This was another one that caught virtually every reader's eye here, and it caught mine as well, so again, my thanks to so many of you who shared it with me.

What am I referring to?

I'm referring to the fact that there have apparently been several electrical fires, and in some reports, explosions, at the NSA's shiny new multi-billion dollar facility in Utah:

Fiery, Metal-Melting Explosions at NSA Data Center Stump Investigators

$2 Billion NSA Spy Center is Going Up in Flames

I want to draw your attention to some statements in the second article:

"The National Security Agency's $2 billion mega spy center is going up in flames.

"Technical glitches have sparked fiery explosions within the NSA's newest and largest data storage facility in Utah, destroying hundreds of thousands of dollars worth of equipment, and delaying the facility's opening by one year.

"And no one seems to know how to fix it.

"Within the last 13 months, at least 10 electric surges have each cost about $100,000 in damages, according to documents obtained by the Wall Street Journal. Experts agree that the system, which requires about 64 megawatts of electricity—that's about a $1 million a month energy bill--isn't able to run all of its computers and servers while keeping them cool, which is likely triggering the meltdowns."

Now, as most of you know, I'm not particularly fond of the idea of massive electronic spying or surveillance all in the name of keeping us safe, by an agency which calls itself the National Security Agency. Now, for our German readers, that translates as Reichsicherheithauptamt, part of the burgeoning Heimatsicherheit (for our United Kingdom readers, that's Homeland Security) apparatus of the Fourth USSA.  ("Hey, Reinhard! Remember all those IBM  and Zuse computers we had at Hauptquartier on the Prinz Albrechtstrasse? Wait till you see the really cool stuff the Amis are up to in Utah!")

Putting all Nazi  NSA RSHA necromantic security and computer-obsessed wet dreams aside, the article raises a good question: are these difficulties simply due to the fact that such computational power has never been networked and linked in such a way before that it's causing the technologically sophisticated USSA to have these "meltdowns"? Or is there some other explanation? Simple incompetence? Well, incompetence is possible, since we're already seeing what wonders Obama"care" has in store for everyone with the failures of the online exchanges.

But in the case of the NSA, I'm thinking incompetence isn't the only possible explanation. Indeed, that the NSA and Obama"care" are experiencing difficulties at the same time gives one pause. One commentator that I read even suggested the possibility of sabotage, and many commentators are not complaining, since the facility is for "spying on Americans."

But again, I rather suspect the real purpose, and the real facility, are two different things. As I put it elsewhere, the idea that the NSA located all the "sensitive stuff" above ground at this facility is naive. In fact, the facility is probably a bit of theater, a Potemkin village, and the "good stuff" is probably far underground. After all, all that vast hidden system of finance will buy not only a lot of cool technology for secret space programs, but a lot of underground tunnels, maglev trains, and "mantle scrapers" (underground skyscrapers).

Sabotage as an explanation invites so many other explanations, none of them entirely present, and fortunately, no one in the goobernment is suggesting - yet - any idea of a kind of "false flag" against the NSA or its facilities, which could be used to further other agendas. But there's another possibility that must be mentioned: the articles note that this problem is causing a delay in the projected opening of the facility of approximately a year. Perhaps, then, one is looking at more indications of a "penetrated operation," of that "factional infighting" that I've been suggesting is occurring within the power structure of the deep state with its various factions and interests. After all, it would be a comparatively simple matter to slip one's own "people" into the construction and electricians' crews building the facility. It takes little imagination to envision some foreign power, interested in delaying the facility, or simply trying to be a nuisance to the USSA's NSA-RSHA, slipping in such people into the construction crews (think BRICSA here folks).

Why would I suggest such a thing? You'll recall that I've been suggesting that the real intentions of such "data mining" are for financial and scenario/market-gaming purposes. Such eavesdropping resources would be another wall of cyber defense around the Anglosphere financial oligarchy, and, indeed, the US dollar. Thus, any attempt to create a global financial alternative to that will have to address, and take out, or at least, interfere with or curb that capability.

I therefore suspect, folks, that there's much more going on with this facility and its problems than meets the idea. This is one to watch, folks.

See you on the flip side.


Joseph P. Farrell

Joseph P. Farrell has a doctorate in patristics from the University of Oxford, and pursues research in physics, alternative history and science, and "strange stuff". His book The Giza DeathStar, for which the Giza Community is named, was published in the spring of 2002, and was his first venture into "alternative history and science".


