Yesterday I left off in this mini-series of analysis of the Cyprus crisis by pointing out that the quiet player in the whole affair was Germany. And I indicated that this was where, once again, we will indulge in high octane speculation. But first, I want you to consider carefully the following highly intriguing article about the affair from The Daily Bell:

Was the EU Right About Cyprus?

And then consider that Germany's and the IMF's (that would be Wall Street, folks) initial call was for a much sharper fleecing of Cypriots:

Germany And IMF's Initial Deposit Haircut Demand: 40% Of Total

Now, all of this would seem to make Germany but the catspaw for US financial interests, and thus the driving locomotive for holding the EU together. In short, Germany is playing the role, on this view, of the financial bully of Europe, armed with helmet, chair, and whip to keep the felines tame and caged.

But we'd do well to recall some other things about recent German financial and geopolitical action that may indicate that a much more subtle game is being played by that country. The first of these is, of course, Germany calls for the repatriation of its gold reserves - reportedly the second largest in the world after the United States - from the New York Federal Reserve, a move that indicates Germany has about as much confidence in that (very corrupt) institution as does the average American. But we would do well to recall that Germany's repatriation calls were not restricted to just the U.S. Fed, but the Banque de France and the Bank of England.

Germany, in other words, was also signaling its lack of confidence in the next two largest economies of Europe and, perhaps not coincidentally, in the only known European thermonuclear powers.  Such a move, viewed from the EU perspective, is hardly one that betokens long-term German solidarity with the whole EU scheme. As The Daily Bell put it in the very last sentence of the above-referenced article, "In the case of Cyprus, Eurocrats apparently want to destabilize the island as a tax haven. They may end up destabilizing Europe." But if that be the case, then the calls for massive expropriation - i.e., theft - of Cypriots' deposits that emanated from Germany may be viewed, I contend, as part of a larger financial policy - and in the longer term, geopolitical policy - that may be designed to do precisely that. (See How German fears of underwriting Russian oligarchs pushed Cyprus to crisis). And that brings us back to Germany and Russia. Consider this statement:

"There are two reasons for this unusual conditionality. First, German politicians and many of their European colleagues suspect Cyprus to be a tax haven and a money-laundering site for Russian oligarchs. Of the 68 billion euros stored in Cypriot bank accounts, around 20 billion ($26 billion) belong to Russian account holders. A report compiled last year by the German secret service, the Bundesnachrichtendienst, claims to have found evidence that Cypriot banks or Russian bank branches based in Cyprus are used to launder illegal money."

Recall that the Russian oligarchs pulled their money out of Cypriot banks prior to the theft proposal. It strains reason, however, to assume that the German government or its own elite would not have known or predicted such a move.  Indeed, I have often pointed out that Germany is increasingly dependent on Russian energy supplies to fuel its industry and economy. It is therefore geopolitically unlikely that Germany would make any overt moves to anger Russia.

So what do we have?

Consider yet another possibility: that Germany is playing a careful game, one it has to play as the shill for Euro-American interests on the one hand, and as the power broker with Russia in Eastern Europe on the other. In short, Germany might be deliberately being cast by the Anglo-American oligarchs as the "bad boy of Europe" once again, when the real austerity measures are not coming out of Berlin or, for that matter, even Frankfurt-am-Main, but the City of London and New York. (Consider the following Daily Bell article in that light: Real Reason for the Cyprus Debacle?). It's an old banskter game, one that meant that Imperial Germany had to be "taken out" in the four years' siege called World War One, then rendered a compliant client state by financial emasculation, and then a dictatorship (that didn't work out too well for anyone concerned).

Unfortunately for the banksters, the Germans just aren't that stupid, and are keenly aware not only of the crimes of the National Socialists, but about the bankster shenanigans that put them into power. So the problem of German diplomacy is now what it has always been, play a careful balancing act with the West, while trying to open up to the East. Repatriating its gold from New York, Paris, and London was the real sign of a long term agenda, and that, I believe, is this: the German elites, both banking, corporate, and military-political, have seen the handwriting on the wall and the degree of fraud and corruption in the Anglo-American oligarchy's management of "the system" for the past century. They know the long term shift of the center of world power is to the East, and they intend to ride that wave. It's a long, gradual policy of disengagement from the West, while trying to remain cognizant of its position as the preeminent European power. The repatriation was the first signal that Germany was saying "the Rockefailure-Rottenchild Emperor has no clothes." As a Mr. G.B. put it to me in an email, echoing my own growing suspicions, "This 'experiment' is going to get very interesting. I think Germany along with some Russian 'input' is manipulating the whole event in order to show that the EU/ECB/IMF is like the emperor with no clothes."

