Daily News

YAWN… JUST ANOTHER PRESIDENTIAL SELECTION CYCLE: AND A MODEST ...

Well, sooner or later I knew I had to comment on this, though I've been delaying it for almost a month, because, quite frankly, I'm more than just "sort of" disgusted at the left-right, liberal-conservative (with "moderates" as the convenient synthesis) theme we're hearing again this year between Mitt Blandney and the Republithugs and Barack Ohblahma and the Dummycrooks.

First, of course, we're treated to the usual vetting of candidates by this lobby or that lobby, in this case, by Isreal apparently:

Netanyahu vets possible Romney VP

This wasn't just another trip to Israel

And of course, accompanying this umpteenth performance of the political version of Beethoven's fifth, the political left is, on cue, outraged by the amount of influence Israel has over American politics ("how dare Israelis be concerned for their national survival!!!"), and the political right is, on cue, outraged that anyone should question any aspect of that relationship or that maybe, just maybe, there have been outrages against Arab Christians and Muslims as well, and by golly, Isreal should have even more nuclear weapons and a blank check to do whatever it wants (Shades of Bettman-Hollweg...look it up if you don't know it...).

But now Alex Jones and info wars are raising the question that "insider sources" (who won't be named of course), have placed Mitt Blandney at the opening of the recent Bilderberger meeting in Virginia:

Eyewitnesses: Mitt Romney Attended Bilderberg 2012

And the story was even picked up by RT TV:

Mitt Romney attended Bilderberg 2012?

Now, I have two very modest proposals to put forward here in respect to the Blandney-Bilderberger aspect of this current Presidential (s)election process (hopefully we'll be able to avoid hanging chad this time around).

PROPOSAL NUMBER ONE:

I'd really like it if someone could sneak into the already-being-planned and carefully managed "debates" that we'll be subjected to between Barack Ohblahma and Mitt Blandney, and that they would ask the first candidate just exactly how much money he gets from George Soros et al, and that they would ask the second candidate, on air, publicly, to state whether or not he was invited, whether he did in fact attend, and what he and "the boys" talked about. It would at least be interesting, and doubtless provoke one of those rare moments of genuine human reaction as each candidate might have to answer a real question as they stammer through their brainless responses. Ok ok, I know there's little chance of that... but it's fun to contemplate.

PROPOSAL NUMBER TWO:

This one's addressed to you, Mr. Putin. Why not take some time out of your busy schedule of writing open letters, holding summit meetings, and chairing cabinet meetings and running a very large country, and contact some of your former associates in the Preobrazensky Prikat....er...the NKVD....er, I mean, the MGB, no, correct that, the KGB....er...the FSI, or whatever it's calling itself these days - you know what I mean - and see if you can't slip a few bugs and people into one of those Bilderberger meetings and tape the sessions, would you? You could then make these transcripts publicly available (or part of them), on RT TV's webpage, and we could all have a laugh or two over all the silly things that "the boys" discuss in their secret meetings which wouldn't be so secret any more. For that matter, I'm sure that probably the MGB/KGB probably already has done so, and that there are probably lots of analyses and so on collecting dust in filing boxes in the archives, so maybe release a few of those just for fun?  I ask because we're getting awfully sick of MSNBC, See BS, CNN, and Faux News over here. Just a thought.

If I hear back from President Putin, I'll be sure and keep everyone posted.

See you on the flip side.

7 thoughts on “ YAWN… JUST ANOTHER PRESIDENTIAL SELECTION CYCLE: AND A MODEST ...”

  1. Somtimes it IS a matter of somantics.

    Such as the choice of
    conservative in laws and more liberty
    OR
    more liberal in laws and less conservative
    in liberty (?)

  2. Somtimes it IS a matter of somantics.

    Such as the choice of
    conservative in laws and more liberty
    OR
    more liberal in laws and less conservative
    in liberty (?)

  3. It’s pretty obvious that the US government is crawling with agents of the zionist entity and has been since its inception but I believe at some point we are due to see agents of Russia start to emerge. A sophisticated intelligence operation such as Russia has should surely be able to place agents into the US federal government. In the least, we should start to see US congressmen beholden to the non- babylon bankster connected monied powers of Russia. Maybe even a radio talk show host?

    Barrack Obamma is clearly a CIA laboratory created manchurian candidate so he is ruled out, I think?

    I’m well aware that the Soviets had spies in the US but I’m talking about spies working in opposition to the evil babylon bankster agenda.

    I would also like to see Putin make a declaration similar to Lord Rothschild’s after the Congress of Vienna when he vowed to destroy the Romanov family. Putin should make the public vow that he will see the entire Rothschild family hunted down and exterminated.

  4. Timing is crucial, Joseph.
    AND
    this ‘fight’ is no different, with even more at stake!

    President Putin knows that.
    He’s a ‘quick study.’
    He learns fast.

  5. right on! right on!…what does “politics” mean anymore anyway? it means crappy performances in a sock puppet kabuki theatre meant to divert attention from all the horrors that are being wrought..its no different than the world wrestling federation

    1. Kent Brashear

      Doc Farrell, I think you’ve outdone yourself in this blog with your subtle
      and not so subtle clever word play.

      Yes it would be great fun to see “the boys” on RTV.

Comments are closed.