Daily News

NOT A DIME’S WORTH OF DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THEM

I'm old enough to remember George Wallace, the segregationist (and frankly, blatantly racist) Democratic governor of Alabama in the early 1960s, who defiantly opposed the admission of blacks to Alabama's university system until President Kennedy forced the issue.  Well, Wallace went on eventually to have a change of heart, and, I suspect, it was a sincere one, though his legacy remains tainted by his earlier stances against the civil rights movement.  I am old enough, too, to remember Dr. King's "I have a Dream" speech in Washington DC, and they were words that would eventually change America greatly for the better, and that would ultimately I suspect play their own role in Wallace's belated conversion.

But Wallace has another distinction in American politics and that is he became one of the first major third party candidates in modern American political history, first breaking with the Dummycrooks and running for president with his first vice-presidential candidate, former chief of the Strategic Air Command General Curtis Lemay. Wallace subsequently ran again on third party tickets, and until the assassination attempt on his life that left him badly crippled, was a constant factor to be reckoned with for the ever-present threat that he might try yet another third party ticket.

It was Wallace who, looking at the Dummycrooks and Republithugs, first quipped, "There's not a dime's worth of difference between them." It was a phrase that stuck, and to this day we occasionally hear it being repeated as we look on at the bland, predictable theater of phony debates and posturing that the "two" major parties and their sock puppets have become. Indeed, so bored with it all have I become - I said bored, not apathetic - that I have scarcely said anything about Barmitt Obromneyack's candidacy. It's like trying to decide between Trotsky and Stalin (indeed, a choice between "the lesser of two evils"). Indeed, we literally do appear to be having something of a contest between "one third fewer calories" versions of internationalist Trotsky and "nationalist" Stalin. Consider the following article on Barmitt Obromneyack's "positions". While I don't ever visit such websites, this one was sent to me by Mr. V.T., and I found myself echoing its sentiments so much I had to share it:

40 Points That Prove That Barack Obama And Mitt Romney Are Essentially The Same Candidate

Were Mr. Wallace alive today, he would probably say "See, I told you so....not a dime's worth of difference between them." I happen to be one of those millions of Americans that years ago (almost a decade and a half), became disgusted with the "lesser of two evils philosophy" especially after loyally supporting a party that claimed to represent my views, promised to undo certain things that those "scallywags" on the other side of the aisle had done, and then, watched them fail time after time to do it.

No, after reading this list, I feel even more resolute in my vote of "NO CONFIDENCE" in Barmitt Obromneyack.

See you on the flip side.

83 thoughts on “NOT A DIME’S WORTH OF DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THEM”

  1. Robert Barricklow

    I haven’t seen Thrive.
    But it can’t touch

    Earth At Risk:
    Building a Resistance Movement To Save The Planet

  2. And I beheld the monster, having two heads and fifty-two horns, and one head was like unto an ass and the other resembled that of an elephant. And both heads belched forth the most noxious fumes that seemed to bewitch the people, and they prostrated themselves before the beast and made offerings of gold and begged the beast to deliver them.

  3. For the moment european politicians do the bidding for american foreign politics. There is only a europe because of the politicians.

    Local Joe and Joanna’s still think of their country with firm borders.

    One day american citizens will rudely awake to the reality that their “freedom foreign politics” are not shared by a lot of people not living in mighty USA and yes even in the strong allied western europe countries.

    If the european politicians for one moment see the light and swap rifle from one shoulder onto the next americans will be in deep shit because a lot of Joe and Joanna’s will support it. Even if it means to be allied with russia and china to defeat you.

    The arrogance in “foreign policy” someday will be america’s downfall. It is not because when your president blows on a wissle you can charge off onto foreign soil to wage war in name of freedom. Because for foreigners thats all it seems to take to get the public warm too charge of.

  4. Jesus H Christ! How the hell do I unsubscribe from this nightmare comment section?? WTF!!!!

    How the hell is a documentary proving that humanity is being treated like a herd of cattle a “feel good BS”??? Thrive is on the freaking ball and that kind of paradigm change in thinking is exactly what humanity needs. The banksters manipulate humanity’s money, medicine, food supply, energy, and judging from the really retarded comments on here, education and thought patterns.

