THAT GOLD THING ONE MORE TIME
On Thursday May 9th's News and Views from the Nefarium, I referred to a very important article by Darryl Robert Schoon that was kindly forwarded to me by Ms. N.H. And though I commented extensively in that News and Views, it did not exhaust what I believe to be the significance of Mr. Schoon's post, nor the underlying possibilities he is implying. So, as a refresher, here's the link to his article:
Gold: Who's Selling Who's Buying Who's Lying
Now why bother talking about this again?
Well, for one thing, the implications alone are arresting. Consider that, as a matter of serious financial analysis, researchers are now linking what is ultimately
- a hidden system of finance
- based upon World War Two Axis plunder
- that was kept entirely secret and administered by factions or groups within the American military-industrial-intelligence complex,
and that all of this is now entering the mainstream on financial analysis. In other words, it's now on the radar. Of course, we won't find CNoNews, Faux News, SeeBS, or any other such corporatized media organs talking about it any time soon. But it has nonetheless made the "internet mainstream" so to speak. That, folks, is hugely significant, for it means an even more expanded set of research parameters, and that means more and more people will scrutinize the historical story, making connections to contemporary events. Indeed, as I suggested in Thursday's News and Views, one might expect the media of the BRICSA nations to run stories focusing on this or that detail, exposing more of what they know of it (and rest assured, both Russia and China know a great deal about it). I suspect the historical aspects of the story will, in fact, become a focus of their media.
Additionally, there is an enormous geopolitical implication, for as I have suggested in Covert Wars and Breakaway Civilizations, the establishment of such a hidden system means that two things happened to the Western central banks and prime banks: (1) some of them became parties or instrumentalities to the scheme, while simultaneously (2) facing serious competition in the form of intelligence agencies who, as administrators of the hidden system, became effectively central bankers and prime bankers in their own right, establishing various international banks and other corporate structures in service of the system (think BCCI, Nugan Hand, and even Michele Sindona and Liccio Gelli here folks).
With this in mind, let's return to Schoon's article. He notes that the argument, thus far presented, is that since the central banks appear to be buying gold at the reduced prices while the paper market explodes, they therefore couldn't be the movers of the vast quantities of gold into the markets that has been recorded since 2006. It therefore had to be a government with access to large amounts of gold, and that led to the conclusion of (1) the US government and (2) Yamashita's gold.
But note what is happening: one faction in the scheme (US intelligence) is selling large amounts of gold through various public laundering cutouts to another faction in the scheme (central and prime banks). And that's precisely where the game gets very interesting... for consider the other implication I've been arguing over the past couple of years:
If the publicly-stated amounts of gold in existence are (1) massively obfuscated as a matter of domestic and national security by various governments and central banks, and (2) if there is a connection between recent bullion market activities and "Yamashita's gold," then one faction - namely the banks - could be in for a very rude awakening, for the other faction - namely intelligence - would be in the position of having an accurate estimation of the actual amounts of gold in existence, they, and their former Axis partners-in-fraud, if you take my meaning.
And of course, there are other "recent coincidences" with all this bullion activity and other events, that I'll leave you to work out on your own...
... See you on the flip side.
Help the Community Grow
Please understand a donation is a gift and does not confer membership or license to audiobooks. To become a paid member, visit member registration.
I confess I have yet to read Covert Wars&Breakaway Civilizations and not sure exactly the depth of treatment of certain areas in the book… but if the synopsis of the book given in “The Ice Show” is anything to go by, I would say that “Oil” and the emergence of WWII of some regimes in M.E. -which challenged the stablished order set by Allied Powers since the fall of the Ottomans all the way until the end of WWII/Pax Americana-; could be a crucial factor in the equation of visible fiat/central banking finance=hidden (casino royale) finance, with gold (and oil) as balancing variables in such equation.
Was is it really a competitive system of finance backed by extorted/hidden gold reserves or rather a “loan” to the banksters under false pretenses, so as not to “upset” the emerging Bretton Woods “fiat” system, which in and of itself was only backed by up to 40% of all existing or known gold reserves?
I recommend going through the archives of USAGOLD and the valuable (although source provenance is not there) input of what appears an insider spilling the beans, back in the late 1990’s.
If indeed “Operation GoldenLily” was a loan backed by Bond Issues, and regular interest service payments might have come by way of CB legitimate money supply (which most likely went towards funding infiltration and leveraging of the infrastructure of Intelligence/military/research networks opening up as mercenaries to the highest bidder); we could be faced with a situation where someone in the bankster’s side may have sought to sever ties with the “goldfingers” as things started to get out of control in the late 1990’s prompting insiders (mostly out of London) like “another” in USAGOLD to go public on the workings of the actual global infrastructure.
One must remember the fall of Barings in early 199)’s and how that triggered the end of British ‘merchant banking with heavy presence in Asia” which ended-up in the hands of the Global Investment & Commercial Banks, that had little or no presence whatsoever in Asia ex-Japan.
But that along with other shenaningans is a bigger story.