There's just one problem, and that's called NATO, the military aspect of the EU. This international bureacracy has become, in effect, the European military franchise of the globalogna-ists, the internal muscle to make sure its members don't become too "independent." Indeed, as Zbgnw Brzznsk (again, that's my vowelless disdain for Zbigniew Brzezisnki) correctly observed, NATO was as much about "how to deal with the reality of German power" as it was about containing the Soviet Union. (One might amend that comment to include France in the assertion, a fact made more obvious by General De Gaulle's refusal to play the Anglo-American game. Alas, now we have Sarkozy and Hollande).

Thus, if this reading of the situation is correct, we will expect to see a similar crisis-driven dissolution of NATO (not without opposition of course). It is perhaps interesting to note that German Federal Chancellorin Angela Merkel withdrew German troops from Afghanistan.

I don't look for German military involvement in Syria or Iran (and I'll bet the screws will be applied, but quietly, rejected, perhaps in the form of sending only support, not combat troops). The bottom line is, the average German doesn't want to be the policeman of Europe nor to bail out other countries any more than the average American wants to be the policeman of the world or responsible for the corruption of, say, Mexico. The problem is, at least the German government and elite appears to be listening - even if only with one ear - to the people of Germany and the rest of Europe. In America's case, the government's ears are completely blocked by oligarchical wax.

If this point wasn't plain enough, putting it differently may help: What is holding Europe together right now isn't Brussels or idiots like Van Rompuy, Christine Lagarde, or the blockheads of London; it's NATO, and the military fist. As Europeans increasingly question the wisdom of the EU and its technocrats, watch for them to also accompany their questions with a new list of concerns that directly address NATO, its purpose, and existence, itself. And this is good news for Moscow and Beijing. And the heavier  the hand that the Eurocrats apply in Europe, the more their grip loosens, and the more they play into the hands of the BRICS nations, allowing Medvedev and Putin to compare them to the Soviet Union and to play the role of guardians, of more velvet-handed authoritarians and protectors of a more moral international order, the ultimate in inappropriate irony.

So what does the long term look like? Can you say BRIGCSA, the expansion of the BRICS, or BRICSA, nations, to include Germany?

As for Cyprus... Russia's terms aren't onerous... they just want a naval base (a nice vice grip on Turkey)...

Russians want Naval Port, German Navy could be out with 3 months notice.

...and thus begins the game of empire all over again...

See you on the flip side.



Joseph P. Farrell

Joseph P. Farrell has a doctorate in patristics from the University of Oxford, and pursues research in physics, alternative history and science, and "strange stuff". His book The Giza DeathStar, for which the Giza Community is named, was published in the spring of 2002, and was his first venture into "alternative history and science".


  1. paul de gagne on March 26, 2013 at 2:04 am

    It seems Voltaire’s Bastards are at it again. (great, great, great grand-bastards that is.)

    And I thought Modernity was brought in by a batch of nice Enlightenment Intellectuals instead of Anglo-Illuminati types and a bunch of Jewish – khazar bankers!?!? (maybe, history keeps repeating itself as always only this time it’s wrapped up in a not so pretty dark, dark night gown? Not my style or piece of pastry?)

    This Article and all the posts beneath it are intriguing. All the plots and diabolical scheming involved. (or what would you do if you were in their hot-seats!)

    I might as well continue reading Robert Ludlum’s fiction. (I got four more of his books now sitting on my almost-new bookshelf from Goodwill I haven’t even got to read yet?) At least if one wants to ‘cheat’ they can go to the back of his books and find out how it usually ends. -hollyweird style with the good-guys winning but also a few of the bad guys surviving so as to make sure he’s sells another episode.)