    I have researched the banksters and their genocide against ALL races and nations for years. For years I have delved into the details of their crimes in order to understand their objectives. I guess you could consider me an expert on reality and in my informed opinion the Thrive documentary exposes and therefore undermines the banksters and their modus operandi. Now, if exposing your own crimes is somehow a valid form of disinformation, please explain to me how that works.

    I’m speaking to you, doc. Let’s see if we can get one intelligentand worthwhile conversation going on here. I really don’t understand why you won’t substantiate your assertion against it. I hope I’m not being obtuse here (I did notice that this site gets hit by bankster trolls).

    1. Yes, the “bankster [CIA] trolls” followed me in here
      2 years ago;
      my apologies to Dr Farrell…………….
      on the other hand,
      the site has since picked up a great number hits on
      http://www.google.com
      under “HAL838”

      1. hhmmm….

        “anti-white” (?)

        Not only am I white, I am a fair, blue-eyed white
        and I am “anti” no “group” except the nanite totbots
        infestation.

  5. lets begin with the charter of the party ?is it still some what intact ?the dog and pony show isn’t as prevalent in state and local politics.there is quite a difference in my neck of the woods except for internationals influence/ preferences here and there.do you still have free will? despite the illusion?buck up and show up.

  6. There is so much difference between the two candidates!

    At least I really, really believe Mitt is a US citizen and the other
    guy…who knows where he’s from? He has lied about his origin
    so much that I doubt he even knows whether he is Kenyan or Mexican
    or Indonesian.

    Anyone voting for Obama is either brain dead, actually dead, or a communist non-citizen also.

    Biggest mistake of my life is that in 1968 I didn’t follow through with my intention
    to vote the Wallace/Le May ticket.

    Well, I’ll leave here tonight saying this has been a lively group of
    Su-doe deep thinkers.

  7. if you want to get elected (or more likely killed) have this platform:

    –citizen bailout– canceling of all mortgage, college and credit card debt.

    –cancel all government IOU’s to private central banks and Rorhschild zionists and their slew of investment banks

    — announce Israel and Saudi Arabia as the perpetrators of the 9-11 massacre and then declare all Rothschild zionists and Saudis enemy combatants and seize all their assets domestically and abroad. This would be used to pay for the continued bare bones operation of the government and to honor foreign debts to sovereign nations. This would mean also the seizure of the Saudi Arabian oil fields. This would also be deemed a humanitarian mission as the women of Saudi Arabia would be liberated from their oppression as well. China would be repaid money owed on the condition that it gives up Tibet and immediately stops harvesting dogs as food. Japan would be given Hawaii as compensation for the Fukishima attack.

    campaign slogan: One Bullet, One Neo-Con

    1. No a much easier way to get killed instead of spouting unsupported antisemitic distractions is to announce readily available over unity energy generation and medicine for all everywhere world wide immediately.

      1. NOT “unsupported.”
        The evidence is in
        AND
        the proof is positive.
        Out of Egypt, yes,
        BUT
        never in bondage !

        Quite the reverse,
        even willing to sacrifice their own
        for the good of their greatest.

        Ramses, now Rameses, was
        Ram(o)ses.

      2. if accusing Saudi Arabia of deplorable treatment of women is anti-semitic, I stand guilty as charged.

        I’m just riding the wave of “anti-semitic distraction” to save a sinking ship, the United States, from insolvency and collapse. Unfortunate scapegoats but they will have to do. The Other Guys participating in 9-11 are too elusive and impregnable.

        Once elected I will initiate an inquisition against satanism, ritual abuse and murder and pedophilia. Thank you Bush and Obamma for giving me the unconstitutional power to make this clean sweep of our nation’s degenerate dregs. The satanists should have been protecting the Constitution and their right to religious freedom and due process and not dismantling it. I look forward to their rendition to the bowels of the Vatican for some good old fashioned medieval interrogation. None of this candy ass water boarding stuff.

      3. Your arrogant know it all attitude, reveal you for what you are Jay.

        Only a Rothschild Zionist would use the Jewish people, as a shield for the evil they do.

        Rothschild Zionism, is just a form of ultra nationalism.

        1. Um Ridge,

          There’s no real evidence for who, or what, party powderized the WTC towers. Also most of the Saudi “hijackers” turned out to still be alive after the fact.

          I still think you’re an agent of control and destruction, given your propensity to advocate more wars.

          That you don’t like being called out doesn’t mean that I’m some “zionist agent”. Sorry it is antisemitism to accuse Israel and Saudi Arabia of attacking the US in Sept 2001, because there is no evidence.

