Yesterday I blogged about the strange connections that seemed to be indicated by the banker-employees of JP Morgan that have been recently "suicided". I have implied the use of exotic technologies may be in play in at least two of those deaths - Jason Alan Salais and Dennis Li Ginjie - and that there may be a connected between (1) credit default swaps, (2) mortgage fraud via the "suicide" of Mr. Talley in Colorado, and (3) foreign exchange, and that either someone in JP Morgan or in the national-intelligence-security-military-industrial complex may be behind these Mafia-style hits. Someone, I averred, is "cleaning house."

Now, before I indulge in today's really high octane speculation (that's the half notch between "high octane speculation" and "oxygen deprived speculation"), let's recall two significant things for which various prime banks are under investigation: (1) the LIBOR(London interbank offered rate) rigging scandal and (2) allegations of FOREX (foreign exchange rigging) that were rumored as pending against large banks such as JP Morgan. The basic point here to maintain in the back of your mind is this: banks were rigging markets and profiting from the rigging.

Now then, on with today's article and really high octane speculation:

Documents Reveal that JP Morgan has been Patenting Death Derivatives

Now, the title alone should give one pause, for the idea of patenting the concept means, in effect, that JP Morgan would make money (1) not only off the derivatives themselves but (2) off any other bank to whom it gave a license to trade them, sort of a royalty or "users' fee" much like Mon(ster)santo and Duponzanto and other agribusiness giants make money off their patented GMO crud. And my mention of GMOs in this context is not merely illustrative, as we shall see.

But now let's look at a much wider picture: this is the same crowd that is also talking about weather derivatives, i.e., securities based on the performance of weather and weather-related business systems (like agriculture). Weather derivatives, as I have noted in prior blogs on this website, are a handy thing to have around if one also has access to technologies that can manipulate the weather itself. In that context, such is another mechanism for manipulating markets and deriving profit from that manipulation. And note that it requires two essential components: (1) the technology to do so, and (2) the securities instruments, the derivatives, themselves.

Now we have "death derivatives," which, like all derivatives based on Dr. Li's formula, are based on the overall aggregate statistical performance of a "bundle" of securities. And that implies the wholesale manipulation of populations in matters of life, health, illness, and death. And in turn, this would require the same two elements: (1) the technology to effect the rigging of the market and (2) the securities themselves. Our focus here is on the first of these components, the technologies. Obviously, weather manipulation could effect whole populations for feast or famine. But additionally, so could the manipulation of the food supply(think GMOs here), the pharmaceutical industry, and the medical-healthcare and insurance industry. Patenting a "longevity risk" is a nice thing to have around in these circumstances.

But the nice thing is, if you like your current plan or doctor, you can keep it.

See you on the flip side.

Joseph P. Farrell

Joseph P. Farrell has a doctorate in patristics from the University of Oxford, and pursues research in physics, alternative history and science, and "strange stuff". His book The Giza DeathStar, for which the Giza Community is named, was published in the spring of 2002, and was his first venture into "alternative history and science".


  1. MQ on March 13, 2014 at 3:13 pm

    A new biggie in bankster related deaths:

    Of course, there was this one, which was a little more mundane:

  2. LibTechBanshee on March 7, 2014 at 5:34 pm

    • Robert Barricklow on March 7, 2014 at 8:15 pm

      Thanks for this LibTechBanshee.
      This is very incredible!
      But long ago I ran into incredible & doubted him; as I was trained to do. Since then, I’ve “untrained” my mindset – and now welcome incredible.
      Thanks again, for posting this.

      • LibTechBanshee on March 7, 2014 at 11:08 pm

        Yep, no worries Robert. I just thought there was a thread here recently on the skulls subject.

        IDK about Karen, but I am intrigued with the material.

        • Robert Barricklow on March 8, 2014 at 9:46 am

          That turn in the rabbit-hole
          was rather surprising!

  3. Poshboy on March 7, 2014 at 11:35 am

    I just have this sneaking feeling that the deluge California just experienced was the result of a White House policy decision to use this hidden weather control technology for economic benefits, which may be a first for this equipment.

    Obama and select advisors know we have this capability and they have been told why it must be kept secret. But knowing the kind of do-gooder Obama wants to be, he may have ordered the black organization controlling this capability to create a storm–with deniable attributes–and help California relieve its water crisis. “Just this once.”

