FLASH! The UK Guardian is reporting that German intelligence has ascertained that Assad did not order the chemical attack... and after all folks, consider: what did he have to gain from doing so? Nothing...

Bild am Sonntag cites high-level German surveillance source suggesting Syrian president was not personally behind attacks

Posted in

Joseph P. Farrell

Joseph P. Farrell has a doctorate in patristics from the University of Oxford, and pursues research in physics, alternative history and science, and "strange stuff". His book The Giza DeathStar, for which the Giza Community is named, was published in the spring of 2002, and was his first venture into "alternative history and science".


  1. Tasha on September 20, 2013 at 10:45 am

    Very interesting arguments for or against Assad doing the deed. However, I am coming at this from a slightly different perspective. If we go back to “prophecies” from decades and even centuries past, we see a pattern of predictions that involve the middle east and areas surrounding. Also, it seems to me that the powers that be, whomever they may be, are conducting themselves in a way to ensure that these “prophecies” don’t have a chance in hell of coming true. Whether they believe in the prophecies or not. Something has them systematically destroying whomever could possibly be the so-called “anti-christ” from the middle east area. They are lining them up and taking them down one by one. Sadam, Qadaffi, Bin Laden, etc., etc. I think this will continue to be the way. There are many levels on which we can look at this, but the connection seems to come back to the prophecies and other writings on the middle east and its presumed/predicted/supposed threats to the world.

  2. disciple on September 9, 2013 at 11:29 pm

    I respect the views here at this site but I am suprised that no one is talking about the “Liquid Natural Gas ” element to this story.

    William Engdahl did a piece on this over a year ago.

    Long story short; Russia is the main supplier of LNG to Europe. Syria is the coridoor for LNG to the Europen market from the stand point of Iran, Qutar and Saudi Arabia. All three countries have sought run a pipeline through Syria. Qutar and Saudi Arabia had been turned down and Iran currently has a deal with Syria and Iraq to run a supply line to the mediteranean coast to compete for Europe’s LNG needs.

    Beyond that, you have the recent discoveries of major Natural Gas deposits in Cyprus, Turkey, Israel, and Greece. Many nations are racing to bring their Natual Gas to the European market. The West is trying to cut off Russia and Iran from benefiting from that market.

    This is the real story behind what is happnening. Of course the Chemical accident was a false flag!

    Qutar has spent 3 Billion so far supporting the Rebels. The Saudis are backing Al-Nusra I imagine. USA is providing the weapons. Qutar and Saudi Arabia each sought to lay a pipeline through Jordan and Syria to Turkey. That’s why Turkey is helping out.

    Consider Greece, having to sign over their newly discovered LNG resources to the IMF/World Bank in compensation for their debt. Bill Clinton is negotiating for Noble Energy to develope these fields for Greece.

    • Robert Barricklow on September 10, 2013 at 8:16 am

      Did recent interview with Red Ice Radio
      I think September 4, 2013
      On Syria and manutactured war

      • Robert Barricklow on September 10, 2013 at 8:23 am

        It was your typical Endahl interview.
        Yes, he did go into detail on the pipeline and other geopolitical underpinnings.

        • Robert Barricklow on September 10, 2013 at 8:24 am

          I press g but..,
          Maybe pecking too fast

    • Robert Barricklow on September 10, 2013 at 8:45 am

      Hopefully Russia/Putin has pulled the lit-fuse-out, with the latest proposal

  3. Reno on September 9, 2013 at 9:10 pm

    The reptilians who started the “civil war” are of course the ones ultimately responsible for the atrocities. David Icke wrote that the ones responsible for causing the problems are the same ones offering the solutions.

  4. Reno on September 9, 2013 at 9:06 pm

    The article states that Assad is not fully in command of his security forces. Sounds a lot like the fate of a long list of US presidents.

  5. jedi on September 9, 2013 at 5:52 pm

    war is profit…its a disease that afflicts people…materialism.

  6. Dag from Ringerike on September 9, 2013 at 11:51 am

    If you follow retired US general Wesley Clark`s famous statement on several youtube Clips, that he was showed a plan in Pentagon to take down several regimes in the Mid East, then I think that the alternative media, contrary to MSM, start to reconfigure certain terms.

    There are several confirmations that many, or most of the socalled rebells are foreigners, financed by some arab countries and others. Of course, we know that there are syrian nationals that have joined the socalled rebells.

    So, let us change the MSM-terms, from rebells to “invaders” or “western invaders”. And, that has been carried on and on, called a civil war, what is now playing out,and obvious, that Syria has been suffering by an “invasion”, or “western invasion”.

    I am totally disgusted, especially when you read this article by Nikolai Bobkin, America`s Covert War against Christian in the Middle East, Global Research, September 02, 2013.

    • Robert Barricklow on September 9, 2013 at 12:02 pm

      All those nations that were listed are, coincidently, not members under the financial umbrellas of the BIS. In fact non-members are all so-called “enemies”.

      • Margaret on September 10, 2013 at 10:55 pm

        Syrian Girl lists #1 reason why NWO hates Syria: its central bank is state-owned & controlled … Her ‘Top Eight Reasons Why They Hate Us’: no Rothschild-controlled Central Bank, no IMF debt, no genetically modified foods, oil and pipelines, anti-secret societies, anti-Zionism, secularism and nationalism.
        Why the US, UK, EU & Israel hate Syria, by Adrian Salbuchi

    • Nidster - on September 12, 2013 at 4:03 pm

      Dag that is a powerful article, but disgusting of course. The foreign ‘invader’ rebels had gathered Christian and Alawi hostages in a building in Khalidiya in Homs. Then they blew it up with dynamite and attributed the act to the regular army.


  7. Robert Barricklow on September 9, 2013 at 8:24 am

    Neo feudalism needs no fascade of truth.
    The Sadis(so-called leaders) were great chemical tools, in numerous ways; going at least back to WW11.

  8. BetelgeuseT-1 on September 9, 2013 at 3:16 am

    I’m not so sure.
    First it says: “But the intercepts tended to add weight to the claims of the Obama administration and Britain and France that elements of the Assad regime, and not renegade rebel groups, were responsible for the attack in the suburb of Ghouta, Bild said”.
    Then towards the end: “Schindler said that BND had intercepted a telephone call in which a high-ranking member of Hezbollah in Lebanon told the Iranian embassy in Damascus that Assad had made a big mistake when he gave the order to use the chemicals, the magazine Der Spiegel said”.

    Looks to me they have switched to Plan B.
    If they can’t blame the attack directly on Assad himself, then they will blame it on some rogue entity within the Syrian forces. How convenient, isn’t it?
    Blaming it on some rogue entity does not require much evidence. One of the alleged phone calls is all it takes, let the missiles and planes fly!
    Not only that, but already Lebanon and Iran are implicated to some degree.
    The next targets have been identified and the demonization process has begun.

    This is The Guardian after all, a Western mouthpiece.

    • Sagnacity on September 9, 2013 at 7:56 am

      Right, “it wasn’t Assad, but still the government” so the US must bomb anyhow+anyway.

  9. DaphneO on September 8, 2013 at 11:21 pm

    I’m very thankful to hear this. Another reason to hope that the US lies will lead nowhere.

  10. marcos toledo on September 8, 2013 at 10:27 pm

    My money is still with it was the insurgents are to blame. They had more to gain from the use of saran than Bashar al Assad what did he need this for he had more reliable weapons at his disposal that would cause less stink in the world press. He had the most to lose if he used these weapons.

Help the Community Grow

Please understand a donation is a gift and does not confer membership or license to audiobooks. To become a paid member, visit member registration.

Upcoming Events