel Group Complicit.
‘The DVD are not and have never been Nazi-these were the boys that installed Nazis, and they were alot smarter. Your averageNazi was pretty dumb, no smarter than your average Democrat.’
Let’s clear out the garbage! Election slogan.
It is a given that power corrupts. Therefore it must be checked. Hence: Checks & balances are used to thrawt powers grasp of complete control.
For experience has demonstrated that, even under the best forms of government , those entrusted with power, if given time and opportunity, pervert it into tyranny.
What has allowed most governments to become corrupted today is that it is actually run by the money cartel, which serves the ruling regimes and not their socities. its only concern is its own self perpetuation. Courts do not dispense justice; their rulings are bought, good and right ones just like bad and unfair ones. The law enforcement bodies are not geared to protect law and rights The bureaucracy does not serve the cause it is called upon to serve. It serves itself , both as a class and as one entity and individually with each member toiling to line his pockets . Everything & everybody is corrupt. The corruption is more than plain bribery or o9ccational dishonesty of an official. It is a complete system that permeates everything from top to bottom.
A balance must be struck again between political capital & economic capital. A check & balance on monoploies of power & markets. Otherwise you are captured by paradigms designed and engineered to make you prisoner/as in the left-right paradigm. For example, anything that falls outside the left/right paradigm is considered: hitting below the belt, crazy, not poltically feasible, a conspiracy, ect.
You, therefor, must remain within the ropes of established thinking and box it out with eachother, right against left/left against right. Divide & conquer.
First government should create, issue, and circulate all currencies & credits to satisfy the spending power of the government and the buying power of consumers. So that, money will cease to be master and become the servant of humanity.
Get t6he public back into the driver’s seat in the economies & as the stewards of power, WITH check & balances to said powers.
Daily Bell = Austrian School of economics = red herring.
Developed by Ludwig von Mises and Israel Kirzner. In the end it will only help international finance — creatures such as Goldman, Rothschild, and Ben Shalom Bernanke.
Very good points Dr. Farrell. I think there are some cracks within the Rothschild clan also, as young Nathan has taken over for father Jacob’s London faction. Supposedly David in France is the new head of the clan with Evelyn stepping down but you know how aggressive young Turks can be. David has banks and investment houses in other countries and those countries have their own rules and so on that must be followed, and they may conflict with the mega visions and power lust of Nathan. I think China is more closely aligned with David than Nathan/Jacob. Everything must end at some point and that may be coming soon, but it will never be headlines. Just keep reading the tea leaves so to speak.France also is another aspect of the equation, as their goals and ambitions may be different from those of England, especially with the fragile economic situation worldwide. Anyway, there is hope!
db
I would also say that your are quite right about relying on one source/researcher Dr Farrell, especially when it comes to this field as so much is open to interpretation. From my studies on the Roman Empire I have seen how different academics can look at the same evidence and come up with different interpretations for what it signifies. The same is true for this field.
The reason why I respect your work so much is because of the sheer scope of your research. Your work is unique because of the Titanic scale (yes, I heard your recent interview on TBS) of what you look at. From the Ancient High Civilisation to the present times, from physics to political/military history. To my mind no-one has tied together so many disparate dots as you have with as much clarity. That alone puts your work on top of my list.
However that doesn’t mean that I rely on your work alone. I supplement this with others like Jim Marrs, William Engdahl, Peter Dale Scott, Webtser Tarpley, Daniel Estulin, Peter Levenda to name a few. I also listen to shows such as The Byte Show, Cutting Through The Matrix and even Alex Jones.
It is always good to get a different perspective and as you say make up your own mind.
Thanks for all you do Dr Farrell and good luck with your upcoming move.
I would have to say that this is one of your great “news and views” Dr Farrell. You make so many good points and i found myself in agreement with you.
The situation amongst the elites reminds me of the Roman Republican system, in particular the machinations of the Roman senate. A senate that was made up of the elite Roman families, sometimes in alliance, sometimes in opposition to each other. All with one goal in common, to have one of their own in control of things.
I see this with the factions of the present day elites in their new global senate, for want of a better term. Early on they unite and co-operate with each other to bring the goal of world government to the fore, but as they get closer and closer to achieving that goal the cracks begin to appear. Who will sit on the top of the tree? Who will have the final say? Will any faction be content to let another sit on the top? I don’t think so. When you are talking about global dominance then all will want to be Imperator Mundi.
I also agree that they are not infallible and that their plan has any kind of inevitability about it. Plans change at first contact with the enemy, a battle never goes as it is planned, this I learned in the Army and studying military and political history. There are two crucial components for their plan to work.
1. Holding their alliance together the closer they come to their ultimate goal. Can they do this with the allure of the ultimate aphrodisiac, Global Power ? Or will human nature and the individual desire to be on top rend them asunder?
2. Will we react the way they have planned? Or will we wake up and move in another direction?
I would say with this in mind that nothing is as infallible as it seems. They could destroy themselves in factional infighting or we could tell them to take a collective hike. Nothing is set in stone. All is not lost.