  1. henry on October 15, 2013 at 6:58 pm

    ”Why would I suggest such a thing? You’ll recall that I’ve been suggesting that the real intentions of such “data mining” are for financial and scenario/market-gaming purposes. Such eavesdropping resources would be another wall of cyber defense around the Anglosphere financial oligarchy, and, indeed, the US dollar. Thus, any attempt to create a global financial alternative to that will have to address, and take out, or at least, interfere with or curb that capability.“
    The first BRICSA summit was held in Yekaterinburg, any chance the recent “meteor” over Ekaterinburg is a “financial message”?
    I don’t think either granting Snowden asylum while holding a joint “anti-terrorist” exercise with China in Chelyabinsk or awarding Snowden while U.S. government is shutting down because of debt-ceiling crisis was a coincidence. Like Putin’s 911 Op-E in The New York Times, they seem to be calculated moves by Russia. Putin is on the suspect list for this one.

    • LSM on October 16, 2013 at 5:54 am

      Hi henry,

      am just trying to connect dots- I have to ask myself WHY of all places Yekatarinburg was chosen for the first BRICSA summit (if true)- as we’ve all been told (and most believe) the Romanovs were executed in the basement of the Ipatiev house in the same-named city (there was/is no basement in the Ipatiev house, by the way- lowest floor of this house built on a hill was a rather small entrance foyer- at least according to the Summers/Mangold book “The File on the Tsar”- very informative read, by the way, if/IF presented info is correct)-

      the Tsar and Tsaryevitch were never seen or heard from again after the Yekaterinburg internment (one needs to read the book) but female Romanovs were last seen later in Perm- then enter “Anna Anderson” (alias Anastasia if true) in the US-

      my point being: 1) Edgar Cayce predicted “the hope for the world will emerge out of Russia”- 2) the 1st BRICSA meeting occured in the city where the male Romanovs disappeared-

      not that I think the Romanovs were 100% benevolent but there has to be a connection of some kind here- the concept of coincidence does not exist-

      I don’t have the answer- am just throwing out thoughts- am I making any sense of myselt whatsoever?-

      stay well-


  2. metaOne on October 15, 2013 at 6:09 pm

    if we’re going along with the premise the NSA is the center computing core of the german leftovers of the core skillset running the tech, then it seems reasonable to consider many others are involved on many levels as well.

    consider what is actually deemed non essential to the gov, it’s the departments most essential to the People. i read today in Forbes it appears the site issues are more to do with hiding the costs upfront to collect all the information and gain consent to link various databases to monitor it all.

    it would also seem prudent to consider it has been turned inside out from inception by someOne. perhaps the entire thing has been used to collect all the dirt on its not being used for the nefarious purpose its been designed for and is actually tied into the death of the stumbling around, confused former military, then was private military (basically).

    it may actually right now be sabotaged from within, within due to compartment breaches near or at the top of that program, but from the bottom.

    programers are a unique bread even within IT if you’ve met a few. the good ones can see the math behind it all and when its good code, the beauty of how it functions through logic interacting with it. logic is flawed though caught between two towers, zero and infinity, the void, the all.

    code will never be man, as hard as we try to form our image in digital likeness. it lacks that spark and perhaps enough hearts have seen this all for what it is at the ground level and did something about it.

    we just need to be ready to do our parts; private systems like xerox are another layer. testing, testing…1,2,3…

  3. basta on October 15, 2013 at 3:26 pm

    To quote a favorite movie, “These are the moments that make life worth living!”

    Joseph, since your German is so good, surely you know the word “Schadenfreude.”

    Well, enough gloating–hopefully a sinkhole will open up and swallow it after it burns down, like Swamp Castle in Monty Python’s Holy Grail.

  4. DownunderET on October 15, 2013 at 12:50 pm

    All computer facilities have what they call UPS systems or uninterruptable power supplies. Basically they are the back up power supply if the normal power supply fails. Saying that, it seems strange that this installation would appear to be a “top of the range” site, and as such would have been engineered to the finest degree.

    Electrical fires can be caused by a number of different problems, in a computer environment, it might be a hardware problem, pc boards igniting etc.

    From an engineering point of view this whole thing stinks, multiple fires in a billion dollar computer center does not add up, unless someone is starting them.

  5. Robert Barricklow on October 15, 2013 at 8:34 am

    Very, very good.
    Just as the construction of the facility was a “gleam” in the eyes of the puppet masters,
    the framework story “cover” was being “primed”.
    Analysis par excellence!

  6. jedi on October 15, 2013 at 5:34 am

    I have a spidey sense that alot of my online friends work for the NSA and other intelligence agency.

    With that in mind…..with wisdom comes knowledge, so for some it is good, others…not so good.

Help the Community Grow

Please understand a donation is a gift and does not confer membership or license to audiobooks. To become a paid member, visit member registration.

Upcoming Events