  8. Yeah, doc, still waiting on why Thrive is not up to snuff.

    On those here attempting to discredit MLK Jr: MLK Jr was killed by the same banksters who hollowed out the American Dream right out from under you while you were wailing away about anti-white BS. The vast majoriy of people in prison and poor are not white. Get a grip. His family sued the CIA for wrongful death and won. I wonder why it is more important to people like you to point out a minor foible (we’re all human) on MLK’s part rather point out the murderers (same ones who murdered JFK, Lincoln etc etc etc) and ripped of your country??? MK-ULTRA STOOGES!!!

    1. “Thrive” is just feel-good propaganda, that’s why.

      No, I’m not the “doc,” but I have more time on my hands
      [literally]
      for the “time” [being]……………………

  9. Robert Barricklow

    All this is theater, and a very expensive theater of the illsionary practice of democracy. Because, there is no democracy; or free market, as both are just expensive media meme facades, charades of mass deception.
    This criminal syndicalist captitalism is a monster; a parasite not only eating up the living beings/creatures of earth, but in the end, destroying the host upon which it depends.
    It’s do or die time.

    And the clock is ticking….

  10. My take on the situation is that there has been a reversal of the social contract as an instrument to ameliorate the lives of the majority.

    In that regard, there is not difference between them.

  11. “I’m old enough to remember George Wallace, the segregationist (and frankly, blatantly racist) Democratic governor of Alabama in the early 1960s, who defiantly opposed the admission of blacks to Alabama’s university system until President Kennedy forced the issue. ”

    Oh come on Dr Farrell, you are just calling him racist because he is white. lol

  12. Hiya Doc. Could you be a bit more specific as to why I should be careful with the concepts covered by the Thrive movie? Much appreciated.

  13. I was trying to comment on the “dark matter” vid but was unable to. I think you should check out http://www.free-energy-info.com. This is the reason I’ve been absent these last few weeks. I just discovered that the banksters have been feeding us crooked science while they enjoy the real deal. I found out by watching this awesome documentary called Thrive at http://www.thrivemovement.com. Einstein worked at the Rockfux Kaiser Wilhelm Institute before coming to the states. Tesla and Walter Russell are the real geniuses of our time. JPMorgue crushed Tesla. The universe now makes more sense to me. Everybody should really check this out. Oh and another great website is Robert Otey’s Free Energy and Free Thinking http://www.feandft.com

    MLK Jr was a great man. Interesting fact about Wallace. That racism was how the banksters undermined the populist Democrats which built the middle class during the Great Realignment of the 60s.

    1. “I urge a little caution with respect to the Thrive movie…”

      you’ll definitely have to elaborate on that one day as I though the Thrive Movement had some good info and special appeal. Its a kinder gentler message than the sometimes bombastic Alex Jones movies. It had more appeal to those with more delicate sensibilities such as fallen liberals and disillusioned multi- cultural secularists and a lot of college aged kids have latched on to it as well.

      I’ll have to watch it again with a more critical eye. Controlled opposition???

  14. Dr Farrell, If you saw Fox News Sunday yesterday Romney brought up his plan to change Obamacare into Romneycare. This in response to an abortion question It was almost as if he wanted to bring up an issue he knew would place him in unfavorable territory with the electorate. He is too smart to do such a dumb thing. Could he be deliberately wanting to spoil his chances of winning? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EMhZjWKefys

  15. Given that’ Romney’s foreign “policy” advisors are basically the Project for the New American Century people, that’s a big difference. While I am not happy about Obama expanding on Bush’s was in the Horn of Africa, same for drone strikes anywhere, Obama is not guilty of starting massive new wars the way those “advising” Romney are.

    At least Obama has proposed minor regulations for wall street–regulations which got wall street types to tell all sorts of lies.

    One third less than Stalin and Trotsky claims won’t get you taken seriously.

    General Lemay most certainly wanted to start a world wide nuclear war when he was the head of the strategic air command in the early 1960s, he almost did so in reaction to Soviet missiles in Cuba. So it’s real hard to see a difference between George Wallace and Barry Goldwater.

    Hard to take seriously any list which includes point 15. Taxes pay for things you use all the time. That’s something the idiot Pauls don’t get.