I understand the cautious position on gold..particularly if some “alchemic” procedure has been refined…but before that; the game might be to let Gold Price reach historic heights as a way to “take over” and control as much productive assets as anyone could get their hands on. Then gradually let the price slip while shifting to a new global “money” order with less fanfare than what we have now.
Is there anywhere in this gold schamozzel the chance that someone has perfected Alchemy?, if the amount of gold on the planet doesn’t match what has been mined, then the books are obviously cooked, but maybe, just maybe, another player is involved here.
If the majority of the Golden Lily load is still in the ground in the PI, then someone could be planning to dig it up, although Sterling Seagrave in his Red Ice radio interview says that it is still there and “protected”, the appearance of masses of the yellow stuff is confusing.
Any takers here that think a lot of the gold has gone off world????
It is always about covering their tracks whether on 9-11-01 or today. Crime International America has had it’s hand in this for sixty years.One is lead to wonder is there really any gold left in vaults of the banks in the west and if the gold isn’t there where is it.
One thing I am certain of, everyone is lying. it is like watching a game of poker and waiting to see who folds first. Asian countries are accumulating gold like crazy, Western countries are dumping paper. I do not think the current gold price is relevant to anything. Question is, where are the Asian countries buying these masses amounts of gold from? Russia, India, China and Japan are buying gold hand over fist, right down to the housewives! In the West they are supposedly dumping gold at extreme rates, … paper. But you do not see a frenzy buying spree of gold in the West, and certainly not by housewives. The Fed cannot deliver Germany’s Gold, so the Asian buy8ing of Gold is certainly not coming from Western sources. Barrick cannot mine in Pasca Lima, and in fact has not even mined an ounce to date. So where are the Asians buying the real stuff from? When Switzerland and Holland are paying people out in cash and not giving them their gold bars…. because it appears they do not have it! Neither does the Fed. And the COMEX from all reports is running dry, so are the vaults of J.P. Morgan. China has got gold mines, but they still buying tons of the stuff.. from where? British housewives are not buying gold. In fact most people in the West are ignoring it completely.
I’am reminded of Chomsky’s party line, that goes something like you could choose (A_) or (A subprime 1), or even (A subprime 2).
B, C, D, E, ect., ect., are completely off-the-table, out-of-the-question command chain.
Today, apparently, you have a choice of betting on who will have the most gold. Well, I hope this ruler wins, so i can be ruled by that faction. It’s a much better pyramid structure.
Get rid of the “he who has the gold rules” meme.
Decentralize ownership, money, and governments.
[KR443] Keiser Report:
Virgin Bitcoin vs. Old Hag Pound
if agents of the secret financial empire are selling their gold now, what are they doing with their money? Why are they selling their gold now?
Buying off warlords? How about throwing down the hole in Afghanistan? For more than a decade the CIA has been dumping bags and suitcases full of ‘secret’ off-the-books dollars to Karzai et al, estimated at tens of millions of dollars … Karzai is happy to allow permanent US bases in Afghanistan after the 2014 deadline to ensure the flow of ‘economic aid’ …
Perhaps, as Dr Farrell has pointed out several times, they have no choice. The “breakaway civilisation” has enormous power and for their own health they had better pay the piper.
I hardly think the banksters would want the gold (and hence the power) to go east as they’d be without a job. Russia and China wouldn’t hire them, I’m sure of that.
This time of great craziness must also be a time of great fear amongst the elite.
As always, this is great work, Joseph. You’ve raised some issues that prompted a response—something I had not planned to do. I may have put some wrong pieces in the wrong place, but at least, here is what we have.
I share with many of you suspicions that the Boston bombings, the JFK library fire and the gold stories are all related. The exact relationships we may never know, but the pattern will help us formulate some theories. Speculations notwithstanding at least it is an attempt to understand what we were invited to ignore. Variations of the following may apply if over time these events are truly related and enough information is made available to verify. These are presented in the form of questions, which if answered, may help us better understand this spectacle before us:
1. If the JFK fire is related, what is the link between the recent gold manipulation story and the JFK policy of printing currency from the US Treasury? Joseph maintains that Kennedy’s policy for issuing currency against the productivity of the state rather than gold—and that is a threat against a private financial reserve currency system based on debt currently in place by the Federal Reserve System. The bearer bond speculations also come to mind as part of this narrative. If the monies JFK printed out of the US Treasury were intended, or actually, linked to this hidden system of finance, would this not be a direct threat against the CIA and the unnamed interests he swore to destroy? Were there clues left in this library related to this period in question that would suggest such an intention or a link? (It does make one wonder what was permanently removed from circulation.) More importantly, if JFK intended to use that gold reserve for public works rather than covert operations and black project research, this would have been a direct threat against the powerful people in control of this reserve for their global agenda. Since JFK there has been a definite series of insiders in the Presidency to ensure this does not happen again—until this President. Some days I am convinced he is part of this cabal—but then he does something unexpected that makes me wonder who really is pulling his strings.
