Russia Today reported that on May 25 of this year protests were scheduled against American "agribusiness" giant Mon(ster)santo. The article is here:

Monsanto protests scheduled in 36 countries

What I find disturbing here is, predictably, Mon(ster)santo's attitude, best summed up in the encyclical pronunciamenti of its CEO, Hugh Grant:

"They're the most-tested food product that the world has ever seen. Europe set up its own Food Standards Agency, which has now spent €300 million ($403.7 million), and has concluded that these technologies are safe,” Grant said in January. “France determined there's no safety issue on a corn line we submitted there. So there's always a great deal of political noise and turmoil. If you strip that back and you get to the science, the science is very strong around these technologies.'”

Uh huh. That's settles it for me: a government bureaucracy, which can be easily bought, and staffed with a revolving door of "scientists" moving easily from that very corporation or others like it, into the regulatory agency, and then back out again... in other words, the "science" can be bought, or rather, the appearance of science.  Grant's attitude is thus a bit dated in the post-Warren Commission, post-Watergate-Iran-Contra-BCCI-Nugan Hand-Waco-Oklahoma City-WTC Bombing-9/11-world: if a government says it's ok, then it's ok.

Surely, Mr. Grant, you're joking.

But I'm afraid he probably isn't, because he's atop a multi-billion dollar corporation in a multi-billion dollar industry, and could really, in the final analysis, care less about the science or even the healthfulness of his product.

It's not about that, it's about profits, and, at a much deeper level, control of the world's food supply and the elimination of those pesky naturally occurring, non-patentable, seeds that anyone can buy, and then husband and grow.

But there's also some convenient omissions here in Mr. Grant's memory, for if memory serves, countries in Europe - Poland, Hungary and Russia itself, for example - have banned specific GMO products, and if memory serves me correctly, there are some scientific reports that do raise issues about the safety of GMOs. And if memory serves, Mon(ster)santo exerted pressure on the Blair government in Great Britain to suppress some findings of certain reports of certain of its scientists who could not be bought, and who, as a result of said pressure, lost their jobs and their reputations... That's the nice thing about being a big corporation with lots of money and bought and paid for science: you can also rewrite history, and blot the inconvenient footnote out of public memory.

But let's assume none of this is true. That there are absolutely no conflicting science reports; absolutely not one tiniest shred, not one jot or tittle of information, not the most miniscule datapoint against GMOs, nowhere, anywhere, not even in "pseudoscience." The real point of the protests, I would argue, is that with something so fundamental as the world food supply, that testing thus far is inadequate. And most importantly, that farmers should be able to plant ordinary everyday non-patentable seeds, and that people should be able to eat their produce and know what's in it.

That, I suspect, is the deepest reason for Mon(ster)santo's blatantly mercantilist policies and its alliance with government, for it knows that it would not survive in the marketplace where genuine choices were offered. It could trot forward all the reports with all the PhDs in the world, and people would still prefer non-Roundup ready ordinary everyday average corn and carrots and peas... It's choice, and people, that Mon(ster)santo and its bought and paid for sock puppets in various governments and their scientific regulatory agencies are really afraid of.

... life is good; eat GMOs, drink GMOs, and be merry...

See you on the flip side.

Posted in

Joseph P. Farrell

Joseph P. Farrell has a doctorate in patristics from the University of Oxford, and pursues research in physics, alternative history and science, and "strange stuff". His book The Giza DeathStar, for which the Giza Community is named, was published in the spring of 2002, and was his first venture into "alternative history and science".


  1. longhorn on May 18, 2013 at 4:25 pm

    Dr Farrell you’ve really opened a can of worms with the Mon(ster)santo post.

    From the position of understanding the corporate fascist State that envelopes us, more properly at statism. I often am enthralled by the concept that a constitutional democratic republic has succumbed to such a low state of energy where thugs and their minion have gotten the upper hand lording their tyranny over a nation once dedicated to political liberty and equality – viva la liberte sans licence.