    Point 12: Real universal health care, Medicare in the US, the whole systems in England, Germany, and Canada works much better than what the US doesn’t have. In this case Romney and Obama are very much the same, neither is an advocate for universal health care. But the fact that point 12 is included is another reason to skip the conclusions of this list.

    If unhappy with the two main choices vote for a third party, I certainly have.

    1. Sorry Jay I disagree that Obama hasn’t started any major wars… if indeed the sock puppets in the White House really DO anything, then I think it is clear that the West’s hands are all over Libya, Egypt, Syria…

      1. JPF

        So far those don’t qualify as major US wars, that the hands of the US are there yes.

        None of those are anything like the 2003 invasion of Iraq or the 2001 invasion and now long occupation of Afghanistan.

        Given who’s advising Romney, that’s a huge difference.

        Also you’ve made an equation of the West and the US, they don’t always act together, see the 2003 invasion of Iraq.

          1. Hal–

            Obama was not president during either the Korean War or the Vietnam War.

            Unlike, John McCain, Mitt Romney and President Cheney, Obama has not advocated invading and or bombing Iran. That’s a huge huge difference that JPF misses.

          2. Can you make some sense, Jay?
            Obama has not much to do with anything,
            let alone my reply……………..

          3. I would point out that though Obama hasn’t as yet started any major conventional conflict he hasn’t exactly ended any either. Is there really any difference between starting a war and just prolonging one started by your predecessors? In my book prolonging an existing war holds the same culpability as starting one.

    2. Jay,
      The thing you forget is that taxes are taken by force and the threat to destroy you if you don’t pay up. There’s no one stopping you and others who wish to pay more for all the wonderful services you receive.
      It seems like quibbling that your guy didn’t start a really big war when the reality is this nation is now a security state with the american people targeted as the enemy. With these invented enemies abroad and the fear instilled that the world is out to get us, do you really think we shouldn’t challenge and question any and all military interventions both at home and abroad? Is there any spot you could point to and say that there’s too much militarism, too much wealth redistribution, too many violations of our natural rights and liberties? In other words, can you ever come to the conclusion that the real enemy of all of us is the state itself and the fictional government cloaking the criminals who claim to be leaders?

      1. Vi–

        Unlike, John McCain, Mitt Romney and President Cheney, Obama has not advocated invading and or bombing Iran. That’s a huge huge difference that JPF misses.

        And get off the tax claims, taxes are perfectly legal and what happens when you break the law?

        As for wealth redistribution, yep, but you’ve got it the wrong way round. Obama and Bush both help the banksters take our public wealth. Until you can propose a better way of paying for roads and the internets, taxes on those like GWBush and Mitt Romney should be much higher, including a stock trading tax. Unless you’re advocating for state owner ship of everything.

        You can also skip the natural liberties thing. It’s a fake imposition of your religion on me–get off it.

        1. Unlike, John McCain, Mitt Romney and President Cheney, Obama has not advocated invading and or bombing Iran. That’s a huge huge difference that JPF misses.

          Jay,
          I don’t defend any of them. None of them have any respect for the lives of others and all of them should be removed from any position of power.

          And get off the tax claims, taxes are perfectly legal and what happens when you break the law?

          Then by all means please pay all you want Jay and don’t tell me that they don’t violate the law by stealing and calling it a tax. It’s still theft to take what isn’t yours and don’t tell me that anyone has a claim on you or what you own or produce. You’re too smart for that and I’m not dumb enough to believe you believe this.

          As for wealth redistribution, yep, but you’ve got it the wrong way round. Obama and Bush both help the banksters take our public wealth.

          No Jay. You’ve got it wrong. It’s very clear that the politicians are doing the bidding of the city of london in both the financial and political policies they follow, knowing that they can be replaced at any time with an interchangable player from team B.

          Until you can propose a better way of paying for roads and the internets, taxes on those like GWBush and Mitt Romney should be much higher, including a stock trading tax. Unless you’re advocating for state owner ship of everything.

          I’m advocating a true free market that allocates payments to private individuals and companies for services we wish to use and not be forced to pay for things we don’t want or need. The last thing I want is the state ownership or regulation of everything. In fact, that’s one of the best arguments one can make for getting rid of the notion of a state to begin with. There’s no legitimate claim that can be made for it other than the brainwashed mantra of those who come to love their masters.

          You can also skip the natural liberties thing. It’s a fake imposition of your religion on me–get off it.