    What’s that former Greek God of Technology name? I forgot it. The one with the lame leg who I believe was married to Aprodite whom he caught fooling around with Ares? Is there a Stellar Consternation named after him or does he merit one?

    If so I think his symbol is ‘rising’ in the Astrological Night Sky!

    Well, it should for the Computers are really the culprits behind all these Confabulations we are witnessing. (whose going to go against the facts or DEFY Computers?)

    The continuing saga of a satanic Pollyanna just might, ha, ha, ah, ah! (Apocalypse Theater here we go this time around!)

    Or like Marco’s hints at — The Barbarians are at it again!

  2. Robert Barricklow on March 25, 2013 at 8:11 pm

    As Inspector Montalbano says/
    Putting a fox inside a hen house
    with the wolf outside.

  3. Frankie Calcutta on March 25, 2013 at 8:02 pm

    Interesting coincidence– Pope Francis and Putin were both living in Germany during the latter half of the 1980’s. Putin was a KGB agent in Dresden and Pope Francis was getting his doctorate in theology in Freiberg which is near Dresden, but there is some confusion to this as some news articles including wikipedia claim he studied in Hamburg and not Freiberg. Pope Francis also had a degree in chemistry.

    And not far from them Russian speaking Angela Merkel was also studying chemistry at the Academy of Sciences in East Berlin in the 1980’s. Her father was also a theologian of some repute but his position did not impede his children’s education choices, as being a pastor in East Germany did for most families. (can you say intelligence operative?) He had also made the unusual defection with his family from West Germany to East Germany. Merkel got her start in German politics in a religious party.

    Is it possible Pope Francis, Angela Merkel and Vladimir Putin were all “friends?”

    • Frankie Calcutta on March 25, 2013 at 8:14 pm

      If you don’t here from me again it probably means I was right. The KGB conspiracy to control the world?

      And where was Obamma back in the 80’s if he really wasn’t at Columbia like he claims?

    • LSM on March 26, 2013 at 7:01 am

      “Is it possible Pope Francis, Angela Merkel and Vladimir Putin were all “friends?”- I wouldn’t rule anything out-

      obviously Merkel was forced to learn Russian in the former East German educational system- if my read sources are correct Putin speaks fluent German, even though when making one of his rare appeances in front of the Bundestag, he speaks Russian and all the Krauts have their earphones tuned to translation-

      and if William Cooper has credulity, it seems Francis is not the 1st pope with a degree in chemistry: John Paul II worked as a chemist for I.G. Farben during the war-

      “And where was Obamma back in the 80′s if he really wasn’t at Columbia like he claims?”- good question

    • Frankie Calcutta on March 26, 2013 at 7:27 pm

      Add one more East German to the mix– current German President Joachim Gauck who was also one of the leaders of the revolution which brought down the Iron Curtain. Gauck was also a Lutheran pastor before he entered politics in in 1989.

      So here is my high octane speculation for the evening– a cell within the KGB made of Christian anti-bankster nationalists (exemplified by Putin) recruit foreign clergymen from different dominations to fight for their international cause against banksterism. One recruit was an Argentinian Jesuit, Father Bergoglio, whose rise to prominence was facilitated by the KGB cell feeding him the name of Jesuit communist subversives on the Soviet payroll. Father Bergoglio was then able to purge these communists from the ranks of the Jesuits. This gave him a reputation which helped catapult him to the head of the Jesuit Order and now the Papacy.

      Eventually this clandestine KGB cell was able to seize control over the entire KGB apparatus and eventually install one if its leaders, Putin, into the Presidency of Russia and many of their recruits like Bergoglio, Merkel, and Gauk into other positions of power. The endgame of of this conspiracy is to rid Europe and the world of these vile banksters.

      Possibly behind this original Christian nationalistic KGB cell is the Orthodox Church itself.

      • Joseph P. Farrell on March 26, 2013 at 8:25 pm

        Frankie: truer words about that Orthodox cell in the KGB …. I presented and argued that case YEARS ago to my Russian history students, and that it was an inevitable result of the Sergian compromise of 1936…you’ve expanded the idea somewhat – internationalized it – but essentially, I think it is a thesis worth pursuing. While you’re at it, look at a Russian secret society during the Soviet era called the All-Russian Union for the Liberation of the People….