    Reading your books opened the neural synapses of unfettered thought but then you threw a curve ball with this Mon(ster)anto piece which has caused me lost sleep thinking about the complexities of the issues you raised.

    In the main, these issues left me wondering how is it so that a multinational (NAZI) conglomerate holds the entire nation (America) hostage to its dictates. Aside to fact that through intensive, dedicated efforts (lobbying) they have managed to put the entire political apparatus of the United States in their hip pocket, through the agency of politicians bought and paid for meaning OWNED – outright.

    While your books and others who write about such things as the NAZI International as Jon Rappaport have been very enlightening, you (Dr. Farrell) were right, there are many who know about the NAZI slime that is stuck to our faces like thrown egg.

    In example; which in reality isn’t anything that you yourself haven’t already stated in other various forums such as your books and the Giza Death Star website is another saying much the same but a little more direct in pronouncement which is the reverse of what Monsanto is doing to the country.

    This example being is, Finian Cunningham’s article:

    “U.S. Driven By Nazi War Machine”

    Which in part he state’s

    “The absorption of Nazi military practice and intelligence into the CIA and other Western organizations at the end of the Second World War had fateful and far-reaching pernicious consequences – consequences that are becoming more and more manifest today, as US-led wars of aggression rage around the world.”

    “If we want to understand why US-led wars of aggression, covert and overt, are plaguing the planet, from Iraq, Afghanistan, to Libya, Syria and Iran, we can gain much insight into today’s problems by going back to events at the end of the Second World War.”


    The only other thing I would state is that the war of aggression both covert and overt, has come home to roost (thanks to you insightful analysis and commentary) here in the United States in the form of Mon(ster)santo.

  2. amunaor on May 18, 2013 at 11:10 am

    Supreme Court rules in favor of Dr. Monsanto and the products spawned in the ghoulish dungeon his laboratories.

    Just as second-hand smoke has proven to be deadly to your lungs, so too is the second generation Monsanto seedling, hiding in a mix of non-perverted seedlings, being proven to be, not only unhealthy for your being, but equally unhealthy for your wallet.

    Corporate Win: Supreme Court Says Monsanto Has ‘Control Over Product of Life’

    The U.S. Supreme Court ruled Monday in favor of biotech giant Monsanto, ordering Indiana farmer Vernon Hugh Bowman, 75, to pay Monsanto more than $84,000 for patent infringement for using second generation Monsanto seeds purchased second hand—a ruling which will have broad implications for the ownership of ‘life’ and farmers’ rights in the future.


    When it comes to the grey-cells upstairs, the Supremes have publically proven time and time again a complete deficiency in harboring any mixture of this common sense!

    I pity the results of their inbred progeny, born of this idiocy.

  3. duncan mckean on May 15, 2013 at 7:32 pm

    ahhh. the separation of church and state..bbbuubes. whopps ;I means the Science and the state

  4. Margaret on May 15, 2013 at 7:22 pm

    Activists Around the World March Against Monsanto – May 25, 2013
    Call to Action against Monsanto, its enablers FDA, USDA, EPA, GMA, BIO, and the processed food companies that use its products.

    Find an event near you and join in! It’s going to be a blast! …
    41 countries, 349 global marches, 200,000+ marchers

    occupy-monsanto dot com
    #OccupyMonsanto #MarchAgainstMonsanto #SayNoToGMOs

    [BTW, Dr. Joseph Farrell, PhD will be third hour guest on Rense tonight … ]

  5. DownunderET on May 15, 2013 at 4:21 pm

    I’d like to visit Mr. Hugh Grant’ house and take a peek in his kitchen pantry, wouldn’t that be interesting. I’d also like to know which organization’s hold stock options in Monstersanto, that would be interesting.

    So here we have a very large organization telling the world they can make better foods than mother nature, well mother nature has done a bang up job so far without any stock options.

    In around 6000 BC, or there about’s, somebody taught people how to grow crops and make food out it. it’s just strange that it all happened basically overnight. I hope the History Chanel does a doco to explain how people went from hunter gatherers to full blow experienced farmers!!!!!!!!!

