Readers of my and co-author Scott D deHart's Transhumanism: A Grimoire of Alchemical Agendas, will recall that we covered researcher F. William Engdahl's Seeds of Destruction, rather carefully. Indeed, Engdahl made, and makes, no hesitation in connecting the GMO agenda to the wider issues of "eugenics" and the Pentagon's quest for "full spectrum dominance." As the ebola scare gets notched up into more and more hysteric theater, Engdahl in his usual fashion has unearthed some astounding connections which, if viewed in the context of other researchers on the subject, Mr. Jon Rappaport for example, give one reason to question the media-driven hype:
Why is the Pentagon making Ebola ‘therapeutic’ and CDC Patenting Ebola strains? First appeared: http://journal-neo.org/2014/10/26/why-is-the-pentagon-making-ebola-therapeutic-and-cdc-patenting-ebola-strains-2
Engdahl begins his article by pointing out what other researchers, including Rappaport, have also pointed out(and Rappaport was among the first to do so): the "test" for Ebola is not really a test at all, and the list of "symptoms" is suspiciously familiar and overlaps to a great extent with those of other diseases, to such an extent that it is almost worthless to do so: more on that in a moment:
"Not only do the official WHO “Ebola symptoms” list symptoms of common influenza or even severe colds. Not only is the only recognized “accurate laboratory test” for Ebola, the Kary Mullis PCR test identified by its inventor (for an entirely other purpose) Nobel Prize winning Dr Kary Mullis as utterly worthless to detect Ebola in a body. In an interview Mullis stated, “Quantitative PCR is an oxymoron.” PCR is intended to identify substances qualitatively, but by its very nature is unsuited for estimating numbers. The tests can detect genetic sequences of viruses, but not viruses themselves.
"Now we discover that a new company has gone into partnership with the Pentagon…to produce “an anti-Ebola virus RNAi therapeutic” (sic). On August 4, the US TV channel, Fox News carried this intriguing lead: “The experimental drug used to treat two American aid workers who have been infected with the Ebola virus has never been tested on humans before and was only identified earlier this year as part of an ongoing research program backed by the U.S. government and military…The Defense Department has long had a hand in researching infectious diseases, including Ebola.”(Emphasis added)
The commonality of symptoms with various types of influenza have suggested, for Rappaport and others, that there are immune-system deficiencies - lack of adequate hydration and clean water, lack of vitamin C, and so on - that are factors in the progress of the disease, and as I blogged here a few days ago, there are more parallels beginning to emerge with the Liberian and other doctors from West Central Africa noticing correlations of ebola outbreaks to vaccination campaigns in Africa, and similar correlations to AIDS and its treatment, one doctor having an unusually high success rate in treating against the disease by using AIDS drugs in his treatment protocols.
But this isn't the end of the story; sequere pecuniam is true here, as elsewhere, and it's when one considers this factor that the current picture becomes very murky indeed:
"Further research has since uncovered the following highly fascinating and highly suspicious fact about that ongoing US Department of Defense Ebola research program.
"It seems the US Defense Department has joined with a biotech company named Tekmira Pharmaceuticals Corporation. Its stock is listed on NASDAQ under TKMR. Tekmira labels itself as a leading developer of RNA interference (RNAi) therapeutics. Since the Ebola scare, the stock price has shot through the roof, much like Don Rumsfeld’s shares in Gilead Sciences, inventor of the Tamiflu soared after Defense Secretary Rumsfeld ordered $1 billion worth of the worthless Tamiflu for his soldiers against an earlier fake flu scare, Bird Flu.
"Tekmira’s own website notes, “TKM-Ebola, an anti-Ebola virus RNAi therapeutic, is being developed under a $140 million contract with the US Department of Defense’s Medical Countermeasure Systems BioDefense Therapeutics (MCS-BDTX) Joint Product Management Office.” As far back as 2010, they state further, “Tekmira signed a $140-million contract with the DoD to advance an RNAi therapeutic, which utilized our LNP technology, to treat Ebola virus infection. In 2013, the collaboration was expanded to include significant advances in LNP formulation technology, including a new LNP formulation that was more potent, the ability to be able to lyophilize (freeze-dry) LNP formulations and an LNP formulation that can be administered intravenously.”
"The same Tekmira website goes on to note that “In 2014, Tekmira signed an Option Agreement with Monsanto, permitting Monsanto to obtain a license to use Tekmira’s proprietary delivery technology…” And now Tekmira is authorized (by whom?) they state, to test their TKM-Ebola on human guinea pigs. Where?
"Tekmira tells us:
Tekmira has joined an International Consortium led by the WHO, to provide an RNAi based investigational therapeutic for expedited clinical studies in West Africa. The Consortium includes representatives from the International Severe Acute Respiratory and Emerging Infection Consortium (ISARIC), at the University of Oxford, UK, the US Centers for Disease Control, Médecins Sans Frontières – Doctors without Borders (MSF), and Fondation Mérieux, among others."
These admissions would appear, disturbingly, to corroborate the assertions I recently blogged about, namely, that West-Central African doctors are noticing the correlation between western "medical aid" and the outbreaks of the disease in their countries. Indeed, Engdahl does not avoid the inevitable and unpleasant hypothesis: "Is Ebola and the entire Ebola scare campaign of WHO and CDC designed by its ultimate sponsors to panic the world into receiving untested or inadequately tested “anti-Ebola” medications or injections such as TKM-Ebola that are designed to eliminate a significant portion of West African populations and beyond?"
The eugenics connection is not, as he points out, far afield from the matter:
"Interesting to note is the fact that until his recent death in a curious airplane accident, the chairman until 2010 of the US Doctors Without Borders was Richard Rockefeller, son of David Rockefeller. And, until only some months ago, another Rockefeller sat on the board of Monsanto when he died. The Rockefeller family, for more than a century since creation of their Rockefeller Foundation, have been among the most generous patrons of eugenics, including the Nazi eugenics research at the Kaiser Wilhelm Institutes in Berlin and Munich during the late 1930’s."
And not to be missed is that there is already a patented version of the Ebola virus, which implies, in western patent law, that the virus was deliberately altered via genetic engineering:
"As if the Tekmira US Pentagon link on Ebola were not alarming enough, it is worth noting that in 2010 the US Centers for Disease Control won a patent on a particular strain of Ebola known as “EboBun.” It’s patent No. CA2741523A1. They are also allowed to charge royalties for its use. Ugggg. What is the premier US Government health agency doing patenting Ebola virus strains in the first place? Patenting a virus? How is such a monstrosity possible? According to Canadian patent lawyer David Schwartz, “'You can’t patent a disease condition per se, such as cancer or influenza. But if you’re talking about patenting a life form like a bacteria or virus, if altered by man, the answer there is yes.'”
And that, really, is the heart of the problem, the gruesome heart that Dr. de Hart and I pointed out in our book Transhumanism: the creation of patentable life also implies the patenting of modified diseases: and thus, profits can be had not only from the cure, but from making people sick in the first place, while simultaneously "culling the heard."
Pathology and psychopathy conveniently conjoined, in one grand narcissistic "chemical wedding." Full spectrum dominance.
And there's something else, and I hope you caught it, and that is the marriage of all these agendas with "agribusiness", for what better "delivery" system than GMO crops, specially designed and shipped to special areas, to test a virus, inducing it through the food chain, and "curing it" through vaccine tests?
See you on the flip side...