It's interesting to see how foreign news, and in particular, the Russian media, is handling the Boston Marathon Bombing. And there is an interesting development in this article; see if you can spot it:

'Confusion and inconsistencies': How US plans to distract public from real truth about Boston

What caught my attention, and probably yours, was the last two paragraphs:

(Sybel Edmonds): "We all have to really look at the timing of this, because again the US media is portraying this incident by itself. It’s not putting it in the context of things that have been happening in the past – let’s say one year so – or recent stuff – we had this case of NGOs being shut down by the Russian government, which was a very smart move, because we know that the majority of these NGOs have CIA agendas, as they’re operated and managed by CIA people. And this is one way of infiltrating Russia by the US government, the CIA.

"So, if you start putting these in context and also add the fact that Russia has been the biggest obstacle for the United States to get in and directly attack Syria – that’s when you start to see the bigger picture and that’s what the people should be paying attention to. Again, the false information that is being put forth by US media is that since the fall of the Soviet Union the United States has refrained from intervening in the Russia-Chechnya situation. And that is purely false. Since mid-1990’s, the US directly, or through Turkey has been arming, training, managing, orchestrating not only Chechens but also other factions in the region – and we are looking  at Central Asia and the Caucasus."

Now I and others following this story have already voiced our suspicions over the whole incident: the peculiar "coincidence" of the bombing occurring on the same day as the meltdown in paper bullion, while concurrently demand for physical gold and silver was climbing!  Then, previously this week, I blogged about the possible connection of the alleged terrorists to a foundation with suspicious connections to the US intelligence community.

Now, Sybel Edmonds on RT is suggesting a "wider context," one which includes the post-Soviet "color revolutions" which expanded NATO influence into the former Soviet republics of the Ukraine and Byelorussia, in spite of solemn assurances of George H.W. Bush to Mikhail Gorbachev that this would not happen. (Really, does anyone believe anything coming out of the mouths of that famdamnly?)

What raised my eyebrows here was, of course, the alleged Turkish connection, one that I have not found mentioned anywhere else, but which concerns me. The pattern of terrorist operations in the west in the past thirty to forty years, if not longer, has been clear: real operations have been consistently piggybacked on drills, which 9-11 itself being the premier and signal example of this. But there are others: Boston shows it, the Oklahoma City Bombing showed signs of it, and as I detailed in Covert Wars and Breakaway Civilizations, Daniel Ganser's superlative research in NATO'S Secret Armies, and Richard Cotrell's more recent Gladio: NATO's Dagger at the Heart of Europe: The Pentagon-Nazi-Mafia Terror Axis (the title says it all folks, and yes, there's Nazi International and Mafia angles to all of this, deeply connected with that hidden financial system), even the Anders Breivik shootings and the bombing in Oslo were conducted during a drill.

Now, for those who have read those books, Turkey is a key player in these terrorist false flag incidents, and that raises a red flag about the whole Chechnya connection.  As I speculated a few blogs back, the Chechnya connection may be the attempt of the West to "call for greater international cooperation" in "resolving" the disputes in Chechnya, as part of the bigger geopolitical game of dislodging the last vestiges of Russian influence in the resource-rich Caucasus region. All that, of course, would be but code for the injection of Western/NATO power directly into the region.

My guess? The West and NATO is opening Pandora's box here, and they will be no more successful in their efforts in the Caucasus, than was Adolf Hitler.

Can you say Stalingrad, Zbigniew?

See you on the flip side.


Posted in

Joseph P. Farrell

Joseph P. Farrell has a doctorate in patristics from the University of Oxford, and pursues research in physics, alternative history and science, and "strange stuff". His book The Giza DeathStar, for which the Giza Community is named, was published in the spring of 2002, and was his first venture into "alternative history and science".


  1. ILJA on May 8, 2013 at 11:12 am

    Echoing the title I would suggest another one that derives from the content of the article (full version is on the link below), i.e.” Outside look at RT”

    Over the past two years, Russia Today has reported with boosterish zeal on conspiracy theories popular in the resurgent “Patriot” movement, whose adherents typically advocate extreme antigovernment doctrines. Its slickly packaged stories suggest that a legitimate debate is under way in the United States about who perpetrated the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, for instance, and about President Obama’s eligibility for high office. It also frequently quotes U.S. extremists as authorities on world events or interviews them at length without asking anything more than softball questions. One British journalist called Russia Today “a strange propaganda outfit” after appearing on a show in which the host injected 9/11 revisionism.


    Worth reading, especially for die-hard conspirologists (though I might be mistaken – rational arguments are not the panacea from this disease of an ill society)

  2. Miguel on May 3, 2013 at 7:13 pm

    Madrid 11 March 2004 “train bombings” were also run in the back of a NATO sponsored drill. The official line pointed fingers at Al-Quaeda jihad followers. Dotted lines drew connections to Morocco, etc… Recently, some people have come up with theories of a “revenge” on account of NATO bombings in former Yugoslavia under the command of Spain-born former NATO chief – Javier Solana.