2. If the JFK fire is part of the story after all, does this tell us that a message was embedded within the engineered Boston bombing circus event whose public purpose seems to be a demonstration of the “efficiency” of the current police state to resolve future incidents? (The goal was not a perfect operation, but the demonstration of a prototype for future operations.) Was a subtle message sent to this sitting president to not repeat the decisions of JFK with respect to monetary policy? Did someone use an event engineered during his presidency by any given set of unnamed actors, whose purpose was to demonstrate the domestic equivalent of “shock and awe” by his police state, as a cover? The movie from last year named “Total Recall” had in it references to a US currency with the face of a recent president on it… I’m not one to think every movie has a “hidden message” but the plot had a predictive quality arousing some curiosity. If President Obama was thinking about the use of this “reserve and its technologies” in a similar fashion, wouldn’t someone want to send a message during an event engineered for public demonstration? What better message than one with fireworks from Texas, a fire in JFK’s library in Boston and gold manipulation in the futures market to reduce its price.
If one adds the opening of the Bush library and a former president, whose father was a CIA director, discussing this Boston story at a press conference at same time–that’s just too weird. We have many of the same players surfacing yet again in an inauguration event in Dallas—juxtaposed in interesting ways, with President Obama curiously sitting away from the rest as if he were the odd man out. The official story of the Boston bombing leaves more questions unanswered than explained, nor does the same story address the other peculiarities in the existing and future scenes we were forced to attend. It’s as if someone changed the stage in the middle of a scene during the performance of a play—a minor scene change that looks like a coded message to one of the main actors. And, just in case we noticed, the director is telling the audience: “ignore the confusion, we’re getting to the bottom of it, so just watch the spectacle and enjoy your play. When we apprehend these actors we’ll tell you the whole story as a sequel.”
Does the ghost of JFK glide slowly over the alchemy of monetary policy and the occulted gold reserves that have concerned Dr. Farrell’s analysis so much over the past couples of years—this time with a vengeance? Maybe none of these are related. Maybe the questions are simply misdirection or the raving delusions of a conspiracy theorist who is looking for a better theory than the official one. But, we have the Bush dynasty, JFK, gold and monetary policy all in the news in the period of a week or two—with one library partially burned at the start of Celtic Tree month and another opened on Beltane. Finally, we have many of these actors on a stage in Dallas in the 50th year anniversary of President Kennedy’s death subsequent to a marathon in Boston, complete with declared drills involving cutouts, police, FBI and Craft International (which, in case you haven’t noticed, may have a subtle nod back to a certain secret society that has received no attention, and whose founder was murdered earlier in the year under suspicious circumstances), for an event honoring the victims of Sandy Hook during an elongated occult holiday season—whose library activity have a strong occult suggestion of a death and resurrection ritual. Duringg the ritual itself, you even have incense, bangs, fire, smoke, blood and sacrifice presided over by men in black. Now, what are the odds?
This is so fantastic, I’m not even sure I believe all of this. I am asked to witness it just the same. To me, the most interesting question is: why is it that some of the most gruesome national tragedies in the past 100 years seem to have the same consistent signature that we being asked to ignore? Even more stunning, when we ask these questions, why are we mocked? If there is a grand conspiracy of which all of these moving parts represent smaller operations within a grand, highly compartmentalized corporate structure, we are being mocked as a nation. If we ask these questions as we try to deconstruct the event, we are mocked twice! Me thinks they protest too much. We may never figure it out, but we have to keep watching and asking questions.
Joseph’s article and the last News and Views put the final missing pieces in place for me to formulate some questions—and that is how the education process begins. Why do we see JFK, the Bush dynasty and libraries linked to a story about gold and monetary policy around an operation orchestrated by someone to allow another president to demonstrate the sufficiency of a national police state in Boston? It appears to be a conspiracy because it has that signature. It is as if someone is signing an occult contract to transfer their blood-debt onto us, and it is written in our blood without our opposition. And, if the Constitution is the target—it’s an occulted one.
In 2007, if one knew that very shortly the global economy was going to tank like the Depression, but in this case the Fed and other central banks would intervene, there’d be huge motivation to short gold.
Just saying that this could be connected hedge funds, not some secret stash of gold–though that could exist too.
Yaj, I mean Sagnacity,
considering hundreds of hedge funds were taken out in 2008, it seems like they were one of the prime targets for mugging. I would also wager that 9 out of 10 hedge funds were long gold going into the 2008 debacle. Unless they had crystal balls, only true insiders would have foreseen the exact timing of the 2008 meltdown. And when it comes to trading, it is really more about timing than acumen.
“connected hedge funds” would not mean all hedge funds, most of which don’t employ particularly smart people anyhow. In other words, 9 of 10 hedge funds are run by fools profiting off of high fees charged other fools.
now of course going long on gold in 2007 when the price went down would have meant more holding it more than 5 years, oh wait that’s last year, when gold was up extraordinarily.
In 1997, I thought Apple computer was a good investment, made a plenty good percentage too, though not the big bucks because I didn’t start with much.