NASA TEST OF “MICROWAVE DRIVE” PROPULSION SYSTEM IS ...
Here's a very odd, and potentially very significant, story that was shared by Ms. S.H., and it's a story we've commented about, but in this particular version from The Houston Space News Examiner, in an article by Mr. Mark Whittington, there's a significant statement that provides more of a glimpse of what's going on inside of NASA, and in the context of our recent blogs about Dr. Harold "Sonny" White's warp drive experiments, perhaps it is a very significant statement. Here's the article:
NASA successfully tests engine that uses no fuel, violates the laws of physics
Here's the basics:
"Very quietly, NASA has tested a space drive that does not use propellant and according to the laws of physics should not work, according to a Thursday story in Wired.UK. The problem is that the drive, called the “Cannae Drive” by its inventor Guiddo Fetta, did work in the NASA directed test. If the efficacy of the drive is confirmed, the implications for space travel are profound. It seems that another technology from Star Trek may be about to become reality,.
"The Cannae Drive is apparently based on the work of a British scientist named Roger Shawyer called the EMDrive. It is said to work by bouncing microwaves in an enclosed chamber and thus creating thrust. Despite having built a number of demonstration models, Shawyer has not been able to get anyone interested in his device. Critics reject his relativity explanation for how it works and point out that it violates the conservation of motion.
"However it appears that the Chinese quietly tested their own version of the EMDrive up to about 72 grams of thrust, enough to be a satellite thruster. The test was not widely reported in the West, possibly because few if any people believed it was possible. That seems to have changed thanks of the test of the Cannae Drive." (Bold and italicized emphasis added)
Now before proceeding, allow me a little high octane speculation on just the boldface and italicized statement, for this is a rather stunning admission in and of itself, because it suggests that the thrust is produced in a kind of "optical" cavity that is completely enclosed, or perhaps like the masing cavity of a maser, "opaque" at one end and semi-permeable at another. Or perhaps completely enclosed - i.e.,, opaque - all the way around. In either case, this suggests that the shape of the cavity is crucial, and if so, its resonance to the microwave frequency or frequencies being used. The idea even recalls, in very loose fashion, the observations of Thomas Townsend Brown, who observed a thrusting motion during his early experiments with Roentgen tubes, though, to be fair, it should be noted that Brown attributed this to the electrical dipole and not to any effect of the X rays being produced.
But now the article goes on to ask the very obvious question, and the answer that NASA gives is somewhat stunning:
"What are the physics behind these devices? NASA’s explanation follows:
"'Test results indicate that the RF resonant cavity thruster design, which is unique as an electric propulsion device, is producing a force that is not attributable to any classical electromagnetic phenomenon and therefore is potentially demonstrating an interaction with the quantum vacuum virtual plasma.'
"In other words, no one knows for sure."(Emphases added)
But here we must beg to differ a bit with Mr. Whittington's comment "In other words, no one knows for sure," for NASA is proposing an explanation, namely an interaction or coupling between three things: (1) the microwaves being bounced around by (2) the cavity itself (constructed in resonance per our speculations above), and (3) the "quantum vacuum virtual plasma," or, to put it more familiarly, the zero point energy. Now if you've really been following these types of stories, those three things are tantamount to saying "lattice structure in a plasma" and its coupling to the ZPE, which should bring all sorts of stuff to mind, like LANRS (lattice assisted nuclear reactions, or cold fusion), or similar statements by a certain Dr. Ronald Richter to the US Air Force long ago in Argentina (1954 to be exact). Even more to the point, the idea of this type of microwave thruster might even be connected to 1950s experiments with the microwave soliton effect as a propulsion mechanism (detailed in Dr. Paul LaViolette's excellent book, Secrets of Antigravity Propulsion, available in my webstore). LaViolette's books is a reminder of the context in which such publicly released statements and experiments should be viewed, namely, a context were substantive work was done decades ago in classified projects.
What we may be looking at, in other words, is yet another one of those "controlled releases" of information, and if NASA is suspecting some sort of coupling mechanism at work between bouncing microwaves inside of resonant cavities and the zero point energy, then it seems to me to be likely that it is more than a theoretical suspicion on their part. After all, as I pointed out in my book The Nazi International, Dr. Richter pointed out decades ago his suspicion that plasma fusion reactions, in conditions of plasma rotation and electromagnetic stress, were transducing effects from a lattice structure in local spacetime, what he deliberately and explicitly called the zero point energy. He even stressed the idea of resonance. Perhaps the only thing he was missing, and perhaps what NASA has discovered, is that the shape of the cavity itself is important.