  6. longhorn on May 15, 2013 at 1:46 pm

    I’m sure that Monsanto is a deep under cover NAZI front organization.

    In speaking of the NAZI International it looks as though others are stealing Dr. Farrells research.

    In example: (nothing more needs said) thank you Dr. Farrell for objective truth and honesty in your unbiased hypothesis and clear explanations of the truth as it can best be ascertained!

    Flashback: Watergate, Nazis, Nixon, Rockefeller


    “To learn why Richard Nixon was really blown out of the White House, you could begin with the infamous Nazi chemical/pharmaceutical cartel, IG Farben. The cartel that pushed Hitler over the top into power in Germany.”

    “One of its lasting legacies is the multinational corporation ballooning out into titanic proportions. Farben didn’t just buy smaller companies, it forged favorable agreements with huge corporations all over the world: Standard Oil (Rockefeller); Rhone-Poulenc; Imperial Chemical Industries; Du Pont; Dow.”

    Credit (ALLEGEDLY)- Jon Rappoport



    Flashback: Watergate, Nazis, Nixon, Rockefeller

    by Jon Rappoport

    May 15, 2013


    Watergate eventually became the story of two young rookie reporters who exposed and took down a president.

    Try to think of another major story in your lifetime where the reporters themselves took center stage, and in the process nearly eclipsed their own work. Odd.

    One of them, Bob Woodward, expanded his fame. The powers-that-be permitted him to go on and, with extraordinary access, write books criticizing future presidents. Woodward became the in-house attack dog. Mr. Limited Hangout.

    The other reporter, Carl Bernstein, faded into relative obscurity. Well, he began connecting journalists to the CIA. That wasn’t a smart career move. That was, perhaps, a case of biting the hand that had fed him.

    To learn why Richard Nixon was really blown out of the White House, you could begin with the infamous Nazi chemical/pharmaceutical cartel, IG Farben. The cartel that pushed Hitler over the top into power in Germany.

    One of its lasting legacies is the multinational corporation ballooning out into titanic proportions. Farben didn’t just buy smaller companies, it forged favorable agreements with huge corporations all over the world: Standard Oil (Rockefeller); Rhone-Poulenc; Imperial Chemical Industries; Du Pont; Dow.

    During World War 2, Josiah Du Bois, representing the US federal government, was sent on a fact-finding mission to Guatemala. His comment: “As far as I can tell the country is a wholly owned subsidiary of Farben.”

    What Farben stood for was an attempt to remake the planet in terms of power.

    Farben held important cards. It employed brilliant chemists who, in some ways, were far ahead of its competitors. Farben was all about synthetics. Rubber, oil, dyes, pharmaceuticals.

    Farben saw itself as a modern version of the old alchemists. Transforming one substance into another. It came to believe that, with enough time, it would be able to make anything from anything. It envisioned labs in which basic chemical facts would be changed so that, in practice, elements and compounds would be virtually interchangeable.

    This was in line with the Nazi obsession to discover the lost secrets of the mythical Aryan race and then reconstitute it with selective breeding, genetic engineering, and of course the mass murder of “lesser peoples.”

    On one level, there was the idea of chemical transformations, and on another level, the transformation of the human species.

    It was really all one piece. The Nazi ideology was the glue.

    It was the picture of scientism—the philosophy that asserts science should absolutely rule all facets of life. Nazi Germany showed the world what that philosophy looks like in practice. Farben had prisoners shipped from Auschwitz to its nearby facility, where horrendous medical/pharmaceutical experiments were carried out on them.

    At the end of World War 2, the Farben executives were put on trial and, despite the efforts of Telford Taylor, the chief US prosecutor, the sentences handed out were light.

    There was a reason for this. A new world was coming into being, and mega-corporations and cartels were at the heart of it. They would be the engines driving the global economy and pillaging the natural resources of the planet. It was colonialism with a different face, the East India company running on technology and industry and a planetary reach beyond anything ever attempted.

