THINGS THAT MAKE YOU GO “HMMM…”: RUSSIAN-CHINESE ...

This one was sent to me in a comment on the website by "H," and it's one of those things that, I admit, make me go "hmmm..." and to entertain a variety of speculations, all of which vastly exceed the evidence for them, of which there is exactly none. Russia, and China, it seems, are holding joint "anti-terrorism" military exercises near Chelyabinsk, the site of last year's "accidental" meteor explosion and event:

Chinese troops of 'Peace Mission - 2013' arrive at exercise area

Now, I have to wonder about the anti-terrorism angle. Given the USA's sponsorship via a variety of fronts of various "color revolutions" inside of the former Soviet republics, plus the more recent South Ossetia adventure, which Mr. Putin very effectively put down during the 2008 Beijing Olympics, one wonders if by anti-terrorism the two major powers of the BRICSA concords are not serving notice that "two can play the terrorism false-front game." With recent revelations of an increasing USA presence in the former Georgian Soviet republic, this only seems more likely.

But then, on top of all of this, there's the Chelyabinsk meteor connection. I made no secret here that I suspected the whole meteor thing was evidence of some sophisticated technology possibly in play, and some equally sophisticated technology possibly in play in its destruction. The presence of a joint Russian-Chinese anti-terrorism military exercise in the very city that was "host" to the meteor event raises my suspicion meter into the red zone, and the anti-terrorism message, viewed in that connection, is profoundly disturbing, for it would place the event in the "terrorism" category, and if that be the case, then a joint Russian-Chinese mission of this sort is signaling that they know it was such, and are not intimidated.

Either way one slices it, I suspect there is more here to these exercises than meets the eye. Of course, the anti-US agenda would seem to be the most plausible. It's that other one, however, that still has me concerned.

See you on the flip side.

Posted in

Joseph P. Farrell

Joseph P. Farrell has a doctorate in patristics from the University of Oxford, and pursues research in physics, alternative history and science, and "strange stuff". His book The Giza DeathStar, for which the Giza Community is named, was published in the spring of 2002, and was his first venture into "alternative history and science".

9 Comments

  1. henry on August 16, 2013 at 7:53 pm

    http://rt.com/news/nasa-hazardous-asteroid-map-575/

    Then there is this “odd coincidence” from a comic book called “Curse of the Mumy”, the “secret history of the Nazis” recorded by “Akashic records” has a scene of meteors showering a city.
    http://24.media.tumblr.com/2df537e500e067db3e29e40cced6b595/tumblr_mlquvawYFA1sn1xs5o3_1280.jpg

    What boggles the mind is according to Dr. Carol Rosin, Von Braun told her about the asteroids in the 70s, it makes one wonder if some of the technologies employed in causing event like Chelyabinsk meteor just as in the Stargate episode “Fail Safe”, where the doomsday asteroid heading towards earth was the work of hostile alien race.
    http://stargate.wikia.com/wiki/Fail_Safe
    What’s even more interesting is how the secret U.S. government dodged it.
    “Sam manages to open a hyperspace window large enough for the asteroid to pass through, long enough for it to miss Earth entirely”.
    Is that why the Russians were caught rather by surprise during the Chelyabinsk incident, and why they are paying close attention to what NASA says about “hazardous” asteroids?



  2. marcos toledo on August 15, 2013 at 6:30 pm

    Are you having computer problems I did not get you post today in my inbox. I did not get my subscribe notice either when I commented on today post.



  3. Robert Barricklow on August 15, 2013 at 2:39 pm

    Thr RC, of the BRICS, know the score.
    (As many here can read between the lines.)
    It looks as if generating Crisis is going to be a little more difficult to achieve, than in the Oligarchy’s good old days.. The “terrorist” umbrella, is becoming very well known as “cover” for elements within, so-called Nation-States, to achieve certain “policy aims”. Of course those policies are “bottom-line profits AND/OR power grabs.
    Russia is all too familiar with the financial terrorist weapons implementing the “West’s Grabitization, …er, I mean Privitization.
    Europe should have woken up along ago on the financial monte being played-out in taken their ability to issue their own soverign currencies. Without them, they have no country. They became virtual states, at the beckon call on the European Provate Central Bank(No doubt under the BIS control). I still find it hard to fathom, that the leader “willing” gave that up: Blackmail?, alternate close choice of silver or lead?, Starring role in a children’s film?, or simular persuations?
    Captured leaders, signing away their nation sovereignty. That is the first step in the downward spiral of degradation – the going toward a private internatinal central bank of the BIS puppet master, instead of a Public national bank of the people, for the people, by the people.



  4. DownunderET on August 15, 2013 at 2:00 pm

    I think if there WAS a hatchet between Russia and China, it has been well and truly buried. They have to now co-exist in a effort to brick wall the Anglo – American elite.
    This will be more evident as the US continues it’s relentless efforts to stonewall the two rivals. Well good luck there, because these two aren’t going to tolerate the bullish foreign policies of a country that is on a path of distruction, and I mean internally.



  5. marcos toledo on August 15, 2013 at 1:07 pm

    The Chinese ,Russians, Indians, Brazilians and South Africans have come to the conclusion they either hang together or hang separately. Collective defense or being pick off one by one.



    • Robert Barricklow on August 15, 2013 at 2:22 pm

      Well Put.



  6. Sagnacity on August 15, 2013 at 7:22 am

    All possible, but then I read things like this: “‘The two militaries have enjoyed a traditional friendship.’” Um not really. A bit more in the last 10 years.



    • Enlil's a Dog on August 15, 2013 at 8:32 pm

      My interpretation of that statement errs toward the fact that their political ideologies were shared for around 40 odd years and a military alliance (if push come to shove) would be a ‘fait accompli’ even if certain aspects of their overall relationship differed.



Help the Community Grow

Please understand a donation is a gift and does not confer membership or license to audiobooks. To become a paid member, visit member registration.

Upcoming Events