THAT GOLD THING AGAIN: AUSTRIA EXPRESSES CONCERN… NOT TO THE NY ...
You may have missed this one too. I know I certainly did, until Mr. V.T. brought it to my attention. You'll recall there was, for the past couple of years, an effort by some nations to repatriate their gold from Western banks, mostly in Paris, London, and especially, the New York Federal Reserve. Hugo Chavez's Venezuela actually led off the repatriation frenzy, when he repatriated some of that nation's few tons of gold. But then came Germany, with, reputedly, the world's second highest amount of gold reserves in western banks, at over 3,000 tons. The move for repatriation spread to the Netherlands, to Switzerland, and then after some suspicious dwaddling on the part of the US Federal Reserve, the Bundesbank announced that only a few tons had been recovered, but that nonetheless, everything was ok, go home, nothing to see here. Austria followed all of this repatriation flurry with a call of its own to the NY Fed to repatriate its gold.
But now Austria, it seems, is question another of the Jachin-Boaz pillars of the western financial system, the Bank of England itself:
Austria Expresses Concern Over Their Gold At BOE
Now, note what the Austrian report states concerning its Bank of England gold reserves:
"The Austrian Court of Audit expresses great concern about the disproportionate amount of official gold reserves (229.6 tonnes) stored at the Bank Of England (BOE), which will be the Austrians excuse for repatriating, “the gold depository contract with the depository in England contained deficiencies” and, “gold reserves stored abroad, internal auditing measures were lacking”. They’re putting it blunt for an official source on a topic so sensitive as gold.
"The OeNB didn’t have any proper auditing rights or access to their own gold at the BOE until 2013. This is line with what Bundesbank executive board member Carl-Ludwig Thiele said in 2011, “We’re in negotiations with our partner central banks [FRBNY] to develop auditing rights.” Apparently, foreign central banks had no rights whatsoever to audit their own gold at the BOE or Federal Reserve Bank of New York (FRBNY) until 2013."
(Emphasis in the original)
Now wait a minute...! We're seriously being asked to believe that there were, until 2013, no internationally agreed-upon auditing agreements between various central banks with respect to deposits of bullion reserves!? I'm not buying that, but let's pursue that idea briefly, just for kicks. Now, recall Hjalmar Schacht's statements in his memoirs concerning his 1928 visit to the New York Fed, where he recounts the fact that the NY Fed could not locate the Reichsbank's gold reserves. Could this be a hint that there were loose-to-no-agreed-upon auditing procedures even then? And why, then, would central bankers not want any such auditing procedures, unless the objective was to be able to obfuscate the amounts of gold in existence, not only from various national security considerations for the respective nations involved, but also to be able to tinker with the gold standard itself? What if they knew there was a lot more (or less) gold in existence than the official guestimates?
But the idea of no auditing procedures at the Bank of England? Someone has to have a more or less good picture of the amounts of gold in the world, but who?
I'll give you two guesses, and they both concern my high octane speculation of the day, and one of them is in Basel, and the other is in Rome: the Bank of International Settlements, and the Institute for Religious Works (aka the "Vatican Bank"). And surprise surprise, both of those institutions have the same accouting firm as auditing firm of record, the last time I looked... And the last time I looked, both of those banks became connected with all that Axis loot that I believe formed the nucleus of a post-war hidden system of finance, the BIS becoming the favored bank of the Nazis, and the Vatican bank became the repository, according to the researches of Peggy and Sterling Seagrave in their important book, Gold Warriors, for some of that Japanese Operation Golden Lily plunder. Of course, we'll never know, because it's only high octane speculation, and we'll never see the books. They probably won't in Vienna, either.
See you on the flip side...
Help the Community Grow
Please understand a donation is a gift and does not confer membership or license to audiobooks. To become a paid member, visit member registration.
Making my point for me.
All those things could be true: H. Clinton being only a lesbian, flight 007 forced to land and the passengers consigned to a Soviet labor camp, and GW Bush certainly did spend time flying big cargo jets, but I don’t lend a much credence to any of those possibilities sans hard supporting evidence.
While CIA’s own inspector general acknowledges that the Contras ran lots of cocaine into the US during the 1980s, and various people at CIA knew about it then. There’s also a separate Senate report from 10 years earlier.