        • Frankie Calcutta on March 27, 2013 at 6:25 am

          “look at a Russian secret society during the Soviet era called the All-Russian Union for the Liberation of the People….”

          Thanks. That would have been my next guess– if not the Orthodox Church directly then a secret society of some sort. An alchemical secret order? Chancellor Merkel and Pope Francis are both Christian chemists. Alchemical Christianity?

        • Yaj on March 27, 2013 at 12:38 pm

          “All-Russian Union for the Liberation of the People”? Isn’t that an organization put together by the Nazis in Prague in 1944?

        • Frankie Calcutta on March 27, 2013 at 7:57 pm

          I’m not sure if this is the same organization or possibly an off shoot:

          VSHSON or All-Russian Social-Christian Union for the Liberation of the People

          “The ideology of the VSHSON was social Christianity (a “third path – not communism, not capitalism”) – the projection of Christian ethics on a reformed social and economical structure of Soviet society.
          VSHSON members stood for the abolition of Soviet totalitarianism and the resurrection of a “healthy balance between the individual, society, and government”, and the resurrection of the individual (versus Soviet collectivism). As compared to other secret youth organizations of the 1960s – early 1970s, the bylaws of VSHSON had stated that every member of the organization “is not only a propagandist and organizer, but a soldier”.

          …. is that not the Core Belief of Pope Francis I : “The ideology of the VSHSON was social Christianity (a “third path – not communism, not capitalism”) – the projection of Christian ethics on a reformed social and economical structure of Soviet [read Bankster] society.”

          Wiki states that VSHSON “In many ways the organization can be compared to the emigre NTS.:

          the strategy of the NTS:

          “The organization adopted a new strategy after the war called the “molecular theory” of revolution, where Soviet citizens were urged (via propaganda literature and radio messages) to create “molecular revolutionary groups” no larger than three people in size in order to minimize the risk of infiltration. These groups were to keep in contact with the NTS center which was located in Frankfurt, Germany. At a ripe moment, the center would coordinate the activity of the molecules and create a revolutionary army out of them.”

          Frankfurt? Didn’t Merkel’s father emigrate to East Germany from Frankfurt? Pope Francis at one point studied in Frankfurt according to some accounts. Molecular Theory of revolution would be easy for trained chemists to understand.

          but eventually, a white Russian anti-soviet clandestine organization operating out of Germany would inevitably bring in other partners… like the CIA. And now we might be back to square one again.

          • Yaj on March 28, 2013 at 6:34 am


            Going by Wikipedia, VSHSON only briefly existed in the 1960s before the KGB crushed it.

          • Joseph P. Farrell on March 28, 2013 at 6:42 am

            The fact that it existed at all….

          • JHM on March 29, 2013 at 7:16 am

            Speculations galore. Merkels father was from Hamburg, not Frankfurt/Main, and she was born and spent her first years there.

          • Frankie Calcutta on March 29, 2013 at 7:55 am


            hamburgers versus hotdogs. All of Germany was a hotbed of cold war shenanigans.

            it seems the most effective conspiracies would be the ones most inconceivable and off the radar. Christian KGB agents recruiting foreign clergymen while the rest of the KGB was recruiting radical students seems plausible to me.

            but as you say, speculation galore. Who knows? but fun to contemplate and research.

      • Yaj on March 27, 2013 at 12:42 pm


        “All-Russian Union for the Liberation of the People”? Isn’t that an organization put together by the Nazis in Prague in 1944?


        And while possible that there were “Jesuit communist subversives on the Soviet payroll”, a lot of Argentine fascists the new pope helped out in the 1970s sure like to throw such names around for their own ends.

      • Robert Barricklow on March 28, 2013 at 10:03 am

        Thanks Frankie for the high-octane speculation. That Dr. Farrell’s been down that road adds weight to it. Wasn’t even on my radar.
        And, good question Larry.

    • JHM on March 29, 2013 at 7:10 am

      Pope Franciscus studying in Germany. Sorry, that is utter nonsense. Please check your sources and stop spreading unsubstantiated stuff.

