Conspiracy Theater

UPDATE ON PODKLETNOV’S ANTIGRAVITY RESEARCH: SOME HIGH OCTANE ...

A while ago I blogged about Dr. Evgenny Podkletnov's antigravity work, and its stunning implications both for propulsion purposes and about its implications for potential weaponization(see MORE FRINGE SCIENCE: BOEING ADMITS ANTI-GRAVITY WORK). Now there's been an update about this same research, and there's an interesting comment in this article that provokes more of our trademark "high octane speculation." The article in question is here:

Update on Podklentov Antigravity Work and Rumors

Note first of all, that Podkletnov is claiming a faster-than-light velocity for his antigravity impulses:

"Podkletnov recently published a peer-review paper on the force beam experiment entitled “Study of Light Interaction with Gravity Impulses and Measurements of the Speed of Gravity Impulses” along with co-author Dr. Giovanni Modanese, and describes the findings of his study, which involved measuring the speed of the force-beam using two separate, but cross-correlated measurement techniques. After careful testing, Podkletnov has found the speed of the antigravity impulse to be approximately 64 times the speed of light (64c), which he indicates does not conflict with modern interpretations of Relativity Theory."

The article also points out the very same weaponization potential that I pointed out in my blog earlier this year about his work:

"Podkletnov maintains that a laboratory installation in Russia has already demonstrated the 4in (10cm) wide beam’s ability to repel objects a kilometre away and that it exhibits negligible power loss at distances of up to 200km. Such a device, observers say, could be adapted for use as an anti-satellite weapon or a ballistic missile shield. Podkletnov declared that any object placed above his rapidly spinning superconducting apparatus lost up to 2% of its weight."

Obviously, such a pulse able to repel objects a kilometer away, and which experiences "negligible power loss at distances of up to 200km" means that in reality such a pulse could repel objects at that distance, and, if such a pulse were powerful enough, simply "crush" or "disintegrate" them.

But what concerns us today, in contradistinction to our earlier blog about Dr. Podkletnov, are the potential implications of the last paragraph of the article:

"An attempt has been made in this work to study the scattering of laser light by the gravity-like impulse produced in an impulse gravity generator (IGG) and also an experiment has been conducted in order to determine the propagation speed of the gravity impulse. The light attenuation was found to last between 34 and 48 ns and to increase with voltage, up to a maximum of 7% at 2000 kV. The propagation time of the pulse over a distance of 1211 m was measured recording the response of two identical piezoelectric sensors connected to two synchronized rubidium atomic clocks. The delay was 631 ns, corresponding to a propagation speed of 64c. The theoretical analysis of these results is not simple and requires a quantum picture. Different targets (ballistic pendulums, photons, piezoelectric sensors) appear to be affected by the IGG beam in different ways, possibly reacting to components of the beam which propagate with different velocities. Accordingly, the superluminal correlation between the two sensors does not necessarily imply superluminal information transmission. Using the microscopic model for the emission given in Chapter 5, we also have estimated the cross-sectional density of virtual gravitons in the beam and we have shown that their propagation velocity can not be fixed by the emission process. The predicted rate of graviton-photon scattering is consistent with the observed laser attenuation."

The clue here is the statement that the superluminal correlation between sensors "does not necessarily imply superluminal information transmission." Now I suspect that the implications here are rather breathtaking both for relativity and for quantum mechanics. On the one hand, light does bend in the presence of a strong mass and its gravitational field. In other words, there is some sort of coupling mechanism between gravity and electromagnetism. So on the other hand, the ability to shield or to create antigravity pulses, as Dr. Podkletnov's latest research seems to indicate, means a similar ability to manipulate the velocity of light itself, as indicated by the above-summarized results of his experiments. And this, in turn, pace relativity theory, is an implied ability to manipulate time itself. In other words, I suspect that these antigravity experiments can be modified in some fashion to explore other aspects of "temporal cloaking" that physicists have been exploring. Antigravity, and the ultimate in such temporal cloaking - the ability to remove an event from the "time stream" and then to reinsert it (presumably, and hopefully) at some point, might just be ever-so-slightly connected. Time will tell if experimental physicists perform such experiments. But given the nature of the black projects culture, and if Dr. Podkletnov's work is any indicator, both in the West and in Russia, I suspect those experiments might already be well under way. Now... since we're crawling way out on the end of the high octane speculation twig, imagine such experiments performed in conjunction with experiments in quantum entanglement....

See you on the flip side...

My thanks to Mr. S.D. for sharing this article!

 

12 thoughts on “ UPDATE ON PODKLETNOV’S ANTIGRAVITY RESEARCH: SOME HIGH OCTANE ...”

  1. I wonder what’s afoot here.In the US, this would be classified. I don’t see any reason that Russia would not similarly classify every bit of this. So why is Podkletnov taking this public? To me, this suggests the Russians are sending a subtle message to US or China or both via Podkletnov to announce they have antigrav and weaponized antigrav. My assumption is that they want ti to be known that they have this. Why? Surely, spy/clandestine forces in US and China know or suspect what Russia has. Is this a way of confirming that to foreign govs?

  2. Dr. Farrell can I recommend that you study Dr. Claude Poher’s Universons website.

    This details his “anti gravity” theory which has been published in peer review papers together with a number of experiments and a letter from NASA confirming they have successfully reproduced his experiments.

    He has far more effective results that Podkletenov with 100’s of G’s of acceleration of weighted pendulum arms. So this is way better than Podkletenov’s 2% weight loss- Poher could send you to Mars and back in a few days.

    Poher was the head of GEPAN the French Governments UFO project as well as being a respected astrophysicist.