There’s the difference between could and established, and that’s what you’re not distinguishing in the accusations about B. Clinton and Mena.
You’re reciting internet rumors as true.
Other internet rumors I don’t lend very much credence too:
Hillary Clinton is a lesbian.
George W Bush flew drugs into the US while employed by Air Alaska.
Korea Air flight 007 was not shot down, but force to land.
While there’s plenty of evidence for George Bush Sr and Reagan’s involvement in massive cocaine running.”
Honestly, Lost (and btw, excellent pseudo, that),
Your latest (and weakest) post is a classic of internet deflection and misinformation:
“4. Use a straw man.
Find or create a seeming element of your opponent’s argument which you can easily knock down to make yourself look good and the opponent to look bad. Either make up an issue you may safely imply exists based on your interpretation of the opponent/opponent arguments/situation, or select the weakest aspect of the weakest charges. Amplify their significance and destroy them in a way which appears to debunk all the charges, real and fabricated alike, while actually avoiding discussion of the real issues.”
Source: “Disinformation Tactics of shills & online trolls/zombies”
Oh, and BTW, while we’re at it, you also invoke point 3:
“3. Create rumor mongers.
Avoid discussing issues by describing all charges, regardless of venue or evidence, as mere rumors and wild accusations. Other derogatory terms mutually exclusive of truth may work as well. This method works especially well with a silent press because the only way the public can learn of the facts are through such ‘arguable rumors’. If you can associate the material with the Internet, use this fact to certify it a ‘wild rumor’ from a ‘bunch of kids on the Internet’ which can have no basis in fact.”
Maybe off-topic, but worth noting, that there were 2 dead billionaires this week:
Lost and Basta….you two need to just get Room!!!
Oh, Heavens forbid that an internet forum might actually break out into spirited debate! Perish the thought!!
Now, let’s all just hold hands and make nice…
Sorry, but isn’t this what it’s all about? Not some echo-chamber where everyone agrees that bad is indeed bad and good is indeed good?
Here we’ve had a pretty good battle, with some major salvoes lobbed back and forth, and now I see the lay of the land much more clearly, and the allegiances and motivations and — in a few cases — agendas of the people who post on this forum.
I find it fascinating, and I must admit, it is more fascinating than debating the Clintons (oh so tedious and unpleasant to even let them breach one’s consciousness, let alone acknowledge the reality that such a pair of cackling, hustling, and philandering grade-A criminal sociopaths could gain such political power and influence) with Lost.
There’s no really a debate here.
You’ve repeated rumors as verified, because you don’t like the Clintons.
While I’ve pointed to well established facts about Reagan and the elder George Bush. And the cocaine problem, problem with your claims, remains that Nicaraguan Contra cocaine planes went to all sorts of US states during the 1980s.
In short, you’ve played a standard false equivalence argument.
And now you don’t like being called out on that act.
You are an anonymous internet poster, giving no verifiable facts, only assertions and claims to some greater, hidden knowledge. The height (or depths) of hypocrisy, you trot out the old disinfo/misdirection tar and brush that these are only “internet rumours” and cannot be trusted,
Well, your own assertions are no more than an internet rumour, so what higher call to authority separates your assertions from mine? I’ve seen not one shred of evidence, only time-worn misdirection tactics.
And why on earth don’t you just let it go?! Honestly, I’m sick of the Clintons, as much as the Bushes, and both families should just take their plunder and leave the country they’ve sold out and ravaged in peace.
The facts of the Nicaraguan “Contras” running cocaine are well established.
Reagan running up the debt, US, and destroying industries for the benefit of bankers is well established.
These facts are far more than assertions posted on the interwebs.
I won’t “let it go”, since it’s a false equivalence.
At this point I’m a bit “lost,” as it were, about the ultimate point behind your critiques to my posts regarding the Bush and Clinton syndicates and the CIA/black-ops drug trade. Is there one, or just sniping?
I’m saying the Clinton claims have significant weaknesses.
They could be true. But perhaps they’re entirely untrue.
