Daily News

NOW IT’S SYRIA’S URANIUM???

Really...it's getting to be like a bit of theater isn't it? It would be laughable, were it not for the loss of life and suffering involved. We've seen every excuse in the world trotted out, it seems, to justify an "intervention" by the West in Syria, with the usual "human rights" leading the charge. That, of course, didn't pan out too well. So now, it seems, Syria has a lot of uranium we should  all be worried about:

Now the West Is Worried About Syrian Uranium! Must Invade?

This, it seems, is the latest scam. But for once it also seems that The Daily Bell might be missing some possibilities in its reverse engineering of the process of reasoning the elites may be putting into play here, so permit me to indulge in my usual high octane speculation.

The mention of Iraq in this article may recall, for some who remember the whole fiasco, what happened when we were all lied to about the necessity of the need to invade that country. First we were told that Saddam Hussein was sponsoring terrorism. That one quickly fell by the wayside to be replaced by the prospect of an immanent nuclear Iraq. He was building "weapons of mass destruction" (specifically atomic bombs), and had demonstrated his willingness to use such weapons by gassing the Kurds. No doubt, the man was evil, and may even have used a-bombs had he had them. Of course, Saddam was no fool either, and may not have used them, knowing that it may have called forth a similar response from the west. But in any case, he didn't have them.

But you'll recall there was story that was quickly circulated as the invasion was under way, and the evidence for such a program was not forthcoming: Saddam, we were informed, had dismantled his whole program and shipped it, lock, stock, and German-made centrifuge, to...

...Syria.

So in a certain sense, invading Syria would (follow the twisted logic here), be completing what we started in Iraq.

Which brings us to Iran.

One would have to be living on top of a pillar or in a Tibetan cave not to realize that the western elite very much wants to "do something" about Iran. Blogs occur almost daily on the subject, on both sides of the issue. The logic here, though, is what interests me. Suppose they manage to sell everyone on an invasion - correction, they'll call it an "intervention" - of Syria, and suppose that the reason is, in part, that Syria has a lot of uranium which, perish the thought, could end up in some rogue state's hands. The logic here isn't what the Daily Bell makes it out to be, but is rather more simple: if we didn't shrink from invading Syria over the possession of uranium, all the more reason not to shrink from invading Iran over the means to enrich it for fuel for a bomb.

Watch this one carefully folks, because this seems to be what is happening here: a way to piggyback an Iranian project on a Syrian one.  Same ole same ole.

See you on the flip side.

11 thoughts on “NOW IT’S SYRIA’S URANIUM???”

  1. “The road to Tehran leads through Damascus”.

    It’s all pre-planned, including the “uprisings” in Africa and Middle East..
    Wetern sponsored (and created) Al Qaeda mercenaries are used to wreak havoc in those parts of the world, all to further Western oligarchical interests.
    Puppet states like the Saudis and Qatar only too willing to go along (probably not much choice).
    Be it gold, oil, drugs, geo-political re-allignments (to isolate Russia and China), ancient artefacts & technology (Cairo and Bagdad museum raids, and that’s only the ones we know of).
    Myanmar has just sold its soul to the devil using Suu Kyi (another Western puppet) to make it happen.

  2. Frankie Calcutta

    That bit in “Transhumanism” about the ancient Iraqi seed vault being moved to Syria was a doozie. Lets hope it has since been moved to Russia and they begin marketing them worldwide for consumers to buy, plant and preserve. That would certainly rile the transhumanist demons as well as hopefully protect these seeds from extinction.

  3. Robert Barricklow

    I really want to see anyone on who seriously believes these carboard on-the-fly political storyboards, being regurgitated, & immediately mainstreamed, via satellite, into the dumbed-down boob-tube walking/talking sponge-tomes of fake news.
    Apparently, sports addicts are just waaay to smart, to engage in this blatant propaganda, celebrating images of eggs on a skillet, as brains.

    1. The French are going into Mali……the dogon live in Mali….under the guise of gold mining…maybe they are looking for artifacts. Look what happened to Iraq.

  4. It’s devolved from theatre, to an out of control Monty Python episode!

    http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2013-01-16/it-will-take-fed-seven-years-deliver-300-tons-german-gold

    Tastiest comment from that thread:
    Germany wants their gold holdings repatriated to home soil. They have asked the French to return all of their gold, at a rate of 50 tonnes per year until all 374 metric tonnes are received.

    The French have just commenced military operations in Mali. Mali is Africa’s third largest gold producer. Mali, this past year, increased its gold production by just over 50 metric tonnes.

    Is anyone else seeing the connection here?

    I’m willing to bet that France does not have Germany’s gold and the Bundesbank has given them a few years to mine it from Mali. Yet the Mali source must be secure, hence the military must make sure the gold flows.

    1. the pink panther is going after Africas jewels….they have no chance….unless, they can get Ben to explain to the germans that gold is not money, paper with promises is.

Comments are closed.