17 thoughts on “NEWS AND VIEWS FROM THE NEFARIUM JUNE 19 2014”

  1. Doctor Farrell pointed out the resonance between Friday the 13th and the arrest of Grand Master Jacques de Molay and other Knights Templar in October, 1307. 13 June is also the anniversary of the death under mysterious circumstances of “mad” King Ludwig II of Bavaria in 1886.

  2. When I read about Richard Rockefeller’s ‘accidental’ death my mind immediately went back a couple of years to some of Ben Fulford’s warnings from the White Dragon Society (WDS) threatening to take out members of the international financial cabal. I don’t know how much credibility to give Fulford, but he did mention the Rockefeller death in a report dated June 16th and that WDS was not involved:
    “The Chinese and the Asians in general … told the WDS they are running out of patience with the West, especially the families that own the Federal Reserve Board. Which brings us to note it is unlikely to be a coincidence that on Friday the 13th, on the day of a full moon closest to the Summer Solstice, a day of extreme occult symbolism, Richard Rockefeller, son of David Rockefeller, died in a plane crash. This is what MI5 had to say about this crash: ‘[…] Alongside fuel cut-off and explosion, this is a trusted method of aviation sabotage.’ The WDS was not involved in this incident in any way and extends its condolences to David Rockefeller and his family. However, a CIA source … says that all senior cabal members are targets.” The statement is at the bottom of the report:
    http://www.shiftfrequency.com/ben-fulford-june-16-2014-are-all-these-emergency-meetings-of-world-leaders-leading-to-some-big-announcement/

    1. Margaret:

      Besides internet claims, what evidence is there that the Federal Reserve is owned by some parties?

      This kind of claim is like those Federal Reserve bearer bonds stories that pop up.

      That yes, the Federal Reserve is not part of the US Government and does massive favors for banks which also have board members at the Fed–absolutely. But it’s not at all clear that the Fed is some private for profit company charging for its services of supplying banks with money + credit. It’s more like a big non-profit doing massive favors for special contractors, and if you know when those favors are about to occur you can make a fortune. And then the Fed takes in a tiny bit of money to maintain those transactions–but that money is accounted for.

      What’s a much bigger question is where does the Fed get so much money to purchase US Treasury debt? The Fed holds more US debt than any other party except the Social Security Admin. The interest the US is paying on that debt isn’t enough to cover the purchase of that level of debt. So the Fed has to have some other method of funding itself.

      Don’t misunderstand, I’m really interested to see documentation of ownership of the Fed, or some other central bank. But a list posted on the interwebs isn’t helpful. I need something one can check independently. Like looking up the NY Fed in the whitepages (not bluepages) of the NY phone book.

      1. Lost, the Fed prints money out thin air….Might help to get a grounding on what the Austrian School of economics has to say on the matter. In the meantime is matter of record that the Fed has issued since 2008 29 TRILLION to banks and corporations…In secret of course. A FOIA was filed by Bloomberg and others to have their shenanigans disclosed (at least partially).

        Here’s some info on “magic money” : http://www.levyinstitute.org/pubs/wp_698.pdf

    2. Margaret,
      Another GREAT Post. Clued me into a number of “off-my-radar” subject matters. And yes…, the families that own the Federal Reserve; not to mention the puppet strings from the BIS, and/or the implied threats that are being implemented.

      Are retaliations(striking back at those “who paid for the bullet?”) coming in forms of covert warfare/where the telltale bullet explodes from the barrel –
      like an act of God?

    3. Hi Margaret-

      I’m glad I’m not the only one to continue reading Fulford’s reports although I do take much of his info with a shaker full of salt; I don’t think he’s purposely a dis-info agent but am not sure if his ‘trusted’ sources are all to be really trusted;

      on the other hand he has at times predicted some things (sounded preposterous at the time) that months later (or longer) actually happened;

      as for the WDS I continue to rattle my brain trying to figure out if this is a truly benevolent org. (if so, why the secrecy?) or if it’s just simply false rebellion, Asian-style-

      stay well!

      Larry

  3. Definitely appears to be an escalation of hostilities. I’m not sure how many bankers have met sudden violent deaths this year. Dr. Rockefeller is not the only relation of someone in high finance to meet an untimely end. However, it is the most high profile YAAC (Yet Another Amazing Coincidence) death yet. It will be interesting to see if there is YAAC blow back.