    He’s such an idiot. You NEVER expose these programs in any way other than to achieve geopolitical outcomes, such as sending a destructive message to Japan via Fukojima, or Hurricane Sandy’s odd turn towards New Jersey weeks before the ’12 elections.

    While helping California is a laudable and decent thing to do, you only need ONE public exposure of this equipment/capabilities to drag the whole wretched thing out into the white world–along with all of its supporting financial fraud, historical revisions, and the multitude of sleaze who have profited from all of this.

    And we know what happened the last time in the early 1960s when someone in power tried to F with these forces…LBJ wound up as President.

    • jedi on March 7, 2014 at 3:14 pm

      rule number one…never underestimate them.

      Obama, an illegal alien is potus…who is the idiots that allow this to happen?

      It would appear, that someone is sending a message of there power to do whatever they want too….in the highest office, of the most powerful nation on earth.

  4. justawhoaman on March 6, 2014 at 7:15 pm

    Is it not a fact that we used to have a 3 year grain supply for every person in the US and now we have zero, nil, nada, a big nothing? That sort of takes the sport out of the bet, doesn’t it?

  5. marcos toledo on March 6, 2014 at 2:28 pm

    Full Spectrum Death Derivatives I wonder how these suicided bank employees insurance premiums profited J.P. Morgan they must have made quite a killing on them. And all those merchants of death are making on weapons derivatives from personal suicide to mass murder,warfare more death profits. Mini murder to mass murder then all those pharmaceutical murders with criminalize and legal drugs another killer profits made death road paved with gold silver as well as blood and tears crime pays zillions.

  6. terminally skeptical on March 6, 2014 at 1:56 pm

    I can fathom controlling the food supply and the ramifications of inducing “natural” disasters but how does one package and sell to the buyer derivatives that are based on calamity? Is it based on rainfall shortage or excess, or even a sort of benchmark over/under bet? Does the 60% reduction in water in California’s Central Valley mean that produce futures will also now be bundled and sold as derivatives? How about a death toll wager on the next tsunami? Or for that matter could iatrogenic deaths become a betters pool?

    And is this speculation like any other where one accepts The House odds when placing a wager? Will there ever come a point at which the players ask what purpose does this serve other than being just another casino bet in a slightly different wrapper? Or is it that the stakes are higher when ones death is expedient to another who stands to gain financially?

    Do the deaths of these bankers then serve a two fold purpose? The first being dead men tell no tales (to prosecutors) regarding FOREX malfeasance and the other reason being they were also patsies in an elaborate life insurance scheme?

    Despite the Pam Martens article I’m getting only a vague sense of how all this works. Without specific examples it all remains confoundingly abstract.

    • LibTechBanshee on March 6, 2014 at 2:59 pm

      It’s about packaging and re-packaging toxic assets to be cleared out at a later date….once the bagholders are lined up en masse.

      Brokerage houses don’t care about clients making money. They care about endless transactional fees rung up on all these “lemons” engineered by the Pigmen.

      The sheep exist to provide an exit stategy for the AIG’s, Fannies, and Freddies….once the crash date is privately announced.

      If the markets are having such an excellent “recovery”…how come all the big money insiders have been quietly exiting their positions? (I think you don’t need an answer)

      The bubbles have always been built, then popped by the same players that have been gaming the system since it’s inception. You have not had free market capitalism since x-mas eve 1913.

      The moneychangers have made a mistake. As George Carlin put it, it’s a club, that we are not invited to join. Their problem is they have drawn too many ‘parasites’ into the fold of their club. That’s why 2008 did not clear out the toxic assets….because there were too many bad bets and too many club members still looking for an exit from their fraudulent gambling predicament.

      Pension Funds and Amerikwans will be set up to provide for the losing side of the last trades before the big crash. When they’ve finished lining up the bagholders…the plug gets pulled.

      • terminally skeptical on March 6, 2014 at 8:44 pm

        First, thanks for taking the time to clarify. Overall I agree it’s just a matter of time before the whole economy, i.e. the stock market, implodes. Even many who have never owned a stock or placed a trade realize that The Market is artificial, nay, rotten to the core.

        I can fathom the repackaging and reselling of the real estate market credit default swaps (CDSs) and mortgage “backed” securities and the corruption that stemmed from vapor filing of deeds in lieu of hard copy recording with the local register of deeds office. As crazy and fraudulent as it may sound, when the scandal first went public it still had some semblance of connection to the real world.