    Unfortunately lots of his site is in French but there is plenty in English as well as many experimental videos on You Tube. He also has patents for his emitters and is working towards industrialisation with “unspecified” partners.

    http://www.universons.com any one can access the research here (You’ll need to register), some of the more technical/sensitive stuff is restricted.

    1. Actually the engineering/physics behind the coupling between gravity and electromagnetism is well documented in the published works of Gabriel Kron (Joseph has a good coverage of this in his “Secrets of the Unified Field”). Kron’s equations are the only ones able to predict and explain the strange behavior of synchronous machines. UFT effects including EM induced torsion and curvature fields are the explanation for strange anomalies like phase slip, creep and the bizarre effect of “hunting”. In 1943 Hoffman at Princeton in a public lecture…about Kron’s version of the UFT says “we now have experimental confirmation of Einstein’s Unified Field Theory”!

      Max

  3. Independent anti-grav investigators in the US have been stepped on hard. An inventor by the name of Joe Newman did a very rudimentary anti-grave demo at the Biloxi Coluseum in 88 in front of a group from MENSA. Later Newman lived in Scottsdale AZ for a few years. Where I went to visit him. I complimented him on his anti-grav demo of which I had seen the video and I personally knew the broadcast engineer that filmed it. His young assistant pulled me to the side and told me that the FBI had come to visit and said”The Energy Machine stuff they didn’t care about. But, don’t mention the anti-grav experiment.” Nuff said.

    The gravity / time connection has been written about a great deal. I’m not surprised FedGov.Inc with it’s Prime Directive to keep us addicted to Petroleum, would not go to great lengths to keep this quiet. It will be interesting to see just how far the Ruskies push this..

  4. Hi Joseph,

    Very interesting article! A careful reading of the published biographies of Townsend Brown has hints that the “Carolina Group” (or whatever it morphed into after the 1930’s) the research that Brown was involved with involved some kind of time-travel & gravitational aspect/application to it.
    In a comment Brown made to Linda’s mysterious boyfriend “Morgan” he thought the time-travel would be possible “within our lifetimes”.. Also puzzling to Linda was a cryptic comment that Brown made to Linda in one of his notebooks from the 1940’s that came to fruition decades later, so yes I think that the research of the 1930’s become to some kind of “operational” status before Brown died in 1985!
    Max.

  5. Consider the scientific advancements over the last 50 years that the public is aware of, add 30 years of additional advancements in military interests; one could make the case that we may achieve Type 1 status within the next 50 to 100 years within the black projects world. That would put us at the start of a logarithmic curve toward Type 2 and Type 3, not a bad assumption, I believe.
    Now consider the other side of the coin, our moral/spiritual development. For all practical purposes, we are mired in the flat portion of the curve possibly even a somewhat degrading curve. This does not bode well for us or for anyone we might encounter along the way. We would be the equivalent of the Klingons from Star Trek, a scientifically advanced but extremely warlike species; bad children with toys we have no business playing with. Anyone we may encounter, more advanced than us might be inclined to punish us, at the least quarantine us.
    Another possibility would be we bring about our own demise in the same manner we suspect prior ancient civilizations which may have existed on this planet may have done in the distant past. If we cannot advance morally/spiritually at the same rate we advance technologically our future looks very bleak indeed.
    The current trend toward planetary fascism will be a huge step backward. If we lose a significant percentage of the population due to this, that sets us back even more. Additionally, if the breakaway civilization has made a deal with the devil (Satan, evil ET’s, demons, whatever), that is a game stopper. We will never be allowed to advance past the point we find ourselves at now, if we ever make it this far again.
    If we are indeed a seeded or engineered species, they washed their hands of us long ago. If they perceive us to be a threat in some way now, how do you think they will respond. They didn’t seem too friendly or morally advanced then…

  6. I’m not sure the Russians are even trying to conceal their time traveling technology. It would seem to me that they’ve brazenly ventured back a few years and unpressed the Reset Button.

    Interesting, though, that Podkletnov wasn’t long ago silenced by those whose job it would normally be to do that sort of thing. Surely he would have been silenced by now in America. [R.I.P. Tesla.] Is this not then further evidence that no secret “meeting of the minds” exists between an American PTB and a Russian one?

    Why should the Russians permit his promising experimental results to see the worldwide light of day? Are they using Podkletnov to slow-leak secret technologies they know the West has already well developed — taunting the West with partial disclosures?

    Perhaps they’re only sending Boeing and the West down a primrose path they’ve long known to be a scientific dead end? Or at least sending them toward an impressive technology — long since dwarfed by others already in the Russian arsenal?

    Or are they creating the very false impression that they haven’t already fully developed and weaponized this same technology — pretending to be only dancing at its furthest edges?

    Thank god I speculate as a hobby, not as a job.

  7. marcos toledo

    So how long would it take to get to Alpha Centauri with this technology anyway. As to weaponize this technology when has this society not use any technology as a new weapon never. That what has always been on their minds a new way to kill something. Their endless search for a new enemy to fear and kill.

  8. Robert Barricklow

    What happens when a child sticks his fingers into a light socket?
    Trouble is,
    collateral damage may happen in ways
    totally

    outside the box.

    1. Robert Barricklow

      Maybe that’s why there is some kind of “field” surrounding our solar system.
      Our little cosmic sand box?

  9. Scenarios like “the butterfly effect” and children shouldn’t play with loaded guns and atomic weapons come to mind. As disconnected from reality as certain people seem to be, there is a possibility here of really messing things up in ways we can’t imagine.
    It wasn’t that long ago these same people didn’t know for certain what would happen when they set off the first nuclear device…

Comments are closed.