    For these large scale operations like 9/11-S & Madrid 11-M, I believe reality lays closer to the Break-away crowd playing with their -US government funded- toys(thermonuclears) from outer space, and the bankster-governments trying to clean-up/sloppy cover-up (planes/missiles/etc..) what is in fact, the breakaway’s induced “mess”.

    The primary essence of the Boston bombings appears to be Stage II of an economic false flag /psy-op by the breakaway’s/goldfingers, catering to a select audience of “people in the know of what’s in store in global financial markets”. The game would be to get these people (rats like Greenspan who need to be co-opted across the line) to believe that the smash on precious metals (stage I) was engineered by the banksters and their governments, and that the Boston bombings are simply “pay-back” by the breakways/goldfingers.

    Whereas the truth would be closer to the “break-aways/goldfingers” staging both events to cause doubt and trigger defections to the breakway side of key people/decision shapers like Greenspan, Lagarde, Evans-Pritchard, etc… now engrossing the banksters ranks.

    I refuse to be dragged into a false track of carefully planted evidence pointing at NATO drills, Turkey, Hungary, Chechnia, Iran, North-Korea, etc… as it only adds noise and inject confusion into the minds of large constituencies of people like us who are “not directly in the know” and for which the primary essence of Psy-op was not initially intended.

  3. marcos toledo on May 3, 2013 at 9:59 am

    The brats in the intelligence[Marching Morons -What Me Worry] agencies are at it again. Death and destruction for the hell of it war is cool lets bring back the Dark Ages. Grow up you done enough damage already around the world.

  4. LSM on May 3, 2013 at 7:59 am

    wasn’t it witch Madeleine Albright who first megaphoned that Turkey should be ‘allowed’ to join the European Union?- wonder why- could it have been to facilitate matters?- this outcry seems to have died down (certainly in the EU nations) but will it suddenly flame up again?-

    Larry in Germany

    P.S: Sybel Edmonds (a born Turk if my read sources are correct) is probably one of the most underestimated whistleblowers out there

  5. Frankie Calcutta on May 3, 2013 at 7:16 am

    While this scenario is most likely the case, I would never rule out the zionists cutting a deal with Putin which would be mutually beneficial– such as a green light to attack Syria/Iran in return for a cessation of CIA meddling in Chechnya and other former Soviet Republics. The deal may even include the zionists handing the bloated, crippled United States over to the Russians on a platter which I believe has always been the Gordon Duff conjecture. We certainly can not underestimate the self-serving, cut-throat nature of the zionists and if they determine it is now in their interest to piggyback off a more viable power like the Russians, then they will do so without hesitation or with a shred of loyalty to the US. We also can not underestimate the likely primary objective of the Russians which probably has to do with seeing their Cold War nemesis collapsed and crushed and replaced as the unipolar power.

    I’m sure Putin has no love for the zionists but as a master tactician, he is concentrating on one enemy at a time and manipulating the demonic nature of the zionists to further Russia’s strategic goals. Not to mention the large Russian emigre influence in the Israeli government which may be doing Putin’s bidding as well. Putin may also be creating a situation where the CIA /US military/zionists cannibalize one another. Revelations of the KGB in the wake of the Boston bombing and the RT reporting may be facilitating this as I suspect much finger pointing is taking place in DC.

    Of course, the other possibility would be the Russians have been dragged into this web of intrigue surrounding the Boston bombing to muddy the waters even further and give conspiracy theorists and radio talk show hosts more fodder for likely culprits. You can be certain we will see theories rolled out linking the KGB to the attacks and even books published. Especially if the CIA and neo-cons decide to turn up the heat on the Russians as Dr. Farrell posits. Every threat or recalcitrant to the banksters is positioned at the scene of the crime in order to be a potential suspect and a thus in a position to be blackmailed by the banksters. The Saudi suspect being the perfect example.

    But at the end of the day, it was Israelis brought in to “help” in the Boston bombing investigation and it was Israeli doctors standing alongside the Chechnyan terror suspect when he made his hospital bed confession.

    And now we have Israel and Russia getting friendly:

    “Russian warship docks in Israeli port for first time
    Russia’s large landing ship Azov, has entered the Israeli port of Haifa, to mark the 68th anniversary of victory in World War II. Azov is the first Russian warship to take part in the ceremonies on Israeli territory. The warship, part of Russia’s task force in the Mediterranean, is due to perform military exercises, after which it will join the fleet after it leaves Haifa.”

    It is not a nice message for the Russians to send to their friends in Syria.

  6. johnycomelately on May 3, 2013 at 6:11 am

    The Gulen connection is most troubling, Turkey’s intelligence infrastructure is unparalleled in the Islamic world (helped with NATO technologoy) and the West’s dumping of Ergenekon (secularists) for Gulen (Islamic fascist) shows a trend from the West for destroying Middle East secularists and propping up fascists.

    Gulen operates colleges across the globe wherever Turkish immigrants have settled and across the ex Soviet region, an exellent recruiting ground for future patsies.

Help the Community Grow

Please understand a donation is a gift and does not confer membership or license to audiobooks. To become a paid member, visit member registration.

Upcoming Events