      The FreibUrg story stems from some german newspaper who claimed that he had studied in FreibUrg in Baden (south western Germany near the Rhine!), not FreibErg in Saxony. FreibErg is the German mining academy (University), not a religious school. Meanwhile the University of FreibUrg has checked their archives and it came out he never has studied there. He has nonetheless spent three months at the Philosophisch-Theologische Hochschule Sankt Georgen in Frankfurt/Main in 1985. But there as well he did not study officially.

      So, just forget this whole KGB friends circle stuff. Dear, dear …

      • Frankie Calcutta on March 29, 2013 at 7:37 am


        I did state there was some confusion regarding his studies in Germany With Der Speigel stating he studied in Freiberg and then retracting it. Thanks for the clarification. Yet he did spend time studying in Frankfurt? Interesting.

        “These groups (molecular revolutionary cells) were to keep in contact with the NTS center which was located in Frankfurt, Germany.”

        more grist for the conspiracy mill.

        Of course, the KGB had never limited its operations to Europe and were very active in South and Central America as we well know and probably still are.

  4. Miguel on March 25, 2013 at 7:09 pm

    I fully subscribe the hypothesis that Cyprus is a heavy hand being played to show that the emperor has no clothes.

    However, the groups playing this hand are not necessarily part of the broader German state but rather what I call “rogue bankers” from within who are hell bent on collapsing the Rothschild/Rockefeller axis and handing it over to yes!… our friends from the Fascist International… To that extent… you have “rogue bankers” in key positions at the EU Commission, BCE and IMF who from now onwards are going to be making the “dumbest” and most counterintuitive decisions so the boat keeps sinking.

    These rogue bankers are rife particularly inside the IMF. Ms Lagarde had her Paris apartment searched (on account of an on/off investigation) following the Cyprus flop. We must go back to the days following Ms. Lagarde recent entry into the IMF and her statements in favour of a gold standard… soon thereafter… an investigation was opened on account of corruption deals during her tenure as Fin Minister. The recent search is part of the same case.

    Likewise, we must not forget her predecessor, DSK… who prior to his hotel maid ordeal… had openly made statements questioning the role of the dollar as a reserve currency and proposing a transition to a gold standard.

    It is true Germany is playing a balancing act, but only within the constraints that are being imposed on the country and its leveraged/compromised banking system from outside…

  5. Bear claw Chris Lapp on March 25, 2013 at 6:19 pm

    Berezovsky’s Dead.

    Whether is was suicide or a hit, the moral of the story is this: DON’T F#$k WITH PUTIN!

    • Konsti on March 26, 2013 at 3:31 pm

      Excuse me, but you are getting too much information from mainstream media. Putin had no intension in Berezovsky’s death. If he had, he would not have waited 13 years.
      Two weeks ago Berezovsky send hand-written letter to Putin with apology and request to return back to Russia. His surroundings are saying he was in deep depression also because of nostalgia. There are rumors that letter from Berezovsky to Putin had continuation, and some sort of negotiations took place week before death. And they might had agreed on something.
      Berezovsky was a key person in two Chechen wars. He was dealing with terrorists and also he was a go-between terrorists and some western intelligences(guess which).
      Berezovsky was an emotional person, and he might agreed to testimony also about his personal crimes. And that theoretically could have been his ticket back.

  6. Frankie Calcutta on March 25, 2013 at 1:40 pm

    Possibly even the Pentagon is cutting ties with the banksters and moving closer to Russia and the neo-cons, the banksters’ Washington DC assault force, are livid:

    While I am not questioning Hagel’s patriotism as this move is very sensible and in line with true US security interests, the question does need to be asked: are there other foreign interests working in DC with more sway than Israel now?

    And then there is this:

    Hagel’s plan for putting NATO in Israel. Brilliant. It could either be an attempt to trigger certain NATO members to quit in outrage, or better yet, a trojan horse to occupy Israel. I always thought allowing Israel in NATO would be perfect excuse to do just this. The arrogant Israelis would just think they are getting the dumb goyim to provide security. Maybe even Israel would drop their guard and start reducing the size of their own security forces. Or, Israel forces, under NATO orders, could be stationed a long way from home when the trap is sprung. (And then there is always the possibility that the international occupation of Jerusalem is part of the great masonic plan to turn Jerusalem into the new global religion headquarters).