    So the Farben moguls, and those like them, were seen by many as designers of the new “peace.”

    Consider the total volume of international trade of goods today—the largest 300 corporations in the world are responsible for an unbelievable percentage of it…as high as 25%.

    So now you see the reason why these treaties like GATT and NAFTA and CAFTA have been launched. Mega-corporations want to roam free. They want to be able to inject money into any entity in the world and suddenly remove it at will. They certainly want to be able to ship goods from one nation to another without paying tariffs, which otherwise would cost them an extraordinary amount of money. For these corporations, nations don’t really exist anymore—they are convenient fictions. These corporations don’t want any restrictions on their plundering of the Global Village.

    Farben envisioned and planned for this kind of licentious freedom. It saw itself as more than a German cartel. It was already international, and it was moving toward domination.

    However, more powerful forces would overtake it—and I’m not just talking about American soldiers. In the sphere of international influence, there are the Plan A and Plan B people. The Plan A controllers (think Rockefeller dynasty, among others) opted for a “softer, gentler” approach, a more covert program, whereby, over a long period of time, the world population would be brought under a global management system, in which mega-corporations would play the central role. The Plan B people, Nazis and their allied interests, wanted crushing force and violence to achieve a somewhat similar goal in a much shorter period of time—with Germany as the leading prow of the movement.

    It is in the arena of pharmaceutical domination that one of Farben’s goals has endured. Two of its original components, Bayer and Hoechst, have survived and prospered. And many other drug companies have copied the basic model.

    For a number of years, I’ve researched and published on this subject. Death, maiming, destruction, poisoning—these are correct assessments of the overall effects of drug-based medicine. Judging solely by these effects, one could say that war by other means has continued after 1945. And the fronts of devastation have spread.

    On the mega-corporate front, the plan for world control remains the Rockefeller template. “Free trade.” This plan was advanced, ceaselessly, for 40 years until, on January 1, 1995, the World Trade Organization was fully formed and took charge of the criminal rules of global commerce: the crowning moment.

    However, back in the early 1970s, the whole operation had almost been derailed. One man, a crook, a president, a liar, an insecure parody of a head of state, Richard Nixon, went off script. He REALLY went off script.

    In an effort to bolster US companies and protect them from foreign competition inside the United States, Nixon began erecting tariffs on a range of goods imported into the US.

    If this Nixon economic plan spread to other countries, the entire global program to install “free trade” and mega-corporate emperors on their thrones for a thousand years could crash and burn.

    Nixon was a Rockefeller man. He was owned by them. He’d been rescued from financial ruin by The Family, and now he was in the White House undermining their greatest dream. You can’t overstate the degree of the betrayal, from the Rockefeller point of view. You simply can’t.

    Something had to be done. The president had to go. This was the real motivation behind Watergate. This was the real op. Yes, there were sub-motives and smaller contexts, as in any major op, but the prime mover was: get Free Trade back on track, and get suitable revenge on the puppet in the White House who went off the script.

    Any historian who overlooks this is an outright fool or a deceiver.

    Whether the Watergate break-in was planned to serve the higher goal or was pounced upon, after the fact, as the grand opportunity, is beside the point. It was there, and it was used. It became the starting point for the Washington Post, its publisher, veteran editor, and two cub reporters to break Richard Nixon into pieces.

    And if the Rockefeller people needed an inside man to report on the deteriorating mental state of the president as he heated up in the pressure cooker, they had Henry Kissinger, who was another Rockefeller operative.

    The Washington Post was owned by Katharine Graham, who was herself a very close friend of the Rockefeller Family. Years later, she would be awarded a medal of honor by the University of Chicago, a an institution founded by John D. Rockefeller. On her death, a paid heartfelt obituary was inserted in the NY Times by the trustees, faculty, and staff of Rockefeller University, where she had served on the University Council.

    And she and Nixon already hated each other by the early 1970s.

