NEW DRUG/”VACCINE” IN EUROPE “CORRECTS” ...
Yesterday I blogged about the possibilities opened up by recent Japanese experiments that have successfully produced egg cells from stem cells, and about the implications these emerging technologies spell for what is increasingly looking to be a transhumanist future. There I noted that my co-author Scott de Hart and I argued in our book Transhumanism: A Grimoire of Alchemical Agendas, that much of what the world calls "transhumanism" is really not all that modern a phenomenon, but merely an update of an old, and quintessentially alchemical agenda.
One of the things that alchemical texts spoke rather anachronistically about was the production of a homunculus or artificial human in a "flask," or test tube if you will. And as I detailed in an earlier book The Philosophers' Stone, in some alchemical texts, the celebrated Philosophers' Stone is referred to as an elixir, which can prolong life, heal diseases, or elevate human consciousness. Indeed, Dr. de Hart and I pointed out in Transhumanism that DARPA (Defense Advance Research Projects Agency) is, in effect, looking for precisely that: a universal vaccine applicable against all possible diseases.
Now there is this very interesting development in Europe:
Genetically Modified Humans? New Gene-Altering Drug Paves Way for Mass Modification
Ponder that one very carefully: a drug that modifies genetic defects. Indeed, the article itself alludes to the danger:
"While the drug is only meant to be given to 1 or 2 out of every million people, it paves way for further experimentation into the field of biotechnology and human alteration. Soon, doctors may be giving out drugs to treat any ‘defects’ in genes, whether it be for the so-called ‘fat’ gene or another instance where a damaged gene is present. It could even apply to purported ‘criminal’ genes that are said to predict an individual’s future ‘life of crime’. It may sound crazy, but scientists are already making even more serious moves that will alter or ‘create’ humankind."
The question is, against what control group do we measure a "defect"? Who, really, is doing the defining of what that defect is? and more importantly, what is to be "done" about it? What is it was a "defect" that produces human genius, say, in a Nikola Tesla, or a Mozart, or a Rembrandt? Is this defect to be modified?
And while we're at it, what sorts of scientific studies have been done concerning the long term, trans-generational effects of the use of such drugs? Notably, the article provides no clue that any such studies have been done, and indeed, it would be impossible for them to have been done since the technology is only recently emergent, and therefore, trans-generational studies are an impossibility, yet, we rush to deploy such technologies...
...and to do so without any public debate. This, my friends, smacks of an elite with a hidden agenda, and in a hurry...
... See you on the flip side.
16 Comments
Help the Community Grow
Please understand a donation is a gift and does not confer membership or license to audiobooks. To become a paid member, visit member registration.
Dr. Farrell has been writing about & talking about “open” systems vs “closed” systems.
“They” are at it again.
Once again the “open” internet is at risk, and they are using the United Nations as the vehicle to accomplish it. The “event” is set for next month(December).
http://blacklistednews.com/
The ‘Genetic Fix’ will initiate all new births entering into this matrix of form as: unipolar automatons, all with bobble-head grinning smiles ready to march off to the factory.
Oh! I forgot to add. Will the new GMO-biped be labled as such?
They’ve probably already patented 150+ types of labels, certificates of authentification, ect., ect.
The counterfeiters are also “gearing-up”.
They’ll need to call old ‘Blade Runner’ Harrison Ford in from retirement to take care of those soulless, out-sourced, knock-offs.
That was one of the greatest science-fiction dialogue scenes when Roy Batty spoke his final words on that rain-swept rooftop/I’ve seen things you people wouldn’t believe. Attack ships on fire off the shoulder of Orion. I watched c-beams glitter in the dark near Tannhauser Gate.(pause)
All those moments will be lost like tears in the rain.(pause)
Time to die.
amunaor,
There is a new sci-fi book out that picks up on the Blade Runner saga. It is written by a famous Spanish reporter of Madrid, who sets a Blade Runner theme/place & crosses it with innuendoed references to the ongoing Bankster’s “PIGS” slaughter, going on now in the EU.
It’s appropriately titled:
Tears In the Rain.
In the short term this Brave New World hominid may not be embraced just yet by a wary public but no worries folks, as per amunaor’s rhetorical observation, the backup plan is already in force complements of Monsanto. We will be marinated and modified from the inside out one meal at a time unless the proponents of Proposition 37 (us included) roll up their sleeves and through their complacency stop being lap dogs.
For an apropo anaqlogy is to look at plants, who have already been down this “never-ending” road.
Today more than half the crops grown in the US have been genetically transformed either by chemical-induced or radiation-induced mutation. It is called mutagenesis. Many of these mutated fooda are grown organically and sold under the organic label. Not until the late 20th century did molecular biologists figue out how to manipulate the genetic material of food w/o cross-breeding, w/o mutating the cells with radiation, or w/o dousing them with carcinogens. Only the latest methods qualify as genetic modification, or Pandora’s box of genetic pollution.
The point here is the homo sapiens that are us, the progenity of those 2,000 that escaped through a bottleneck about 70,000 years ago, everything that they ate-has been genetically altered from its original form. Every act of domestication, every act of pollination, and every act of cross-breeding has changed the genetic makeup of human food. Transforming the code of the genome was simply the next “logical” step.
So if I may:
Once there were hunter-gatherers. Then everything changed. An organized tribe of “others” decided it could no longer leave food to the whimsy of the gods. These revolutionaries drained lakes, rerouted rivers, chopped down forests, and slashed straight into the guts of mother earth. They were being farmers.