          No Jay. I’m not getting off of it. You have natural rights that people like myself respect and recognize even if you’d spit on ours. Your fake religion of statism needs to be euthanized and deep sixed along with anyone who’d commit violence against others. Your religion is the problem. Get off of it.

          1. VI–

            Get off claiming I’ve spit on your natural rights Natural “rights” are not the basis for US law.. And get off inflicting your religion on me. And others. (You can think anything you want, but you can’t do anything you want; it’s really that simple.) The laws of the US apply to you.

            And get off calling taxes theft. They’re perfectly legal for the most part, and no you don’t get to live by your interpretation of the law.

            Total private ownership leads to exactly the same abuses as total state owner ship.

            The private system you espouse is grossly dependent on the perfect flow and perfect use of information. Both are something capitalists detest, also something hardcore communists try to control.

            Most living on say the east coast of the US aren’t going to want to pay for a cleaner San Francisco bay in your limited system, and that’s a big flaw and a big reason to use things like Federal taxes, laws, and regulations to keep places like that sort of clean. No it would not simply be up to California, because then neighboring states wouldn’t need go along.

            Don’t see any logic in disagreeing with me about banksters, you’ve just agreed with my point.

            Never particularly thought you’d defend Bush/Mitt/Cheney/McCain, all I’m saying is that Obama is very slightly better. And you’re the one who raised the “redistribution” lie.

            Me I voted against Obama last time, but the lies told about him by say Mitt Romney and repeated here are so offensive that I may vote for this time round.

            Go right ahead and call any claim for a rule or a tax “statism”, it makes you sound really ignorant.

          2. Taxes are a kind of theft when a lot of that money is used to feather the nests of those who claim to represent us, The ridiculous salaries, the ludicrous superannuation and pensions and the megalomaniacal perks and priviliges given to those few who claim to work so hard for us and yet have achieved SFA.
            I have no problem with paying taxes when the money is used for better infrastructure and better programs etc but I do have a big problem when that money ends up in the pockets of the corruptiticians and their elite backers. For example here in Australia our mighty beneficial and benevolent government has recently voted themselves a pay rise while some Australians have no homes and are starving in the streets. Our tax money at work. That is nothing more than state sanctioned theft.
            And they are all the same, Barack Ocommudus, Mitt Crassus, Livia Gillard and Tony “the mad monk” Abbott. All the same excrement only just presented in a different bucket.

          1. legioXIV :

            Most certainly object to the uses to taxes, but that Iraq war cost a lot more than nice salaries to for Congress.

  16. Funny thing about King, he says, “I have a dream that one day men will not be judged by the color of.their skin but by the content of their character.” And then he plagiarizes 60% of his doctoral thesis. Then when the university is made aware of this, they refuse to revoke his doctorate, on the basis of his skin color.

      1. Everyone wants a “source.”

        What do you ask for when you are at
        THE Source?

        Just a different take on the ‘aliens are here’
        theme,
        AND
        you are still left without
        a Prime Mover.

    1. Yeah I’ve read that as well. The internet sure says he was a plagiarist.

      Google:
      martin luther king plagiarist
      About 579,000 results (0.11 seconds)

      Funny how liberals won’t allow certain things to be discussed in the MSM. They’d just shout “Heresy!” (racist) until the nice white people back off.

      Didn’t know you live in the Soviet Union, did ya? 🙂

      1. Well, you don’t have to be so pleased about it………….

        BTW
        It’s United Soviet States of America [USSA]

          1. Ridge, didn’t you call Jay a “jerk?”

            He’s a ‘cut-out.’

            I’ve been surrounded by the
            Criminals In Action for longer than I care to think.
            Everyone else is brainwashed by them (?)

            You have a beef with me?

            THEY will soon be more noticeable than the
            “Scarlet Letter!”

            Quite “exposed”

            THEY [the CIA] are still
            in my PC, trying to delete everything I type!

        1. As for Saint Martin Luther King, I really don’t care about him personally. To me he just another empty suit, like Obama. I am looking at the people behind Saint Martin Luther King.

          What I have seen is a pattern of deceit, in pursuit of one goal:

          Asia for Asians, Africa for Africans, white countries for everyone.

          This is genocide for white people.