While the idea that Reagan and Bush turned a blind eye to all sorts of drug running for their wars in the 1980s is well established, by real sources, as are the CIA connections to the heroin trade in Vietnam in the 1960s.
The fact that the Clinton and GHWB became friends years later is meaningless.
Sigh. Where to begin with a Clinton apologist?(and do you truly believe what you post, or is it just for misdirection, having gotten too close?)
Your argument, which boils down to: “The Bushes are bad, sure; and the Reagan admin was even worse, and yes, the CIA ran drugs, I’m cool with that… but hey! Leave the Clintons and Isreal out of this!” Seems a bit–how shall one put it? –disingenuous, to say the very least.
Yes basta I believe what I post,
I believe what post.
The problem you have here is giving equal credence to the accusations. The two stories just aren’t the same but regarding different former presidents. The “evidence” against Clinton is nowhere near as strong as you imply.
You need to look up “apologist”.
You’ve bought into a rumor mill used to distract and enervate Clinton.
As regards Israel, you’ve put words into my argument that I didn’t make. You got caught saying the creation of Israel has a lot to do with the drugs trade and didn’t like it.
Protestations that the Clintons are somehow… (cue pastoral strings, rising in volume as dawn breaks over the Mena, Ark. airstrip as an unmarked Learjet lands with gold sunlight glinting off its flanks… ) different than all the rest of them, if only you knew them as I know them, as I believe in them! If only you weren’t suckered by the “rumor mills” churning about them… as opposed to the verifiable facts about everyone else around them and with whom they owe their poltical fortunes….
Erm,. no. Not buying it. Sorry.
You’re reciting internet rumors as true.
Other internet rumors I don’t lend very much credence too:
Hillary Clinton is a lesbian.
George W Bush flew drugs into the US while employed by Air Alaska.
Korea Air flight 007 was not shot down, but force to land.
While there’s plenty of evidence for George Bush Sr and Reagan’s involvement in massive cocaine running.
“Sigh. Where to begin with a Clinton apologist?(and do you truly believe what you post, or is it just for misdirection, having gotten too close?)
“Your argument, which boils down to: “The Bushes are bad, sure; and the Reagan admin was even worse, and yes, the CIA ran drugs, I’m cool with that… but hey! Leave the Clintons and Isreal out of this!” Seems a bit–how shall one put it? –disingenuous, to say the very least.”
Superb summary, Basta! Simply superb. Couldn’t have said it better myself.
One tactic I noted years ago was the insistence of many obvious Bush Crime Family disinfo agents playing left-wingers on starting the recent US decline with Reagan, not Bush Sr., and in so doing cloak Bush Sr.’s pivotal role in specifically killing the “Reagan Revolution” in order to get the US back on the globalist track toward destruction. Reagan was NEVER supposed to happen! And as soon as he was elected, they (specifically a Bush family friend) tried to kill him! But after that, everything, by executive order, went through the VP who Reagan obviously NEVER would have freely picked in a million years, Bush Sr., and so we wound up with trademark Bush, NOT Reagan, operations like CIA drug-running, etc. They always want to make it sound like Reagan was onboard with unambiguous money-grubbing human garbage like the Bush family in order to hide the fact that we specifically ARE talking about the Bush Crime Family and nobody else.
So how is it clear that Reagan was never supposed to happen? His rhetoric. All he talked about was freedom and getting the parasites out of your life. Such talk is quite naturally anathema to the global parasites and they understandably wish to destroy any discussion of such things. Obviously they never would have let a man like Reagan in office in a million years, but in 1980 the people could still defeat them. And how glorious that victory was!
Note that many genuine left-wingers are tone deaf to the distinctions between many factions on the Right and may honestly lump Reagan with the Bush Crime Family out of ignorance. But there are definitely fully aware disinfo agents who play up this product of ignorance to their advantage. And to the extent that the Bush Nazis now appear to be under the thumb (i.e. tools) of the Zionists, this may indeed be what you are dealing with here.
Yes Reagan’s Presidency was taken over by Bush criminal team, to which the assassination attempt was the ostensible outward manifestation.
