cosmic war

ADMITTING CLASS ONE CIVILIZATION STATUS…?

December 15, 2014 By Joseph P. Farrell
Over the years I've been arguing a complex case, in part related to the UFO phenomenon and the strategic problems it posed for the post-war national security-military-industrial establishment, and in part related to the development of very expensive off-the-books technology in secret, both by Nazis during World War Two, and by the West thereafter, and the implications of both for the establishment of what I have called a "hidden system of finance" implemented by President Harry Truman in 1947 to pay for it all. In conferences (specifically the Secret Space Program conference in San Mateo, CA last June), and in various books (specifically Saucers, Swastikas, and Psyops, Covert Wars and Breakaway Civilizations and Covert Wars and the Clash of Civilizations), I have also outlined a speculative hypothesis that this hidden covert technology and production infrastructure would have sought technological parity or near-parity with the UFO, and sought to demonstrate that capability in limited displays and "encounters" of its own making.
 
As a component of this argument, I have suggested that the civilization typing-scheme of Russian astronomer and astrophysicist Nikolai Kardashev would form a key component of this strategy. Briefly, Kardashev speculated that non-terrestrial civilizations - such as might be visiting here - could be classified by their energy requirements. A Type I civilization would require the energy production of an entire planet. A Type II, that of an entire star, and a Type III that of an entire galaxy. From this, I developed or proposed what I call "corollaries," that the national security-military-industrial-finance complex would seek to deploy. In order to effect such demonstrations of technological capability to "whomever might be visiting", they would seek to demonstrate the capacity to engineer and manipulate systems of planetary, and perhaps even stellar(our own star, Sol), scale. I have even gone so far as to speculate that ionospheric heaters could conceivably be used via resonance effects to "tickle" the Sun, in addition to manipulating weather and geophysical systems on planet Earth. Thus, by the "corollary" view, humanity is already on the cusp of Type I, if not Type II, capabilities.
 
But this has all been conjecture and "high octane speculation." 
 
Until now.
 
Consider this interesting bit of news that many of you shared with me over the past week:
 
Elite Think Tank Admits to Ongoing Climate Engineering Experiments
 
For anyone who has been following the chemtrail issue, or for that matter, the rise and use of ionospheric heaters (HAARP, EISCAT, and so on) over the past few years, this announcement will come as no surprise. Indeed, it is rather an admission, as the article itself notes:
 
"For those who know about the history of geoengineering - aka chemtrails - you might be noticing a spate of admissions from the halls of establishment science and government that the "conspiracy theory" is no longer ... it is a fact.

"Perhaps the efforts of independent researchers have forced such open disclosure, at least putting us over the hurdle of abject denial. However, the narrative being created for mainstream media consumption is disingenuous at best, and full-throttle manipulation at worst. Case in point is an admission from The Royal Society that geoengineering experiments are being debated for full rollout even in the absence of policy restrictions.

"The elite UK think-tank, The Royal Society, has for years openly discussed control over the planet's weather.  Their 2011 propaganda press release entitled "Who Decides?" is an overtly Orwellian exercise in problem-reaction-solution that, naturally, argues for a cabal of technocratic insiders to implement godlike power over the unwashed masses who are threatened both by their own ignorance as well as "rogue elements" that could hijack weather manipulation technology.

"Mainstream outlet The Verge wound up echoing these supposed concerns in their 2013 article, "Weather wars: who should be allowed to engineer our climate?" which has the subtitle, "Geoengineering could be the silver bullet in fighting climate change — or the start of something even worse'"

These admissions recall the admissions of President Bill Clinton's Secretary of Defense, William Cohen, who also voiced "concern" over emerging technologies and their ability to manipulate large scale planetary-sized systems such as weather, and of the dangerous potentials should such systems fall into the hands of terrorists. After all,tornadoes, hurricanes, earthquakes, volcanic eruptions, monsoons, floods, and so on, are all acts of nature or God, and thus, afford the "perfect plausible deniability." And as I've pointed out earlier on this subject, it's very convenient to the power elite to push the meme of "climate change" and even to invent financial instruments like "weather derivatives" if one has the technology to manipulate it, which, pace HAARP and other ionospheric heaters, they've had for quite some time.
 
So what's really going on here?
 
I suspect that it might be something quite different from what The Activist Post envisions, for it fits a pattern we've been observing elsewhere with respect to other technologies - three-d printing, invisibility, temporal cloaking, increasing success in entanglement and encryption, genetic engineering... you name it - and that pattern is that while the alternative research community has indeed been on the cusp of covering these technologies, and exposing them for years, the are being talked about by the mainstream institutions now with growing frequency and force, which means, in my opinion, that what is really going on is social engineering, and preparation of the global population for the open public admission and use of the technologies.
 
The pattern is a familiar one to those who have studied the Nazi secret weapons program, where one notices a curious thing: the technologies were invented and perfected first, and then the formal order or decree for their "development" was issued. Hence, the V-1s and V-2's were developed and tested, and when successful, only then did Hitler give the formal order for development. Making it public, in other words, always follows the actual development and tests.
 
The result of the formal order, of course, was when the v-1s and V-s started raining destruction down on London. And in the context of geoengineering and weather manipulation, it's an interesting parallel, and as my opening paragraphs indicate, I think there may be another, hidden agenda behind their development that has nothing to do with "climate change" at all.
 
See you on the flip side...