    It definitely seems as if there is a rival long term strategic plan afoot in the middle east with Turkey now occupied by German troops, tanks and missiles and German tanks positioned in Saudi Arabia.

    At this point, it may even be convenient to allow Israel entrance into the EU (which they have been clamoring for). The EU could demand that Israel must now adhere to EU human rights and immigration policy. Israel will naturally scoff at this and this would be the trigger for the rest of Europe to then follow the Israel example and begin adopting Israeli immigration policies which would allow non-indigenous Europeans to be transported back to their native countries.

    • Joseph P. Farrell on March 25, 2013 at 6:07 pm

      All of which will, of course, provide grist for the apocalypse mills of American fundamentalist-dispensensationalists as more “fulfillments” of prophecy, which, as we averred in Yahweh the Two-Faced God may be precisely the elite game. Interestingly enough, one of those genocide-under-the-sanction-of-Jesus peddlers, in one of his books, always numbered Germany with Russia (that Gog and Magog thing), as being the attacker of Israel (the Kings of the East and North thing)… so any way this plays out, they’ll claim it’s a fulfillment of prophecy

      • Frankie Calcutta on March 27, 2013 at 8:27 pm

        Dr. Farrell,

        regarding that Gog and Magog thing— One last point on the Hagel ‘US trojan horse in Isreal’ is that the German Navy has had a naval force in the Mediterranean for several years. Israel requested that Germany stop all the pirates and arms smuggling off the coast of Lebanon, and so at the Israeli invitation, Germany now has had a Navy fleet there. Makes me think the Germans play Israeli lapdog, but in so doing, now dominate, or at least have a sizable presence, off the coast of Turkey-Syria-Lebanon-Israel with a naval fleet.

        More importantly, on another note regarding Turkey and Germany, a while back I speculated the possibility that the German patriot missiles deployed in close proximity to the Gobekli Tepe ruins in Turkey may be there not to protect Turkish population centers from Syrian missile attacks but instead to protect the important, mystifying, paradigm shattering temple ruins, currently being excavated by German archaeologists, from mercenary forces south of border and presently in the employ of banksters trying to overthrow the Syrian government. The same banksters who may not want the world to know about some of the mysteries of the Gobekli Tepe ruins and whose Babylonian ancestors may have hid the site with tons of rubble many thousands of years ago.

        This from Der Speigel regarding a growing spat between Germany and Turkey over archaeological treasures:

        On face value, it could be just that– an argument over valuables. But the timing seems strange as many of these artifacts have been in Germany for a hundred years and the Turkish claims seem dubious as well. My hunch is that the Turks are trying to trigger a conflict which will give them the cover to pull the permits on the Germans working at Gobekli Tepe. Of course, the Turks would only be doing this on someone else’s orders (like most of their actions) in my estimation.

        “Turkish government has broken agreements concerning cooperation between the countries and is deliberately making it harder for German archaeologists to work in Turkey. The latter are worried that, in 2013, they may for the first time be denied coveted excavation permits.”

  7. morton_h on March 25, 2013 at 1:13 pm

    The Russian oligarchs, as I understand, have been based and operating in the the Greek part of Cyprus.

    What has not been mentioned is, that another side of the money laundring and -manipulating business is taking place in the tyrkish part of Cyprus.

    Turkey is, as we know, a key member of NATO. Turkey and NATO and the Gladio-operations based in Turkey has for decades used Cyprus as one of its main centers of covert financial activites. There was a great scandal with a Turkey-part-of-Cyprus based bank called First Merchants Bank that turned out to be a huge agent in laundring the drug-heroin-opium money, that were floated by NATO through Turkey through Dubai and ending up in Brussels.

    The story is descibed details in the the four-part interview with FBI whistleblower Sibel Edmonds done by James Corbett.

    I am suggesting, that the presence of the Russians in Cyprus may have to do with their need to observe what was going on with all the heroin money. The Russian mafia gradually lost their share of one of the most profitable businesses in the Wordl in Afghanistan, when the Americans and NATO took over = one of the main reasons for them to invade this country – oil and geo-strategy being the others.