          1. THAT is a bit racest………..Ridge………..

            I’m just a tad more concerned with
            “genocide” for the human race and the higher mammals,
            which would seem a bit over the top,
            but for the totbot insanity, since the ‘carrot people’
            went wilingly to their ultimate end…………

            Sometimes the preservation of free will seems
            to have a high price tag, and for what (?)
            The dolphins and porpoises were once happy,
            but now their ‘smile’ is meaningless.

          2. “THAT is a bit racest………..Ridge………..”

            In your opinion it is racist. You are just saying that because I am white. Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.

            “I’m just a tad more concerned with
            “genocide” for the human race and the higher mammals,”

            Your passive aggressive response is of no import to me or anyone else. Every identifiable group has a right to a group defense and you and your anti-white kind have no say in the matter.

            The UN Genocide Law protects identifiable national groups from genocide, by people like You.

            “Generally speaking, genocide does not necessarily mean the immediate destruction of a nation, except when accomplished by mass killings of all members of a nation. It is intended rather to signify a coordinated plan of different actions aiming at the destruction of essential foundations of the life of national groups, with the aim of annihilating the groups themselves. The objectives of such a plan would be the disintegration of the political and social institutions, of culture, language, national feelings, religion, and the economic existence of national groups, and the destruction of the personal security, liberty, health, dignity, and even the lives of the individuals belonging to such groups.”

            From genocide Wikipedia entry.

            Stop playing passive aggressive games, anti-whites. We are not going away.

          3. Ridge, the ‘pointing finger’ usually means self-recrimination.

            You’ve gone from not making sense to complete nonsense,
            which is a tamer, more common form of insanity……
            in most cases these days……..meaning….. due to….
            totbot ‘thinking.’

            Certainly no sense in relation to my posts,
            and the ‘bots [hate] me like there is no tomorrow
            because for them and their [willing {?}] hosts…..
            well, THEY seem to think of me as a threat (?)
            AND
            they think collectively……………….

            YOU don’t even know me !

      1. Another source is Plagiarism and the Culture War by Theodore Pappas. This one is kind of ironic as it’s probably written by a liberal. Quote in front of book is “No more evidence is needed; the verdict is in; nothing is more intolerant of a diversity of opinion than a ‘liberal’ society touting the virues of tolerance and diversity.”
        I would add that another verdict that’s glaring is “Anti-racist is a code word for Anti-white.

        1. Stephen Jay Gould is yet another anti-white hero, that was recently revealed to
          be a charlatan, liar and a fraud. You guys can research that for yourselves.

          Google:
          “Stephen Jay Gould charlatan”

          Really, whites should just laugh at ourselves, for how foolish we have been. We let ourselves be taken in by anti-white con artists. lol

          1. Then what ‘color’ was Gould’s [parachute]?
            He was an excellent ‘naturalist’ and writer,
            albeit himself led astray on hardcore Darwinism

          2. “Stephen Jay Gould” fraud

            Is the best search term. It will lead to a Wired article, a New York Times Article, etc.

            Scientists Measure the Accuracy of a Racism Claim New York Times

            “I just didn’t trust Gould,” he said. “I had the feeling that his ideological stance was supreme. When the 1996 version of ‘The Mismeasure of Man’ came and he never even bothered to mention Michael’s study, I just felt he was a charlatan.”

            Hey HAL838 , why do you defend proven frauds, liars and charlatans? What is your malfunction?

          3. His books are very good, Ridge.
            At least the ones I’ve read (?)

            Have you read him?

            Pure Darwinism is hogwash,
            but nature ie real

          4. I cannot judge individual jews
            and he is not a personal friend of mine,
            so no personal opinion was or is necessary.

          1. “Jerks” know no race, Ridge

            Last time I checked, I am “white,” too.
            Although I still have a rash.

            Besides,
            I was agreeing with you [I think]

          2. You were calling me a jerk as well and you are defending proven liars.

            Sorry, white or not, I wouldn’t like to be in your company Hal.

        1. “Now take your objections to BU.”

          They were already taken to BU and were rejected by corrupt individuals of your political persuasion.

          Your suggestion to appeal to a cabal of corrupt individuals, is an insult to truth and justice.

          1. Ridggiles—

            Yawn.

            Glad I got under your skin. Of course everything not appropriate to your world view is “corrupt”. When you complain to BU make sure to cite other Phds that that had to be invalidated for similar reasons after the person who wrote it died. And make sure to cite examples of purported white genocide in your objections.

Comments are closed.