Cosmic Warfare

NASA, SPACE WEATHER, CYCLES, AND THE GEOMETRIZATION OF PHYSICS

One of the sites that I like to subscribe to is Mitch Battros' Earth Changes Media, and this past week, while I was away on my business trip, Mr. Battros reported on an interesting conference on space weather sponsored by NASA:

NASA and Space Weather

The paragraphs that grabbed my attention were these:

"Bolden began his address with the acknowledgement that space weather events (such as solar flares, cmes, coronal holes, filaments, gamma ray burst, and galactic cosmic rays) - which he further emphasized the fact that 'space weather can be as devastating to the planet as serious tornadoes and other natural disasters.'

"This is a great step forward demonstrating a new awareness highlighting a direct causal effect between charged particles generated from various sources and their role on celestial orbs such as planets, comets, and asteroids. This conference showed great interest in bringing together diverse scientific researchers along with targeted policymakers to further identify how our galaxy Milky Way and our Sun produce far reaching consequences right here on Earth." (Italicized emphasis in the original, boldface emphasis added)

Putting all this together, one might say that coronal mass ejecta and coronal holes on the Sun, plasma filaments (an important component in the plasma cosmology of Swedish physicist Hannes Alfven), and in general the idea of an electrically dynamic" solar system and galaxy (with all the vast implications for "electrogravitics" that both imply) having an effect on terrestrial weather is an idea whose time has definitely come, for it is self-evident that these events greatly effect terrestrial weather, and that these phenomena are cyclic in nature in ways that are only beginning to be understood, though such cyclical cosmologies were, of course, a common feature to many ancient systems of cosmology.

To put it briefly, there is a physics behind these cyclic ideas, and where there's a physics, there's a geometry. After all, the two grandest "unification" theories in physics - Maxwell's and Einstein's - were fundamentally geometric theories, Maxwell's with his quaternion geometry, and Einstein's with his tensors.

But there's a hidden implication to Mr. Battros' reportage on this conference, and it is with this that I am chiefly concerned.  Readers of this site will be well aware of the fact that I believe that in addition to a public space program, that there are indicators of a private and secret one, one with far different paradigms and parameters of physics than the public consumption model. One need only reflect again on the well-known comments of Lockheed skunk works director, the late Ben Rich, to appreciate this hypothesis. Assuming for the sake of argument that Mr. Rich was not participating in some psychological operation when he said that "we have discovered an error in the equations, and now we have the technology to take ET home," and assuming that we may take such statements at face value, it would imply knowledge of principles not generally nor publicly known.

I suspect that Mr. Battros may be hitting very close to the nail, if not hitting it directly on the head, when he suggests that  there is an electrical dynamism, an electrodynamic interrelationship of systems and forces on a galactic scale that is a highly prized secret of Mr. Rich's implied secret space program, and that, if such knowledge is a component of "taking ET home," that knowledge includes the possibility to "tickle" planetary and stellar systems... to manipulate the "space weather," so to speak.

If so, then that means someone on this planet might possess not only the possibility to "take ET home," but, if necessary, to press a button, and blow ET up if need be. Once again, the problem isn't the existence or non-existence of such technologies, but rather, their proliferation and the need to prevent them from falling into the wrong hands. It is, if you will, a kind of cosmic "MAD" doctrine of Mutually Assured Destruction, on a wholly new scale.

NASA's conference, like all such public conferences, needs therefore to be understood in the context that we understand the revelation of stealth fighters and bombers: we're being shown the stuff that's already old news to the technocrats "on the inside."

See you on the flip side.

 

 

11 thoughts on “NASA, SPACE WEATHER, CYCLES, AND THE GEOMETRIZATION OF PHYSICS”

  1. With reference to the “Tower of. Babel ” moment. There is. A website that speaks about this. Religious of course, but compelling.

    The basic premise is that this so called Tower, could just as easily have been a gate or Stargate to heaven. Nimrod supossedy was trying to enter “Heaven” through this gate, being built by Humans and Nephilim. To bring back the technologies they’d just lost. And allowing the so called ”gods” to return. They were going into the interdimensional space forum that reason.

    These were the immediate survivors to the Flood and very obviously wanted their hegemony returned. It was going to be a long road back. It was very obvious that God or His representative for that time and place would be very concerned that Mankind would be at it again in the not so far future. Nimrod was known by a lot of names, one of which was Gilgamesh…2/3rds “god” and 1/3 Human…whose remains were positively identified in April 2003 by Germany archaeological scientists. In Iraq..of all places.
    No official confirmation has yet occured except with usual caveates in place from academia.

    The one tongue or one language could,ve been science and/or mathematics but it could’ve been cultural as well. Very much like the current American one now, with it’s television programs distributed world wide. Good or bad.