    The managing editor of the Washington Post, Ben Bradlee, was an old hand at writing promotional material, having worked in Europe crafting releases for a CIA front group. A former Naval intelligence man, he liked one of his cub reporters, Bob Woodward, who had also worked for the Navy in intelligence.

    When Woodward came to Bradlee with a story about a man in a parking garage who was passing secrets from the White House/FBI about Watergate, we are supposed to believe that Bradlee naturally responded by giving the green light to a major investigation. Woodward and Carl Bernstein, another cub, would undertake it—with nothing more than Bradlee’s reputation and the future survival of the Post and Katharine Graham’s empire on the line if the cubs got it wrong.

    We are supposed to believe Bradlee gave the green light, without knowing who the man in the garage was, without knowing whether Woodward could be trusted, without even getting permission from Graham to move ahead.

    Bradlee, a grizzled veteran of Washington, understanding exactly what Washington could do to people who told secrets out of school, just said to Woodward and Bernstein, “You’d better be damned sure you’re right, because otherwise we’re all in trouble.”

    Two untested cub reporters set loose in a cage with tigers.

    The odds of that happening were nil. Bradlee had to know a great deal from the beginning, and he had to have Katharine Graham’s signal to move. The series of breaking stories would be spoon-fed to the unsuspecting young reporters. They would be consumed by their ambition to advance their careers. Bradlee was confident because he had the essentials of the scandal in hand—all the way up to Nixon, the target—well in advance of his two reporters.

    To have proceeded otherwise—Bradlee was simply not that kind of fool. Whatever Deep Throat, the man in the garage, was dishing out to Woodward didn’t really matter. Bradlee already had it in his pocket. Deep Throat was merely a contrivance to allow the story to expand and grow by steps, and to permit Woodward and Bernstein to believe they were peeling layers from an onion.

    The man behind the curtain was David Rockefeller.

    After the whole scandal had been exposed and Nixon had flown away, in disgrace, from the White House for the last time, Rockefeller addressed a meeting of the Chamber of Commerce of the European Community (October, 1975). He was there to allay their fears about Nixon’s betrayal of the new economic world order. There was really very little he needed to say. David had already created (1973) the free-trade Trilateral Commission. And a new puppet, Gerald Ford was in the White House, and Ford had appointed David’s brother, Nelson Rockefeller, as his vice president.

    David told the European attendees, “Fortunately, there are no signs that these anti-[free] trade measures [of Nixon] are supported by the [Ford] Administration.”

    And that was that. The global mega-corporate colossus was back on track.

    The temporary rip in the Matrix had been repaired.

    On a far lower level of power politics, everyone and his brother was consumed with the contrails of the scandal that had driven away Nixon and his colleagues. People were congratulating each other on the expunging of a corrupt conspiracy from public life.

    The real players, of course, were still in place, more powerful than ever. David Rockefeller and his aides were preparing for an even greater coup. They had chosen an obscure man with zero name recognition to be the next president of the United States. Jimmy Carter. Carter would function to forward the goals of the Trilateral Commission in bold view of anyone who knew the score.

    And every president since Carter, regardless of party affiliation, has supported and extended those Globalist-corporate goals. No questions asked. Obama, who fatuously remarked during his 2008 election campaign that NAFTA “needs to be revisited,” has taken his cues like any other puppet.

    When, from this perspective, you examine the global takeover of land and resources by GMO agribusiness, the destruction of small family farms, the plundering of natural resources in the Third World, the use of UN “peacekeepers” and “humanitarian groups” and intelligence agencies to create a wedge, for corporations, into these areas, you see the hand of the Rockefeller plan.

    When you see the destruction of currencies and the escalation of insupportable debt, the incursion of a bewildering number of UN-affiliated groups sinking their teeth into local communities all over the planet to “manage sustainable development,” you see the plan.

    On the approaching anniversary of Watergate, you can see that the trashing of Nixon, who like every president since, was put in place to serve his masters, is an opportunity to notice the Plan Behind the Curtain.

    Obama? Merely the latest willing front man. A third-rate hustler.