With that in mind, then my high octane speculation of the day also would seem to indicate that we're not being told the whole story here.
See you on the flip side...
Help the Community Grow
Please understand a donation is a gift and does not confer membership or license to audiobooks. To become a paid member, visit member registration.
BTW: In Dr. Brandenberg’s new book, Death on Mars, he remarks that he invented that drive with someone else. It might be a difference in design, but I understand from his writing that he invented it.
Now that its obvious (2006 heim theory proven experimentally ,cannae engine proofs)that Tesla’s claim that the vacuum of space is an aether is correct, when does the scientific community change the laws of physics and cut the physicists lose on this new/old discovery? Are they just trying to figure out how to formulate a new law that partially includes the old one’s so they don’t appear criminal historically?
not new just reverse engineering the UFO TECH… been going on for decades
I suppose it’s time to start developing other energy income stream by tapping into “known” zero-point energies and monopolizing them into a new platform of agreed-upon international infrastructure platforms.
[I suppose you can buy these international bureaucrats by the pound in office supply stores.]
Here is a good thread on Linda’s forum (Townsend’s daughter) that is “essential” reading for anyone interested in this subject and Dr. Brown’s work in this area of propulsion from decades ago:
Thank you very much for that link, MadMax. All of this supports the observations of a friend of Mark McCandlish who saw three domestically built craft “floating” in a top secret hangar a few years ago; craft that seemed to have been used extensively, not just prototypes. (From the McCandlish Secret Space Program presentation).
What occurred to me as I read this was that if, as David Bohm suspects, plasmas are a life form, what is really going on with this technology? If you believe we are more than our physical bodies, how is the non-physical part of us related to plasmas? Information Robert Monroe gleaned from travels outside his physical body seemed to indicate that some emanation from life forms – particularly human life forms – powered the universe. Perhaps our slavery takes a form that goes beyond serving the breakaway civ/elites…just a stray thought.
Krypton Superman home world 1938 planet with a habitable moon orbit it When Worlds Collide 1934 to 36. Interesting these stories came out in the thirties of the last century by the way TIE fighters of the empire of Star Wars anyone. They probably had all this technology under raps since 1966 the year the first Star Trek went on the air chris.
If we take this revelation forward, that means we also have the means to produce free electricity, as well as locomotion for vehicles on the ground.
It wouldn’t be a surprise if they have found livable new worlds a long time ago. It’s more like a delayed+controlled-release of info. & technology. Today however, the rest are starting to catch up and want in on it.
The old energy industry is to be dropped because they have lost control and they’re up against people like Putin and the rest who want change to happen. It is indeed a new age of possibilities.
Btw, this shape/fundamental structure which is everywhere might also have a part in transducing things as they are or atleast as we perceive
It would not surprise me if, a wave of these “Off the Wall” inventions appear. Presaging the “Break Away” / “3.0” phenom. Hence, the reasons Oil took a dive and the Rockefellers publicly stated they were getting out of oil.. We might be seeing the end of the 2.0 economy.
“is producing a force that is not attributable to any classical electromagnetic phenomenon and therefore is potentially demonstrating an interaction with the quantum vacuum virtual plasma”.
So can this be tied to “We found an error in the equations”of the public version of physics of course. “Impulse Power”?
Anything else you are holding back on guys? Gosh Golly Gee…
Reading a very out-there book by Barbara Narciniak – the “Earth” book I think although I’m pretty sure she references this in all the books. She urges chucking out the microwave as an abomination in the context of food but keeping it for space travel. This now helps explain that. Great book by the way Earth
Given everything else suppressed from public view/knowledge, not so ‘out there’ at all.
I read the book of Paul LaViolette and it is fascinating indeed. And I agree with your point of view that we are not told the whole story. I remember Bill Cooper once asked his audience when did they first hear about Stealth technology. The answers pointed beginning-middle of ’80s. But then he went on and said that actually the first flight of a Stealth fighter was in the beginning of the ’70s. Ever since I heard him, I assume it might be the same all the time…
Thank you for sharing your thoughts, for me they are inspiring.
I have seen the comments made from following these articles in other sources, that it is pushing against quantum particles popping in and out of existence. My question is, have they ever considered that the frequencies of the emdrive are actually pushing agains the fabric of the universe, the very same fabric that by expanding and contracti NH would allow you to go faster than light.