    1. PaulfromMinneapolis

      Thanks emlong! Any other sources of info regard Ormus that you like other that what is already on your web site?

  2. space.com report about “the new threat from space”
    “Severe space weather could be as devastating to the planet as serious tornadoes and other natural disasters, NASA chief Charles Bolden said in a public address Tuesday (June 4)”
    quoting NASA chief:
    -“This conference shines a spotlight on another naturally occurring phenomenon that can be just as punishing as a tornado — space weather”
    -“Given the growing importance of space to our nation’s economic well being and security, it is of increasing importance that NASA and its partner agencies continue to advance our nation’s capability to understand and predict space weather events”
    -“Space weather is a problem that crosses all borders and demands input from our international counterparts”
    -“With the United Nations now on our team, we are assured of even greater global coordination in the effort to increase our understanding of space weather and its impact on Earth and throughout the solar system,” he added. “We have shown how, working as a team, we can save lives when hurricanes and tornadoes strike here on Earth. I am confident we can be just as effective working together to protect our people, our critical infrastructures, and our planet from the dangers of space weather.”
    translation:
    – besides “punishing” tornadoes, be expecting something equally devastating to occur just as “naturally” as the tornadoes
    – we understand and can “predict” these events, since it can affect one’s economic well being and security
    – expecting more problems if “the international counterparts” don’t respond to our warning
    – “without us on the team”, expecting more loss of lives as you would expect when hurricanes and tornadoes strike.

    not long ago, NASA reveals their “asteroid-catching plan”, assures the world it won’t be a threat like “Chelyabinsk”. Not only someone was openly admitting they can “catch and move” asteroids right after the Russian meteor incident, if it was a blatant threat, one would expect more “Chelyabinsk-like” phenomenon to occur after the warning, which is exactly what happened.(referring to the Spainish “ball of fire” incident in mid April, interestingly it was reported by RT with reference to the “Chelyabinsk” incident) However it’s not giving them their desired results since those asteroids kept getting intercepted by something.
    It seems “space weather”, together with hurricanes and tornadoes are aces up their sleeves used more as a way of bargaining these days, as “the declining empire” is increasingly relying more on its exotic arsenal, one would take it as sign of dominance and confidence before the 2008 “financial meltdown”, but now it’s rather became a sign of panic. Nevertheless, one should expect a “hit back” from the adversary. I suspect that “hit back” is called “Edward Snowden”.

  3. As someone who now professionally involved in aether physics by way of the strange and wonderful material called orgonite I can attest to the notion that there is another dimension to physics at our grasp. To wit, here is my site:
    http://www.orgonia.bigcartel.com
    There is here at least a stab taken at the subject of aether physics as its effects are observable in the vicinity of orgonite.

    1. PaulfromMinneapolis

      Emlong,

      I have long been wanting to communicate with someone in the “know” regarding the “O” products, uses and so forth, if only to get a birds eye view as well as practical first steps. This is off topic so is there a way to take this conversation offline somewhere? Thanks, Paul

  4. Another thing that this suggests is that Astrology is real. Couple this talk of geometry with the RCA solar experiments back in the 50s.

    Consider that the planet’s position may cause effects in the Aether, but also consider that the very composition of that planet may have additional effects as well. Different materials make better (or worse) transmitters of different types of energy.

  5. What came to mind was and reading Mitch Barttros was the nineteenth century scientific theory of aether an space not being a total vacuum. As for Ben Rich statement about taking ET home I do think he was all but admitting to a secret off the books space program. The Left Behind series a covert message to the chosen that will be saved not by god but by the Elites and the rest left here to die.

  6. Frankie Calcutta

    “Take ET home”

    Maybe Rich was talking about some meddlesome, homesick ETs who were marooned on our planet long ago that can now be escorted back to where they came from… and now with the message that we can blow their planet up if they step foot on our planet again.

    But are the ETs among us and is that why there is such a great interest in universal DNA testing? Could fostering the idea of a a “promised land” for those who are Chosen be a clever ruse to create a single embarkation point? And what about the “Left Behind” meme? Is that psychological preparation for the mass of humanity who will be bewildered when a portion of the human population is suddenly shipped off planet?

    Admittedly, returning ETs to their home planet seems very humane and not the least bit human. It would seem more in keeping with our violent nature that we just kill the aliens among us or at least put them on reservations. It must be that the ETs are entities that can not be killed so easily and are capable of commandeering new human bodies before physical death or soon after. Hence the need to entrap them in some kind of prison body. The cyborg suit?

    1. Positing “they” can commandeer other bodies what would be the point of DNA testing if human bodies are just hard drives that can be rewritten?

Comments are closed.