    The innocuous-sounding “free trade” policy is the number-one priority of every American president. He must do two things: rarely speak of it, and allow it to move forward. That’s all. In return, he gets to act as if he’s the most powerful man in the world.

    But if he wobbles and considers taking up a position against free trade (corporate domination of the planet), he can look back and see what happened to Richard Nixon. He can learn from that example.

    He can recite the famous words of Zbiggie Brzezinski, co-founder of the Trilateral Commission and David Rockefeller’s intellectual flunkey: “The nation state as a fundamental unit of man’s organized life has ceased to be the principal creative force: International banks and multinational corporations are acting and planning in terms that are far in advance of the political concepts of the nation-state.”

    Like Jimmy Carter, a future president can espouse the most wide-ranging humanitarian philosophy and ascend to a cloud of beautiful altrusim, admired by all. As long as he sticks to the plan.

    If not, two reporters coming out of nowhere, wet behind the ears, eager for advancement, will magically learn of his missteps and demolish him.

    Jon Rappoport

    The author of two explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED and EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free emails at http://www.nomorefakenews.com

    • Joseph P. Farrell on May 15, 2013 at 3:25 pm

      Actually Longhorn, I know Mr. Rappaport and he is certainly capable of having researched these matters without reference to my books. There are many authors besides me who have written about the survival of Nazism and its role as a kind of extra-territorial state. I believe his interpretation of GATT as the ultimate background of Watergate and his impeachment is sound. After all, Gerald Ford became the President, and HE immediately appointed Nelson Rockefeller as his Vice-President… Few people have considered this background to Watergate besides Rappaport, so I doff my hat to him for bringing the topic out into the open.

      • longhorn on May 16, 2013 at 8:13 am

        My apologies to you Dr. Farrell if I have offended sensibilities, but as I have no rapport with Mr. Rappaport but I own and have read most of your wonderful books I am a bit prejudice in your favor.

        As concerns my allegations against Rappaport I did give full credit to his endeavors where due using explicitly the word “alledgedly” which imports most certainly some doubt which swings both ways.

        My intentions were innocent, but I apologize to the both of you. To you for placing you in the position of having to explain, and Mr. Rappaport for questioning his honor.

        But a little controversy every now and then goes a long way to forwarding ones endeavors.

        My hat is off to the both of you,!

  7. amunaor on May 15, 2013 at 1:09 pm

    I’ll take a little GMO with my biscuit please!


  8. marcos toledo on May 15, 2013 at 10:20 am

    Dope Peddlers International at it again junkiefying the world to fed their addiction to money and power. How much money do these idiots need to live the good life anyway? They seem to love playing the game of chicken and Russian roulette with every body’s lives including theirs. These people are worse than mad they are utterly stupid and irresponsibly period.

  9. Frankie Calcutta on May 15, 2013 at 8:28 am

    Considering the latest legal precedents in the US:


    Why would any country even want to take the financial risk of having Monsanto GMO in their country? You can now make a good case that it just is not worth it. I believe this is what Viktor Orban, the PM of Hungary, determined when he plowed under a 1000 acres of GMO corn. While people might not understand the obfuscated health risks, everyone understands the blatantly unfair financial risks. Maybe Monsanto just gave the rest of the world some ammunition to fight them?

    I would wager Monsanto is a big supporter of Sigbi Brvinski’s desired EU-US Anschluss in anticipation of these reactions?

    I notice Big Pharma is also under attack in Europe:


    Add to that Merkel’s snubbing of US puppet Karzai on her trip to Afghanistan where it has been made clear the Germans are pulling out in 2014. Followed by the recent Russian announcement of a missile defense system in Belarus with the German Foreign Minister on hand standing next to the Russian FM Lavrov when the announcement is made.

    It looks like the Fellowship is breaking. Big pharma, big ag, EU banksters, NATO and US foreign policy all under attack. Add to that intrigue in DC and a rumored war between certain factions. Everyone is ganging up on the banksters and trying to buck them.