        Packaging and repackaging of toxic wastes has become a phrase of household familiarity but how many of us truly understand how complex this gets. When JPF discussed David Li’s Gaussian Cupola Formula (thank you Joseph for the education) as I blissfully ignored the math, I could only grasp that it was an intricate web of correlations that somehow allowed the user to weigh risk, at least in the short run.

        Again, how does one sell a medium to long term weather forecast to another? If acres of farmers hedge their crop by buying insurance policies against inclement weather and then some Wall Street banker decides to bundle those policies and resell them, who would be the buyer? The willfully ignorant buyers of CDSs were at least hypothecating under the illusion that those deeds had an intrinsic value. But where would the value be for a re purchaser of the farmers risk hedging? And likewise are investment firms like Chase Morgan taking out policies on their own employees and then having them bumped off later? (BTW, wasn’t there a time when suicide was grounds for default of life insurance?) I guess my lonely call in the wilderness goes something like, “somebody please help me understand the workings of these death and climate derivatives”

        True, a lot of investors are now on the side line. That is why overall market volatility is so low. With the right indicators and strategies money can still be made in the “market” but only in options and long term investing and hedge funds are outright sucker bets. As you indicated the too-big-to-fail bad debts from 2008 are still with us today as our national debt has doubled in less than 6 years. The question of course on every trader’s mind is how much longer can these scam artists continue to short the market on the currencies and metals. As for the quadrillions in derivatives . . . . . . . .

        • LibTechBanshee on March 6, 2014 at 9:24 pm

          Yes, you answered your own questions.

          Our “Straw-personas” are created as a way to monetize and promissory note the ‘citizen’.

          When the ‘citizens’ reach “maximum potential” and can no longer continue to be “clipped” of their production…they must be more than “shock tested”.

          You are a “death derivative” when you register to vote or brandish your secret slave number when requested.

          Weather is just another casino created to satiate the need for endless derivatives and plenty of creative bookkeeping.

          Don’t forget the model has been tested from Bear Sterns/Lehman, to MF Global…to Cyprus.
          Your property is digitized and locked within a clearing corporation and loaned out to be used as gambling mechanisms to drive pricing in the opposite direction. All casinos are built for profit…and alternative agendas. As far as weather is concerned….their dream of a global carbon tax must be accomplished. Drought, Famine, Superstorms….they mean to justify the impending genocide and need for global governance.

          Nobody needs to concern themselves with how these new casinos operate. They don’t even understand how the present line-up functions right now. They need to accept the notion that endless casinos and various gambling options have no other purpose of existing, outside the nefarious nature of some thieves wanting to extract capital and wealth from rubes…while providing the backdrop to lay credence to their alterior motives.

        • terminally skeptical on March 7, 2014 at 5:59 am

          Sorry, last paragraph, meant to say mutual/pension funds, not hedge funds.

          • LibTechBanshee on March 7, 2014 at 7:58 am

            I knew what you meant…and sorry I didn’t mention the death derivative in detail(have yet to delve deep in research). My tin foil hat tells me they plan to merge an economic reset with something equally big like a ‘lights out’ grid down scenario.

            Govts are not planning on paying pensioners long term. If they can set up another casino to profit from the demise of half the humanity or more following a global reset….then it plays music to their ears to accomplish their favorite agenda with the eugenics de-pop program

  7. DownunderET on March 6, 2014 at 1:31 pm

    Sorry guys, this is off topic:

    If you want to know who predicted what’s going on in the Ukraine, just re-listen to Red Ice Radio’ interview with Joseph entitled “Yahweh the Two Faced God – part 2”. Its all there the Ukraine/Putin/NATO/ZB/Rockafailure/Rothshield.

    In a few words, Henrik and Joseph basically get off the book and discuss the west’s aim to encircle Russia. It’s a hoot of an interview and Joseph was spot on with his prediction.

  8. Robert Barricklow on March 6, 2014 at 10:19 am

    Let’s see 1914 is being brought up in analyses to 2014 by many well informed commentators(William Engdhal, Webster Tarpley, etc.).

    Is the “Death Derivatives” portending another deja vu: 1918?

    • jedi on March 6, 2014 at 3:03 pm

      finally Robert….and what does that tell you, me , us?
      These parasites are being repetitive…they are following programs…ie they have no creativity….you need a soul from a spirit to be creative.