Now the some of those farmers are heading towards “being farmed”.
They’re the next-new product.
I appologize profusely for being slightly off-topic at the moment but a slight rebuttal of Mozart’s genius is in need of addressing-
“What is it was a “defect” that produces human genius, say, in … a Mozart”-
there was no human positive “defect” that produced Mozart- he was an invention of a money-hungry elite-
please source Scottish musicologist Robert Newman’s website musicalrevisionism.info (grossly in need of up-dating but still contains much very valid info) not to mention his redice.com interviews about “The Manufacture of Mozart,” “The Music Iindustry,” etc.-
almost all that has been attributed to Mozart he didn’t write himself- the concept of this bogus childhood genius/Wunderkind “W.A. Mozart” was/is a complete fabrication of the music industry to sell music –
as I’m a professional musician this topic interests me greatly- not to mention the following:
and drugs/vaccines take it a mega physical step farther-
and we’re not living in a world of deception?- not even harmless “classical” music has been spared deception let alone the rest-
hope all are well- many regards-
Larry in Germany
LSM
Absolutely loved your “take” on “The Manufacture of Mozart”. It is; however, just the tip of an “iceberg” thats been in plain sight for a long time.
A word coined for this is,
“inattentional blindness”.
Hi Robert,
my “take” is not my own- I did nothing more than just try as succinctly possible to paraphrase the incredible research of Robert Newman- and his redice interview entitled “The Shakespeare Project” is equally interesting- looks like the validity/true identity of both Shakespeare and Mozart are bogus- we’ve all known that for a long time about Shakespeare but Mozart is a new one for us- and I’m sure the bogus list/”cast of characters” of other “independent” geniuses will continue-
stay well- Larry
I’ve just orderred a new book about those “Shakespeare origins”.
It’s a historical novel titled:
Marlow Paper: A Novel by Ros Barber.
I’am sure the “bogus list” is quite extensive.
Today they manufacture “stars” left & right. It’s a supply sided monopoly, whose control/distribrution, is both vertically & horizontally integrated throughout(with bogus synergies).
Larry I too was fascinated by this alleged bogus bill of goods that we’ve been sold. Haven’t had time yet to read it for myself and if membership to the website below gets in the way I may just have to save it for another time.
http://tonecoloralchemy.com/pages/robert-newman-mozarts-dirty-britches/
Anecdotally, I read once that the brilliant and eccentric Glenn Gould came to loathe Mozart’s music as somewhat banal though this never made me less of a fan.
I read an essay some 2-3 years ago about Einstein the details of which are now lost to me. The author presented big Al in a similar light as Robert Newman’s depiction of Mozart. That is a cultural icon of sorts. While he was perhaps the smartest postal clerk in Switzerland, he was said to have attained his insights through his dreams; certainly not a crime as other geniuses have admitted to the same. But the pitfall was, that despite the rumor of his math savvy to the contrary, the story said that he lacked the skills to work out the calculations to his own insights and had to enlist the help of others. The thesis continued that Einstein’s exaltation by the power elite later in his life was expedient by presenting his work as an unimpeachable manifesto in order to quell looming pesky over-unity research by others. Tesla is alleged late in his life to have made at least two overtures to Einstein for a meeting but was rebuffed. I wish I could cough up the details but the broader story obviously stayed with me.
Now kaumutef here on THE IMF’s “NEW” (OLD) Plan thread suggests that WWII might have been in no small part an attempt to derail The Thule Society’s erstwhile world changing new energy research. I guess JPF would be a go-to source for additional input.
Jay Weidman does a 1/2 hour youtube presentation on the alleged hidden life of Stanley Kubrick suggesting he with his unique camera techniques was blackmailed into filming a supplementary studio version of the Apollo lunar landings in which case was then shown to an unsuspecting public was a hybrid Hollywood rendition of what really happened.
And was Shakespeare, like some suggest, actually Francis Bacon?
So little time and so many holy cows to topple.
Einstein looks to be another one of these “bogies” There were several “storied” scenarios presented, like the ones you’ve mentioned, and ones like his wife being the real “brains” behind the math.
This is typical of the seeds the elite plant in a their “cover-up” ops.
JPF’s work on Roswell’s “flying saucer/alien(s)” touches upon this “bury the truth, layer by layer” method, in a detailed analyses.
James Fetzer also does a good analyses of this mehod used in 9/11 as well.
I highly recommend getting Weidman’s videos on the movie 2001, and Stanley Kubrick: mindblowing. KUBRICK’S ODYSSEY and BEYOND THE INFINITE KUBRICK’S ODYSSEY II. Alchemy invades Hollywood!
The best book I know of about Einstein’s possible fakery is ALBERT EINSTEIN THE INCORRIGIBLE PLAGIARIST by Christopher Jon Bjerknes. I have been convinced that Einstein’s wife may have been the major intellect who produced the “Einstein” material. It is all circumstantial evidence, but when you line all the ducks in a row, it is a very impressive argument. Bjerknes wrote a sequel: ANTICIPATIONS OF EINSTEIN. Both still available used at Amazon (for a price!). Only for those interested in “dissident” physics, as true believers will be outraged.
” Ever since we dispensed with God, we have only our selves to explain this meaningless horror of life.” ~ Dr. Ed Jessup( William Hurt ), from Paddy Chayefsky’s “Altered States”.