Bush and the gang were particularly incensed
by Reagan’s Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI) which was conceived by Lyndon LaRouche
as a means of overcoming the ‘utopians’ on both sides who were looking towards a survivable first strike roll out. Knowing that both the US and Soviet economies were blowing out, the issue was to not deal with the crisis by starting a war, but by working cooperatively with a ‘Science Driver’ approach to develop new classes of technologies predicated upon certain high energy bean breakthroughs that had been made by Soviet Scientists which the LaRouchies had
become aware of. Reagan approved LaRouche back channel discussions with the Soviets.
The double cross apparently happened by factions on both sides, run by the British ultimately, here in the U.S. through the Bush leagues, where it was Bush and Kissinger who put the sting upon LaRouche and company.
Bush eventually railroads LaRouche and associates into jail.
It is Tarpley and Chaikin’s book, The Unauthorized Biography of George H.W. Bush which uncovers some very unsavory things about that family on a number of fronts, and was featured upon a bookshelf behind George Stephanopoulos during Clinton’s run for the Presidency.
Clinton does get LaRouche out of jail, but according to Tarpley, the better people in the Labor Committees are thrown out, meaning himself.
Clinton of course sells the country down the toilet with the signing of NAFTA and later with the repeal of Glass-Steagall…..Bubba basks in the Wall Street bubble while he gets suckered puckering with his cigars with Mossad playmate Monica Lewinski.
It is all a disgusting prelude to the W and the Neocons and now puppet Obama.
So in the end who the fuck cares about the gold, let it rot in some basement to hell with it, you can not eat it and that is the ultimate point because we need to return to Parity if we are to properly deal with this economic crisis.
who were freaked out by what Reagan was doing
particularly as involved the Strategic Defense Initiative of LaRouche =
Reagan’s anti-taxation policies are about turning US states against each other.
Reagan sure liked the state prying into people’s personal lives, if those persons didn’t fit his white christian idea.
Reagan sure started wars, and expanded them.
Reagan massively indebted the US, and far more importantly gave far more power to banks and finance types than they’d had in 100 years.
Recall that Clinton went to Moscow while at Oxford. They tried to paint him as an ideologue who would want to go to Moscow, but let’s face it, he was no ideologue, but would tell you anything you wanted to hear and do anything you wanted done in order to get your vote. Clinton was about Clinton and nothing else (which made him a perfect tool for the real string-pullers).
The CIA was notorious for recruiting Americans studying abroad, and it seems pretty clear to me that Clinton was a CIA asset from his time at Oxford. Once a CIA asset; always a CIA asset. I do not see how Clinton really could have had such a powerful crime family of his own, but rather must have been a part of somebody else’s. When lifelong CIA man, Bush Sr., began his drug-running op as the hidden power in the Reagan administration, I think he naturally went to known CIA assets to assist. Then governor of Arkansas, Bill Clinton, was one such company man, hence Mena. And I am sure that Bill Clinton could avail himself of the services of the Bush Crime Family from that point forward, which he undoubtedly did. I have to believe that the Clinton death list is nothing more than an extension of the Bush death list.
And it’s perfectly legitimate to speculate that someone was recruited by CIA while at Oxford, but that’s just your speculation and entirely different than your above claims.
And Obama is nothing but another Reagan-lite. So very like Clinton.
In my opinion, Papa Bush has been in control of this country since the Kenedy assassination. It served as his initiation into the highest echelons of the Parasitic Zionist Fraternal Order. Clinton was/is his ritual sex partner, hmm might explain the deviated septum… It’s going to be Jeb vs Hiliary, Jeb will most likely win given their dislike of females. That is unless the technology has improved enough for Hilary to achieve androgyny. I’m hoping Bush Sr narrowly misses the tech that will allow him to live forever. Though I wonder what he’s up to these days? You don’t here much about him.
Bush Sr. was recently in the news for being ill and entering some hospital. However, others claim he is in great health, but feigning Alzheimer’s and general weakness so as to ensure that he is never charged for any of his crimes. However, these claims come from the same dupes and useful idiots who promote the patently obvious disinfo that the “cabal” has already been defeated such that we are now in the “mopping up” phase, and therefore should properly be ignored.
As for Bush Sr., I don’t expect that old demon to ever go away in my lifetime. In fact, I halfway look for him to show up as a head on a motorized cart just like Captain Pike from Star Trek.