      Creative beings are in touch with the creator…ie blessed by the divine.

  9. patentable on March 6, 2014 at 9:02 am

    Event-linked credit protection structure
    US Patent No. 8010393
    Morgan Stanley, New York, NY, United States of America

    1. A process for providing event-linked credit protection to a protection buyer, wherein the protection buyer procured one or more primary insurance policies from one or more primary insurers to cover a defined insurable event up to a coverage limit, the process comprising:
    receiving, by a secondary insurer from the protection buyer, following an occurrence of the insurable event specified in the one or more primary insurance policies, a claim for reimbursement under a secondary insurance policy between the protection buyer and the secondary insurer that covers the same event as the one or more primary insurance policies up to the same coverage limit as the one or more primary insurance policies, wherein reimbursement to the protection buyer is triggered under the secondary insurance policy upon (i) an occurrence of the event specified in the one or more primary insurance policies and (ii) a failure of by one or more of the primary insurers to make payment, because of the occurrence of the insurable event, to the protection buyer under the one or more primary insurance policies within a specified time after a qualifying claim is submitted under the one or more primary insurance policies by the protection buyer; and
    computing, by a computer system, an amount for the reimbursement due to the protection buyer from the secondary insurer under the secondary insurance policy, wherein all recoverables received by the protection buyer under the one or more primary insurance policies reduce, dollar for dollar, the amount of the reimbursement due the protection buyer under the secondary insurance policy;
    wherein upon paying the claim for reimbursement to the protection buyer, the secondary insurer is assigned by the protection buyer rights to recover against the one or more primary insurers that failed to pay under the one or more primary insurance policies within the specified period of time following submission of the qualifying claim by the protection buyer under the one or more primary insurance policies.
    2. The process of claim 1, wherein the secondary insurance policy qualifies as reinsurance for legal, regulatory, and accounting purposes.
    3. The process of claim 1, wherein the defined event includes an event selected from the group consisting of an event that causes real property damage, a health-related event, or


  10. LibTechBanshee on March 6, 2014 at 8:36 am

    Rothschild conveniently announced years ago they were giving up their seat on the Gold/precious metals exchange and getting into the weather gambling business. (Giving up on the trading houses of yellow metal was meant to induce a calculated response) Don’t think for a second the old families are going to stop stockpiling stolen gold in their private vaults. When they decide to crash the entire system….there will be a few families, out of the goodness of their hearts, that will “stake” govts and bring the listing Ponzi construct to stability, following the screams of the unwashed masses to go back to the more fair gold backed/redemption type system.

    It’s been stormy since then

    • jedi on March 6, 2014 at 3:35 pm

      Nixon announced decades ago that the US dollar was also not tied too gold…..

      I see a pater.

      • LibTechBanshee on March 6, 2014 at 4:25 pm

        Interesting that you mentioned the closing of the gold window jedi….

        because today (March 6th) marks the 40 year anniversary of the secret pact/meeting between the FED and the US Treasury to enter into manipulative operations to keep the price of gold suppressed. The most interesting part of that secret collusion would be the “error” that represents the numbers(amount of gold and it’s value). Either it was a mental mistake and the Treasury Sec. and Asst. Sec. did not have a grasp on the “math” and the differences in value between the govt ledger and the world’s market pricing….or they never knew or properly stated how much gold the US Treasury actually had at their disposal at that time. Either way I find it interesting that the big shots could not get their numbers right….or they were clueless…or they were deliberate in their obfuscation. If it’s the latter, then where is the other 75% of the Amerikwans gold?

        If it’s nothing but a mental error and somebody misspoke, it still doesn’t change the fact that intent to enter some sort of manipulative practice was conjured on this day 40 years ago.

  11. DanaThomas on March 6, 2014 at 8:19 am

    “All they that take the derivative shall perish by the derivative” (from the newly revised Gospel of Banksters)

    • DownunderET on March 6, 2014 at 12:43 pm

      Love it DT

    • bdw000 on March 6, 2014 at 10:19 pm

      I disagree:

      The scammers of the deriviatives game will continue to profit, while the suckers (i.e., pension funds, etc) will continue to lose . . . .

Help the Community Grow

Please understand a donation is a gift and does not confer membership or license to audiobooks. To become a paid member, visit member registration.

Upcoming Events