These articles were shared by regular readers here, including Ms. P.H. and Mr. P.T., and we need to spend some time with them, for there are still those who think that mind-control mind-manipulation technologies are the fantasies of wild-eyed conspiracy theorists and science fiction operas. But they are a reality.

The U.K.'s Daily Mail, for example, has reported on a new technology developed at the University of California (Berkeley) that can scan people's brains while they are asleep and dreaming, and which can then reconstruct the faces of people the subject is dreaming about:

Machine that could scan the brain and read your dreams

As the article states, "Researchers believe the same technology could be used in the future to enable them to reconstruct images from people’s memories, imagination and dreams." But there's more, but to see what it is, one has to put this article into the perspective of yet another story on mind-manipulation technologies, courtesy of our friends at phys.org:

Pentagon report investigated lasers that put voices in your head

Note that this article envisions the practicality of technologies designed not only to interfere or interrupt neural processes, but actually to inject, via remote electro-magnetic means, voices in one's head, a technology that this author wrote about, in fact, in Genes, Giants, Monsters and Men.

Combining the implications of the two technologies together, one can conceive of the remote scanning of an individual by a kind of technologically assisted telepathy, literally, mind-reading, as well as to inject thoughts, emotions, or even alter memory.

There's a catch however, and it's something very suggestive in fact. The "catch" is suggested at the very end of the Daily Mail article:

"Mr Cowen and his fellow researchers, Brice Kuhl of New York University and Professor Marvin Chun of Yale, believe that extracting facial images is the first step towards eventually producing advanced mind-reading technology.

"Mr Kuhl said: ‘I study memory, and it’s hard not to be excited by the prospect of being able to reconstruct the images that we bring to mind when we remember something.

"‘We are certainly heading in the direction of reconstructing dreams too. Something that looks like a high-definition movie of your dreams is not going to happen in the immediate future, but we have already seen improvements in the sensitivity of these methods.’

"Mr Cowen assured the public that the technology did not enable them to forcibly extract information from subjects, however.

"He told Fox News: ‘This sort of technology can only read active parts of the brain. So you couldn’t read passive memories – you would have to get the person to imagine the memory to read it.

‘It’s a matter of time, and eventually – maybe 200 years from now – we’ll have some way of reading inactive parts of the brain." (Emphasis added)

Note that inactive parts of the brain have to be "engaged," i.e., the individual has to willfully "turn them on" in order for such scanning to be possible. And that, to my mind, suggests the opposite of what Mr. Cowen is suggesting, namely, that the brain-mind connection is not explicable in solely materialist ways, that the brain, in order to recover memories, must be turned on to tune those memories in; or to put it country simple: memory shows signs of being non-local, and the brain their transducer.

Now all this must have Bishop Berkeley chuckling in his grave, for while that might sound like good news to the anti-brain control advocate (and I would certainly number myself in that camp), suppose for a moment, however, that Mr. Cowen's prediction of a technological capability to access the non-engaged part of the brain actually occurred within the context of findings implying the non-locality of memory. The implications of such a concurrence would be breathtaking, for it would mean nothing less than that such a technological capability was also an ability to engineer the information content of the field (to employ a favorite phrase of Soviet era scientists); such a technology would, in other words, conceivably be a technology not only of engineering and manipulation the brain, but the physical medium itself. Now if that sounds like a tall order, remember that within the strange world of quantum mechanics, events are not physical events until observed, and ultimately that requires the intelligent observer(at least, according to some). Mind manipulation would thus also be temporal cloaking and event cloaking. What would happen, for example, if this were employed on a planetary-population scale?

Now, whether all these very high octane speculations ever occur or not, one thing does emerge from the new ideas and capabilities, and that is the rapid convergence of the neuro-sciences and physics itself.

See you on the flip side...

Joseph P. Farrell

Joseph P. Farrell has a doctorate in patristics from the University of Oxford, and pursues research in physics, alternative history and science, and "strange stuff". His book The Giza DeathStar, for which the Giza Community is named, was published in the spring of 2002, and was his first venture into "alternative history and science".


  1. yankee phil on June 25, 2014 at 12:05 pm

    MK Ultra was voice to skull communication systems being used to manipulate its victims. Add post hypnotic suggestion to sleep depravation techniques and you have a controlled subject for you to either help or destroy. Interestingly the mafia could contract the NSA/standard oil MK Ultra program since the 60’s. Their NAZI connections enabled the mafia extensive access to military electronic warfare equipement and a lot of good americans suffered as a result. Hypnosis is easily induced if you are being put under as you fall asleep,a technique used quite extensively here in european intelligence circles.

  2. Frank Stankus on June 19, 2014 at 1:45 pm

    According to David Icke, mind manipulation on a planetary scale is already being done — from another dimension. Imagine trying to figure out the physics of how that could be accomplished.

  3. DanaThomas on June 19, 2014 at 10:49 am

    It’s been 100 years now since Gurdjieff – and before him teachers in a variety of traditions – was teaching that the great majority of us lead a robot-like existence (this was before TV iphones and other mod cons!!) and that tremendous effort is required to live a truly conscious, aware life. This state of things makes mind control (and of course social engineering) much, much easier.

  4. Daryl Davis on June 19, 2014 at 9:37 am

    Mind control is a somewhat ironic concept, since most people never assume the fullest control of their OWN minds. But perhaps that’s where this opportunity for high-tech manipulation and retrieval of memories lies — i.e., where we don’t yet fully know ourselves.

    Those who DO know their own thoughts and who have faced their darkest fears would likely be amused but not entirely concerned by a sudden confrontation with Darth Vader — or with dearly departed Aunt Gerty.

    They could search my memories all they liked. They’d find there little more than slayed demons and tamed dragons.

  5. marcos toledo on June 19, 2014 at 9:30 am

    Remember the Manchurian Candidate that was over fifty years ago. I heard a interview of the author who said he didn’t make it up the techniques describe in the book. Then mind control has been a theme of detective, espionage, science fiction, and fantasy stories. And was featured in several episodes od X-Files and Fringe among other television programs. This is our masters wet dreams full spectrum surveillance keeping a eye on the under class and take over their minds and turn us into perfect slaves.

  6. Aridzonan_13 on June 19, 2014 at 8:49 am

    $4T MIA at DOD buys a lot of technology.. The more you know, the more life starts to look like a comic book or an episode of Star Trek.

  7. Robert Barricklow on June 19, 2014 at 8:06 am

    After getting by the commercial controls: advertisements, surveys, pop-up black-ops, and other controls like the mouse arrow jumping around as if controlled by a ninja drone/ I began to wonder…
    Will “they” be able to control mindsets in an analogous manner…?

    • Robert Barricklow on June 19, 2014 at 8:20 am

      Will they send mind control messages:
      you will become a Zionist
      you will become a neo conservative
      you will become a subscriber to the NYTs
      you will become…

Help the Community Grow

Please understand a donation is a gift and does not confer membership or license to audiobooks. To become a paid member, visit member registration.

Upcoming Events