    And with the DC zionists and Europe banksters in trouble, it might explain why Netanyahu is looking for new allies in Russia, China, and… Texas. Don’t mess with Texas. They’ll pull the Rothschild zionist’s fat out of the fire… or establish a separate Republic which the neo-cons can use as a new base of operations in North America. Just joking… I hope.

    • Frankie Calcutta on May 15, 2013 at 8:46 am

      The millions of conditioned evangelicals in Texas would offer much unquestioning protection to the neo-cons and would be like putty in their hands when the neo-cons go to fulfill Leo Strauss’s dream of a zionist inspired state in North America based on Old Testament law… and with all the US military hardware already in Texas to go with it. Noahide Texas with nukes. Ride ’em cowboy!

    • Margaret on May 15, 2013 at 8:30 pm

      forgot to include this link earlier …

      Happy Texas-Israel Day! … Such an occasion! On that grand day the Texas-Israel CofC proclaimed great opportunities to work together in — water management. Texas has the problem, Israel has the solution. Gov. Perry decided to take $2bn from the Rainy Day fund and spend it on upgrading water infrastructure. Brilliant! Legislators will no doubt benefit by more free trips to ‘the promised land’.

      However, among Texans, reactions to “Texas-Israel Day” were largely negative and cynical: “Listen up, all you kosher cowboys! Time to saddle up and ride on down to the picnic and grab yourself a mouthful of barbecued matzoh balls! … So in honor of all things Texas-Israeli, I just wrote this here song celebratin’ the merger of the Great State of Texas with the Outlaw State of Israel.”


      btw, there are miles of vacant, arid land out west where new settlements can be accommodated, perhaps around Eldorado … next to the FLDS Yearning for Zion settlement … where polygamists and Orthodox Jews can do their own ’thang’. Maybe even secede …

      • Frankie Calcutta on May 16, 2013 at 8:02 am


        I thought a future, independent of the US but not Israel, Texas Noahide Republic was just my usual far fetched crazy talk, but now I’m not so sure. I’m discovering there is a large and growing noahide movement in Texas, along with John Hagee and his millions strong christian zionist crackpot church. If I recall, one of the Christian sharia law kooks was based out of Texas as well.

        Now I have to assume the seeds of the plan have been planted in the form of suspiciously bankrolled and encouraged Texas Secessionist movements and Texas media outlets now amenable to Texas independence. We certainly know who the Texas Governor takes orders from. Now if I know my neo-cons, this kind of strategy would be right up their alley. I’m sure the position papers were written long ago. Turning Texas would be much easier than turning the entire US and would make a good bastion for the noahide” faith” as well as a good launching pad for future conquests into the surrounding states . And Texas has oil as well as a lot of “Christians” who like a “good” fight. The neo-cons love these kind of challenges. Conquering Texas and putting it under zionist control would be quite an experiment for them. And at the end of the day, I think that is what really motivates them– thinking up something really selfish and wicked and then seeing if they can achieve it. Of course, this would fit perfectly into their long range plans of a global theocracy run out of Jerusalem.

  10. Robert Barricklow on May 15, 2013 at 7:51 am

    Just as the sovereignty of nations is being destroyed by the monopoly of international private curreny; the food sovereigny of what’s left the the people’s liberty to eat “real” food, is being taken away as well. Just as this forum on the internet, has the sword of the “net neutrality issued” ever lurking the internet’s sovereignty. The wireles form, being already won over by commercial power; only the land-based wire system is currently surviving. On all fronts: currencies, foods, energies, communication – the stranglehold of tyranny is ever tightening.
    In Mexico the future of maize is being threatened by Monstersanto; The US State Depatment has sadly joined the push to distribute GM crops around the world whether people want them or not; new laws are making any form of disagreeing(protest defintion?) with “environmental policy” an act of “terrorism”; all these, virtual soldiers marching onward in the service of a worldwide tyranny.

Help the Community Grow

Please understand a donation is a gift and does not confer membership or license to audiobooks. To become a paid member, visit member registration.

Upcoming Events