OFF TOPIC and FYI:
I just tried searching Google for “Putin” (plus or minus a few other words). Oddly, whenever “Putin” was in the search box, Google would not let me choose “search tools” (where you can narrow your search: I like to make limit the results to “past year”). Put anything else in the search box, and the “search tools” worked. But if Putin was anywhere in the box, “search tools” were not available (nothing happened when you clicked on the button).
I know this is minor, and yet I find it very interesting . . . .
I once read that this was used by the Chinese –
A sort of: internet by 10,000 cuts, control method.
true with google but thought was just in china but who knows
More like the usual tool of Western governance: “reverse projection”. Accuse others of doing exactly what you’ve been doing. So the “western media prints an internet story about what China is allegedly doing; when in fact, it’s exactly what we’re doing.
The USA is using “reverse projection” like there’s no tomorrow[which, with their policies, is probably close to the truth].
Getting your own gold back seems to be one of those “good luck there” scenarios, BUT, why do sovereign countries have their gold stored in another country’s central bank in the first place? It doesn’t seem logical does it?
So what’s going on here? there has to be reason why the country, who owns the stuff, decides to store it in another country?????
And another thing, the country who owns the gold, and it’s politicians, must have made the original decision to move it in the first place, or did they. Sounds to me that there has been an “agreement” by the political class AND the central banks, to hold gold reserves. And what about the “paperwork”, there has to be documents listing the number of gold bars and there respective serial numbers, oh wait, no paperwork – no gold…..whoops !!!!
They were told to…
or, suffer the consequences.
Historically, these caretaker arrangements are the result of WW II, when many threatened European countries moved their physical gold “out of harm’s way” to CBs, particularly the US Fed, considered at the time to be virtually untouchable.
Of course, the monumental irony here is that the ostensible “owners” can no longer touch, see or even count said gold, and would have been better in the end burying it under an old oak somewhere with a treasure map locked in a vault in an underground bunker.
At least in such a scenario there would be hope, eventually, that the country’s gold would be recovered on its own soil.
No audits of YOUR gold allowed, said with a straight face to supposedly sovereign treasuries?
Someone please provide a material difference between central banks and organized crime?
Banks are nothing more than parasites. They are a means to facilitate commerce, not an end in themselves.
How the banksters have managed to insinuate themselves into the center of all and everything is also the story of the collapse of the West.
Organized crime is making GOLD in the Drug Trade.
It’s all being funneled into
the Breakaway civilization’s black pool of operations.
Papi Bush of the Bush Crime Syndicate opened up the illicit CIA drug trade when he ran the agency, and the cocaine was flown by unmarked CIA planes into a god-forsaken backwoods airstrip in Mena, Arkansas, upgraded for the purpose, and the then-governor, one William Jefferson Clinton, gave his blessing and turned a blind eye, and had to have a deviated septum surgically fixed from all the blow that sat in bowls in his governor’s office. That smart, opportunistic young politico ended up president. Well blow me over with a feather.
Today, Bill Clinton and Papi Bush are BFFs, and trade the crwon of office betweeen their respective crime syndicates. And FWIW, one of three reasons for the creation and continued existence of Israel is drug trafficking (the other two are fomenting ME instability and money laundering).
“had to have a deviated septum surgically fixed from all the blow.”
And Clinton was one of the better ones…
Nice note, basta. Thanks.
George H W Bush was not CIA director during the time that Bill Clinton was governor of Arkansas.
It’s not news though that the CIA knew about Reagan’s beloved Contras flying drugs into the US, and there’s no reason that couldn’t have included somewhere in Arkansas, well except that Missouri is supposed to have been the central US destination.
CIA involvement in running drugs into the USA goes back into at least the 1960s, The CIA made all sorts of deals with drug/war lords in places like Laos to keep these war lords on the side of the US during the Vietnam war. It’s likely that some of the POWs the right wing types in USA complain the Vietnamese didn’t return were in fact held by war lords who’d run drugs for CIA.
The motivation for the creation of Israel being drug dealing? Um, try the OSS making deals with Marseilles mafia so as to keep communists out of power in the 1940s in France.
