One of the things I have been constantly asked about, is the subject of chemtrails. I've usually responded that, as such, the subject in itself does not interest me in and of itself, but for what it might actually mean in conjunction with other technologies: weather modification, and...
...well, we'll get to the "and" part in a moment.
Another thing that has gnawed at me (and my co-author Scott de Hart and I discussed this in our book Transhumanism: A Grimoire of Alchemical Agendas), is the possibility that genetically modified foods might work similar genetic modifications in its consumers. Consider: these foods are the product of genetic engineering, of what scientists call "horizontal gene transfer" from one species to another, without any reproduction. If this can be done in plants, then ingesting them might produce similar results in humans.
If you're as concerned as I am about GMOs and the reckless power-mad profit-lusting insanity that has now gripped the Amerikan agribusiness industry and our equally corrupt "government," then consider the following article very carefully:
There are a number of highly crucial points this article makes and I want to draw your attention to them:
"…genetic engineering in the laboratory is crude, imprecise and invasive. The rogue genes inserted into a genome to make a GMO could land anywhere; typically in a rearranged or defective form, scrambling and mutating the host genome, and tend to move or rearrange further once inserted. Transgene instability is a big problem, and has been so right from the beginning. There is fresh evidence that GM crops grown commercially for years have rearranged [15, 16] (MON810 Genome Rearranged Again. Transgenic Lines Unstable hence Illegal and Ineligible for Protection, SiS 38). This is a real opportunity to challenge the validity of all biotech patents. Another key issue is safety. Transgene instability means that the original transgenic line has turned into something else, and even if it had been assessed as ‘safe’, this is no longer the case.
This is a vital point, since as Dr de Hart and pointed out in Transhumanism, one of the crucial points we discovered the "agribusiness" industry relied upon to promote their cruddy products was precisely that of "substantial equivalence," the FDA equivalent of "if it looks like corn, and tastes like corn, it's corn." At the same time, however, the very same industry was willing to abandon this protocol when it came to patenting its genetically engineered products.
We raised the specter in that book that, if this was the case, and if genetically modified organisms in turn induced genetic modifications in humans, could they then be made to pay a "royalty" to these miserific companies if DNA was found in them that came ultimately from their otherwise "substantially equivalent" corn? It sounds like the purest science fiction, but there it is in the above report: the engineered genomes are unstable, andas such will seek a more stable "home" and hencewill horizontally transfer yet again to other species. But if not a royalty, then as the above quotation avers, the original grant of patent - and therefore, a special monopoly - would seem to be null and void, for the organisms are mutating faster than the patents would seem to be processable.
Then note this statement:
"Once GMOs are unleashed in the environment, there is absolutely nothing to stop the natural occurrence of horizontal gene transfer to non-GMO organisms, especially considering GMOs’ increased tendency to do so. And what this process produces is anyone’s guess. There is a reason for the limits nature places on this type of thing, and we’ve long since past those limits."
In other words, by unleashing such organisms on a public which has not consented to the genetic modification of its own DNA, such corporations may in fact be exposing themselves to enormous damages, if for no other reason than "breaking and entering, robbery, invasion of privacy" ...clever lawyers could have a field day with this. Indeed, if one wanted to trace culpability and liability back to the ultimate sources, one would have to look at the foundations that began the whole quest for "agribusiness" and "patentable food" in the first place. File that under "things that make you go 'hmmm...'"
Now, back to that "and" part I mentioned above. Consider only the addition of chemtrails, the alleged (and in my opinion, very real) spraying of heavy metals into the atmosphere, and in that context, ponder these statements:
"…heat shock and pollutants such as heavy metals can favor horizontal gene transfer; and the presence of antibiotics can increase the frequency of horizontal gene transfer 10 to 10 000 fold.
"What are the ingredients of the aerosols typically seen in geo-engineering programs? You guessed it – heavy metals such as barium.
"…And just what are the conditions imposed by these geo-engineering programs? You guessed it again – abiotic stresses such as heat shock.
"…And just what is abundantly used specifically for genetic engineering? Bacteria that carry antibiotic resistance genes. Therefore, more and stronger antibiotics are being used, which increases – you guessed it once again – horizontal gene transfer."
The authoress of this article - Barbara H. Peterson - concludes with these words:
"Get ready, as we are in for one helluva ride, folks! Hold onto your DNA just as hard as you can by avoiding anything GMO, and spread the word. This is not something that can be ignored for long, as mutations, genetic disorders and abnormalities, as well as health issues can only increase with the rampant spread of transgenic organisms (GMOs), and humans are not exempt. It’s time to put up the stop sign at your own front door and just say NO to GMOs!"
I would not only add my own hearty "hear hear!" to her conclusion and exhortation, but would also add to the savvy lawyers out there: start watching for the lawsuit that can break the back of the whole Duponzanto monster, so that we can return to real seeds, and real food. With luck, they might have to appear before their own elite-sponsored world court to answer for their criminal stupidity.
See you on the flip side.
- BUZZ ALDRIN AND ANTARCTICA: UPDATE - December 3, 2016
- MEMBERS: VIDCHAT DEC 2 2016 - December 2, 2016
- NEWS AND VIEWS FROM THE NEFARIUM DEC 1, 2016 - December 1, 2016
- TIDBIT: NEW VIDEO WITH DARK JOURNALIST ABOUT CERN HERE: - December 1, 2016
- THE UPCOMING ITALIAN CONSTITUTIONAL REFERENDUM - December 1, 2016
- CONFLICTING MESSAGES FROM NATO AND EU - November 30, 2016
- MEANWHILE IN FRANCE: SKARKOZY’S BID FOR ANOTHER STAY IN THE ... - November 29, 2016
- TIDBITS: DEMONSTRATIONS IN PARIS - November 29, 2016
- “RE-SHORING”: A SECURITY MEASURE? - November 28, 2016
- ANTARCTICA, JOHN KERRY, PYRAMIDS, AND CONSPIRACY THEORIES… - November 27, 2016