I've been deliberately avoiding for the past weeks talking about the Sandy Hook shootings. Suffice it to say, we all know it was a tragedy, and I suspect that many of you, like me, have been quietly investigating the incident and are coming to the same conclusion I am: there is much about it that reeks of pre-planning, much about it that reeks of yet another orchestrated bit of ritual and social engineering. By now, it has become a familiar pattern: "disturbed" teens (usually boys), go on a rampage, shooting up schools, classmates, teachers. We then get the usual "counselors" for the grief, and the requisite period of a few hours or days goes by, and finally someone in Dummycrookery calls for more stringent gun laws.Sandy Hook in this respect proves to be no different. The usual gun grabbers are out in force and of course once again it is the Dummycrooks leading the charge (with a few helpful chimings-in from Republithug "leaders").
This much, at least, has been perfectly predictable, and I can predict that the evil people orchestrating and preparing such events (firstly, by prescribing the hideous drugs to teenagers that turn them into sociopathic killers) will continue to perpetrate them until they have grabbed every last gun in America, and they won't stop with guns...then it will be on to any other potential weapon. In short, expect them to keep milking such events for all they are worth to support their agenda of a disarmed population.
But that's not what concerns me.
Now, don't get me wrong. I am as concerned about the gun grab as many of you are, even though I don't own one. In fact, I don't even like being around them. But I am also quite certain that an armed population is the last check against tyrants and sociopaths in the political and oligarchical class.
But again, it's not the predictable gun grabbery of Dummycrookery that bothers me this time.
What bothers me this time is that Sandy Hook is being milked and exploited for a whole new meme, one that we might call "transhumanist." Consider this:
That's right... notice that what is being injected into the mix here is the precedent (1) to genetically map a slain (and alleged) killer's body in order to (2) form a database by which to predict potential killers and eventually (3) create a possible means for prevention.
Now, granted, the article doesn't say all that, but rest assured, that's what it's about. So how is this "transhumanist"? In one very important respect: the transformation of human consciousness. We can fully expect that, gradually, as incidents of this sort are repeated (and they will be), that will will be increasingly treated to stories of how "scientists" are "closing in" on "the evil gene." All this, as Dr. de Hart and I pointed out in Transhumanism: A Grimoire of Alchemical Agendas, is part of that "behavioral genetics" and "molecular biology" craze popularized and funded by certain well known "foundations" beginning back in the 1950s. Don't get me wrong, I'm not arguing that there may not be a genetic basic for patterns of human behavior. But that's just the point: Patterns. Genetics is not some sort of ineluctable predestination in the Spinozist or Calvinist sense.
But we are going to be told it is: He/she/you can't help it; you carry "defective genes." (Ahh.... the whiff of eugenics once again wafts over the landscape like a sulfurous Rockefellerian body odor). The data, as the above article avers, is already - like that for global warming - is already being bought and paid for. The department of Pre-Crime is already being mapped out. The "counseling" bureaucracies are already being planned.
The fact that "they" are doing this in Lanza's case is to my mind the strongest indicator that the whole thing was planned - and this was one of the bits of the planning - in the first case, for it's not even clear that we're dealing with a lone killer in this instance. But nevermind all that: what matters is the story and the utility of the story to push yet another agenda (finding the "evil" gene). Had James Holmes not ruined everything by surviving, we would have heard calls for genetic mapping in his instance as well. No matter; they can collect more samples from the next school shooting, which means of course, that the alleged killers in such instances are either going to have to die on the scene, which will complicate planning a bit, but nonetheless, it is the implication of the new meme. Failing a killer's death at the scene, "they" will simply collect DNA samples from alleged killers, and convicted killers, and this will in turn become a new class of evidence in trials: a "predisposition" to evil... what a field day for prosecutors and defense attorneys, and we can imagine the glee of the Supremes as they consider the first case before the high court trying to establish all this as precedent.
As for Sandy Hook... given not only its political exploitation, but now, its utilization to effect yet another transformation and to plant yet another "meme" for social engineering purposes, and given all the manifest problems in the "story" itself, there's no doubt in my mind that it was a planned event. The real culprits - big pharma and their drugs, intelligence with their mind control techniques and technologies - those are the ones who, once again, escape scrutiny. It isn't about genes, or guns, folks.
See you on the flip side.