  8. kamutef on March 25, 2013 at 11:41 am

    Germany and Russia have never been favourites of the banksters.
    They have never forgiven the Kaiser and the Romanovs for their support of Lincoln in his battle to establish the greenback as an independent American currency.
    Germany and Russia will eventually grow tired of paying lip service to a system that is clearly showing the symptoms of encroaching dementia, then things will get really interesting,

    • Joseph P. Farrell on March 25, 2013 at 4:51 pm

      Uhm… there WAS no imperial Germany during the American War between the States. The German Empire was proclaimed in Versailles upon the conclusion of the Franco-Prussian War, which began five years after the end of the American War Between the States. But that point aside, you are correct in that Prince Otto von Bismarck had interesting things to say about the role of banksters in the American civil war.

      • Robert Barricklow on March 25, 2013 at 8:06 pm

        They engineered it, but Lincoln threw the greenback monkey wrench into the Rottenchild’s well laid plans. Quite a letter. But not much ink spent on it in subsequent generations. Wonder why?

      • kamutef on March 25, 2013 at 8:25 pm

        Of course you are correct. It was Bismarck that I had in mind, should have taken the time to search out the quote. 🙂
        I’ve done my due diligence now, here is the extract of the interview in full for those who may be interested:

        “The division of the United States into two federations of equal force was decided long before the Civil War by the High Financial Power of Europe. These bankers were afraid that the United States, if they remained in one block and as one nation, would attain economical and financial
        independence, which would upset their financial domination over the world.

        The voice of the Rothschilds predominated. They foresaw tremendous booty if they could substitute two feeble democracies, indebted to the Jewish financiers, for the vigorous republic, confident and self-providing. Therefore, they started their emissaries in order to exploit the question of slavery and thus to dig an abyss between the two parts of the republic. Lincoln never suspected these underground machinations.

        He was anti-slavery, and he was elected as such. But his character prevented him from being the man of one party. When he had affairs in his hands, he perceived that these sinister financiers of Europe, the Rothschilds, wished to make him the executor of their designs.
        They made the rupture between the North and the South imminent!

        The masters of finance in Europe made this rupture definitive in order to exploit it to the utmost.

        Lincoln’s personality surprised them: they thought to easily dupe the candidate woodcutter. But Lincoln read their plots and soon
        understood that the South was not the worst foe, but the Jewish financiers. He did not confide his apprehensions; he watched the gestures of the Hidden Hand; he did not wish to expose publicly the
        questions which disconcert the ignorant masses. He decided to eliminate the international bankers, by establishing a system of loans, allowing the states to borrow directly from the people without intermediary. He did not study financial questions, but his robust good sense revealed to him that
        the source of any wealth resides in the work and economy of the nation.

        He opposed emissions through the international financiers. He obtained from the Congress the right to borrow from the people by selling to it the bonds of the states. The local banks were only too glad to help such a system. And the government and the nation escaped the plots of foreign financiers.

        They understood at once that the United States would escape their grip. The death of Lincoln was resolved upon.

        Nothing is easier than to find a fanatic to strike.

        The death of Lincoln was a disaster for Christendom. There was no man in the United States great enough to wear his boots. And Israel went anew to garner the riches of the world. I fear that Jewish banks with their craftiness and tortuous tricks will entirely control the exuberant riches of
        America and will use it to systematically corrupt modern civilization. The Jews will not hesitate to plunge the whole of Christendom into wars and chaos in order that “the earth should become the inheritance of Israel.”
        Prince Otto von Bismarck.

        • Robert Barricklow on March 26, 2013 at 8:41 am

          Thanks kamutef,
          I had read even smaller extracts.

          This painted a more precise bull’s-eye!

  9. Robert Barricklow on March 25, 2013 at 11:22 am

    I’am reminded of Lenin’s:
    The Capitalists will sell us the rope,
    with which we will hang them.

  10. marcos toledo on March 25, 2013 at 9:42 am

    Looks like it’s tribal warfare in Europe as usual the barbarians still rule.

Help the Community Grow

Please understand a donation is a gift and does not confer membership or license to audiobooks. To become a paid member, visit member registration.

Upcoming Events