Point of chronology taken, though it doesn’t change the wider point of how those two became such pals. GHWB was DirCIA two years before Clinton became governor. Though there wan’t any temporal overlap, Bush certainly did not drop his ties to Langley while at the CFR and then as VP, and he was just as up to his eyeballs in Iran-Contra as anyone in the Reagan admin. The Mena airport and Barry Seal became so notorious that there were even movie scripts floating around Hollywoood about it. Just Google “Mena airport drugs” and see what pops up.
No, of course Israel wasn’t created just for drug running, nor is that what was written; though since you bring up the very good point about drugs and Vietnam serving as the Iran-Contra template, then you must also know that Israel was a major transit point during that war for all and sundry illicit materials.
I’m aware of the Mena accusations, but they’re not new, and CIA partners were bringing drugs (cocaine) into the US to all sorts of other destinations, so I mostly discount the Mena accusations as a way to paint Clinton in a bad light. (I have no idea if Clinton used cocaine, but it sure is likely that GWBush abused it.) Clinton wasn’t the governor of California, or Florida and plenty of planes loaded with cocaine went there. And while Clinton was governor of Arkansas in the 1980s, CIA was deep in the heroin trade out of Afghanistan, but no one ever brings up the Afghan connection to heroin in the 1980s, or ever implies that Clinton was involved.
Right, of course GHW Bush was deep in IranCocaineContra,
As for the Israelis sometimes dealing drugs to raise funds for some project, I’m sure that’s true. But that’s very different than the original claim. Turks do it too. I’m sure drug shipments, big ones, were a factor in the civil war in Lebanon in the mid 1970s.
But selling 20 billion dollars in armaments for 100 billion dollars to Iran, as the Israelis did in the 1980s, sure seems more profitable.
OK a couple things of note here first please would people stop saying USA has a central bank as it does not and there would be no reason to ask the Federal reserve anything at all they are a foreign owned Private Bank solely owner by UK holdings. This has nothing to do with Her Royal Highness Betty and not just because she is a distant cousin twice removed on my mothers side as it happens.
But the Bank of England was asked to ship back to them specific numbered bars as they were private deposits not as such that of the Austria Central Bank in it’s self bars normally physical bars do not move far once they have been delivered in this case as an asset holding practice to give them greater value it is to do with price of Au Gold and the second fixing price in London standard thing.
They are still under the street in the vault opposite St Martins church whether it gets bought and sold never goes anywhere common practice the safe keeping receipt just gets rewritten to new owner and stays where it is following in this case as is normal they wanted it physically moved back just been delayed nothing more.
The real question is why something like this got blown out of proportion that is the odd very quick off the mark sort of thing someone trying to embarrass someone or party.
Or make a run on Au to get it back up above $1200 per ounce as it has slipped under over the last couple of weeks down to $1100 that is a lot with large amounts $100 per ounce it had edged up but this is all too strange the shadow men must be getting twitchy with things not going their way lately they made some bad calls and paranoid with people acting openly against them they want the Au in their hands and expect better service and not how they play the game usually with others.
Though as secrets go, these are among the most holy of holies, ranking far higher in secrecy than atomic secrets or even UFOs, it has been reliably reported that several major shareholders (yes, they are shareholders, in the private corporation of the ‘US Federal Reserve’) are known to be the Rockefeller banks, which after numerous M&As today are Citibank and JPMorgan/Chase.
So no, that old saw that the City runs the Fed and the US is somehow a colonial vassal to the UK is putting things upside-down. If anything, the Zionists (aka the Cabal)own and run the US, and the UK is but the spent husk of empire.
I get lost trying to break down who controls whom, but if any faction does in fact hold ultimate control, it certainly would appear, at least on the surface, to be the Zionists, and that of course ultimately leads back to the Rothschilds and the BoE. It seems to me that the Rothschilds and related lines also control the Fed.
One other faction(?) to consider:
Here Patrick Wood reveals the purpose of the Trilateral Commission to be revamped (by Brzezinski and David Rockefeller) “technocracy” from the 1930s, and accounts for Agenda 21, Sustainable Development, and all the other green globalist crap foisted upon us by the UN (another Rockefeller creation), i.e. the green globalist nonsense IS the Rockefeller agenda. There is no question that this agenda is being imposed on us, but how exactly does it fit in with the Zionist agenda? Or does it? Note that the original call to form the Trilateral Commission came out of a Bilderberg meeting in 1972. Even more confusing….