  4. If they can kill a Rockefellers you know we are road kill. I wonder who among the oligarcths he might have cross or was he a expendable pawn in the real life Game Of Thrones. I am now waiting if they will ice a Rothschild but I doubt we ever know or it would be likely heart failure or cancer so called natural causes. As for James McDonald the date on the article is 2009 five years ago if I am not mistaken. It would look like he was suicided underworld style.

  5. I dont understand why the report says James McDonsld’s death was recent…when a search on the internet says it occurred in 2009.

    1. Yea I saw that Urban Gal, and guess I didn’t make that clear in the report. There are older links to the story. What I was trying to get at (clumsily) was that the recent death of Richard Rockefeller brings it home even more forcefully. My bad for the presentation… I always ad lib these things and sometimes I forget everything I meant to say.

  6. I know there have been a lot of these ‘suicides’, but for some reason this one really surprised me. It’s disconcerting, to say the least, and I agree with Dr. Farrell, it shows they are getting really serious. I know a lot of people worry about a one world government, but I worry more about a one world financial system, because they, whoever they are, could control every facet of our lives in a way no government ever could. And this is looking like that’s where we’re headed.

  7. If only we were privy to whether these bankers, et al., were dying only for what they knew, or instead for what they had actually done — or perhaps even for what they had refused to do. Dr. Rockefeller, one would assume, would have been killed — assuming this wasn’t just a sticky Fetzer valve(Fletch, 1985) — surely only for what he may have known, between those three options.

    But more likely his possible assassination would have constituted a severed horse head in the sheets — both an ongoing threat and a promise delivered: He wouldn’t seem to have been in a position to offer operational aid to the elite — nor therefore to refuse to do so.

    And it would be difficult to imagine, given coverage of 9/11 and the recent, largely-ignored 60 Minutes piece on high-speed Wall Street manipulation, that even his full-throated disclosure of systematic, worldwide, financial fraud could have cracked the opaque screen maintained by the lamestream, corporate media.

    Honestly, though, sometimes I worry for you, Dr. Farrell. This erudite analysis of yours might not be as warmly welcomed by those “behind the scenes” as it is by your regular blog readers. And the closer you scratch at these fresh wounds — i.e., the better you are at what you do — the more likely you could be made sorry for it.

    Would you ever consider purchasing a canary? Or traveling Greyhound?

  8. Hi Dr. Farrell-

    what I find hard to believe is that the Rockefellers would be capable of feeling the emotion of bereavement; if they were capable of this emotion they wouldn’t finance (like the despicable Rothschilds) both sides of a conflict;

    and I can’t believe for one second that he being a “Doctor” was for the benefit of mankind; if that were the case he would’ve been iced long before he turned 65-

    obviously this incident was foul play; but the unanswered question is whether it was caused by factional in-fighting or a third force rearing its head;

    anyway, I’m just so looking forward to your latest book; I’ve always had major questions about the Knights Templar (so much conflicting info so far) so I hope your newest book will unveil a lot of things and answer many of my questions-

    please be well Dr. Farrell-

    Larry in Germany

  9. Seems that plane crashes are a “preferred” option of the organization. I agree, there had to be some kind of internal bickering between various financial groups and the “agreement” that was struck many moons ago is now being torn down. With such a prominent family in the banking cartels, it seems it doesn’t matter how big you are, they can take anybody out at any time. Isn’t it strange that he was a doctor and taught medicine, he doesn’t seem to fit the family image at all, maybe that’s why HE was the target.

    1. “Isn’t it strange that he was a doctor and taught medicine”-

      exactly; but none of us know for sure what kind of medicine he was practicing; but knowing the history of the Rockefellers and how they (well, start with John D. Rockefeller the 1st) bankrolled the American Medical Association + the pharma industry- interestingly enough he died at the ripe old age of 97 with his homeopath at his bedside- he never once touched the pharmaceuticals he bankrolled)-

      but I find it hard to believe if he was some sort of an upstart/renegade to his family they would wait until he was 65 to ice him-

      Larry

Comments are closed.