Well it's that time of the month again, when I comb through piles of emails of articles and so on that readers send me, and once again, this has been one of those weeks when many of you, for whatever reason, were thinking of space. In fact, so many of you sent me these two articles, that I cannot as is my custom, thank all of you who did so by naming your initials. Indeed, that strange attractor in the aether that was functioning in the last two weeks seems to have affected me as well, for in my prowls I found the first of these articles and it quickly led to the second one. So, this seems to have been a distinct message: "You need to blog about this."
By way of background, my reasons for prowling around looking for space news was to discover is anything more was being said that suggested corroboration, or for that matter, dissent, from my scenario that space is being quietly although quickly collateralized. For those who don't know, I have argued here, and more importantly, in my books (Covert Wars and Breakaway Civilizations and Covert Wars and the Clash of Civilizations), that there are three crucial aspects to this scenario that need to be understood:
- In the aftermath of World War Two, with the sudden appearance of UFOs, UFO-related incidents (the Arnold sighting, the Roswell incident, the vast numbers of UFOs reported world wide), the national security state was established, to monitor essentially three threats: (a) the Communist bloc, (b) a postwar Nazi extraterritorial "state", what I have called the Nazi or Fascist international, and (c) the UFOs, which the national security establishment suspected represented both a hidden human technology and a possible ET one;
- this group was tasked with the development of the technologies to emulate UFO performance and to roll back and defeat its terrestrial opponents. This required the development of a vast hidden system of finance, to fund both the covert political operations and the crash development of technologies in a long-term sort of "Manhattan project on steroids;"
- As a result of the creation of this system, the national security establishment became deeply involved in its own right as a banking and investment entity, along with certain prime banks around the world. Furthermore, this system adopted a kind of "Venetian" system, as space itself and whatever was out there was offered as the collateral for those assuming the risk of participation in the financing itself, rather like the bankers of the Rialto financing the merchants of Venice, and thus assuming the risks, and a share of the profits of what they brought back with them, the collateral of the ventures. This arrangement insured that secrecy could be maintained, for as ufologist Richard Dolan has argued, privatization allowed secrecy simply as a matter of corporate proprietary rights. This collateralization, I have argued, occurred almost as soon as the creation of the national security apparatus and hidden system itself, i.e., ca. 1947 or shortly thereafter.
Now in this context, I have been arguing the admittedly speculative idea that the recent discussions of space with respect to asteroid capture and mining are in fact the now open indicators of this more hidden context. But I have also argued the equally speculative idea that to capture an mine asteroids with anything approaching cost effectiveness would take some other very different kind of propulsion technology than standard rockets, and have been snooping around for indicators that this technology is in the pipes.
Of course, there are the usual stories of ion propulsion, fusion rockets, and so on. But now, significantly, there's this very intriguing announcement:
I have advanced the idea that 3d printing represents a technology developed in the black projects world, and probably used by it for some time, that possibly greatly exceeds the capabilities of that which we see being made available to the public, and I suspect the same is true here: magnetic rings as a propulsion system in space conjurs images that, for many readers here, will ring a Nazi Bell. After all, that project relied upon the idea - if you've been following the argument there closely - of "magnetic fields separation" and rings and so on. Might there even be some sort of deep connection between that device and this more recent one? Sure, it's a possibility, at least, to my mind it is. But the real point here is that this technology is very possibly in a much more advanced stage than is being publicly admitted, and it would be in the long run a more useful technology in its advanced state than rockets for the purpose of maneuvering and manipulating asteroids.
Bottom line: I think what we're seeing here is the gradual though open disclosure of technologies that are probably a lot further along. Of technologies that one would need to "mine asteroids"....
....or hurtle them at targets:
Now, if you're like me, I suspect that you're thinking that slamming cored out "mined" asteroids at the Moon doesn't make very much sense at all, unless you're planning to bombard it for whatever reason. So I suspect if you're like me, you're thinking the real message here is something else: if we can hurl asteroids at the Moon, then we can hurl them at other targets in space too, and I suspect that's the real goal. And nifty magnetic rings, brought to enormous scale, might be just the ticket to do it.
Consider, too, the geopolitical context in which these little stories occur: the USA has just been handed its geopolitical head by one Vladimir Putin, who shows no sign of being the compliant lap poodle to the NWO on each and every issue that western oligarchs might wish him to be. Amid growing Russian indicators that they intend to build their own missile (and asteroid!) defense (remember Mr. Medvedev's statements prior to the Chelyabinsk meteor), comes these intriguing NASA stories, made more intriguing by the timing of their release. The real state of secret technological ability might be only slightly more than has been revealed or suggested in these stories, or it might be vastly more than has been revealed or suggested. But in either case, as a psyop, it's masterful, because it injects another element of doubt in your opponent's calculations. "We can lob 'em, you can shoot 'em down" appears to be the subtle messages that they're saying to each other....
...or perhaps, to someone else.
See you on the flip side.