I agree with your point re: the Rothschilds, and in that sense BDL has a point if you argue that the Rothschilds are the UK…but then they are archZionists too; the Knesset is a creepily symbolic Rothschild-funded project, as frankly is Israel itself.
So really it depends on what labels you give them or what hats they wear at that moment, as they have fingers in many pies. I prefer to lump the whole lot of them into “the Cabal.”
Re: the Trilateral Commission, it’s pretty obviously just what you say it is, pushing the Rockefeller agenda, which you’ve summed up nicely. I’d only add that all I’ve read indicates that the Trilateral was basically created to manage Japan, which is essentially a Rockefeller satrapy.
Blue Dragon Lord:
Where are you establishing ownership of the Federal Reserve?
It has member banks, which are known, its official holdings are publicly available, and it has known board members. It’s also non-profit, but in a position to do massive favors for its member banks, which can then profit.
The bigger mystery is where does the Federal Reserve get monies to buy up US Tbills and the junk bonds so many investment banks issued from the 1980s to 2008? The interest paid on the Tbills doesn’t cover it, nor is all the gold held by the Federal Reserve anywhere near that valuable. And a junk bond/derivative that say Chase off loaded is likely nearly worthless, so those can’t be resold.
Now I could not help cracking up when I read this-
“….the Bank of International Settlements, and the Institute for Religious Works (aka the “Vatican Bank”). And surprise surprise, both of those institutions have the same accouting firm as auditing firm of record, the last time I looked… “
I must say i missed the connection so this must have been the Bank of Don Geovani the depository holding bank for the Holy square Mile that will explain the delays and hold ups then lazy bunch and very slow hopping it would be transfered though them so they could make a bit on the side for handling common skulduggery from them or standard everyone knows that.
2nd half The Keiser Report is an up-to-date report on Gold.
[13:35 clicks in]
“QE is the taking on of more debt, even a child could understand why that wouldn’t work”-Max keiser
“We’re seriously being asked to believe that there were, until 2013, no internationally agreed-upon auditing agreements between various central banks with respect to deposits of bullion reserves!?”
add to this the recent plane “crashed by a suicidal pilot” ( which just happen to occur after a series of missing and crashed planes within a few years if not months fr. each other)
The big joke is on us.
I sometimes wonder if Max & Stacy are aware of the Catherine Austin Fitts/Dr. Farrell’s financial coup & hole that “our” institutions are funneling their ill-gotten gains into?
The cover story is nonsense. As are most of the other upside down tell-tale signs resulting from policies for the Breakaway Civilization; that are, in fact, hurting the rest of humanity.
Creative accounting anyone GOLD GOLD come out from wherever your hiding. The rest of the World is searching for their gold it seams to have disappeared down the black hole of the BOE-NYFR. And by the way how much GOLD is there on Earth anyway and what about the other planets and moons of the solar system plus the asteroids, comets.
Well you had to ask Earth has the most Gold (Au) in the solar system that is why those Sumerian Aliens were here 260,000 years ago and in Zud Africa the two son of gods right for the gold just love history even if the clay quenoform tablets translated are mainly bills of lading of the gold shipments and some history thrown in as an after thought but mainly deposit and inventory slabs of what they had in storage ZS had loads to go through before he found the cosmology and creation stories to fill his books.
Obfuscation disguised as expert opinions on the existing amount of gold still continues, though sometimes with at least a semblance of discussion of the overall context: http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-03-27/peak-gold-goldman-calculates-there-only-20-years-gold-supply-left
It’s easy to make gold out of mercury.
And there are other techniques using less toxic metals than mercury.
Stories like these should be on the front page. However, that will not be the case. I find the younger set that is sitting around unemployed with oodles of college loan debt, catching on to this very quickly. Kids that were watching Fox Spews / CNN have been harvested to the point where they are looking for their own explanations. Something stinks and they are not being told the truth. I find it very gratifying.