Tidbits of Conspiracy News

TIDBIT: NOW THEY’RE SAYING THE UKRAINE IS SEEKING NATO ...

Well no sooner said than undone it seems. Adding to the speculations of behind-the-scenes diplomacy between Mr. Putin and Mrs. Merkel, and her own assurances that the Ukraine should be kept neutral (suspiciously similar to the position we blogged about concerning Mr. Mearsheimer's article in the CFR journal Foreign Policy) we now have the coup government in Kiev saying they do plan to pursue NATO membership:

Ukraine to pursue NATO membership

22 thoughts on “ TIDBIT: NOW THEY’RE SAYING THE UKRAINE IS SEEKING NATO ...”

  1. Robert Barricklow

    Fire!
    Aim
    Ready.

    Solution!ready (need crisis!)
    Create the problem (to cause the purposed crisis)
    Crisis!

    The above is SOP Neoliberal Policy(Chicago Style).

    “IMF Loans For Ukraine’s Disadvantage”
    (Greece Crisis Engineered
    to privatize public assets for pennies on the dollar);
    Same bat time, same bat modus operandi,
    turn your bat channel to Ukraine.

    http://michael-hudson.com/
    (under 3 minute video)

  2. Probably just an instance of ‘parting verbal diarrhoea’ by Ukraine’s prime minister, Arseny Yatsenyuk.

    I think Ukraine’s entry into the forthcoming Eurasian Union is more likely, as well as Germany’s entry into the Eurasian Union a little later on.

  3. They can “plan” and “pursue” all they want but it will never happen as existing members know it would be a shortcut to ww3 under Article 5.

  4. The “Greater Germany” faction in Berlin might envisage absorbing “NATO”, the other side of the coin of the country’s economic domination in Europe…

    1. The “greater Germany” faction can barely keep the Luftwaffe airworthy never mind anything else. Ageing nation whose influence will last only as long as people keep wanting Mercedes, BMW etc. German “hard power” will never be tolerated – peoples’ memories too long for that.

  5. Of course they are! They can’t keep a government that’s not pro-Russia if they don’t. That had to have been the point from the git. If Merkel won’t have it, Ukraine can’t join.

  6. The Ukrainian equivalent of Bedlam better have enough straitjackets for these members of the Kiev government. And a secure place to put these nuts away for good.

  7. Joseph, et al, if I recall, Chancellor Merkel who said that NATO membership is off the table. Now since Germany is such a major component of NATO, It may very well be that pornoskako wants NATO membership and is seeking it, But that Putin and Merkel are drawing a line and letting Brussells know of there increasingly determined interest in pursuing rational International relationships.

    You can bat that the hegemonic internationalists and the Ziocons are working furiously against this, using their degenerate methods. Kissinger just published A piece of his work in the Wall Street Journal discussing the new world order and it’s rational basis. We live in interesting times.

  8. Robert Barricklow

    Saber Rattling?
    “I’ll see you and raise NATO”?
    The inmates have taken over the asylum?
    The “Village of the Dammed” screwdriver?

  9. Also, have you seen this doozy? “Isis” targets the pope?

    http://washington.cbslocal.com/2014/08/29/report-pope-francis-is-in-the-crosshairs-of-isis/

    Yikes! The thing they call “Isis” sure is ambitious, and oh-so-terrifying! The cabal of spokesmen for the Cabal are all shrieking in unison about the impending end of Western ‘civilization’ at the hands of these extremely well-funded crisis actors; the Saudis (who should know) are giving us two months, tops, until the West is overrun…

    In all seriousness, this is very worrying indeed, but not for the reasons given in the MSM.

        1. Robert Barricklow

          And this is no BIG secret.
          Sometimes I have to wonder how many people actually swallow the mainstream bait like dumb-ass Basses? Can’t they see the bait & switch?
          Sometimes, when viewing the world through “corrected” lenses, it’s hard to fathom those who can’t even see 9/11 as an inside job? Surely they suspect?
          I know – cognitive dissonance.
          But that seems just too easy, too pat an answer.

  10. Right now their enemy is Putin, but regardless of who is in power in Moscow there is no way the Russian Federation will let NATO bases be housed on their doorstep. The rest of the world really need to wake up to this fact real quick!!

    That’s really what this is all about in the end, and why people cannot see all this for what it really is just beggars belief in my opinion!

  11. Well, good luck with that. Reeks of the worst sort of desperation, on both sides…

    Correct me if I’m wrong, but isn’t there a clause somewhere in the NATO charter that you need to have control of at least two-thirds of your territory and/or population for 6 consecutive months to become a member “state?”

    1. all contracts are not worth the “paper” they are written on….its the double dutch marine maneuver.

      Whats the double dutch marine maneuver, you ask?…”well” in the open ocean, with no witnesses, other than a kangeroo court of yo peers, you have the final choice in a dichotomy matrix world…walk the plank, or face the sword that is in your back….your choice…either way, your dead or in the water.

    2. If Ukraine got in (in its current state) it’d be a travesty–not because I would want to begrudge anyone the right to freely associate, but rather the fact that the area isn’t stable at all, physically or financially. If I were Turkey I’d be hopping mad that there’s even talk of this. They’ve been trying for years to get in to NATO. And the Uke politicians (pro-west or east) have been so crooked, the Turks look rather upstanding in comparison.

Comments are closed.